Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Managing the Global Supply Chain and Sustainability
2,500 words
Managing the Global Supply Chain and Sustainability – Individual Company Case Analysis
This assessment is an individual company case analysis for the Level 7 module Managing the Global Supply Chain and Sustainability. Students are required to select a real organisation of any size, type, industry or country and produce a comprehensive analysis of one operations performance objective. The available performance objectives are cost, dependability, flexibility, speed and quality. The report should identify current issues faced by the chosen organisation in relation to the selected objective and critically analyse the factors affecting its performance. Students are expected to apply relevant theories, concepts and tools covered during lectures and seminars to the selected company case. Rather than providing only descriptive explanations of theoretical concepts, the assessment requires students to demonstrate how these concepts can be applied to understand the organisation's operational or supply chain challenges. The analysis should consider how relevant theories, models or tools could contribute to improving the company's performance. The report should also provide a critical discussion of appropriate performance-improvement practices. These may include the use of digital technologies, sustainability practices, supply chain strategies, operational approaches or other relevant methods. Students should relate these practices directly to the findings from their chosen company case and consider their practical implications. Academic evidence and real-world examples should be used to support the analysis, with appropriate attention given to supply chain and operations management literature. The assessment is designed to develop students' ability to understand supply chain strategies, assess their contribution to agility, viability and sustainability, propose practical solutions to modern logistics and supply chain challenges, and evaluate how digital technologies and sustainability practices can improve supply chain performance. The report should therefore demonstrate analysis, application of theory, critical evaluation and evidence-based recommendations rather than simply describing the organisation or its supply chain. The individual report has a maximum length of 2,500 words, excluding references, tables, figures and appendices. It must include a contents page, be spell-checked and follow the specified formatting requirements. The report should use Arial 12-point font, 1.5 line spacing, A4 page size and 2.54 cm margins. Academic sources such as journal articles and books should be used, and all sources cited within the report must appear in a Harvard-style reference list. The report is submitted through Moodle Turnitin as a Word document.
Read Model Answer →
Business Research Methods
3,500 words
Business Research Methods – Research Methodologies, Research Instrument and Research Dissemination
This individual assessment for the Business Research Methods module requires students to produce a structured report of no more than 3,500 words. The assessment is designed to develop students’ ability to identify and justify a suitable business research problem, critically evaluate research methodologies, design an appropriate research instrument, and consider how potential research findings could be effectively communicated to relevant audiences. The report consists of three interconnected sections that require students to demonstrate critical research skills and an understanding of how research can contribute to knowledge and practical decision-making. Section 1 focuses on comparing two research methodologies. Students select a topic of interest or a business problem relevant to their degree specialism, such as strategy, supply chain management, international business and economics, marketing, finance, or human resources. They first explain and justify the selected research problem and formulate a research question. Students then review relevant academic literature, justify the selection of key readings, and demonstrate the scope of the literature through a visual presentation such as a mind map, Venn diagram, or literature map. The section concludes with a detailed critical evaluation of at least two established research methodologies, considering their application, contribution to theory and research, advantages, limitations, constraints, and potential research gaps. Section 2 focuses on the development of a research instrument. Students design an appropriate instrument for their proposed research, such as an interview guide, survey questionnaire, or another suitable data-collection tool. The instrument is provided in an appendix, while the main report includes a reflection explaining how and why it was designed. Students are not required to collect data for this assessment. The section concludes by evaluating the expected value of the proposed instrument and its potential contribution to answering the research question. Section 3 addresses research dissemination. Students identify the audiences that could benefit from the potential research findings and explain why those audiences are relevant. They also consider appropriate methods of communicating research outcomes, including suitable summaries, media, report design, and potential partners such as public organisations, NGOs, associations, or industry. The assessment requires Harvard referencing and a bibliography containing at least 12 relevant journal articles, including at least six published within the previous 24 months. The report is assessed on the clarity of the research problem, depth of literature analysis, critical evaluation of research methods, quality of the proposed research instrument, understanding of research dissemination, and overall academic presentation.
Read Model Answer →
Operations and Supply Chain Management
2,000 words
Operations and Supply Chain Management – Individual Reflective Report
This assessment is an individual 2,000-word reflective report for the Operations and Supply Chain Management module at De Montfort University. The report requires students to reflect critically on their experience of completing Assessment One and to demonstrate how their learning developed throughout the project. The assessment focuses on reflective practice, application of relevant theories, critical analysis of team and project experiences, and the development of an action plan for future professional practice. The report begins with an introduction explaining why reflection on practice is important and connecting reflective practice to relevant learning theories where appropriate. Students are required to identify the particular areas they will focus on within the report and explain why these areas are important and interesting to explore. This section establishes the purpose and scope of the reflection and provides a foundation for the critical discussion that follows. The main body should use appropriate sub-headings to organise the discussion into different areas. Students should explain how the team collectively established specific approaches relating to the topics selected in Assessment One. The report should then examine how the approach changed as the project progressed and connect these changes to relevant theories. Both successful and unsuccessful aspects of the project should be critically considered, rather than simply describing what happened. Detailed examples from the situation analysis and problem-solving components of Assessment One should be used to support the arguments and demonstrate meaningful reflection. The report should demonstrate critical understanding of operations and supply chain management issues, including the ability to critically appraise and adapt to tangible, intangible and information-related aspects of the global supply chain. It should also reflect on capacity planning and process design decisions relating to the production of goods and services. The emphasis is on connecting practical project experience with relevant academic concepts and theories. The conclusion should identify the key learning points gained from the project process and the consultancy presentation. Students should reflect on how these experiences have contributed to their knowledge, skills and professional development. The final part of the report should present a clear action plan explaining how the learning gained from the project will be taken forward into the student's future career. The assessment is worth 30% of the module and has a required length of 2,000 words, with an accepted range of 1,800–2,200 words. Assessment criteria include introduction and rationale, application of theory and concepts, critical analysis and evaluation, conclusion and action plan, and academic skills including Harvard referencing, source quality and quantity, structure and presentation.
Read Model Answer →
Global Supply Chain Management
1,800 words
Suez Canal Blockage: A Case Study of Global Supply Chain Disruption
This individual report examines the challenges faced by global supply chains as a result of the Suez Canal blockage and critically evaluates the factors that affected supply chain performance during the disruption. The assignment uses the Suez Canal blockage as a case study to explore the wider principles and practices of global supply chain management, with particular attention to supply chain disruption, risk management, resilience, logistics, supplier relationships and integrated supply chain performance. The report requires students to conduct preliminary research into the Suez Canal blockage and use relevant academic and practical sources to identify the major challenges created by the disruption. The case study focuses on the six-day stranding of the Ever Given and the resulting disruption to international supply chains and global trade. The assessment considers how a disruption at a strategically important global trade route can create wider consequences for organisations, logistics networks and supply chain operations. The analysis should identify the key factors that influenced supply chain performance and critically evaluate the effectiveness of the solutions implemented to resolve the disruption. Relevant global supply chain management theories, models and concepts should be clearly defined and applied to the case rather than simply described. The report should demonstrate an understanding of fundamental supply chain principles and consider how evolving trends and global issues can affect supply chain operations. The assignment also encourages consideration of important supply chain management areas covered within the unit, including risk management, resilience, outsourcing, supplier planning and selection, relationship management, supply chain integration, demand management, order management and customer service. These concepts should be connected to the Suez Canal blockage to provide a critical assessment of the challenges and possible approaches to improving supply chain resilience. The report must be presented in a formal and logically coherent report format and should provide evidence of critical reasoning through a wide range of relevant academic and practical sources. The conclusion should draw together the main findings, while recommendations should propose realistic approaches for addressing the supply chain issues identified in the case. The assessment is worth 30% of the overall unit mark and requires an individual report of 1,800 words, with a permitted variation of ±10%. The report is assessed across four main areas: use of theory and frameworks (25%), analysis and evaluation (30%), conclusions and recommendations (20%), and structure, presentation and referencing (25%). The marking criteria emphasise the application of relevant theoretical concepts, critical evaluation of academic and practical sources, a clear connection between theory and practice, realistic recommendations, logical structure, and appropriate in-text citations and referencing.
Read Model Answer →
Global Supply Chain Management
4,200 words
Global Supply Chain Management – Gatwick Airport Northern Runway Expansion
This individual report examines several strategic and operational aspects of the global supply chain associated with the Gatwick Airport Northern Runway expansion. The assessment requires students to investigate the organisation and its current global supply chain challenges, while applying relevant supply chain management theories, frameworks and models to analyse its operations and develop strategic recommendations. The report begins by providing a background of the organisation, with particular attention to its current global supply chain issues and strategic supply chain relationships. Key areas of investigation include risk management, supply chain resilience, outsourcing, supplier planning and selection, supply chain integration, network design, leadership, benchmarking, decision-making, and the application of lean and agile approaches. These areas provide the basis for understanding how the organisation can manage its supply chain effectively within a complex and changing global environment. A critical evaluation of external factors affecting the organisation's global supply chain is also required through the use of a PESTEL analysis. This enables consideration of the political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal factors that may influence supply chain performance, risks, costs and strategic decisions. The report must then develop key strategic recommendations aimed at optimising the organisation's global supply chain. The recommendations should focus on reducing costs, supporting sustainability, improving operational efficiency and enhancing supply chain resilience. Each recommendation should be supported by appropriate supply chain management theories and models, such as agile supply chain approaches, lean supply chain principles and global sourcing strategies. Students are expected to provide a clear rationale for their recommendations using theoretical insights and relevant academic and professional literature. The assessment places emphasis on critical reasoning, wider reading and the ability to connect supply chain theory with practical organisational issues. A logically structured, professional and business-like report is required, supported by appropriate evidence and Harvard referencing. The marking criteria assess the use of theory and frameworks, critical analysis and evaluation, conclusions and recommendations, and the overall structure, presentation and referencing of the report. The assignment is worth 70% of the unit assessment and has a required length of approximately 4,200 words, with a permitted variation of ±10%. The report should demonstrate an understanding of global supply chain management practices and the ability to apply relevant theories and frameworks to analyse supply chain challenges and develop realistic strategic recommendations.
Read Model Answer →
1,000 words
Organisational Strategy and Sustainability: Strategic and Sustainability Analysis of Engineers & Planners Company Ltd
This formative Organisational Strategy and Sustainability assessment requires students to act as a management consultant for BPP Consulting Group and provide a strategic and sustainability evaluation of ENGINEERS & PLANNERS COMPANY LTD for its Board of Directors. The task focuses on how internal capabilities, external market forces, sustainability pressures, ethical practices and responsible leadership shape the organisation’s strategy within an increasingly global business environment. Formative Assessment - Organisa… ENGINEERS & PLANNERS COMPANY LTD is described as a Ghanaian-owned mining and construction contracting company, established in 1997 and headquartered in Accra. Its activities include contract mining, road construction, tailings-dam construction, land reclamation and hard-rock mining, with operations in Ghana and Liberia. The company also owns Dzata Cement, a cement manufacturing facility in Tema with an annual production capacity of approximately 2.3 million metric tons. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa… The formative task addresses the first two learning outcomes of the summative assessment. LO1 – Strategic Environmental Analysis requires a brief but critical evaluation of the organisation’s internal resources and capabilities together with its external environment. Students should use one internal and one external strategic framework, with examples including PESTEL or Porter’s Five Forces, identify internal competencies, opportunities and threats, and consider how the organisation might respond to dynamic market forces in regions such as the European Union, Asia or North America. Sources of competitive advantage should also be identified from the internal analysis. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa… LO2 – Ethical, Sustainable and Responsible Practices requires students to assess how ENGINEERS & PLANNERS COMPANY LTD could integrate CSR, sustainability or ethical practice into its wider business strategy. The brief recommends applying one framework such as the Triple Bottom Line or Sustainable Supply Chain Management. The discussion should connect the sustainability analysis back to the strategic issues identified under LO1. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa… Students are also expected to consider how leadership shapes the organisation’s sustainability response, including engagement with stakeholders such as suppliers, customers and NGOs and the influence of regulatory frameworks such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals and relevant European Union legislation. One specific sustainability initiative should be briefly considered, such as product lifecycle management, eco-design, renewable-energy integration or supply-chain transparency. Formative Assessment - Organisa… The recommended report structure consists of an introduction, LO1 Strategic Environmental Analysis, LO2 Ethical, Sustainable and Responsible Practices, and a conclusion summarising recommended strategic and sustainability improvements. Suggested allocations are approximately 50 words for the introduction, 450 words for LO1, 450 words for LO2 and 50 words for the conclusion. Formative Assessment - Organisa… The total submission limit is 1,000 words, with the main body subject to the word-count restriction. The work must use third-person academic writing, professional formatting, appropriate tables and figures, and consistent Harvard citations. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Higher-quality work is expected to go beyond descriptive use of strategic models by critically evaluating the organisation’s internal and external environment, identifying key drivers of change, considering global and local influences on strategic choices, and linking sustainability and responsible-business practices to stakeholder expectations and regulatory pressures. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa…
Read Model Answer →
4,200 words
Global Supply Chain Strategy for the Gatwick Airport Northern Runway Expansion
This individual Global Supply Chain Management assessment requires students to prepare a professional strategic report on the supply chain implications of the Gatwick Airport Northern Runway expansion. The task focuses on applying contemporary supply chain theories, models and analytical techniques to a complex infrastructure development context, with particular attention to strategic relationships, operational efficiency, risk and resilience. Assignment Brief 2 - MBA013 Glo… The report begins by establishing the background to the organisation and examining its current global supply chain context. Students are expected to consider issues including strategic supplier and customer relationships, risk management, resilience, outsourcing, supplier planning and selection, integration, supply chain networks, leadership, benchmarking, decision-making, lean principles and agile supply chains. These areas provide the basis for evaluating how supply chain performance can be improved in a major airport expansion project. Assignment Brief 2 - MBA013 Glo… A key analytical component requires a PESTEL analysis to critically assess how external political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal factors may affect the organisation’s global supply chain. The purpose is not only to identify external pressures but to evaluate how those factors may influence sourcing, supplier management, cost, risk exposure, resilience and long-term strategic decision-making. Assignment Brief 2 - MBA013 Glo… The final part of the report develops strategic recommendations aimed at optimising supply chain performance. Recommendations should focus on reducing costs, supporting sustainability, improving operational efficiency and strengthening resilience. Students are expected to justify these proposals through explicit application of relevant theories and models such as lean supply chain, agile supply chain and global sourcing strategies, supported by appropriate academic and practical evidence. Assignment Brief 2 - MBA013 Glo… The marking criteria place substantial emphasis on theoretical application, critical analysis and the connection between theory and practice. The rubric allocates 25% to theory and frameworks, 30% to analysis and evaluation, 20% to conclusions and recommendations, and 25% to structure, presentation and referencing. Assignment Brief 2 - MBA013 Glo… Assignment Brief 2 - MBA013 Glo… Overall, the assessment develops competence in strategic supply chain analysis, infrastructure logistics, risk and resilience, supplier management, lean and agile operations, sustainability and evidence-based recommendation development. Overview word count: approximately 350 words. Important: the brief explicitly states that the report must be original and that students should not use AI to produce the work. Assignment Brief 2 - MBA013 Glo…
Read Model Answer →
Supply Chain Operations and Logistics Management
3,000 words
Critical Review of Global Logistics: Supply Chain Strategy, Resilience and Sustainability
This postgraduate logistics assessment requires students to conduct a critical review of the global logistics operations and strategies of a selected multinational manufacturing organisation. The chosen company must operate internationally and have sufficient publicly available information to support detailed academic and industry research. The report examines how global manufacturers structure, manage and improve their upstream and downstream logistics channels in increasingly complex and uncertain supply-chain environments. Component_2_NBS_7054A_25_Report… The first part analyses the organisation’s upstream and downstream logistics channels and evaluates the logistics strategies it has adopted. Particular attention is given to how the organisation responded to disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Students examine how supply-chain networks were reconfigured and how logistics strategies were adapted to maintain operations, while explicitly relating these responses to relevant performance objectives and supply-chain dimensions. Component_2_NBS_7054A_25_Report… The second part focuses on value creation within global logistics networks. Students evaluate how supply-chain intermediaries contribute to value co-creation while balancing operational costs and reducing waste or Muda. The analysis also considers how communication and information sharing support the objectives of the organisation’s marketing channel network and identifies lessons learned from pandemic-related disruption. Component_2_NBS_7054A_25_Report… The final section examines how the organisation can strengthen the sustainability of its logistics operations. Students assess the feasibility of aligning circular economy principles and Industry 4.0 technologies with existing inbound and outbound logistics activities. Relevant issues include reduced material use, reuse, repair, refurbishment, alternative transport modes, carbon-footprint reduction and environmental efficiency. Students must also recommend operational decisions that apply innovation-led lean approaches to sustainability initiatives. Component_2_NBS_7054A_25_Report… The marking criteria place 25% of the assessment on logistics theories and strategies, 35% on value co-creation, communication and resilient logistics networks, and 40% on circular economy, Industry 4.0 and sustainability recommendations. Marking_Criteria_NBS_7054A_25_R… Overall, the assessment integrates global logistics strategy, resilience, lean operations, digitalisation, sustainability and evidence-based supply-chain decision-making within a real organisational case study. Overview word count: approximately 340 words.
Read Model Answer →
Environmental Sustainable Engineering
3,000 words
Environmental Sustainable Construction & Logistic Sources – EG7037
This coursework assesses Environmental Sustainable Engineering and Logistic Sources through a large-scale construction project scenario. The student is appointed as the project manager for a £320 million design-and-build project involving the development of a new shopping centre in central London. The project is planned over a 48-month period and is presented as a flagship initiative focused on environmentally friendly and sustainable construction practices, with government support for its sustainability commitments. The project manager is responsible for protecting the client's interests while ensuring that project standards, schedules, budgets, procurement requirements and quality expectations are achieved. The assignment is structured around environmental sustainability, construction logistics, procurement, renewable energy, health and safety, and sustainable design. Part A requires investigation of the environmental, economic, historical and cultural factors that could contribute to significant project costs and delays. It also requires discussion of four renewable or sustainable energy sources that could be used within the project, together with justification for each selected energy source. These activities require consideration of the project's location, sustainability objectives and practical construction requirements. Part B focuses on supply chain management and health and safety. Students must outline the supply chain management and procurement process for the material resources required for the construction project. This includes consideration of how appropriate materials and suppliers can be sourced and managed. The section also requires identification of key health and safety considerations during the production phase and discussion of the associated risks. Part C focuses on sustainable design systems. Students must discuss the need for implementing passive or active systems during the design stage and identify appropriate tools or techniques that can support their application. The potential environmental impacts of these systems must also be considered. The assignment therefore requires students to connect sustainable design decisions with environmental performance and the wider objectives of the construction project. The completed coursework should be approximately 3,000 words, excluding appendices and labelled diagrams or sketches. Students are expected to provide a well-researched and clearly structured written account using appropriate textbooks and other relevant sources. Images, photographs and diagrams should include captions and be cross-referenced within the text. The submission should include a conclusion and a properly cited bibliography or reference list. References must follow the Cite Them Right requirements. The coursework is submitted electronically through the designated Turnitin link.
Read Model Answer →
2,000 words
Covid 19 and the Automotive Industry
This individual report examines the impact of COVID-19 on the automotive industry and the management of automotive supply chains during the disruption. The assignment requires students to select a company operating in the automotive sector and focus the report on a particular product manufactured by that company. The analysis must consider how the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the supply chain and how the resulting social impacts and government-imposed restrictions affected automotive supply chain activities. The report requires consideration of both upstream and downstream activities within the selected automotive supply chain. Students are expected to analyse the effects of COVID-19 on the chosen country, organisation or product and examine how entities within the supply chain responded to the disruptive events and government restrictions. The analysis should consider the actions taken by supply chain participants and evaluate the successes and failures associated with their approaches to managing the disruption. A central requirement of the assignment is to examine supply chain management and adaptation during the pandemic. Students should explain how the selected automotive company and relevant supply chain entities responded to disruption and restrictions, considering the challenges affecting the movement and management of supply chain activities. The report should then provide independent analysis of the effectiveness of the approaches used rather than simply describing the events or responses. The assignment also requires students to develop recommendations for sustainably managing an automotive supply chain in the event of similar disruptions in the future. These recommendations should follow from the analysis of the selected company, product and supply chain and should address how supply chain management could be improved to respond more effectively to disruptive events. The suggested report structure consists of an introduction, background, supply chain impacts, supply chain management, analysis, recommendations and conclusions, followed by references. The background section should discuss the COVID-19 disruption and describe the relevant automotive supply chain, while the supply chain impacts section should examine the effects on the selected country, organisation or product. The supply chain management section should discuss how the supply chain adapted to the disruption, followed by an independent analysis of the successes and failures of those management responses. The report must be supported by ample and suitable academic and other appropriate references. The brief specifically requires Harvard referencing and states that students should cite core books, journal articles and non-journal articles. Blogs and Wikipedia should be avoided. The completed report has a maximum length of 2,000 words and the stated submission deadline is 5:00 pm on 10 December 2025.
Read Model Answer →
Organisational Strategy and Sustainability
2,500 words
Strategic Evaluation and Analysis of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL)
This 2,500-word coursework for the MSc Management module Organisational Strategy and Sustainability requires a strategic evaluation and analysis of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL). The assignment is written from the perspective of a management consultant at BPP Consulting Group and is addressed to HUL’s Board of Directors. It focuses on HUL’s strategic management, sustainability initiatives and responsible leadership within a global business context. The report begins by examining HUL’s internal capabilities and external business environment. Students are required to apply one strategic model to analyse the internal environment and one model to assess the external environment, such as VRIO, PESTEL or Porter’s Five Forces. The analysis should identify internal competencies, external opportunities and threats, sources of competitive advantage, and the influence of global and local market dynamics on HUL’s strategic choices. Particular consideration may be given to key regions such as the European Union, Asia and North America. The second section evaluates HUL’s ethical, sustainable and responsible business practices. The brief requires the use of one framework, such as the Triple Bottom Line or Sustainable Supply Chain Management, to assess one selected area of CSR, sustainability or ethical practice. The discussion should consider stakeholder engagement, regulatory influences such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and European Union legislation, and one HUL sustainability initiative such as product lifecycle management, eco-design, renewable energy integration or supply chain transparency. The third section critically evaluates HUL’s strategic responses to current and future challenges, including climate change, artificial intelligence and digital disruption. One strategic framework, such as the Ansoff Matrix, Blue Ocean Strategy or VRIO, should be applied to evaluate strategic options and their implications for long-term sustainability, competitiveness and market relevance. The final section provides a personal leadership and sustainability reflection. Students select one leadership model, such as Goleman’s Emotional Intelligence, Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions or Transformational Leadership, and reflect on their learning from the previous sections. The reflection covers personal development, ethical, cross-cultural or sustainable leadership, career aspirations, and values-driven leadership. The report concludes by summarising recommended changes to HUL’s organisational strategy and sustainability initiatives. The assessment requires Harvard referencing and a professional academic structure. The main body has a 2,500-word limit, with suggested allocations of approximately 50 words for the introduction, 600 words each for LO1, LO2, LO3 and LO4, and 50 words for the conclusion. The cover page, contents, references and appendices are excluded from the word count.
Read Model Answer →
Consultancy Project
1,464 words
Enhancing Sustainable Supply Chain Practices through Digital Transformation: A Case Study of Unilever Plc
This consultancy project proposal examines how digital transformation can enhance sustainable supply chain practices at Unilever Plc. Unilever is presented as a multinational fast-moving consumer goods organisation operating across more than 190 markets, with a complex global supply chain and sustainability commitments linked to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The proposal focuses on the challenges associated with achieving supply chain transparency, managing fragmented sustainability data, and balancing sustainable sourcing and operational costs. The project investigates how emerging digital technologies, particularly blockchain, the Internet of Things (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI), could support greater transparency, traceability, operational efficiency and sustainability within Unilever's supply chain. The organisational analysis identifies issues including the complexity of tracing raw materials across multi-tier supply chains, fragmented procurement and sustainability information systems, and the tension between sustainability investments and short-term operational costs. The proposal also considers infrastructure readiness, data security and employee upskilling as factors affecting digital transformation. The research aims to examine how digital transformation technologies could improve sustainable supply chain planning at Unilever while supporting long-term business and environmental goals. Three objectives are established: examining sustainability challenges affecting Unilever's global supply chain, assessing how blockchain, IoT and AI could improve transparency, traceability and efficiency, and proposing strategic recommendations for integrating digital innovation into Unilever's sustainability framework. The central research question examines how digital transformation can contribute to an ethical, transparent and sustainable supply chain while maintaining operational efficiency. A qualitative exploratory case-study research design is proposed. The main emphasis is on secondary data, including Unilever's annual reports, sustainability information, digital transformation publications, company news, industry articles and analyst reports. Where feasible, primary data may be collected through semi-structured expert interviews and a short qualitative questionnaire. The proposed analysis includes thematic analysis, document review and descriptive statistics using relevant secondary numerical data. Validity is supported through triangulation, while reliability is addressed through consistent coding and an audit trail. The proposal also addresses ethical considerations, including research integrity, transparency, confidentiality, informed consent, anonymity, GDPR requirements, plagiarism avoidance, Harvard referencing and potential corporate bias or greenwashing. Overall, the project explores the potential contribution of digital innovation to Unilever's sustainability objectives and the wider responsible digitalisation of the FMCG supply chain.
Read Model Answer →
Supply Chain Management / Strategic Sourcing
1,800 words
Strategic Sourcing and Supply Chain Resilience Under Global Uncertainty
This postgraduate supply-chain assessment examines how organisations operating in the UK are adapting their strategic sourcing and supply-chain practices in response to sustained global uncertainty. The assignment is situated within an environment shaped by major disruptions including the Covid-19 pandemic, geopolitical conflicts, trade tensions, tariff volatility and Brexit, all of which have challenged the reliability, cost efficiency and resilience of globally distributed supply networks. Students select either a British organisation or a multinational enterprise with significant UK operations and critically analyse its documented supply-chain strategy. Potential areas of investigation include insourcing and outsourcing, offshoring, reshoring and nearshoring, single versus multiple sourcing, supplier selection and monitoring, supplier and customer relationships, inventory management, digitalisation, sustainable sourcing and supply-chain risk management. The assessment requires more than description. Students must provide a critical and theoretically informed evaluation of the organisation's decisions, identifying both opportunities and risks associated with its strategic response. At least one relevant theoretical framework or analytical tool must be applied to assess the company's sourcing or supply-chain decisions. The analysis must also include at least one company practice or decision from 2025 and conclude with a detailed recommendation explaining actionable steps, implementation challenges, expected outcomes and alignment with organisational objectives. Research must draw on a minimum of 10 credible sources, including at least five academic journal articles and five non-academic sources such as news articles, industry reports or corporate publications. At least two of the non-academic sources must have been published during 2025–2026. Students may present the work as either a business report or academic essay, with consistent in-text citation and referencing. Norwich Business School normally requires the Harvard referencing system. Overview word count: approximately 340 words. Note: the document header states PG Coursework 2025–26, but one later line gives a submission deadline of 15 May 2025, which appears inconsistent with the stated academic year. I would therefore use 2025/26 for the library record and avoid publishing the deadline unless it is verified.
Read Model Answer →
Operations and Supply Chain Management
1,987 words
Supply Chain Analytics and Quantitative Data Analysis for Organisational Decision-Making
This postgraduate individual report focuses on the application of quantitative data analysis to Operations, Logistics and Supply Chain Management decision-making. Students are required to select an organisation from the private, public or third sector and investigate a relevant operational or supply-chain issue using quantitative data. The purpose is to demonstrate how data can be collected, prepared, analysed and interpreted to generate evidence-based insights that may support managerial decision-making. The selected dataset must relate to the organisation's operations or supply chain and may include variables such as revenues, product orders, sales, transportation costs, procurement expenditure, inventory levels or other appropriate quantitative measures. The dataset must contain at least 60 observations, and the analysis must involve at least two variables. Data may be obtained directly from organisations or from recognised secondary-data platforms and databases. The assessment consists of two equally weighted components. Part A – Motivation and Justification for the Analysis requires students to formulate relevant analytical questions and explain their practical importance by linking them to Operations and Supply Chain Management theory and business practice. Appropriate academic, industry and practitioner evidence should be used to justify the selected issue. Research questions may also be translated into testable hypotheses where appropriate. Part B – Execution of the Analysis requires students to answer the identified questions through appropriate statistical techniques. Potential methods include tables, charts, summary statistics, t-tests and regression analysis. Data may first need to be cleaned, transformed and structured before analysis. The results must then be interpreted clearly for a managerial audience such as the organisation's board, owner or CEO. The statistical analysis is expected to be conducted using Stata, with all data-cleaning, manipulation and analytical commands recorded in a reproducible do-file. The report must also demonstrate explicit links between theory and practice and contain a suitable mixture of academic and professional evidence, including at least five academic journal articles. Harvard referencing is required throughout. The resulting work demonstrates practical competence in business analytics, statistical interpretation, supply-chain decision support, reproducible analysis and evidence-based managerial communication. Overview word count: approximately 370 words.
Read Model Answer →
Business Management / Business Consultancy / Supply Chain Management
5,000 words
Digital Transformation for Sustainable Supply Chain Transparency at Unilever: Blockchain, IoT and AI
This MSc Business Consultancy Project requires students to undertake an evidence-based consultancy investigation addressing a strategically significant business problem within a selected organisation. The assessment is designed to replicate professional consultancy practice by requiring students to define a focused organisational challenge, critically analyse secondary evidence, apply relevant management frameworks, evaluate stakeholder implications and develop practical recommendations that create value for the client organisation. The final submission is a 5,000-word consultancy report, including a 500-word employability reflection. The reference project examines Unilever Plc and focuses on the challenge of improving transparency and traceability across its complex global supply chain. Particular attention is given to the potential application of Blockchain, Internet of Things (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) to support real-time traceability, predictive analytics, ethical sourcing, operational efficiency and sustainability performance. The project considers how digital transformation could support Unilever's sustainability objectives while responding to growing regulatory, environmental and stakeholder pressures. The consultancy report requires a structured analysis consisting of an executive summary, introduction, company/client overview, clearly defined business problem and consultancy focus, and detailed stakeholder analysis. Students then undertake an extensive data analysis and framework application section using two or three relevant theoretical models alongside credible secondary evidence, industry reports, company data, tables, charts or Excel outputs. Findings should be interpreted critically and linked back to appropriate strategic or management frameworks while incorporating ethical and sustainability considerations. The project concludes with three prioritised, actionable and evidence-based recommendations, including consideration of implementation risks, barriers and anticipated benefits. Students must also critically reflect on the employability skills developed through the consultancy project, including research, analysis, problem-solving, project management, communication, professional behaviour, ethical awareness and future career development. All academic and professional evidence must be cited using the Harvard Referencing System, with emphasis on credible and current sources.
Read Model Answer →
Global Supply Chain Management / Operations Management
2,494 words
Global Supply Chain and Operations Performance: Company Case Analysis
This Level 7 individual assignment requires students to produce a 2,500-word company case analysis examining an important operations performance issue within a real organisation. Students may select an organisation of any size, type, industry or country and must concentrate their analysis on one operations performance objective: cost, dependability, flexibility, speed or quality. The report requires students to identify the current challenges faced by the chosen organisation in relation to the selected performance objective and critically examine those challenges using relevant operations and supply chain management theories, concepts and analytical tools. Rather than providing only a descriptive account of organisational activities, students are expected to apply appropriate theoretical frameworks to the case and evaluate how these concepts could contribute to improved organisational and supply chain performance. A significant component of the assignment involves critically discussing appropriate best practices for performance improvement. These may include digital technologies, sustainability practices or other relevant operational and supply chain approaches. Students should connect these practices directly to findings from their chosen company case and assess their practical relevance, opportunities and limitations. Academic literature and appropriate real-world evidence should be used throughout to substantiate the analysis and recommendations. The assignment evaluates students' ability to analyse supply chain and operations problems, apply academic theory to organisational practice, and develop evidence-based conclusions and practical recommendations. The marking rubric places substantial emphasis on analysis and discussion (30%), application of theory (30%), and conclusions and recommendations (30%), with the remaining 10% allocated to presentation, logical structure, English expression and correct referencing. The report must use Harvard referencing, include a contents page, and follow the specified academic formatting requirements, including Arial size 12, 1.5 line spacing and A4 pages with 2.54 cm margins.
Read Model Answer →
Operations and Supply Chain Management
1,800 words
Strategic Sourcing and Supply Chain Resilience Under Global Uncertainty — A Firm-Level Critical Evaluation
This type of postgraduate coursework asks students to take a single real firm — a British company, or a multinational with substantial UK operations — and critically evaluate how its sourcing and supply chain strategy has adapted to a decade of sustained disruption: the pandemic, geopolitical conflict, tariff volatility, and departure from the European single market. The analytical scope is broad but the depth expectation is narrow. Students choose one or two themes rather than surveying all of them: insourcing versus outsourcing and location decisions; single versus multi-sourcing across supplier segments or regions; how supplier selection and monitoring criteria have shifted toward reliability and geographic proximity; alignment between sourcing decisions and wider corporate objectives; supplier and customer relationship management under cross-border friction; inventory tactics such as stockpiling and safety stock repositioning; digital adoption for visibility and compliance; sustainable sourcing under cost pressure; or risk management around currency, customs and compliance. The evidence base is deliberately mixed. Alongside academic literature, students are expected to draw on annual reports, shareholder briefings, company statements, practitioner journals and recent news coverage — with a minimum spread of credible sources across both categories, and some of the non-academic material drawn from the most recent year so the analysis reflects current firm behaviour rather than historical commentary. At least one theoretical framework from the module or the wider literature must be applied to the firm's decisions, and at least one recent documented practice must be examined with specific sourcing. Two requirements distinguish strong submissions. The first is criticality: the brief explicitly separates evaluation from description, and marks weight critical analysis most heavily. Reporting what a firm did is not the task; assessing whether it was the right response, and what opportunities and risks it created, is. The second is the recommendation — at least one specific, actionable proposal with steps, anticipated obstacles, expected outcomes, and a clear line back to the firm's own stated goals. A generic suggestion to "diversify suppliers" fails this test; a costed, sequenced proposal grounded in the firm's actual constraints does not. Word-count conventions are stricter than students often expect: in-text references, tables, illustrations and front matter typically count, while appendices and the reference list do not. Our support on assessments of this type is guidance-based. Typical areas of help include: narrowing a firm and theme so the analysis fits the word limit, explaining the difference between description and critical evaluation with worked examples, clarifying how a theoretical framework should structure an argument rather than sit decoratively in a paragraph, checking source mix and Harvard referencing consistency, and reviewing a completed draft against the published assessment weightings.
Read Model Answer →