Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Machine Learning and Deep Learning
2,000 words
Development and Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Healthcare Classification
This individual technical assessment focuses on the design, development, analysis and evaluation of a deep learning solution for a healthcare-related classification problem. Students select one of two provided scenarios: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) detection using ultrasound images or heartbeat classification using electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. The objective is to develop an appropriate deep learning approach and demonstrate critical understanding of the complete machine learning workflow, from initial data exploration through to model evaluation and reflection. Students may either design and train a deep learning model from scratch or customise and fine-tune an existing pre-trained architecture. The complete work is presented through a single Jupyter Notebook integrating Python code, technical discussion, results and visualisations. The notebook must clearly define the selected healthcare problem, explain its significance, justify methodological and architectural choices, and critically evaluate the resulting solution. The first stage involves exploratory data analysis and preprocessing, including investigation of class distributions, data imbalance and relevant patterns. Students prepare the data through techniques such as normalisation, augmentation, train-validation-test splitting and appropriate handling of class imbalance. This is followed by model design, training, validation and hyperparameter tuning, with the architecture selected according to the characteristics of the data and classification task. Model performance must then be evaluated using appropriate classification measures, including precision, recall, F1-score, ROC curves and area under the curve (AUC). The developed model should also be compared against suitable benchmark approaches, which may include traditional machine learning algorithms or alternative deep learning architectures. This comparison should identify the relative strengths and limitations of the proposed solution. The final component requires clear visual presentation and critical reflection on the complete modelling process, including limitations, challenges and opportunities for improvement. Importantly, grading prioritises methodological rigour, analytical depth and critical evaluation rather than simply achieving the highest predictive accuracy. Overview word count: approximately 330 words. AI restriction: this brief only permits automated AI tools for spelling and grammar checking. It explicitly prohibits tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini or Copilot from authoring assessment text or code; any permitted AI use must also be acknowledged.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
1,000 words
End-to-End Machine Learning Model Development, Tuning and Evaluation
This Level 7 Machine Learning and Intelligent Agents assessment requires students to develop and document an end-to-end machine-learning solution, covering the complete workflow from data preparation through model training, tuning, testing and evaluation. Students select an appropriate dataset or scenario, formulate a research question and determine whether the problem is most appropriately addressed through supervised learning, unsupervised learning or reinforcement learning. Suitable machine-learning techniques must then be implemented to create a model that can be systematically trained and tested. The assignment requires students to follow a structured machine-learning development process and document the complete development journey. The report should explain the selected scenario, data collection or dataset, Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA), rationale for selecting particular machine-learning methods, model training, fine-tuning and evaluation. Model performance must be assessed using appropriate established metrics, with relevant published research used to justify methodological decisions and support the interpretation of results. The technical implementation should demonstrate the ability to identify the performance of machine-learning algorithms, implement machine-learning approaches using one or more object-oriented programming languages, and determine which algorithms are most appropriate for a particular analytical brief. These requirements directly correspond to the module learning outcomes relating to machine-learning performance, implementation and algorithm selection. Students are advised to document their work within a Jupyter Notebook, combining Markdown explanations with executable code. The notebook may be submitted directly or converted to PDF. Alternatively, students may prepare the 1,000-word report in Microsoft Word, provided that the Python code is included within the submitted document. Assessment is divided into three principal areas: Introduction (20 marks), Machine Learning Process (40 marks), and Evaluation of Model Performance (40 marks). Higher-level work is expected to demonstrate strong understanding of machine-learning concepts, a functioning and thoroughly tested implementation, appropriate selection of algorithms and critical evaluation of the developed solution. Overall, the assessment integrates research-question formulation, data exploration, algorithm selection, programming, model optimisation and evidence-based evaluation within a reproducible machine-learning workflow. All academic sources must be presented using Harvard referencing.
Read Model Answer →
Data Science / Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
2,500 words
Predicting ADHD Diagnosis Using Machine Learning and Explainable Data Science
This Data Science assessment requires students to develop a comprehensive analytical solution to a real-world healthcare prediction problem using the WiDS Datathon 2025 Health Outcomes Prediction Dataset. The dataset contains socio-demographic information, diagnostic variables and functional MRI data relating to children and adolescents, with the principal objective of developing predictive models for ADHD diagnosis. The assessment is designed to demonstrate the complete data-science lifecycle, from data preparation and exploratory analysis through predictive modelling, interpretation and evidence-based recommendations. Students begin by exploring the dataset's features, data types and distributions before addressing missing values, outliers and other inconsistencies. Appropriate feature engineering should be undertaken where necessary, followed by Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) using relevant visualisations to identify relationships, patterns and correlations within the data. Students with limited computational resources may use a representative subset, provided that the sampling method preserves the integrity and distribution of the original dataset and is clearly justified. A major component of the assignment involves developing and comparing at least three classification models. Appropriate techniques may include Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting and Neural Networks. Model performance should be evaluated using measures including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score and ROC-AUC, allowing students to identify the strongest-performing model through systematic comparison. The assessment also requires model interpretation and explainability. Students should explain the results of the selected model and may apply techniques such as SHAP or LIME to investigate feature importance and individual predictions. A feature-importance visualisation must be produced, and the most influential variables should inform practical recommendations for healthcare professionals regarding the potential use of predictive modelling in supporting earlier ADHD diagnosis and intervention. Overall, the assignment integrates data cleaning, exploratory analytics, predictive modelling, model comparison, explainable AI and research-informed healthcare recommendations. Students must submit a comprehensive report of no more than 2,500 words, alongside a Jupyter Notebook containing the implementation and outputs. The report must use Harvard referencing, with appropriate academic research integrated into the analysis, recommendations and conclusion.
Read Model Answer →
Strategy and Innovation
Strategic Analysis and Innovation Strategy for a UK Organisation
This postgraduate Strategy and Innovation assessment requires students to conduct a detailed strategic analysis of an allocated organisation and present the findings through a series of professionally designed information dashboards. The purpose of the analysis is to establish the organisation's current strategic position and use the resulting evidence to recommend an appropriate and justifiable innovation strategy. The work is expected to demonstrate master's-level evaluation, interpretation and synthesis rather than descriptive or checklist-based analysis. The first major analytical area concerns the organisation's external environment. Students evaluate the broader business environment, analyse the firm's industry and undertake competitor analysis, including consideration of the organisation's strategic group. Analysis should concentrate on the most consequential environmental factors and integrate general and industry-level evidence rather than simply listing factors. Competitor evaluation can examine issues such as products and services, market commonality, positioning, distinctive value propositions, first-mover advantage and breakthrough innovation. The internal analysis examines the firm's resources, capabilities and sources of competitive advantage. Appropriate analytical techniques should be used to assess competitive resources and key capabilities, with the internal value chain helping to identify factors capable of supporting competitive advantage. Students must also evaluate the organisation's business-level strategy and consider whether its resources and capabilities support its competitive positioning. Corporate-level analysis considers the firm's degree of diversification, internationalisation strategy, growth through acquisitions, mergers or organic development, and any cooperative strategies. These elements should be evaluated against the organisation's capabilities, resources and competitive context. The analysis concludes by interpreting the evidence to establish the firm's overall strategic position and recommending an innovation strategy or approach to innovation. Presentation quality is also important: the report should use an effective combination of text, charts, diagrams and other graphical forms, with professional formatting and accurate referencing. Overview word count: approximately 330 words.
Read Model Answer →
Computing and Digital Technologies
3,000 words
Contemporary Computing and Digital Technologies: AI Agents Hackathon Reflective Report
This postgraduate reflective assessment forms part of the Contemporary Computing and Digital Technologies module and is based on experiential learning undertaken through an AI-focused hackathon. The hackathon theme, “AI Agents Unleashed – Building the Future of Automation,” requires MSc students from computing-related disciplines to collaborate on intelligent agent-based solutions capable of automating complex tasks, solving real-world problems and supporting human decision-making. The hackathon encourages students to investigate agent-based system design, intelligent automation and responsible AI development. Potential applications include autonomous cybersecurity monitoring, multi-agent systems for information gathering and decision support, automated data pipelines, intelligent software-development assistants, and conversational systems such as virtual tutors or career coaches. Students may use code-based approaches or platforms such as Flowise, Microsoft Power Automate and Make.com, while more advanced implementations can use technologies including LangChain, AutoGen, Python-based agent SDKs, APIs and large language models. The 3,000-word Individual Reflective Report, worth 70% of the module assessment, evaluates the student's learning and professional development arising from these experiential activities. The first component is a 2,000-word Portfolio of Evidence, requiring evidence-based reflection on participation in the hackathon. Students should evaluate their leadership and teamwork competencies using concrete evidence such as screenshots, code commits and feedback while identifying key lessons for personal and professional development. They must also consider how the experience applies to future research, career development or professional practice. The remaining 1,000 words comprise a Critical Self-Reflection examining the student's personal contribution and achievement of learning-contract goals. Students are expected to critically consider challenges encountered, how those challenges were addressed, lessons learned and their development as effective collaborative team members. Overall, the assessment integrates technical experimentation, reflective practice, teamwork, leadership, professional development and responsible use of emerging AI technologies, supported by a structured portfolio of evidence
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Data Mining / Text Mining
Machine Learning Analysis of Classification Models and Text Mining on Furniture Review Data
This technical machine-learning report demonstrates the practical application of predictive modelling and text mining using WEKA. The work is divided into two major tasks. The first evaluates and compares Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree classification models, while the second applies text-mining techniques to furniture-review data and compares multiple classifiers after preprocessing, feature selection and class balancing. The first task uses the Screenshots.arff dataset to investigate the performance of libSVM and J48 Decision Tree classifiers. A 70% training and 30% testing split is applied, and the models are manually tuned to examine how different parameter settings affect predictive performance. For libSVM, an RBF kernel is used while different gamma and cost values are tested through grid-search-style experimentation. The report identifies gamma 0.03 and cost 2 as the strongest tested combination, producing approximately 91.67% accuracy on the test split. The J48 model is also optimised by adjusting the confidence factor used for pruning. Several confidence-factor values are examined, with 0.09 producing the strongest reported result of 80% accuracy. The optimised SVM and J48 models are then compared using five-fold cross-validation, where libSVM achieves 89.75% accuracy compared with 81.25% for J48. The second task focuses on text mining of Furniture Reviews. Text preprocessing includes TF-IDF term weighting, stopword removal, stemming, conversion to lowercase and word-count generation. The resulting textual dataset is transformed into a numerical feature representation suitable for machine-learning classification. Dimensionality reduction is performed using InfoGainAttributeEval with Ranker, selecting the 900 most informative attributes. The dataset is then balanced using WEKA techniques including Resample and SpreadSubsample to reduce class bias before classification. Finally, three classifiers—Naive Bayes, libSVM and J48—are evaluated on the balanced text dataset. The reported accuracies are 90.52% for Naive Bayes, 58.62% for libSVM and 78.45% for J48. The analysis concludes that Naive Bayes performs strongest for the processed furniture-review dataset, while the wider exercise demonstrates the importance of preprocessing, parameter tuning, feature selection, class balancing and appropriate model evaluation in producing reliable classification results. Important: this upload appears to be the completed student report, not the actual assessment guideline. Because the document does not state the university, module name, academic level, academic year, required word count or prescribed referencing style, I would leave those fields as Not specified rather than guessing.
Read Model Answer →
Technical Evaluation and Professional Reflection on a Cloud-Based Machine Learning Fraud Detection Solution
This individual technical evaluative report forms the reflective and critical component of the Machine Learning on Cloud module. It builds directly upon a group project involving the development of a machine learning solution for financial fraud detection. The report requires each student to critically evaluate the technical decisions made within the group solution while also reflecting on their individual contribution, teamwork experience and professional development. The first component, Technical Evaluation, accounts for 50% of the individual assessment and has a suggested allocation of approximately 1,000 words. Students critically examine the group’s machine learning solution, including the approaches adopted for data preprocessing, model selection and evaluation. They are expected to discuss the suitability of the chosen techniques and metrics, identify limitations and explain how individual technical decisions affected the final performance and outcome of the fraud-detection solution. The second component, Reflection and Professional Issues, also accounts for 50% and has a suggested allocation of approximately 1,000 words. Students reflect critically on their personal contribution to the project and their experience of working within a team. The discussion addresses challenges encountered, lessons learned and how the experience contributed to technical and professional development. Professional and ethical considerations form an important part of the reflection. Relevant issues include algorithmic bias, fairness, sustainability and data privacy, particularly in relation to machine learning applications within financial services and cloud environments. Students are also required to attach their Seminar Activity Tracker as an appendix, providing evidence of weekly participation and knowledge development. The assessment therefore combines technical critique with reflective practice, requiring students to demonstrate that they understand not only how a machine learning solution was developed, but also why specific technical decisions were made, their consequences, the limitations of the resulting system and the wider ethical and professional implications of deploying AI on cloud infrastructure. Overview word count: approximately 315 words. The brief also states that AI may assist with areas such as grammar, structure, organisation of ideas and suggestions, but the main content, analysis and conclusions must be the student's own work, and AI use must be declared.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Cloud Computing
3,984 words
Machine Learning on Cloud: Fraud Detection Model Design, Training and Evaluation
This postgraduate group project focuses on the design, development and critical evaluation of a cloud-based machine learning solution for financial fraud detection. The scenario involves a financial services organisation seeking to detect fraudulent transactions in order to reduce financial losses and improve customer security. Students are required to analyse an appropriate dataset, develop a machine learning solution, evaluate its effectiveness and critically consider the suitability of cloud technologies for deployment. The project begins with a cloud feasibility study, requiring critical comparison of at least two major machine learning platforms such as Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud Platform. Evaluation criteria include performance, scalability, cost, compliance, integration and vendor lock-in, followed by a justified recommendation. Students then conduct exploratory data analysis to identify patterns, anomalies and correlations using appropriate visualisations such as heatmaps, histograms and boxplots. A substantial component addresses data preprocessing and class imbalance. Students are expected to clean and transform the data, apply scaling and encoding, perform feature engineering and investigate approaches such as SMOTE, undersampling and cost-sensitive learning. Each preprocessing choice must be justified in terms of its potential impact on model performance. Students must select and train at least two machine learning models, with suggested approaches including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost and Neural Networks. Model development incorporates cross-validation and hyperparameter tuning. Evaluation uses fraud-relevant measures including Precision, Recall, F1 score, AUC and precision-recall curves, supported by confusion matrices, ROC curves and feature-importance visualisations. The project concludes with critical consideration of professional and ethical issues in cloud-based AI, including bias, fairness, transparency, data privacy and sustainability. The overall assessment therefore integrates cloud-platform evaluation, machine learning development, imbalanced classification, model evaluation and responsible AI practice. Overview word count: approximately 340 words.
Read Model Answer →
Business Intelligence / Data Analytics / Project Management
Business Intelligence and Data Analytics for Project Progress Evaluation
This assessment for the Data Analytics and Project Management for Business Intelligence module requires students to critically evaluate the progress of a live-style project through the application of business intelligence and data analytics techniques. Working as a group of Project Analysts, students select either a Convocation project or Concert project associated with Northumbria University London and prepare a professional presentation assessing its progress, stakeholders, deliverables and performance. The assessment begins with development of a clear project problem or opportunity statement, followed by identification and analysis of the key stakeholders and deliverables associated with the selected project. Students then use Business Intelligence and Data Analytics techniques to examine project progress and communicate findings through dashboards. The assessment permits the use of Microsoft Excel or other suitable software for dashboard development. A central part of the task is the creation and critical evaluation of a project dashboard. Students are expected to use realistic assumed or projected data where necessary, as the assessment is designed to test the ability to design, interpret and critically evaluate dashboards rather than the accuracy of real project data. The data should therefore be internally consistent, relevant to the selected project and capable of generating meaningful management insights. Students must also critically justify their chosen BI and analytics tools, explaining how the dashboard supports project monitoring and informed decision-making. The assessment concludes with recommendations for the successful implementation and use of a Business Intelligence or Data Analytics solution within the selected project. Academic references and relevant examples should be used to support the analysis. The marking criteria place the greatest emphasis on application of BI tools and techniques (30%), followed by stakeholders and deliverables (20%) and justification of BI tools (20%). Project and opportunity analysis, conclusion and recommendations, and presentation and referencing each contribute a further 10%. Higher-performing work is expected to demonstrate critical evaluation, meaningful dashboard insights, strong theoretical or industry justification and professionally presented recommendations. If the file you want to upload is the resubmission report instead Use the same University, Subject and Module Name, but change these fields: Title: Business Intelligence and Project Analytics: Individual Critical Analysis of Project Performance Assignment type: MS Technical and Scientific Writing Word count: 1,500–2,000 words Key topics: Business Intelligence, Data Analytics, Project Management, Stakeholder Analysis, BI Tools, Dashboard Evaluation, Project Opportunity Analysis, Project Deliverables, Critical Analysis, Project Recommendations The resubmission is an individual written report in which the student selects only one area from the original project—Project & Opportunity Analysis, Stakeholders & Deliverables, Application of BI Tools & Techniques, Justification of BI Tools, or Conclusion & Recommendations—and develops it in depth. It should use the same Convocation or Concert project context while demonstrating independent critical analysis, reflection and application of theory.
Read Model Answer →
Big Data Analytics / Data Analytics
4,000 words
Big Data Analytics Using Python and Business Intelligence with Tableau
This individual Big Data Analytics assessment requires students to critically analyse data using programming languages, statistical techniques, data visualisation methods and business intelligence software. The assessment combines practical data analytics using Python with interactive business intelligence and dashboard development using Tableau, requiring evidence of technical implementation, research, critical appraisal and justification of the selected analytical approaches. The first section, worth 70%, is based on a dataset containing accidental drug-related deaths recorded in Connecticut between 2012 and 2024. The dataset contains 12,964 observations and 49 variables. Students are required to conduct exploratory data analysis using Python, develop three to four research questions, formulate null and alternative hypotheses, and apply appropriate statistical methods. The analytical process also requires an evaluation of alternative technologies and methodological approaches, supported by relevant research. Students must justify their selected methodology and present a clear workflow diagram. The solution-development stage involves data preprocessing, descriptive statistical analysis, visualisation, answering the research questions and conducting statistical significance testing to determine whether the null hypothesis should be accepted or rejected. Evidence of coding and a link to working code are also required. The final Python component requires evaluation of the findings, consideration of limitations and recommendations for future development using emerging technologies. The second section, worth 30%, focuses on Business Intelligence using Tableau and uses a historical Olympic Games dataset containing 271,116 rows and 15 columns. Students analyse relationships between medals and host cities, athlete age and medal type, season and medal counts, and sex and medal type. The section culminates in an interactive Tableau dashboard containing at least four interconnected sheets, where changes to relevant parameters are reflected across the dashboard. Overall, the assessment develops practical competence in Python-based analytics, statistical reasoning, research-question development, hypothesis testing, data visualisation and interactive business intelligence dashboard design. Overview word count: approximately 350 words. AI note: the brief permits AI for limited support such as grammar, structure, organisation of ideas and suggestions, but states that the main content, analysis and conclusions must remain the student's own work. AI use must also be declared.
Read Model Answer →
Cyber Security / Penetration Testing
2,400 words
Grey-Box Penetration Testing: Vulnerability Assessment, Exploitation and Mitigation
This technical cyber-security project presents an authorised grey-box penetration test conducted within a controlled virtual laboratory environment. The objective is to assess the security posture of a deliberately vulnerable target system, identify weaknesses in exposed network services, demonstrate how those weaknesses could be exploited, evaluate their security and organisational impact, and recommend appropriate mitigation measures. The assessment follows a practical penetration-testing workflow supported by technical evidence, screenshots, activity records and academic research. The project begins with laboratory configuration, network discovery, service enumeration and vulnerability analysis. Tools including Kali Linux, Metasploitable, VMware, Nmap, Netcat and Metasploit are used across the testing lifecycle. Identified services are mapped to known vulnerabilities before controlled exploitation is undertaken and the resulting access is documented. The activity log records the progression from environment setup and network scanning through vulnerability identification, exploitation, evidence collection and final reporting. Five principal attack vectors are examined. These include the vsftpd 2.3.4 FTP backdoor, Samba username-map-script exploitation, an UnrealIRCd backdoor, insecure Java Remote Method Invocation and a misconfigured DistCC service. The practical demonstrations show how vulnerable or incorrectly configured services can permit unauthorised command execution and, in several cases, privileged shell access. For each vulnerability, the report explains the weakness, exploitation process, observed result, security impact and proposed mitigation. Recommended controls include patching or upgrading obsolete services, disabling unnecessary services, implementing firewall restrictions, strengthening authentication and input validation, restricting access to authorised systems, applying least privilege and monitoring suspicious activity. The project also incorporates group management and reflective practice. Team members perform specialised roles covering laboratory configuration, reconnaissance, vulnerability analysis, exploitation and documentation. Individual reflection considers technical performance, teamwork, evidence management and future skills development, demonstrating how structured collaboration contributes to an effective penetration-testing engagement. Important: unlike the earlier assignment briefs, these uploads appear to be completed student/project materials rather than the official 7COM1068 assessment brief. Therefore I would not invent the university, academic level or academic year. If you upload the actual 7COM1068 assignment guideline, I can fill those fields exactly.
Read Model Answer →
Operations and Supply Chain Management
1,987 words
Supply Chain Analytics and Quantitative Data Analysis for Organisational Decision-Making
This postgraduate individual report focuses on the application of quantitative data analysis to Operations, Logistics and Supply Chain Management decision-making. Students are required to select an organisation from the private, public or third sector and investigate a relevant operational or supply-chain issue using quantitative data. The purpose is to demonstrate how data can be collected, prepared, analysed and interpreted to generate evidence-based insights that may support managerial decision-making. The selected dataset must relate to the organisation's operations or supply chain and may include variables such as revenues, product orders, sales, transportation costs, procurement expenditure, inventory levels or other appropriate quantitative measures. The dataset must contain at least 60 observations, and the analysis must involve at least two variables. Data may be obtained directly from organisations or from recognised secondary-data platforms and databases. The assessment consists of two equally weighted components. Part A – Motivation and Justification for the Analysis requires students to formulate relevant analytical questions and explain their practical importance by linking them to Operations and Supply Chain Management theory and business practice. Appropriate academic, industry and practitioner evidence should be used to justify the selected issue. Research questions may also be translated into testable hypotheses where appropriate. Part B – Execution of the Analysis requires students to answer the identified questions through appropriate statistical techniques. Potential methods include tables, charts, summary statistics, t-tests and regression analysis. Data may first need to be cleaned, transformed and structured before analysis. The results must then be interpreted clearly for a managerial audience such as the organisation's board, owner or CEO. The statistical analysis is expected to be conducted using Stata, with all data-cleaning, manipulation and analytical commands recorded in a reproducible do-file. The report must also demonstrate explicit links between theory and practice and contain a suitable mixture of academic and professional evidence, including at least five academic journal articles. Harvard referencing is required throughout. The resulting work demonstrates practical competence in business analytics, statistical interpretation, supply-chain decision support, reproducible analysis and evidence-based managerial communication. Overview word count: approximately 370 words.
Read Model Answer →
Business Management / Strategic Management
50,000 words
Starbucks Labour Relations and Unionisation: Strategic Business Consultancy Analysis
his Masters-level Business Project presents a strategic consultancy analysis of Starbucks, focusing on the company's ongoing labour-relations challenges, unionisation disputes and associated legal, operational and reputational implications. The project examines how employee relations and organised labour can develop from a human-resource concern into a wider strategic management issue affecting corporate governance, organisational performance, stakeholder trust and long-term brand value. The report follows the consultancy structure required by the Business Project assessment, beginning with identification of a current organisational challenge and the resulting issues affecting the client organisation. The official brief requires the selected challenge to be connected with current affairs, emerging industry trends and the organisation's wider business strategy. It also requires evaluation of both internal and external stakeholders and analysis using conceptual and numerical secondary data. In the completed project, Starbucks' labour dispute and unionisation environment are examined through several strategic-management frameworks. PESTLE analysis is used to assess political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental influences surrounding labour relations. SWOT analysis evaluates Starbucks' organisational strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, while Porter's Generic Strategies considers the relationship between differentiation, competitive positioning and labour-management practices. The project also applies stakeholder analysis to groups including senior leadership, employees, unions, regulators, customers, investors and other external stakeholders. A major part of the analysis considers stakeholder power, interest, legitimacy and urgency. The assessment brief specifically requires students to identify internal and external stakeholders, assess their power and interests, and evaluate how the investigated business challenge affects each stakeholder group. The project concludes with evidence-based strategic recommendations designed to improve labour relations, governance and organisational resilience. Recommendations include strengthening good-faith bargaining, developing more consistent labour-governance practices, improving workforce systems and employee participation, incorporating labour-relations indicators into ESG and corporate reporting, and adopting a coordinated legal and reputation-management strategy. Overall, the work demonstrates the application of strategic management, stakeholder analysis, corporate governance, HRM and secondary-data evaluation to a contemporary organisational challenge. The official assessment requires recommendations to arise directly from the critical analysis and to explain how they create strategic value for the client organisation and its wider industry. The completed submission itself is titled Business Project and focuses on Starbucks; its contents include the organisational challenge, purpose of the report, stakeholder impact, secondary-data evaluation, and recommendations and conclusion.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Data Science
Linear Regression and Stability of the Moore–Penrose Pseudoinverse Using Python
This machine learning practical and assessment activity develops an understanding of linear regression, Ordinary Least Squares and the Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse using Python. The work progresses from generating synthetic regression datasets to implementing regression algorithms manually, applying established machine learning libraries, analysing real datasets and evaluating the stability of estimated regression coefficients. The laboratory component begins with the generation of synthetic linear regression data using NumPy, including explanatory variables, random noise and an outcome variable. Students then implement simple linear regression without relying on machine learning libraries, using the least-squares solution to estimate the intercept and slope. The resulting observations and fitted regression line are visualised using Matplotlib. The work is subsequently extended to multiple linear regression, where several independent variables are used and coefficients are first calculated manually before the same problem is solved using Scikit-learn. The laboratory also introduces application of regression to the Scikit-learn Diabetes dataset, including feature and target standardisation, model fitting, prediction, correlation analysis and interpretation of regression coefficients. It also highlights the importance of residual analysis when assessing whether a linear model is appropriate. The associated weekly challenge focuses on the stability of linear regression solutions estimated using the Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse. Using a house-price dataset containing variables such as property size, number of bedrooms, distance from the city centre and property age, students construct the design matrix, standardise features and the response variable, and calculate regression coefficients using the pseudoinverse. Students then investigate model robustness by repeatedly fitting the regression model to random subsamples of different sizes and analysing the mean and standard deviation of each coefficient. Tables, boxplots or error-bar visualisations can be used to compare coefficient variability. The final discussion considers which variables are most influential, which coefficients are most stable, how sample size affects stability and whether coefficient interpretation remains reliable across different samples. The final work is submitted as a single PDF exported from Jupyter Notebook or Google Colab, combining documented Python code, experimental results, plots and written interpretation in a professionally organised notebook. Overview word count: approximately 360 wor
Read Model Answer →
International Human Resource Management / International Business
801 words
A Comparative Analysis of Cultural Factors Shaping Human Resource Staffing Strategies in International Enterprises
This International Human Resource Management assessment examines how cultural, institutional and employment-related factors influence recruitment and international staffing decisions when an organisation expands into a new national market. Students take the role of an HR representative for VetDopomoga, a Ukraine-based international veterinary clinic chain considering expansion into either the United Kingdom or India. The task requires a comparative analysis of Ukraine and the selected host country, followed by evidence-based recommendations for adapting the organisation's recruitment strategy. The first element of the assessment evaluates the cultural and institutional environment of the selected country. Students consider factors such as communication style, hierarchy and power distance, individualism versus collectivism, time orientation, labour-market conditions, professional expectations and the regulatory or employment environment. These factors must be compared with the corresponding context in Ukraine to identify implications for international HR practice. Students must then apply an appropriate international staffing strategy, selecting from ethnocentric, polycentric, regiocentric or geocentric approaches. The selected strategy should be justified in relation to VetDopomoga's proposed international expansion and recruitment requirements. The poster must also apply one cultural framework. Students may use either the Cultural Intelligence Framework developed by Earley and Ang or Erin Meyer's Culture Map. Two relevant dimensions from the selected framework should be analysed to explain potential benefits and challenges for recruitment across Ukraine and the selected host country. Practical application is an important component of the assessment. Students research recruitment best practices used by international veterinary organisations operating in the UK or India and assess which practices VetDopomoga could adopt, modify or avoid. The poster concludes with three evidence-based reasons supporting expansion into the selected country. The final poster should be concise, visually structured and supported by diagrams, charts, icons or other relevant visuals. At least seven academic or professional sources are required, including the core International Human Resource Management textbook, with Harvard-style in-text citations and a full reference list. One important guideline: the assessment brief indicates Category 2 AI use — proofreading only, meaning AI-generated assessment content is not permitted under that category.
Read Model Answer →
Cloud Computing / Big Data Technologies / Cyber Security
2,500 words
Cloud and Big Data Security Application: Design, Implementation and Evaluation
This assessment for the Cloud and Big Data Technologies module requires students to design, implement and evaluate an individual cloud-based or distributed data application. The project focuses on practical solutions involving the complex transformation, processing, storage and security of big data within cloud environments. Students are expected to demonstrate how distributed data can be organised in the cloud, how data pipelines can be used to access or process distributed databases, and how appropriate security controls can be incorporated into the resulting architecture. Students have considerable freedom when selecting their application. Suggested project directions include developing a data-science solution using SQL or MongoDB with cloud storage and an appropriate security policy; implementing privacy-preserving distributed processing using techniques such as Differential Privacy; creating multi-party authentication and group-based access-control mechanisms; or designing Multi-Level Security, Attribute-Based Encryption or Role-Based Access Control solutions. Projects may also examine distributed or cloud applications using security protocols such as SSH, SSL or IPsec. Creativity and originality are explicitly encouraged. The written component is a Design and Implementation Document of no more than approximately 2,500 words. It should present the project aims and objectives, application concept, cloud and security technologies, functional and security requirements, architecture and design decisions, protocols, access-control mechanisms, implementation process, achievements, problems encountered and overall evaluation. Relevant diagrams, such as interaction or sequence diagrams, may be used to explain system behaviour and architecture. The assessment also requires submission of the functioning Cloud and Big Data Security application and a 7-minute highlight demonstration video. The video should demonstrate the application's major features, implementation details, security functionality and, where appropriate, attack scenarios. Assessment places strong emphasis on the quality of the design and implementation documentation, originality, use of advanced features, and the overall effort and technical quality of the completed application. Students are therefore expected to demonstrate independent development rather than simply reproduce an existing tutorial.
Read Model Answer →
Computer Networks and Network Engineering
3,500 words
Wireless, Cloud and Software Defined Networking: Network Modelling, Emulation and Evaluation
This technical networking assignment focuses on the design, implementation, emulation and evaluation of wireless, cloud and Software Defined Networking environments. It combines practical network modelling with analytical discussion and requires students to demonstrate their understanding of modern networking architectures through Mininet-WiFi, Mininet, cloud deployment technologies and an ONOS Software Defined Networking controller. The first task involves creating an ad-hoc wireless network for an emergency-response scenario. A minimum of three wireless stations must be configured using specified parameters such as transmission range, antenna height, antenna gain, SSID and wireless capabilities. Students are required to explain the network design and implementation, provide the Python configuration script used with Mininet-WiFi, and demonstrate connectivity using ICMP communication between appropriate stations. The second task examines cloud-service emulation. Students must construct a Mininet topology containing a switch and two hosts and deploy a simple static website using Render.com. The task requires evidence of cloud configuration, GitHub repository integration, commands used to provide internet access to the emulated host, webpage access through Xterm, screenshots of the resulting webpage and the associated HTML code. The third task addresses Software Defined Networking (SDN). Students create an emulated environment involving three hosts and three servers, implement the required network topology and use the ONOS controller to provide control-plane programmability. Evidence must include the Python emulation script, ONOS GUI output, host-to-server connectivity testing and TCP transmission testing. The final analytical component requires students to critically evaluate the relationship between Software Defined Networking and Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) and assess security algorithms used in cloud computing, including a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of two selected algorithms. The coursework therefore integrates practical network configuration, connectivity testing, cloud deployment, programmable networking and academically referenced technical evaluation. Overview word count: approximately 335 words. Important: the brief explicitly states that AI-generated report or code content is prohibited, so this Reference Library description should be treated only as catalogue/metadata content, not as coursework material for submission.
Read Model Answer →
Business and Management
34,000 words
Examining the Role of Cross-Cultural Communication in Enhancing Team Efficiency: Evidence from McDonald’s Multicultural Workforce in London
This dissertation examines the role of cross-cultural communication in enhancing team efficiency within McDonald’s multicultural workforce, with the study framed around the challenges and opportunities created by culturally diverse working environments. The research considers how differences in language, communication styles, cultural expectations and workplace behaviour can influence employee collaboration, productivity and organisational effectiveness. The study aims to assess cross-cultural communication within multicultural teams, analyse its relationship with team success, and identify cultural factors that can support stronger workplace collaboration. The research adopts a qualitative secondary-research methodology under an interpretivist and inductive approach. Evidence is drawn from peer-reviewed academic literature, McDonald’s annual and diversity reports, and relevant hospitality-sector studies. The collected evidence is examined through thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns relating to communication barriers, workforce productivity, multicultural collaboration and inclusive leadership. The analysis is organised around four principal themes: cross-cultural diversity and workforce productivity; communication barriers and cultural challenges; diversity management and inclusive leadership; and HR practices, employee motivation and organisational performance. The discussion considers issues such as language barriers, cultural adjustment, misunderstandings, workplace conflict, leadership representation, employee inclusion, recruitment, training, digital HR systems and the use of AI-enabled workforce technologies. The study finds that workforce diversity alone does not automatically generate higher productivity. Instead, the effectiveness of multicultural teams depends substantially on the communication structures, inclusive leadership practices and HR support systems used by the organisation. Effective cross-cultural communication can strengthen coordination, customer responsiveness, employee engagement and operational efficiency, while poorly managed communication differences can contribute to delays, misunderstanding, stress and conflict. The report concludes with recommendations for continued cross-cultural communication training, inclusive leadership development, conflict-resolution initiatives and multilingual communication support. It also recognises the limitation of relying on secondary evidence and identifies primary research with employees and managers as a potential direction for future research. Overview word count: approximately 350 words.
Read Model Answer →
Computer Science / Algorithms and Optimisation
Genetic Algorithms for the Balanced Spanning Tree Problem
This technical research work investigates the Balanced Spanning Tree Problem, an optimisation problem that seeks to construct a spanning tree capable of balancing two competing network objectives: the low overall cost associated with a Minimum Spanning Tree and the short source-to-destination distances provided by a Shortest Path Tree. For an undirected, weighted and connected graph with a designated root vertex, a balanced spanning tree is defined using two parameters, α and β. The first limits the distance between the root and each vertex relative to the corresponding shortest path in the original graph, while the second limits the total tree weight relative to the Minimum Spanning Tree. Finding an optimal balanced spanning tree is computationally challenging because determining whether a graph contains an (α, β)-balanced spanning tree is an NP-complete problem. The research therefore proposes genetic algorithms as heuristic optimisation techniques for two variants of the problem: minimising β while α is fixed, and minimising α while β is fixed. The proposed genetic algorithm represents individual spanning trees as chromosomes composed of graph edges. An initial population of valid spanning trees is generated before evolutionary operations are repeatedly applied. The approach incorporates chromosome selection, crossover, mutation, fitness evaluation and stopping criteria. Four selection strategies are examined: Random Selection, Roulette Wheel Selection, Stochastic Universal Sampling and Tournament Selection. The fitness function is based on the relationship between the Minimum Spanning Tree weight and the total weight of the candidate chromosome. Experimental evaluation is performed using randomly generated weighted graphs containing 6, 10, 15 and 20 vertices. The experiments investigate different values of the balancing parameters, selection mechanisms and population sizes. The implementation uses a population size of 30, a maximum of 300 generations, crossover probability of 0.9 and mutation probability of 0.01 in the principal experiments. The reported results show that the genetic approach can generate high-quality balanced spanning trees and, for the tested instances, produced solutions matching the corresponding optimal balanced spanning trees. The study also examines how balancing parameters and population size influence execution time and convergence, demonstrating the practical use of evolutionary computation for complex graph-optimisation problems.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
1,011 words
End-to-End Machine Learning Model Development, Testing and Evaluation
This Level 7 Machine Learning and Intelligent Agents assignment requires students to develop and document an end-to-end machine-learning solution, covering the complete process from data preparation through model training, tuning, testing and evaluation. Students independently select a suitable dataset or scenario, formulate an appropriate research question and determine whether the problem should be addressed using supervised learning, unsupervised learning or reinforcement learning. Appropriate machine-learning algorithms must then be implemented to create a model capable of being trained and objectively tested. The assessment encourages the use of a structured machine-learning development methodology. Students are expected to explain the selected scenario and data source, perform suitable data preparation and Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA), and provide a reasoned justification for the machine-learning methods selected. The development process should demonstrate how the chosen algorithms are trained and fine-tuned before their performance is evaluated using established and relevant metrics. Published academic research should be incorporated to justify methodological choices and support the interpretation of results. The technical work is normally documented within a Jupyter Notebook, combining Markdown explanations with executable code cells. Alternatively, the report may be produced in Microsoft Word provided that the Python implementation is included. The assignment therefore assesses both conceptual understanding and practical programming competence. Students must demonstrate an ability to identify the performance of machine-learning algorithms, implement machine-learning techniques using an object-oriented programming language, and evaluate which algorithms are appropriate for a particular analytical brief. Assessment places particular emphasis on three areas: the Introduction, the Machine Learning Process, and the Evaluation of Model Performance. The marking criteria reward strong understanding of machine-learning concepts, a functioning and thoroughly tested implementation, appropriate selection of algorithms, and critical evaluation of the final solution. At the highest achievement level, implementations are expected to work without exception, satisfy the required functionality, demonstrate comprehensive testing and extend beyond the basic requirements. Overall, the assignment combines research-question formulation, data analysis, algorithm selection, machine-learning implementation, model optimisation and evidence-based evaluation within a reproducible technical workflow. All academic sources and supporting material must be presented using Harvard referencing.
Read Model Answer →
Data Science / Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
2,500 words
Predicting ADHD Diagnosis Using Machine Learning and Explainable Data Science
This Data Science assignment focuses on developing a comprehensive analytical solution to a real-world healthcare prediction problem. Using the WiDS Datathon 2025 Health Outcomes Prediction Dataset, students are required to analyse complex and high-dimensional healthcare data containing socio-demographic information, diagnostic variables and functional MRI data relating to children and adolescents. The principal predictive objective is to determine ADHD diagnosis from the available features. Students may use a representative subset of the dataset where computational resources are limited, provided that the sampling approach maintains the integrity and distribution of the original data and is appropriately justified. The assessment requires a complete data-science workflow beginning with data understanding and preprocessing. Students investigate the dataset's features, data types and distributions before addressing missing values, outliers and inconsistencies. Appropriate feature engineering should then be undertaken where it can improve the predictive capability of the models. Exploratory Data Analysis is used to identify important patterns, relationships and correlations, supported by relevant visualisations that communicate meaningful insights. A major component of the work involves the development and comparison of at least three classification models for predicting ADHD diagnosis. Suitable approaches may include Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting and Neural Networks. Models are evaluated using performance measures including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score and ROC-AUC, after which the most effective model is selected based on the evidence obtained. The assessment also places substantial emphasis on model interpretation and explainability. Students must interpret the selected model and may use approaches such as SHAP or LIME to explain feature importance and individual predictions. A feature-importance visualisation is required, and the most influential variables should inform practical recommendations. The final section translates analytical findings into recommendations for healthcare professionals, considering how predictive modelling could assist early ADHD diagnosis and intervention. Research literature must be integrated into the recommendations and conclusion. The assessment therefore combines preprocessing, exploratory analysis, predictive modelling, explainable AI and evidence-based healthcare decision-making within a single applied data-science project. The required report is a maximum of 2,500 words, with code, supplementary charts and tables permitted in appendices. A Jupyter Notebook containing the implementation and outputs is also required. Harvard referencing must be used throughout.
Read Model Answer →
Management / Digital Transformation and Leadership
1,500 words
Leading Through Digital Change: Digital Transformation Report and Future Technology Poster
This Masters-level assessment for the Leading Through Digital Change module examines how organisations can respond strategically and effectively to rapid technological and digital transformation. Students take the role of a Digital Transformation Manager for one selected international organisation and prepare a professional Digital Transformation Report accompanied by an A4 digital poster. The purpose is to evaluate the organisation's current digital context and recommend changes that can strengthen competitive advantage and create sustainable business value. The first component requires critical evaluation and recommendation of one appropriate digital transformation strategic framework. Students may apply frameworks such as the McKinsey 4Ds, BCG Three Stages, Gartner's Six Steps or Cognizant's Four Pillars. The analysis should establish clear digital transformation objectives relevant to organisational functions such as operations, ICT and marketing, while using organisational evidence, academic research and practical examples to justify the proposed strategic direction. The second component is an academic poster evaluating two disruptive technologies or techniques expected to affect the chosen organisation, its industry, employment and the labour market over the next five years. Potential technologies include Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 5G connectivity, the Internet of Things, robotics, drone delivery, blockchain, augmented reality and virtual reality. The poster should combine academic literature with real-world examples to demonstrate the likely opportunities, challenges and wider organisational implications of technological disruption. The final component focuses on digital leadership. Students analyse and recommend two suitable leadership approaches for managing and supporting digital transformation. Relevant approaches may include agile leadership, ethical-tech leadership, people-oriented leadership, hyperaware agile leadership and Goleman's leadership styles. Overall, the assessment integrates digital strategy, innovation, emerging technologies and leadership. The wider module also covers digital transformation strategies, data-driven decision-making, leadership in the digital age, artificial intelligence in contemporary business, digital risk management and planning for the future. Reference style: Harvard. Main report word limit: 1,500 words. Poster: A4 size with no specified word count.
Read Model Answer →
Management / Business Management
5,000 words
Principles of Management: AstraZeneca Management Analysis and Skills Development Report
This Masters-level Principles of Management assignment examines the management practices, organisational environment and managerial functions of AstraZeneca plc. The assessment is structured as a 5,000-word management report in which the student acts as a business consultant and critically evaluates how management theories, concepts and practices contribute to organisational performance and value creation. The work requires the application of relevant academic literature alongside case-study evidence and independent research on AstraZeneca. The first part of the assessment considers key management theories and practices. Students are expected to examine how management contributes to AstraZeneca's success, apply an appropriate dimension of the Competing Values Framework, and select an additional relevant management theory. Suggested theoretical perspectives include Scientific Management, Bureaucratic Theory, Administrative Theory, Contingency Theory and Total Quality Management, although students are encouraged to select theories most appropriate to the organisation rather than applying every available model. The assignment also evaluates AstraZeneca within the global business environment. Frameworks such as LoNG-PEST or Porter's Five Forces may be used to analyse global, national and local influences, including significant opportunities and threats. Students then critically analyse an internal organisational challenge and consider how the core management functions of planning, organising, leading and controlling can be applied to address it. Supporting analytical approaches may include Value Chain analysis, VRIO and stakeholder analysis. A further component focuses on personal and professional development. Students complete a Personal SWOT analysis and construct a Skills Development Plan linked to future career aims. This is followed by a 500-word reflective statement examining personal management competencies, including self-management, problem-solving and decision-making. An appropriate reflective framework, such as Borton, Kolb or GROW, is applied to structure the reflection. Overall, the assessment integrates management theory, organisational analysis, global business considerations, managerial decision-making and reflective professional development. It is designed to demonstrate Level 7 critical analysis and the practical application of management concepts to a contemporary multinational organisation. The wider module covers management theories, stakeholder management, global management, planning and decision-making, human resource management, leadership, operations and finance for managers
Read Model Answer →
Human Resource Management / People Practice
5,500 words
Essentials of People Practice: Recruitment, Employment Relations, Performance, Reward and Learning
This comprehensive CIPD Level 3 assessment examines the principal operational areas of people practice across the employee lifecycle. The unit covers recruitment and selection, employment legislation and employee relations, wellbeing and inclusion, performance management, reward, learning and development, and the practical application of people-profession knowledge. The assessment uses the fictional insurer Jemijo, which employs more than 2,500 people across office, home and hybrid working arrangements. Much of its workforce operates within customer-service and insurance call-centre environments, including a 24/7 emergency claims service. The first task addresses recruitment and selection. Learners examine the employee lifecycle, job analysis, job descriptions, person specifications, recruitment through corporate websites and commercial job boards, structured interviews, assessment centres and appropriate recruitment records. It also includes the use and critical review of AI-generated appointment and non-appointment letters. Written responses for the main questions total approximately 1,500 words. A separate practical task requires learners to devise selection criteria, shortlist candidates and conduct a recorded one-to-one simulated interview for a People Assistant vacancy. Further written tasks examine employment law, working time, employee wellbeing, discrimination, diversity and inclusion, and fair dismissal. This section is approximately 1,250 words. Performance and reward topics then cover objective setting, motivation, continuous performance reviews, total reward, non-financial reward and equitable pay, with approximately 1,500 words allocated. The final component addresses learning and development, including induction and training benefits, learning needs, face-to-face and blended learning, coaching, mentoring, accessibility and evaluation of training effectiveness. Approximately another 1,250 words is allocated to this section. This produces approximately 5,500 assessed written words, alongside additional practical evidence that is excluded from the formal word count. Important for your portal: I would not select “Masters” just because the assignment-type options say “MS”. These are explicitly CIPD Level 3 Foundation Certificate assessments, so Academic level = Not specified is the accurate choice with the options your system currently provides.
Read Model Answer →
People Practice / Human Resource Management
2,000 words
Core Behaviours for People Professionals: Ethics, Professional Values and CPD
This CIPD Level 3 assessment focuses on the core behaviours expected of people professionals, with particular emphasis on ethical practice, professional values, inclusive behaviour and continuing professional development. The unit considers behaviours that people professionals should apply consistently, including when working in unfamiliar or challenging situations, to support ethical, inclusive and professionally responsible workplaces. The assessment is structured around a job-application scenario for an HR/L&D Assistant position at Nuvascare Ltd, a home-based care organisation employing more than 200 care professionals. Nuvascare emphasises honesty, kindness, openness, teamwork, learning and ethical professional behaviour, and candidates are therefore required to demonstrate how their own experience aligns with these expectations. Learners respond to five areas of assessment. They must explain ethical principles and professional values and provide an example demonstrating how a personal or professional value has influenced behaviour. They must also provide examples of complying with relevant regulation and law in a professional or educational context. The assessment additionally examines behaviours associated with effective teamwork, including contributing views, clarifying problems and working collaboratively with others. Learners then explain how they keep their professional knowledge current and identify methods used to follow developments within the people profession. The final component requires evidence of active continuing professional development (CPD). Learners provide a CPD record containing at least two recent development activities and reflect on how these activities affected their knowledge, capability or professional practice. Written responses to Questions 1–4 should total approximately 2,000 words ±10%. The CPD record is submitted as additional evidence and is excluded from the word count.
Read Model Answer →
People Analytics / Human Resource Management
2,003 words
Principles of People Analytics and Evidence-Based Decision Making
This CIPD Level 3 assessment introduces the principles of people analytics and evidence-based decision making within the people profession. It focuses on how data, professional expertise, research evidence and stakeholder information can be used to diagnose organisational issues, support rational decision making and improve people practices. The unit emphasises the practical application of analytics rather than data collection alone. The assessment uses a recruitment scenario in which the learner applies for the position of People Analytics Administrator at Company X, an organisation providing HR and people-management solutions. Learners complete an assessment pack containing eight questions designed to demonstrate understanding of how analytics can support business and people decisions. The written component requires learners to explain evidence-based practice and demonstrate how it could be applied in an organisational context. Other areas include the importance of accurate data in diagnosing problems, different forms of data measurement, the role of organisational policies and procedures in decision making, and how people professionals create value for employees, organisations and wider stakeholders. Learners must also consider how a people analytics professional can remain customer focused and standards driven. The practical analytics element uses employee overtime data from Blue Mountain Patisserie. Learners calculate average overtime for individual employees, express overtime as a percentage of normal working hours, interpret patterns within the data and identify potential organisational problems and possible solutions. Findings must then be communicated using at least two different diagrammatic formats, such as bar graphs, pie charts or line graphs. The required written evidence is approximately 1,500 words for Questions 1–6 and 500 words for Question 7, giving approximately 2,000 words in total, with the visualisations excluded from the word count.
Read Model Answer →
People Practice / Human Resource Management
2,500 words
Business, Culture and Change in Context: Organisational Acquisition Case Study
This CIPD Level 3 assessment examines how the external business environment, organisational culture and planned change influence organisations and their people. The assessment is based on a case study involving Best Pharmacy Ever (BPE), a small group of local pharmacies considering the acquisition of Emrosu, a much larger national pharmacy chain with approximately 100 stores and an established online pharmacy operation. The acquisition creates significant implications for organisational structure, culture, technology, people practices and change management. Learners are required to provide written responses to nine case-based questions. The assessment begins by examining external factors that may affect the acquisition and identifying appropriate post-acquisition business goals. It also requires consideration of the organisations' products, services and customers and the ways technology could support people professionals, improve working practices and strengthen collaboration following organisational growth. A central component of the assessment concerns organisational culture. Learners must explain the meaning and importance of culture, consider organisations as interconnected systems, and assess how the actions of people professionals can influence wider organisational outcomes. The final questions focus on planned organisational change, the contribution people professionals can make during periods of transition and the potential impact of significant change on employees. The unit therefore develops understanding of environmental analysis, organisational systems, workplace culture, technology and effective change management from a people-practice perspective. Written answers should make clear and consistent use of the case study and demonstrate application of relevant people-practice concepts rather than providing generic theoretical descriptions. The required submission is approximately 2,500 words, with a permitted variation of ±10%, subject to the CIPD word-count policy.
Read Model Answer →
International Entrepreneurship / Business Management
International Entrepreneurship: Start-up Business Idea and International Market Expansion Pitch
This group presentation assessment requires students to develop and pitch an internationally oriented entrepreneurial business idea. Students may create their own start-up or select an existing small or medium-sized enterprise or family firm. Large multinational organisations are not permitted. The selected business must have an international dimension, either from its inception or through credible plans to undertake international activities such as overseas sourcing, manufacturing, selling or market expansion within approximately three to five years. The presentation requires students to clearly explain the proposed business idea, its products or services and the customer value proposition. Students must demonstrate how a viable market opportunity or gap has been identified and explain how the proposed venture intends to capture that opportunity. Consideration may also be given to social entrepreneurship and the potential contribution of the business to local communities. A significant part of the assessment examines how an entrepreneurial venture can overcome the practical challenges associated with start-up development and internationalisation. Students should evaluate resource scarcity and the role of entrepreneurial networks or open innovation, propose appropriate funding mechanisms such as angel investment, venture capital or crowdfunding, and explain how the venture's intellectual property could be protected. Students must also present a credible international growth strategy. This includes identifying suitable foreign markets, analysing competitors, selecting appropriate market-entry modes, defining target customer segments and developing suitable marketing and promotional strategies. All arguments should be supported with reliable evidence, with sources cited directly within the presentation and a reference list included. The assessment places emphasis on knowledge and application of entrepreneurship theories, clarity and focus of the business idea, quality and reliability of supporting materials, professional presentation delivery and the group's ability to respond confidently during questioning. All group members are expected to contribute to the work and presentation. The accompanying Group Engagement Form specifically records whether members contributed equally and allows agreed contribution percentages to be documented. Reference style: enter Not specified rather than automatically selecting Harvard. The brief requires reliable sources, slide citations and a reference list, but the uploaded assessment documents do not prescribe a named referencing system. If the actual library file you are uploading is the FourGaz presentation sample, rather than a new 2025/26 submission, use the title “FourGaz: International Entrepreneurship Start-up and Market Expansion Strategy” and do not label it 2025/26, because that sample is dated 25 November 2019.
Read Model Answer →
Cyber Security / Digital Forensics
3,500 words
Digital Forensics Portfolio: Disk Image, Memory and Windows Registry Investigation
This Level 7 Digital Forensics portfolio requires students to conduct a structured forensic investigation across disk, memory and Windows Registry evidence. The assessment develops practical investigative skills alongside professional forensic reporting and requires students to preserve evidence integrity, document methodology, interpret technical artefacts and communicate findings clearly. The portfolio is equivalent to 3,500 words and forms 60% of the module assessment. The first part involves analysing a seized USB forensic image in the context of a suspected insider involved in video piracy and potentially more serious criminal activity. Students must follow ACPO digital forensic best practice, verify image integrity before and after examination, maintain a clear chain of custody, identify significant device properties and artefacts, and justify conclusions using evidence. Tools such as FTK Imager and Autopsy may be used, alongside other appropriate forensic utilities. The scenario also requires examination of an encrypted VeraCrypt container discovered within the evidence. The second part focuses on memory forensics using a Windows memory dump. Students are expected to reconstruct process execution timelines, examine suspicious processes including PowerShell, Notepad and AtomicService, identify process owners and SIDs, extract relevant memory artefacts and produce an executive summary suitable for a non-technical audience. The third part requires an extensive Windows Registry and system artefact investigation. Students examine operating-system information, users, network configuration, login activity, suspicious files, executable and DLL creation, BAM records, Prefetch artefacts, scheduled tasks, persistence mechanisms and evidence of potentially malicious activity. Findings must be supported with screenshots, extracted artefacts or other appropriate evidence. The assignment must use the university's official portfolio template and be submitted as a PDF. The template organises the work into forensic image analysis, memory investigation and Windows Registry investigation sections. For a public Reference Library entry, this title is better than simply “Digital Forensics Coursework” because it clearly communicates the three major technical components of the work.
Read Model Answer →
Customer Experience / Business Management / Marketing
2,500 words
Customer Experience Strategy Analysis in the Global Quick-Service Restaurant Industry
This MSc assessment requires students to produce a 2,500-word business report critically analysing the customer experience (CX) strategy of a major organisation operating within the global quick-service restaurant industry. Students must select one company from Starbucks, McDonald’s or Chipotle Mexican Grill and focus their analysis on the organisation's customer experience strategy within one clearly identified country. The report is written from the perspective of a CX consultant and is intended for the chosen company's Board of Directors. The assessment first requires students to explain the concept and strategic importance of customer experience and evaluate how CX contributes to business success. This includes examining the mutually beneficial relationship between the organisation and its customers, assessing the impact of CX on business and financial performance, and using company-specific examples to demonstrate how customer experience can create competitive advantage. A major part of the report focuses on the organisation's ability to deliver a seamless omnichannel customer journey. Students must develop a research-informed customer persona covering customer profile, goals, pain points and motivations, and then construct a detailed customer journey map addressing stages, needs, activities, feelings, pain points and opportunities for improvement. The effectiveness of the organisation's existing customer journey must then be critically evaluated and practical areas for improvement identified. Students must also evaluate three customer experience metrics, examining their benefits, limitations and relevance to the selected brand. The final part of the report critically evaluates the organisation's customer-centric culture in the context of increasing digitalisation, with specific consideration of CX leadership, CX governance and one additional critical success factor such as people, organisational structure, strategy, process or innovation. The report must be presented in an academic business-report format with an automatic table of contents, page numbering, consistent formatting and 1.5 line spacing. Academic sources, figures, diagrams and independent research must be appropriately cited using the Harvard Referencing System. Important for the public library: because the brief allows three different companies and any country, keep the Reference Library title generic unless the uploaded past work is specifically based on one brand. If the actual completed assignment is on Starbucks, McDonald’s or Chipotle, I can give you a more specific title and key topics for that exact work.
Read Model Answer →
Business Management / Business Consultancy / Supply Chain Management
5,000 words
Digital Transformation for Sustainable Supply Chain Transparency at Unilever: Blockchain, IoT and AI
This MSc Business Consultancy Project requires students to undertake an evidence-based consultancy investigation addressing a strategically significant business problem within a selected organisation. The assessment is designed to replicate professional consultancy practice by requiring students to define a focused organisational challenge, critically analyse secondary evidence, apply relevant management frameworks, evaluate stakeholder implications and develop practical recommendations that create value for the client organisation. The final submission is a 5,000-word consultancy report, including a 500-word employability reflection. The reference project examines Unilever Plc and focuses on the challenge of improving transparency and traceability across its complex global supply chain. Particular attention is given to the potential application of Blockchain, Internet of Things (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) to support real-time traceability, predictive analytics, ethical sourcing, operational efficiency and sustainability performance. The project considers how digital transformation could support Unilever's sustainability objectives while responding to growing regulatory, environmental and stakeholder pressures. The consultancy report requires a structured analysis consisting of an executive summary, introduction, company/client overview, clearly defined business problem and consultancy focus, and detailed stakeholder analysis. Students then undertake an extensive data analysis and framework application section using two or three relevant theoretical models alongside credible secondary evidence, industry reports, company data, tables, charts or Excel outputs. Findings should be interpreted critically and linked back to appropriate strategic or management frameworks while incorporating ethical and sustainability considerations. The project concludes with three prioritised, actionable and evidence-based recommendations, including consideration of implementation risks, barriers and anticipated benefits. Students must also critically reflect on the employability skills developed through the consultancy project, including research, analysis, problem-solving, project management, communication, professional behaviour, ethical awareness and future career development. All academic and professional evidence must be cited using the Harvard Referencing System, with emphasis on credible and current sources.
Read Model Answer →
Business Intelligence / Data Analytics / Project Management
Business Intelligence and Data Analytics Dashboard for Project Progress Evaluation
This group assessment requires students to act as Project Analysts and critically evaluate the progress of a university project using business intelligence, data analytics and project management techniques. The scenario is based on Northumbria University London planning two major events: a Convocation and an associated Concert. Students must select one of these projects and assess its progress through a professionally structured presentation. The assessment requires students to begin by defining the main problem or opportunity associated with the selected project. They must then identify and analyse the project's key stakeholders and deliverables. A major component of the work involves evaluating project progress using suitable business intelligence and data analytics techniques and developing an appropriate dashboard, which may be created using Microsoft Excel or other suitable software. Students must not only present the dashboard but also critically analyse and justify its design, selected metrics, analytical methods and usefulness for project monitoring and decision-making. Because the projects are treated as already being in progress, students are permitted to create assumed or projected data to demonstrate their dashboards. The assessment does not primarily evaluate the accuracy of real project data; instead, it assesses students' ability to design, present and critically evaluate meaningful dashboards. Any assumed data should therefore remain realistic, internally consistent and relevant to the selected project. The presentation should conclude with evidence-based recommendations for the successful implementation and use of the proposed business intelligence or data analytics solution. Academic references and relevant examples must support the presentation, and a single reference list must be included. Assessment weighting places particular emphasis on application of BI tools and techniques (30%), followed by stakeholders and deliverables (20%) and justification of BI tools (20%). Project and opportunity analysis, conclusions and recommendations, and presentation/referencing are each worth 10%. The final assessment is a 15-minute group presentation followed by a 5-minute question-and-answer session. Every group member must contribute to the presentation. The PowerPoint submission is made electronically through Turnitin. Do not select Harvard automatically for this one. Unlike the previous Roehampton brief, this Northumbria brief requires academic references and a reference list but does not state a specific referencing style in the uploaded document.
Read Model Answer →
Computing / Artificial Intelligence / Digital Transformation / Management Consultancy
7,000 words
AI Readiness and Programme Adoption Strategy for the NewFutures: AI Programme at Northumbria University London
This postgraduate consultancy project focuses on developing an AI readiness, skills-development and programme-adoption strategy for students and recent alumni at Northumbria University London. The project supports the university’s participation in NewFutures: AI, a funded AI skills and career-readiness programme offering a four-week online course covering responsible AI foundations and specialist pathways in Marketing and Communications, Finance and Accounting, Business Operations and Logistics, Administration, and ICT and Technical Support. The central consultancy challenge is to understand the AI literacy, confidence, readiness and training needs of Northumbria University London students and alumni and translate that evidence into a practical implementation and outreach strategy. The client aims to reach approximately 12,000 students and recent alumni and support a target of 6,000 LMS registrations during the 2026–2027 programme period. The project requires primary and secondary research into AI readiness, demand for different AI-skilling pathways and barriers to participation such as awareness, time, perceived value and accessibility. The consultancy team is also expected to benchmark comparable initiatives and use research evidence to develop recommendations appropriate to different academic disciplines and student and alumni groups. The implementation component focuses on designing an evidence-based outreach and adoption campaign, including appropriate communication channels, messaging, timing, incentives, faculty engagement and stakeholder participation. Recommended channels may include email campaigns, newsletters, social media, student services, events, learning platforms and alumni communications. The project also requires an implementation timeline and indicative budget for the 2026–2027 programme period. The wider assessment develops professional consultancy capability through business and requirements analysis, research methodology, ethical research practice, practical implementation, testing and strategic recommendations. The project charter additionally establishes milestones for research design, data collection, analysis, report development, review and presentation, together with defined responsibilities for project management, data analysis, AI expertise and stakeholder communication. The individual component complements the consultancy work through critical reflection on personal contribution, skills development, decision-making, problem-solving, communication, collaboration, technical capability, innovation and continuous professional development.
Read Model Answer →
Global Supply Chain Management / Operations Management
2,494 words
Global Supply Chain and Operations Performance: Company Case Analysis
This Level 7 individual assignment requires students to produce a 2,500-word company case analysis examining an important operations performance issue within a real organisation. Students may select an organisation of any size, type, industry or country and must concentrate their analysis on one operations performance objective: cost, dependability, flexibility, speed or quality. The report requires students to identify the current challenges faced by the chosen organisation in relation to the selected performance objective and critically examine those challenges using relevant operations and supply chain management theories, concepts and analytical tools. Rather than providing only a descriptive account of organisational activities, students are expected to apply appropriate theoretical frameworks to the case and evaluate how these concepts could contribute to improved organisational and supply chain performance. A significant component of the assignment involves critically discussing appropriate best practices for performance improvement. These may include digital technologies, sustainability practices or other relevant operational and supply chain approaches. Students should connect these practices directly to findings from their chosen company case and assess their practical relevance, opportunities and limitations. Academic literature and appropriate real-world evidence should be used throughout to substantiate the analysis and recommendations. The assignment evaluates students' ability to analyse supply chain and operations problems, apply academic theory to organisational practice, and develop evidence-based conclusions and practical recommendations. The marking rubric places substantial emphasis on analysis and discussion (30%), application of theory (30%), and conclusions and recommendations (30%), with the remaining 10% allocated to presentation, logical structure, English expression and correct referencing. The report must use Harvard referencing, include a contents page, and follow the specified academic formatting requirements, including Arial size 12, 1.5 line spacing and A4 pages with 2.54 cm margins.
Read Model Answer →
Computer Science / Research Methods
500 words
Interim Report: Systematic Literature Review Research Protocol
This postgraduate computer science assignment requires students to prepare an Interim Report establishing the research protocol for a systematic literature review. The assessment focuses on whether the proposed research question is suitable for computer science research, clearly formulated, appropriately motivated by existing literature, and capable of being investigated through a systematic review. The main body of the report must not exceed 500 words, while supporting evidence may be provided separately where appropriate. The report is structured around three main chapters. Chapter 1 introduces the selected research area and summarises the purpose and structure of the report. Chapter 2 provides relevant background and a brief history of the chosen research domain, identifies the problem being addressed, and supports the discussion with at least two relevant academic citations. Chapter 3 presents the formal Literature Review Protocol, including the research question, its context, and the associated PICO elements: Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome. Students must also develop and test a Boolean search string using IEEE Xplore and report the number of papers returned by that search. The search strategy is accompanied by explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria governing which studies will be considered for the review. The supplied protocol template requires students to document these elements through two structured tables: one covering the research question and PICO framework, and another recording the search string, paper count, and study-selection criteria. The assessment places significant emphasis on methodological consistency. The research question, PICO elements, search strategy, paper count and inclusion/exclusion criteria must align logically with one another. Students are also assessed on the justification and motivation of the research question, document structure, presentation quality, spelling, grammar and academic referencing. The report must include a title page, table of contents, bibliography and the required research-protocol tables. Harvard referencing is required for both in-text citations and the final reference list. Overall, the assignment develops the foundational skills required for conducting a rigorous systematic literature review, including research-question formulation, structured evidence searching, transparent study-selection procedures, academic justification and professional research reporting.
Read Model Answer →
Computer Science / Machine Learning
Machine Learning Portfolio Challenge: Support Vector Machines and Kernel Methods
This machine learning portfolio challenge requires students to demonstrate both theoretical understanding and practical application of machine learning methodologies introduced during the second block of the module. During Weeks 7–12, students select one of the machine learning methods covered in class and apply it to a dataset of their choice. The completed work contributes to an assessment portfolio and must demonstrate a clear, systematic and professionally documented experimental process. The accompanying learning material places particular emphasis on Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and kernel-based machine learning. SVMs are presented as maximum-margin classifiers that construct a decision hyperplane between classes, with support vectors playing the key role in defining the classification boundary. The material also introduces soft-margin optimisation, slack variables, the regularisation parameter C, primal and dual formulations, and the use of KKT multipliers. SVMs are additionally discussed in relation to multiclass classification through approaches including one-versus-all and Error Correcting Output Codes (ECOC). Kernel methods extend these principles by replacing explicit feature transformations with similarity functions. Students encounter concepts including Gram matrices, feature mappings, Mercer conditions and the kernel trick, alongside common kernel choices such as linear, radial basis function and polynomial kernels. The material demonstrates how kernel methods can represent nonlinear decision boundaries in the original input space while retaining a linear representation in an embedded feature space. The final submission must be produced as a single PDF lab notebook. It should contain clear and well-commented MATLAB, Python or equivalent code explaining each methodological step, experimental results presented through appropriate tables and/or plots, and narrative discussion explaining the selected approach, observations and conclusions. The notebook should integrate code, outputs and written explanation into a coherent and professional submission. Students may also optionally present their solution in class, where the quality of explanation and discussion can contribute additional marks.
Read Model Answer →
Data Science / Deep Learning
3,000 words
Advanced Research Topics (7PAM2016) — Building GANs from Scratch and Applying Them to Medical Imaging, Network Traffic and Sketch Generation
This Masters-level assessment asks for a complete generative adversarial network study, delivered as an annotated code submission carrying sixty per cent of the marks and a six-to-eight page technical report carrying the remaining forty. The work spans four separate GAN implementations, moving from a controlled synthetic setting into three contrasting real-world application domains. Part one builds a GAN from scratch in PyTorch on synthetic two-dimensional data. The tutorial sine-wave generator is reproduced first as a baseline, then a new distribution is modelled — a noisy parametric curve of the form y = sin(2x) + 0.3cos(5x) with an additive noise term — before the architecture itself is varied. Activation functions and layer depth are altered systematically and the resulting sample distributions plotted against the originals, so the effect of each architectural choice on convergence and sample fidelity can be seen rather than asserted. Part two applies the same principles at scale across three domains. The medical strand trains a DCGAN on the OCTMNIST subset of MedMNIST, generating synthetic optical coherence tomography retinal images, tracking generator and discriminator losses across training, and evaluating output both visually and quantitatively using Fréchet Inception Distance. A conditional GAN extension conditions the generator on class label so that images for a chosen retinal pathology can be produced on demand. The cybersecurity strand shifts from images to feature vectors, using preprocessed CICIDS 2017 network intrusion data. Benign and DoS traffic is combined and explored for class balance, a GAN is built to synthesise tabular feature vectors rather than pixels, and real against generated distributions are compared through PCA and t-SNE projections, with a discussion of how well the model generalises across attack types. The creative strand trains a DCGAN on the QuickDraw 'birthday cake' sketch category, tracking visual outputs epoch by epoch and benchmarking generated sketches against real ones, with an extension covering additional categories of differing sketch complexity. The accompanying report explains the analysis steps and the reasoning behind each architectural decision rather than restating textbook definitions of the method. It gives brief descriptions of the models used, presents generated samples and loss curves as figures, interprets the evaluation metrics, and reflects honestly on failure modes — training instability, mode collapse, and the visible flaws in synthetic output that determine whether such data is fit for downstream use. The code is written as reusable functions, commented for a reader other than its author, and reproduces every figure and numerical value quoted in the report.
Read Model Answer →
Computer Science / Database Systems
4,000 words
Advanced Databases (KL7011) — NORTHERNTOURS Coach Travel Database: EER Design, Oracle Implementation, Object-Relational and NoSQL Extensions
This piece of work addresses a four-part Masters-level assessment in Advanced Databases built around NORTHERNTOURS, a fictitious coach travel operator running services across cities, towns and tourist sites in the North East of England. The company sells tickets through a network of independent travel agents, each currently working from a paper-based sales book, while NORTHERNTOURS itself maintains separate paper records for routes, schedules, seat availability, vehicles and drivers. The brief asks for a single computer-based system capable of replacing both, tracking every agent transaction while giving the company control over ticket issue and seat allocation. Part one covers the conceptual and logical design. An enhanced entity-relationship model was produced covering agents, agent employees, customers, tickets, routes, stops, schedules, vehicles, drivers and the meal provision recorded at each stop, with key attributes, primary keys and full structural constraints shown. Because the scenario does not name identifiers for most entity types, appropriate surrogate and natural keys were devised and justified. The diagram was then mapped to a logical relational schema, normalised to third normal form, with a documented naming convention applied consistently across relations, attributes and keys, and every element recorded in a text-based data dictionary giving names, data types, descriptions and constraints. Part two moves to implementation in Oracle. A full DDL script creates the relations with primary and foreign keys and a substantial set of check constraints — key format patterns, positive seat counts and fare values, date ordering on schedules. Sample data populates the relevant tables, and two retrieval problems are answered twice over, once in relational algebra and once in SQL: schedules between Newcastle and Berwick-upon-Tweed with seven or more seats free in the coming fortnight, and the agent with the highest ticket sales across a defined month. Spooled session output evidences each script running. Part three revisits the conceptual design to argue where object-relational features earn their place — nested route-and-stop structures and composite address and contact types being the clearest candidates — implemented using Oracle object types, VARRAYs and nested tables, and demonstrated through two multi-join aggregate queries. A parallel discussion identifies the schedule and availability workload as a fit for document-oriented NoSQL storage, with representative code and a reasoned account of the denormalisation trade-offs involved. Part four is a report to the managing director covering sustainability, professional, legal, ethical and security obligations, alongside diversity, inclusion, cultural and environmental matters, commercial risk evaluation and mitigation, supported throughout by current literature and published standards.
Read Model Answer →
Digital Marketing and Analytics
2,974 words
Digital Marketing Analytics Consultancy Report — Accessibility, Social Listening and Web Analytics for an E-Commerce Storefron
This assessment places the student in a consultancy role advising a global brand's e-commerce storefront on its digital marketing strategy. It is written as a business report rather than an academic essay, in the third person, with appendices used only for supporting material that the main text explicitly refers the reader to. The work is built from four analytical layers, and the mark weighting tells students where the effort belongs. The first is an accessibility and user experience evaluation of the client site benchmarked against two self-selected industry competitors — the selection itself must be justified, and the analysis must cover both technical and content dimensions using recognised evaluation tools rather than impressionistic browsing. The second layer, carrying the smallest weight, is social listening: which networks the brand and its competitors are active on, what engagement looks like, which content types perform, and who the influential voices are. This is paired with qualitative sentiment or content analysis of actual social comments, on the premise that quantitative engagement metrics describe reach but not attitude. The third and heaviest layer is quantitative analysis using a web analytics platform, typically via a demonstration account that provides real traffic data. Students query the data themselves and extract performance insights. Comparison across time periods is what separates competent work from strong work here: a single-period snapshot describes, while period-over-period comparison explains. The fourth layer, weighted equally with the analytics, asks the student to synthesise everything into strategic recommendations for the coming year, covering areas such as customer segments, user behaviour, landing and exit page performance, search ranking positions, advertising budget allocation, marketing channels and e-commerce performance. This section is where most marks are lost. Recommendations that do not trace back to a specific finding from the preceding analysis read as generic digital marketing advice, and rubrics at this level penalise exactly that. Presentation requirements are prescriptive — specified font, size, line spacing and justified margins — and the report is expected to be concise despite the breadth of analysis, which makes ruthless selection of evidence part of the task. A draft submission point for similarity checking is usually provided separately from the marked final submission. Assessments of this type commonly require a signed declaration itemising any AI tool use, with an explicit confirmation that AI was not used to generate sentences, paragraphs or sections. Our support on assessments of this type is guidance-based. Typical areas of help include: explaining how accessibility evaluation tools are used and what their output actually shows, clarifying the difference between reporting analytics figures and interpreting them, showing how a recommendation should be traced to a specific finding, advising on report structure and appendix discipline, checking APA consistency, and reviewing a student's own draft against the published rubric.
Read Model Answer →
Artificial Intelligence
2,000 words
End-to-End Applied AI Development — Comparative Machine Learning and Neural Network Modelling on a Public Dataset
This assessment runs a complete applied AI development cycle end to end: problem definition, dataset selection, preprocessing, model building, optimisation, evaluation and critical reflection. Students identify a real-world problem themselves, formulate a research question from it, and source a suitable dataset from a recognised public repository such as UCI, Kaggle, Data.gov or OpenML. Dataset choice carries more weight than students expect. It must be genuinely suitable for supervised learning, complex enough to make preprocessing and feature engineering meaningful, and — critically — structured so that a traditional machine learning approach and a deep learning approach can be sensibly compared on it. A dataset too small or too clean makes the neural network component pointless; one too large or too noisy makes the whole pipeline unfinishable within the page limit. The source must be referenced and the choice explicitly justified against the research problem. The modelling requirement is fixed: at least two supervised machine learning models, plus one artificial neural network built in a mainstream deep learning framework, all trained and tested. The comparison between them is the analytical core of the work. Reporting that the neural network scored higher is not an answer; explaining why, in terms of the data's structure and each model's inductive assumptions, is. Marks are distributed across problem framing, the traditional models, the deep learning model, evaluation and critical analysis including responsible AI considerations, and academic communication. That responsible AI component is easy to overlook and is not decorative — it asks what the model's limitations mean for anyone who might rely on it. Presentation requirements are specific. The report is page-limited rather than purely word-limited, and every plot must be described in the text while also being legible enough to communicate on its own — a common failure is dense default library output pasted in without axis labels or scale. The implementation is documented in a notebook combining markdown and code cells so the development process is visible, not just the final result, and submissions typically include the cleaned dataset alongside the code. The strongest submissions treat the notebook and the report as one argument. Weaker ones produce a working notebook and then write a report that describes it, rather than a report that uses it as evidence. Our support on assessments of this type is guidance-based. Typical areas of help include: advising on whether a candidate dataset can actually support the required model comparison, explaining how to justify preprocessing decisions, clarifying which evaluation metrics suit which problem type and why accuracy alone is often misleading, showing how to structure a critical limitations and responsible AI discussion, checking Harvard referencing, and reviewing a student's own draft against the published marking criteria.
Read Model Answer →
Data Science
1,000 words
Data Investigation Pipeline — Exploratory Analysis and Statistical Evaluation of a Chosen Dataset
This assessment simulates the opening stages of a real data investigation. Students choose their own research question and dataset, then build the full pipeline from raw data through preparation, exploration and statistical testing to visualisation — and, where the question supports it, simple modelling or forecasting. Either Python or R is acceptable; the statistical route through R typically expects an explicit hypothesis rather than a purely exploratory question. The work is structured around an established process methodology such as CRISP-DM, and the development journey is documented alongside the code rather than reported after the fact. The usual submission format is a single notebook combining markdown and code cells, so the written report and the analysis sit in one artefact, though a word-processed document containing the code is normally also accepted. The written element is short — around a thousand words — which makes selection the hardest part of the task. It must cover the scenario, the data collection, the exploratory analysis, the reasoning behind the choice of statistical tests, their results, and the visualisations. Students routinely spend that budget describing what they did and leave nothing for why. The mark distribution makes the priority explicit. Framing the problem and the data source carries the smallest share. Preparation and exploratory analysis, and evaluation of the results in context, carry the bulk in roughly equal measure. That final component is where most marks are lost: it asks for an honest assessment of accuracy, limitations and usefulness. A notebook that produces clean output and then claims more than the data supports scores below one that reports a modest result and explains precisely why it is modest. Established metrics should be used for the statistical tests, and published research cited where it informs the background or interprets the findings. Note that assessments of this type increasingly include a live demonstration in which the student explains their own project to verify authorship, so every line of the submitted work needs to be something the student can talk through unprompted. Our support on assessments of this type is guidance-based. Typical areas of help include: explaining how to scope a research question so the analysis fits the word limit, clarifying which statistical test suits which data type and why, reviewing whether a chosen visualisation communicates what it claims, showing how to write an honest limitations section, checking Harvard referencing, and reviewing a student's own draft notebook against the published marking criteria.
Read Model Answer →
Marketing
4,000 words
Strategic Recovery Marketing Report — Diagnosing Underperformance and Building a Sustainable Turnaround Plan
This is a case-based marketing assessment in which the student selects a real business that is currently underperforming or failing, diagnoses the causes, and builds a full marketing recovery strategy for it. The company choice is the student's own but requires module team approval, so the selection itself carries risk: a firm with thin public disclosure will starve the analysis, while an over-documented household name invites description rather than diagnosis. The deliverable is a formal report of around four thousand words, excluding references and appendices, referenced in APA 7. Appendices can carry supporting data, models and supplementary analysis, but not core content — a common way marks are lost is pushing substantive argument into an appendix to stay within the word limit. The report has two linked halves that students often treat as separate. The first is diagnostic: why is this business underperforming? This demands explicit application of marketing theory rather than a narrative of the company's troubles assembled from press coverage. The second is prescriptive: a recovery strategy that follows from the diagnosis. Recommendations that could have been written without the analysis — refresh the brand, invest in digital, improve customer experience — score poorly regardless of how well they are expressed. Where this module differs from a generic strategic marketing assessment is the sustainability and ethics dimension. The learning outcomes centre on sustainable marketing, social responsibility, and the intersection of marketing technology with sustainable practice. The marking criteria reward conclusions that show awareness of ethical and sustainability dimensions at every band above a pass. A recovery plan built purely on cost and revenue logic will therefore underperform against the rubric even if it is commercially sensible. The strongest submissions treat sustainability as part of the recovery mechanism rather than a section appended at the end. Assessments of this type increasingly sit within a tiered AI policy. Where a permissive tier applies, students may use AI tools for idea generation, structuring, source discovery, summarising notes, and proofreading or feedback — but not for producing the analysis itself — and must declare which tools were used and how, usually in a table placed before the reference list. Students are also expected to retain evidence of how their thinking developed, such as version histories or drafts, which can be requested if misconduct is suspected. Our support on assessments of this type is guidance-based. Typical areas of help include: advising on company selection and data availability, explaining how a diagnostic framework should structure an argument, showing the difference between descriptive and evaluative use of theory, clarifying how sustainability criteria are actually assessed in a marking rubric, checking APA 7 consistency, and reviewing a completed draft against the published criteria.
Read Model Answer →
Engineering and Professional Practice
3,000 words
Internship Reflective Report and Poster Presentation — Professional Practice in an Industry Placement
An internship module assessment asks students to convert a period of workplace experience into evidenced academic reflection. It is not a report on what the host organisation does; it is an account of what changed in the student's own understanding of their discipline as a result of working outside the taught programme. The written component typically runs to around three thousand words and is built in weighted sections. An opening section covers how the placement was secured — the reasoning behind the choice, the search and application process, and what that process itself taught the student. The bulk of the marks then sit on the reflection proper: what the student actually did, how existing disciplinary knowledge held up when applied in an unfamiliar setting, and where gaps appeared. A final section addresses personal and professional development, supported by specific examples rather than general claims of having "grown in confidence." The second component is a short poster presentation summarising the placement and its learning, delivered live. Posters are assessed on professional presentation, clarity, correct referencing and balance — students commonly over-fill them with text that a viewer cannot read at presentation distance. Formatting requirements on this type of assessment are unusually prescriptive and carry marks: a cover page with name, student ID, tutor name and declared word count; a table of contents; page numbers; captions on every figure and table; specified font, size and line spacing; numbered headings; and a strict file-naming convention. Marks are lost here for no reason other than inattention. Note also that in-text citations and quotations usually count toward the word limit even when tables and references do not, and markers may simply stop reading once the limit is exceeded by more than the allowed margin. The defining challenge of reflective assessment at this level is criticality. Rubrics consistently distinguish description from evaluation: recounting tasks performed scores at the lower bands, while analysing why something was difficult, what it revealed about a gap in preparation, and what will be done differently scores at the top. Reflective frameworks give this structure, but they must organise genuine experience rather than substitute for it. This assessment is inherently personal — the content derives entirely from the student's own placement. Our support is therefore confined to guidance: explaining what distinguishes descriptive from critical reflection with worked examples, showing how a reflective framework structures a section, advising on poster layout and information density, checking formatting and referencing against the specification, and reviewing a student's own completed draft against the published rubric.
Read Model Answer →
Entrepreneurship and Business Start-up
5,000 words
Enterprise Start-up Portfolio — Business Plan, Fundraising Strategy and Entrepreneurial Self-Assessment
An enterprise start-up portfolio assessment asks students to originate a business idea and build the full supporting case for it, then present that case both in writing and as a recorded investor pitch. It is a pass/fail module structure in which every component must be passed individually — a strong business plan cannot compensate for a weak pitch, or vice versa. The written portfolio divides into two unequal halves. The larger part is the business plan itself, built to a fixed section structure with prescribed word allocations: an executive summary; the business idea set against an identified market gap, with market research and competitor analysis; customer profiles and segmentation; product development; marketing and communications; financials and business models covering costing, pricing, sales and revenue; and the founding team with its core competencies. The word allocations are not decorative — financials carry the single largest weighting in both the word budget and the marking rubric, which tells students where analytical depth is expected and where concision is. The smaller part is reflective. It covers the fundraising strategy — which funding sources are realistic for this venture, and how each would be targeted, approached and secured — and the student's own entrepreneurial tendency, informed by a standardised self-assessment instrument taken online. The rubric here rewards critical self-reflection over description: reporting a test result scores poorly; interpreting what the result means for how this founder should build a team and where they need support scores well. The pitch component is assessed on visual and audio quality, content and message, comprehension, delivery, and evident preparation. Technical execution carries real marks, which students routinely underestimate. Two things separate strong submissions. The first is internal consistency: the revenue model must follow from the pricing, the pricing from the customer segment, the segment from the identified gap. Plans that read as seven separate essays under seven headings lose marks even when each section is individually competent. The second is specificity in the financials — costing assumptions stated and justified, rather than round numbers presented without derivation. Note that assessments of this type commonly require the student to retain all drafts and earlier versions of their work, and to sign a detailed declaration itemising exactly how any AI tools were used. Our support on assessments of this type is guidance-based. Typical areas of help include: explaining what a market gap argument needs to be credible, showing how competitor analysis should be structured rather than listed, clarifying how costing and pricing assumptions should be built and presented, reviewing whether a fundraising strategy matches the venture's actual stage, explaining how reflective writing is assessed at postgraduate level, and checking a completed draft against the published rubric.
Read Model Answer →
Operations and Supply Chain Management
1,800 words
Strategic Sourcing and Supply Chain Resilience Under Global Uncertainty — A Firm-Level Critical Evaluation
This type of postgraduate coursework asks students to take a single real firm — a British company, or a multinational with substantial UK operations — and critically evaluate how its sourcing and supply chain strategy has adapted to a decade of sustained disruption: the pandemic, geopolitical conflict, tariff volatility, and departure from the European single market. The analytical scope is broad but the depth expectation is narrow. Students choose one or two themes rather than surveying all of them: insourcing versus outsourcing and location decisions; single versus multi-sourcing across supplier segments or regions; how supplier selection and monitoring criteria have shifted toward reliability and geographic proximity; alignment between sourcing decisions and wider corporate objectives; supplier and customer relationship management under cross-border friction; inventory tactics such as stockpiling and safety stock repositioning; digital adoption for visibility and compliance; sustainable sourcing under cost pressure; or risk management around currency, customs and compliance. The evidence base is deliberately mixed. Alongside academic literature, students are expected to draw on annual reports, shareholder briefings, company statements, practitioner journals and recent news coverage — with a minimum spread of credible sources across both categories, and some of the non-academic material drawn from the most recent year so the analysis reflects current firm behaviour rather than historical commentary. At least one theoretical framework from the module or the wider literature must be applied to the firm's decisions, and at least one recent documented practice must be examined with specific sourcing. Two requirements distinguish strong submissions. The first is criticality: the brief explicitly separates evaluation from description, and marks weight critical analysis most heavily. Reporting what a firm did is not the task; assessing whether it was the right response, and what opportunities and risks it created, is. The second is the recommendation — at least one specific, actionable proposal with steps, anticipated obstacles, expected outcomes, and a clear line back to the firm's own stated goals. A generic suggestion to "diversify suppliers" fails this test; a costed, sequenced proposal grounded in the firm's actual constraints does not. Word-count conventions are stricter than students often expect: in-text references, tables, illustrations and front matter typically count, while appendices and the reference list do not. Our support on assessments of this type is guidance-based. Typical areas of help include: narrowing a firm and theme so the analysis fits the word limit, explaining the difference between description and critical evaluation with worked examples, clarifying how a theoretical framework should structure an argument rather than sit decoratively in a paragraph, checking source mix and Harvard referencing consistency, and reviewing a completed draft against the published assessment weightings.
Read Model Answer →
Computer Science
1,700 words
Systematic Literature Review — Final Report with Data Extraction and Synthesis
A Research Methods final report at postgraduate computer science level is a systematic literature review written to a defined protocol. Unlike an essay, the method itself is assessed: markers re-run the student's search string and check that the number of papers returned matches what the report claims, so the process must be reproducible rather than merely described. The report is typically built in five chapters. Chapter 1 introduces the research area and states that a literature review is the chosen method. Chapter 2 gives the background, with citations behind every claim or assertion. Chapter 3 sets out the research protocol — the research question decomposed through PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome), the search string, and explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. Chapter 4 presents the results: a data extraction table holding direct quotations and references from each included paper, followed by a data synthesis table that groups those extractions into cross-cutting themes. Chapter 5 concludes by answering the research question from the Chapter 4 evidence alone. Several requirements catch students out. The word limit applies to the main body only — tables, figures, references and appendices sit outside it, which changes how the argument should be distributed. Screenshots and supplementary search strings belong in appendices, not the body. Where an interim report has already been submitted and marked, the final report must visibly incorporate that formative feedback rather than reproduce the earlier chapters unchanged. File naming and file completeness are often mark-bearing in their own right, with missing files scored at zero. Presentation carries weight too: consistent heading and font usage, labelled tables and figures, and error-free spelling and punctuation. The most common conceptual error is treating Chapter 4 as a narrative summary of each paper in turn. A synthesis groups evidence by theme across papers and answers the question; a summary walks through the reading list. A related error is a research question that the background has not motivated — the introduction and background should make the question feel necessary before the protocol formalises it. Our support on assessments of this type is guidance-based. Typical areas of help include: explaining how to decompose a research question using PICO, reviewing whether a search string is syntactically valid and whether inclusion criteria genuinely follow from the question, showing how extraction tables feed into synthesis tables, clarifying Harvard referencing conventions, checking report structure and formatting against the specification, and reviewing a completed draft against the published marking criteria before submission.
Read Model Answer →
Professional Development & Employability
2,100 words
Professional Development & Planning Portfolio — SWOT, Career Plan, UK CV & Interview Reflection
A Professional Development and Planning portfolio is a Level 7 employability assessment that asks postgraduate students to evidence their own professional growth rather than analyse an external case. It typically integrates three connected components into a single submission: a critical self-analysis with a forward-looking career plan, a set of job-application documents, and a reflective account of a practical employability exercise such as a recorded mock interview. The first component combines a SWOT analysis with a structured career development plan. Students are expected to move beyond listing traits, and instead show how each strength, weakness, opportunity and threat actually shapes their short- and long-term trajectory. Established reflective frameworks — Gibbs, Kolb, or comparable employability models — are commonly used to give the self-analysis theoretical grounding. The plan that follows usually requires a career vision, two or three SMART goals derived directly from the SWOT, an action plan with resources and timelines, and a strategy for reviewing the plan over time. Marks are lost most often where the components sit side by side without integration: a SWOT that never feeds the goals, or goals that are specific in form but generic in substance. The second component is a UK-format CV and a targeted cover letter for a real advertised role. UK conventions matter here — no photograph, no date of birth, no full address — alongside a concise personal statement, achievement-focused bullet points rather than duty lists, and visible evidence of research into the employer's values and strategic direction. The cover letter is expected to argue for candidacy rather than restate the CV, and is normally capped at one page. The third component is a reflection on a recorded practice interview, written against the platform's own scored feedback on speech rate, filler words, self-positioning and answer structure. Because this reflection must respond to individual results, it is inherently personal and cannot be written generically. Our support on this type of assessment is structured around guidance rather than production. Typical areas of help include: explaining what distinguishes a descriptive SWOT from an analytical one, showing how SMART goals should trace back to identified development needs, reviewing CV and cover letter formatting against UK employer expectations, clarifying how reflective models are applied at postgraduate level, and checking a completed draft against the assessment's own marking criteria before submission.
Read Model Answer →
Database Design and Implementation for KAP Speciality Chocolates Ltd
Design and implement a relational database system for KAP Speciality Chocolates Ltd based on the given case study. The assignment requires creating an Extended ER Diagram, developing SQL database structures with appropriate constraints, writing SQL queries for business requirements, populating the database with sample data, and demonstrating normalisation from Unnormalised Form (UNF) to Third Normal Form (3NF). Expected Deliverables: One PDF report containing: Extended ER Diagram with entities, attributes, relationships, keys and constraints SQL DDL statements for database implementation SQL DML queries with testing evidence/screenshots Normalisation process from UNF to 3NF
Read Model Answer →
Assignment 2 - Individual project Image segmentation
Assignment tasks This assignment will focus on Image Segmentation using the ADE20K dataset. This is an individual assignment where each student will produce a report on the data analysis they will perform. You are encouraged to utilise Google Colab for the coding part of your assignment. https://herts.instructure.com/courses/129101/assignments/406384 1/86/17/26, 12:10 PM Assignment 2 - Individual project - Image segmentation - 25% You will explain and discuss the data processing, the method(s) you make use of and elaborate the outcome. You will work on the ADE20K dataset (explained below in more detail) to research viable models to train, discuss different approaches to explore and visualise the data (i.e., perform EDA), build a tool to pre-process the dataset, and customise your chosen model(s) to improve performance. You will produce a code that does semantic segmentation of the 4 classes targeted in this assignment: person, car, book, airplane. In more detail, your model(s) should identify which of these 4 classes the region of the image corresponds to, and should be applicable to any unlabelled image. To be clear: doing only binary segmentation (i.e. any class vs background) will result in a very large penalty, as you will be considered not to have done the required task. You may use more than one model, but one has to be trained partially or fully by you. Should you use more than one, you are encouraged to compare your main trained model with one or more pre-trained models.
Read Model Answer →
Cyber Security for Business and Cloud Management
This activity aims to assess your comprehension of the diverse concepts discussed in this module. You must use the frameworks and concepts covered in this module's delivery to respond to all the tasks below. Scenario ShieldSafe Analytics Ltd. is a fast-growing health analytics company specialising in AI-driven patient diagnostics and telehealth platforms. Operating across multiple countries, the company processes high volumes of real-time patient data, including biometric and genomic records. Due to the increased reliance on remote healthcare and IoT-enabled medical devices, their infrastructure has expanded into hybrid cloud environments. Recently, ShieldSafe experienced a suspected data exfiltration incident involving anomalous traffic from one of its diagnostic platforms integrated with third-party cloud APIs. As a result, executive leadership has raised concerns about the company’s vulnerability to adversarial information operations, particularly in relation to data manipulation, misinformation, and insider threats. As a Junior Cybersecurity Strategist, you’ve been recruited to support the lead cyber intelligence consultant in reviewing vulnerabilities within their information environment, exploring offensive and defensive Information Operations (IO) concepts, and crafting robust cyber defence mechanisms. The leadership also wants to migrate a legacy electronic health record (EHR) system used across its African operations to a more scalable and secure cloud infrastructure. However, concerns exist regarding cross-border data protection laws, insider threats, and the strategic use of information in potential cyber warfare scenarios.
Read Model Answer →
Research Methods (Computer Science / Systematic Literature Review)
500 words
Interim Report – Research Methods (7COM1085)
This assignment is an Interim Report for the Research Methods module (7COM1085). The purpose of the report is to demonstrate that the research team has identified a suitable Computer Science research topic and developed a systematic literature review protocol that can be used for the final dissertation or research project. Students are required to formulate a clear and well-justified research question, define the associated PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) elements, create an IEEE Xplore Boolean search strategy, and establish appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria for selecting academic literature. The report must also provide background information on the chosen research area and justify the importance of the research question using relevant scholarly sources. The interim report should follow a structured academic format consisting of an Introduction, Background, Literature Review Protocol, and Bibliography. Students must use Harvard referencing throughout the report and ensure that all citations are properly integrated within the text. The report should demonstrate consistency between the research question, search strategy, and selection criteria while maintaining a professional academic presentation. The main body of the report must not exceed 500 words, although supporting materials such as search results, screenshots, and other evidence may be included in appendices. The assignment is designed to assess students' understanding of research methodologies, systematic literature reviews, critical analysis of academic sources, and their ability to design a rigorous research protocol for a Computer Science investigation.
Read Model Answer →
mgt
This module requires you to complete two assessments: a group presentation (25%) and an individual report (75%). In the group presentation, your team must analyse a chosen industry using strategic tools such as PESTEL analysis, Porter’s Five Forces, and competitor/strategic group analysis. The presentation should critically evaluate the external and industry environment, include graphs, charts, and academic references, and demonstrate strong teamwork and confident delivery during the 15-minute presentation and 5-minute Q&A session. The individual report requires you to select a company from the recommended list and critically evaluate its strategic challenges, business ethics, sustainability practices, and/or organisational culture issues. You must analyse the impact of these issues on the company, provide well-justified recommendations, suggest suitable leadership and management approaches, and support all arguments using relevant strategic and leadership theories. The work should be analytical rather than descriptive, properly referenced with in-text citations, professionally formatted, and based on extensive research.
Read Model Answer →
L7 Cyber Security for Business and Cloud Management
This activity aims to assess your comprehension of the diverse concepts discussed in this module. You must use the frameworks and concepts covered in this module's delivery to respond to all the tasks below. Scenario ShieldSafe Analytics Ltd. is a fast-growing health analytics company specialising in AI-driven patient diagnostics and telehealth platforms. Operating across multiple countries, the company processes high volumes of real-time patient data, including biometric and genomic records. Due to the increased reliance on remote healthcare and IoT-enabled medical devices, their infrastructure has expanded into hybrid cloud environments. Recently, ShieldSafe experienced a suspected data exfiltration incident involving anomalous traffic from one of its diagnostic platforms integrated with third-party cloud APIs. As a result, executive leadership has raised concerns about the company’s vulnerability to adversarial information operations, particularly in relation to data manipulation, misinformation, and insider threats. As a Junior Cybersecurity Strategist, you’ve been recruited to support the lead cyber intelligence consultant in reviewing vulnerabilities within their information environment, exploring offensive and defensive Information Operations (IO) concepts, and crafting robust cyber defence mechanisms. The leadership also wants to migrate a legacy electronic health record (EHR) system used across its African operations to a more scalable and secure cloud infrastructure. However, concerns exist regarding cross-border data protection laws, insider threats, and the strategic use of information in potential cyber warfare scenarios.
Read Model Answer →