Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Identifying Psychological States of Human Subjects via Machine Learning Algorithms
This research project investigates the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques to the identification of human psychological states. The study collects multimodal information from participants during structured conversational interactions and combines these data with established psychological and demographic measures. The research explores whether machine learning algorithms can identify patterns associated with psychological states using behavioural, physiological and conversational information. Participants take part in structured conversations involving both artificial intelligence and another human participant. The conversational activities include emotional reflection, cognitive challenges and open-ended discussion. During the emotional reflection activity, participants discuss experiences such as happiness, stress and coping strategies. The cognitive component includes memory tasks, riddles, planning questions and problem-solving or moral-dilemma questions. The final component involves an open conversation around topics such as travel, artificial intelligence, books or films. The ChatGPT interaction is designed to provide a consistent conversational structure while allowing participants to respond naturally. The study collects several forms of multimodal data. These include voice recordings, video recordings showing participants' facial expressions, spoken conversation transcripts and EEG data. Additional demographic and lifestyle information may also be collected. The research materials describe factors such as age, marital status, weight, height, disability, smoking, drinking, academic performance, family income, family size and physical exercise. Established questionnaires are also used to obtain information about participants' experiences and psychological states. Machine learning techniques are subsequently applied to the collected datasets to identify patterns that may be associated with psychological states. The research materials describe potential applications of AI in psychological assessment, predictive analytics, emotion recognition, monitoring and prevention, personalised treatment and AI-assisted mental health support. The broader objective is to investigate whether computational approaches can contribute to earlier identification of psychological difficulties and support more accessible and personalised approaches to mental health assessment. The project also places emphasis on participant welfare, informed consent, confidentiality and secure handling of research data. Participants are informed that they can withdraw their data up to completion of the study and are provided with support information if participation raises concerns or emotional discomfort. The consent documentation confirms that participants are informed about voice, video and photographic recording, data handling and access arrangements. The supplied materials also contain separate instructions for a conversational AI study in which participants interact with ChatGPT for at least ten minutes. The interaction is recorded and the resulting conversation transcript is retained for research purposes. The project therefore provides a multimodal research setting for examining human psychological states through conversational, behavioural and machine-learning approaches.
Read Model Answer →
Strategic Innovation and Entrepreneurship
3,500 words
Strategic Innovation and Entrepreneurship – Entrepreneurial Report
This assessment for the Strategic Innovation and Entrepreneurship module requires students to develop and present an original business idea through an entrepreneurial report and an individual pre-recorded presentation. The assessment is designed to develop students’ ability to evaluate sustainable entrepreneurial principles, design a sustainable and ethically informed business proposition, communicate effectively to a diverse audience, and apply relevant management resources to support their entrepreneurial learning. The main assessment consists of a 3,500-word Entrepreneurial Report based on a business idea formulated by the student. The report should critically examine the purpose and motivation behind the proposed venture, the market opportunity and target customers, the value proposition, business model, financing strategy, route to market, sustainability and ethical considerations, launch plan, and the student’s learning and reflection. Students are expected to apply appropriate theories, models and frameworks rather than simply describe them. The report contains eight main sections. These cover personal purpose and entrepreneurial motivation; market opportunity, target market and value proposition; business models and strategic approach; financing strategy; route to market; sustainability and ethical considerations; launch planning; and reflection on learning. The assessment specifically requires consideration of customer needs through segmentation and the Value Proposition Canvas, while sustainability should be connected to two relevant Sustainable Development Goals and an appropriate impact measurement method. In addition to the written report, students must prepare an individual pre-recorded presentation of no more than 10 minutes and 10 slides. The presentation is intended for an investor, lender or grant provider and should communicate the business proposition using the Value Proposition Canvas as the guiding framework. It covers the customer’s jobs, pains and gains, the proposed products and services, pain relievers, gain creators, reflection and references. Harvard referencing is required throughout the submission. The report must have a professional structure and consistent formatting, with appropriate citations, labelled tables and figures, page numbers and a reference list. The presentation slides and speaker notes must be included in the report appendix. The assessment is worth 100% of the module and requires a minimum mark of 50% to pass.
Read Model Answer →
Global Engineering: Theory and Practice
3,000 words
Global Engineering: Theory and Practice – Aspen Pharmacare Global Expansion and Environmental Sustainability
This assessment for the Global Engineering: Theory and Practice module requires students to prepare a critical report examining the international growth strategies and future sustainability of a global pharmaceutical company. The assessment is based on the published case study “The growth strategies of a global pharmaceutical company: a case study of Aspen Pharmacare Holdings Limited” by Victoria Margaret Hodgon and Muhammad Ehsanul Hoque. The scenario requires students to act from a management perspective, where a pharmaceutical company is considering international expansion while maintaining environmental sustainability as one of its core business values. The report has a maximum length of 3,000 words, excluding the reference list, and must critically address the success and growth strategy of Aspen Pharmacare as presented in the selected research paper. Students are expected to demonstrate understanding of international business and global engineering concepts while evaluating the strategic choices made by the company. The report should not simply reproduce the findings of the source paper; instead, it should critically evaluate the evidence, identify strengths and weaknesses, consider challenges and risks, and use additional published literature to inform management decisions. The first section is a 250-word summary explaining the approach used in the report to describe Aspen Pharmacare’s success and presenting the key findings. The introduction, limited to 500 words, should provide the background context of the global pharmaceutical industry and explain the main growth strategies available to a global pharmaceutical company. This section establishes the context for understanding Aspen’s international development. The main evaluation section accounts for 1,500 words and requires a critical assessment of Aspen Pharmacare’s roadmap to global success, including its growth strategies and strategic planning. Students should examine the different approaches used by the company and consider the benefits, limitations, challenges, risks and strategic trade-offs associated with its growth. The analysis should demonstrate critical strategic evaluation rather than simply describing the company's historical development. The future prospects section, limited to 500 words, focuses particularly on sustainability. Students must identify the key area affecting Aspen’s future sustainability in light of the challenges associated with its growth and consider what additional actions could be taken in environmental sustainability. Students are also required to locate and use published literature beyond the main Aspen Pharmacare paper to inform management about future trends and developments. The report concludes with a 250-word conclusion containing recommendations for management based on the findings of the analysis. The recommendations should be specific, relevant to the company's circumstances and supported by the evidence discussed in the report. Alternative strategic options should also be considered where appropriate. Harvard referencing is mandatory. The report should be professionally presented with appropriate headings, a logical structure, clear and coherent language, correct grammar and punctuation, and effective integration of academic evidence. The assessment is worth 100% of the module and is evaluated on the quality of the summary, introduction, strategic evaluation, future sustainability analysis, conclusions and recommendations, referencing and overall professionalism.
Read Model Answer →
Strategic Management in Healthcare
4,000 words
Strategic Management in Healthcare – Strategic Analysis and Strategy Formulation
This individual summative assessment for the Strategic Management in Healthcare module requires students to critically examine strategic management and strategic thinking within a healthcare organisation, hospital, clinical department or healthcare unit of their choice. The assessment is designed to develop students’ ability to apply strategic management concepts and analytical frameworks to a real healthcare setting, evaluate the internal and external factors affecting organisational performance, and formulate appropriate strategies in response to identified operational and competitive challenges. The assessment consists of a 4,000-word report with a 10% tolerance and accounts for 100% of the module assessment. Students must first select an organisation, clinical department or healthcare unit to use as the case setting. The report should begin with a concise introduction to the selected case setting, establishing its organisational context and providing a clear direction for the strategic analysis. The introduction should explain the relevant characteristics of the organisation or healthcare unit and provide sufficient background to understand the strategic issues examined in the report. The report must critically analyse the relevance of strategic management and strategic thinking to the selected healthcare setting. Rather than simply describing strategic management concepts, students are expected to explain why strategic planning and strategic thinking are important for the particular organisation or department and how they can support performance improvement, service development and responses to operational and competitive challenges. A central requirement is the application of three strategic analysis tools or frameworks. The assessment examples include SWOT, PESTLE, Balanced Scorecard, Value Chain, Porter’s Five Forces, Resource Based View and Blue Ocean Strategy. Students must apply at least one appropriate tool at each of three analytical levels: macro-environment analysis, service area or market analysis, and internal environment analysis. Before applying each tool, students should define the framework and critically justify why it is relevant, effective and suitable for the selected healthcare case setting. The analysis should be detailed and evidence-based rather than purely descriptive. Students are then required to develop a hierarchy of strategies based on the findings from the strategic analysis. Strategies should be formulated at three levels and should clearly respond to the issues identified through the external, market or service-area and internal analyses. The report should explain how the proposed strategies could help the healthcare organisation or unit improve performance and address its operational and competitive challenges. The relationship between the analysis, strategic recommendations and expected outcomes should be made explicit. The final component requires students to reflect on the relevance and usefulness of the strategic tools beyond the selected case study and in relation to their current or future professional role. The reflection should consider how the strategic frameworks and analytical approaches could be transferred to other organisational or professional situations. The assessment should use appropriate evidence from sources such as academic journal articles, books, websites, case studies and grey literature. Harvard referencing is required. The marking criteria place emphasis on the quality of the introduction and case context, critical discussion of strategic planning, quantitative and analytical application of three strategic tools, strategy formulation and evaluation, reflection on application relevance, and presentation and referencing. The assessment therefore requires an integrated connection between the healthcare case, strategic analysis, evidence, recommendations and reflection rather than isolated descriptions of strategic frameworks.
Read Model Answer →
Research Methods
Assignment 3 – Large Language Models: LLM Coding and Report
This individual assessment for the Research Methods module focuses on the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) to a practical data science problem. The assignment is worth 25% of the module and is designed to develop students’ knowledge and understanding of research methods, investigative planning, data analysis, model evaluation and effective technical communication. Students are required to complete both a coding component and a concise written report demonstrating how an LLM has been selected, trained or fine-tuned, applied to a suitable task and evaluated against an appropriate baseline. The assessment begins with familiarisation with relevant literature. Students are expected to investigate the history and development of their chosen problem and examine the methods that have previously been used to address it. The brief provides key papers on common types of LLMs as a starting point for the literature review. Students then select a task that can be addressed through fine-tuning an LLM, with examples including sentiment analysis, fake news detection and topic classification. A publicly available dataset suitable for the selected text-classification problem must also be identified. Suggested sources include Kaggle and Hugging Face Datasets. The data must be appropriately preprocessed, including tokenisation using BERT's tokenizer and division into training and testing sets. Students then fine-tune a pre-trained BERT or BERT-style model using suitable tools such as the Hugging Face Transformers library and PyTorch. Possible model choices include BERT, RoBERTa and T5. The selected model should be appropriate for the specific problem, recognising that different language models may perform differently across tasks. Students are expected to implement a suitable training process using an appropriate optimiser and loss function. Model performance must be evaluated using relevant classification metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score. The performance of the selected LLM should also be compared with a baseline model, such as Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes or a pre-trained BERT model. The analysis should explain the results and consider their relevance to the chosen problem. Two main submission components are required. The first is a code notebook, such as a Jupyter or Google Colab notebook, containing annotations explaining the purpose and operation of the relevant code so that another person can understand and reproduce the work. The second is a report of no more than three pages, including appropriate figures, tables and references. The report should cover the motivation and dataset, methodology, model training and evaluation, results and discussion, limitations, conclusion and possible future improvements. The assessment rubric places particular emphasis on coding quality and implementation, model architecture, analysis and interpretation, and report presentation. Strong work should demonstrate well-structured and reusable code, clear explanation of the model architecture and configuration, appropriate evaluation metrics and visualisations, meaningful comparison with relevant literature or baseline models, and critical evaluation of the model's success and possible improvements.
Read Model Answer →
Fundamentals of Digital Technologies
Fundamentals of Digital Technologies – Group Project and Individual Refinement
This assessment is a project-based assignment for the DG4FDTL Fundamentals of Digital Technologies module. It is designed to develop students' practical understanding of digital technologies by combining mathematical concepts, programming, algorithms, data analysis and learning methods within a real-world project. The project is structured around a common group component, known as the Group Trunk, and an individual component in which each student develops a specialised refinement of the shared project. The project topics are designed around key areas covered by the module, including linear algebra, calculus, probability, learning algorithms, algorithms and Python programming. Students work in groups to establish a common project foundation and then develop an individual refinement that extends the functionality or analytical capabilities of the shared system. The project guidance is intended for a mixed cohort that may include Data Science, Computer Science and Business Analytics students. The assessment is divided into two main components: Proposal and Implementation. The Proposal accounts for 40% of the assessment, while Implementation accounts for 60%. Both the group trunk and individual trunk contribute to the assessment. The group proposal requires students to describe what the group intends to build, explain the problem being addressed, outline the proposed approach and identify the main functions and responsibilities within the project. Students should demonstrate a clear understanding of the project objectives and provide an appropriate plan for developing the shared system. The implementation stage requires students to develop the common group functionality and then complete their individual refinement. The shared component provides the basic project framework, while the individual refinement allows each student to investigate a specific aspect of the problem and add specialised functionality. Depending on the selected project topic, individual refinements may involve data analysis, visualisation, optimisation, prediction, monitoring, reporting or other computational features. The project topics include practical applications such as productivity and task-management systems, supermarket sales analysis and other data-driven applications. Students are expected to use Python and appropriate libraries or computational techniques to implement their solutions. The project materials provide examples involving data structures, CSV files, functions, numerical calculations, visualisation and analytical dashboards. The assessment emphasises both technical implementation and the student's ability to explain the problem, approach and functionality of the developed system. Students should demonstrate appropriate use of programming concepts, mathematical foundations, algorithms and data-analysis techniques. The individual refinement should clearly extend the common project and demonstrate the student's own contribution to the overall solution. Overall, the assessment develops practical digital-technology skills through collaborative project development followed by individual technical refinement. It provides experience in project planning, programming, computational problem solving, data analysis, visualisation and the application of mathematical and algorithmic concepts to practical problems.
Read Model Answer →
information Governance and Cyber Security
2,500 words
Information Governance Policy for Healthcare Assistant (HCA)
This assessment is the group component of the Information Governance and Cyber Security module and requires a 2,500-word report for the fictional Healthcare Assistant (HCA) organisation. HCA is presented as a large private hospital group operating across the UK, with specialist healthcare services, intensive care facilities and a wide network of GPs, departments, partner hospitals, medical centres and third parties. The organisation processes highly sensitive information including patient personal information, admission details, health records, staff information and other organisational data. These data are shared across different sites and partners and are also used for analytical purposes, treatment planning and marketing activities. The assessment requires students to develop an Information Governance Policy for HCA and provide an accompanying report that justifies the policy contents, selected framework, risk assessment methodology and implementation strategy. The objective is to establish a robust information governance structure capable of protecting HCA's information assets while supporting legal, regulatory and contractual compliance. The first component of the report focuses on the introduction, purpose and scope of the Information Security Policy. Students should establish the organisational context, explain why information governance is important to HCA and define the people, processes, technologies and information assets covered by the policy. Particular attention should be given to the confidentiality, integrity and availability of sensitive healthcare and organisational information. The second component focuses on the identification and allocation of roles and responsibilities. The report should establish appropriate accountability for information governance and information security and consider responsibilities relating to legal, regulatory and contractual obligations. Relevant roles may include senior management, information security leadership, data protection personnel, information asset owners, information asset administrators, employees, contractors and third parties. The third component requires the development of an Information Governance Policy Framework and recommendations for a minimum of eight controls to establish an effective Information Security Management System. The assessment brief identifies ISO/IEC 27001:2022 as an appropriate framework within the developed policy and requires the framework and controls to be justified in relation to HCA's organisational context and security requirements. The fourth component focuses on implementation and monitoring. Students should develop an implementation plan explaining how the information governance policy and security controls can be introduced and maintained. Appropriate monitoring mechanisms should be considered to identify security threats, mitigate vulnerabilities, maintain accountability and support continuous improvement. Overall, the assessment requires a practical and critically justified approach to information governance within a healthcare environment. The report should demonstrate how an effective information governance policy can protect sensitive patient information, support regulatory compliance, establish accountability and strengthen HCA's ability to manage evolving cyber security threats.
Read Model Answer →
Operations and Supply Chain Management
2,000 words
Operations and Supply Chain Management – Individual Reflective Report
This assessment is an individual 2,000-word reflective report for the Operations and Supply Chain Management module at De Montfort University. The report requires students to reflect critically on their experience of completing Assessment One and to demonstrate how their learning developed throughout the project. The assessment focuses on reflective practice, application of relevant theories, critical analysis of team and project experiences, and the development of an action plan for future professional practice. The report begins with an introduction explaining why reflection on practice is important and connecting reflective practice to relevant learning theories where appropriate. Students are required to identify the particular areas they will focus on within the report and explain why these areas are important and interesting to explore. This section establishes the purpose and scope of the reflection and provides a foundation for the critical discussion that follows. The main body should use appropriate sub-headings to organise the discussion into different areas. Students should explain how the team collectively established specific approaches relating to the topics selected in Assessment One. The report should then examine how the approach changed as the project progressed and connect these changes to relevant theories. Both successful and unsuccessful aspects of the project should be critically considered, rather than simply describing what happened. Detailed examples from the situation analysis and problem-solving components of Assessment One should be used to support the arguments and demonstrate meaningful reflection. The report should demonstrate critical understanding of operations and supply chain management issues, including the ability to critically appraise and adapt to tangible, intangible and information-related aspects of the global supply chain. It should also reflect on capacity planning and process design decisions relating to the production of goods and services. The emphasis is on connecting practical project experience with relevant academic concepts and theories. The conclusion should identify the key learning points gained from the project process and the consultancy presentation. Students should reflect on how these experiences have contributed to their knowledge, skills and professional development. The final part of the report should present a clear action plan explaining how the learning gained from the project will be taken forward into the student's future career. The assessment is worth 30% of the module and has a required length of 2,000 words, with an accepted range of 1,800–2,200 words. Assessment criteria include introduction and rationale, application of theory and concepts, critical analysis and evaluation, conclusion and action plan, and academic skills including Harvard referencing, source quality and quantity, structure and presentation.
Read Model Answer →
Global Business Strategy
2,500 words
Global Business Strategy: Strategic Analysis and Growth of a Global Company
This Global Business Strategy assessment is an individual e-portfolio that requires students to conduct a comprehensive strategic analysis of a selected global company facing a significant business challenge. The assessment focuses on the identification and analysis of a real organisational problem, evaluation of the global business environment, development of sustainable strategic options, the role of strategic leadership, and recommendations for future growth and competitiveness. Students are required to select a global company from any industry and investigate challenges such as loss of market position, difficulties in gaining or regaining market share, operational challenges, or declining revenues and profits. Relevant strategic theories, models and academic evidence should be used throughout the analysis. The first stage focuses on selecting the organisation, identifying its strategic purpose, vision, mission and objectives, and analysing the significant problem affecting the company. Students are expected to investigate both internal and external aspects of the global business environment and identify factors that may have contributed to the organisation's challenges. Appropriate theories and strategic models should be applied to provide a critical analysis of the business context. The second stage examines sustainable business strategies, diversification and competitive advantage. Students are required to conduct a resource audit and use an appropriate strategic model to assess how the organisation can sustain competitive advantage. The assessment also requires students to propose an appropriate mode and strategy for entering an international market in which the selected company does not currently operate, supported by relevant theories and models. The third stage addresses strategic change, leadership and governance. Students must demonstrate an understanding of effective leadership styles and their relevance to strategic change, good governance and ethical business practices. The role of ethics in international business should be examined using relevant practical examples and evidence. The fourth stage focuses on good strategy execution, evaluation, recommendations and conclusion. Students are expected to justify how the selected organisation can execute strategy effectively using available resources and process management tools that support continuous improvement. At least two strategic options should be considered, with attention given to their feasibility, potential impact, alignment with organisational goals and available resources, as well as the role of leadership and leadership styles. The assessment concludes with a summary report of approximately 1,000–1,500 words, synthesising the key learning and insights gained from the individual tasks. The overall report should be approximately 2,500 words, excluding references and appendices, and should follow the ULBS Harvard referencing style. Evidence and artefacts may include business-journal articles, professional or government reports, relevant videos, analytical tables, competitive-position graphs and financial or balanced-scorecard information. The completed e-portfolio is compiled in PebblePad and submitted as a PDF through Turnitin.
Read Model Answer →
Principles of Management
5,000 words
Critical Analysis of Management Practices at Apple Inc.
This assessment is a 5,000-word individual management report examining the management theories, concepts, practices and functions of Apple Inc. The report is written from the perspective of a business consultant and is intended to provide senior management with a critical evaluation of Apple's current management practices and recommendations for changes that could improve organisational success. The assessment integrates academic management theories with the practical context of a contemporary global organisation and also requires students to reflect on their own management competencies and future career development. The first part of the report critically evaluates the management theories, concepts and practices currently used by Apple Inc. Students must explain how management contributes to Apple's success and creates organisational value, supported by appropriate academic literature, case study evidence and independent research. The assessment specifically requires consideration of the four philosophies of the Competing Values Framework and one additional relevant management theory. Students are expected to select an appropriate theory rather than attempting to apply every available management theory. The second part evaluates management as a value-adding universal activity within Apple's global business environment. Students must examine how Apple has adapted its strategies and management approaches at global, national and local levels. Frameworks such as LoNG-PEST or Porter's Five Forces may be used to analyse the external environment. The analysis should identify one global factor that creates an opportunity and one that presents a threat to Apple and explain where management can add further value. The third part critically analyses the key principles and functions of management, including planning, organising, leading and controlling. Students must identify one internal challenge faced by Apple in response to current or expected environmental changes and evaluate how management functions can be applied to address it. An appropriate academic model, such as Value Chain Analysis, VRIO or Mendelow's Matrix, should be used to justify the selected challenge and support the analysis. The fourth part focuses on critical reflection and personal skills development. Students must complete a Personal SWOT analysis, identify three career-related development objectives and prepare a Skills Development Plan covering the required competencies, resources and support, methods of achievement, measures of success and target review dates. A 500-word Reflective Statement must then critically reflect on the student's own management competencies and learning during the module. The reflection should be written in the first person and use an appropriate model such as Borton's, Kolb's, Maslow's or the GROW model, with particular attention to self-management, problem-solving and decision-making. The report should conclude by summarising the recommended changes that Apple should implement to improve its success. The main body is structured around an introduction, four assessment tasks and a conclusion, with the indicative allocation being 100 words for the introduction, 1,200 words for each task and 100 words for the conclusion. Tasks 1–3 should be written in the third person using an academic style, while Task 4 should use the first person. The submission must use Harvard referencing, appropriate academic sources, professional formatting and correctly labelled tables and figures.
Read Model Answer →
Academic and Employability Skills and Research Methods and Masters Dissertation
1,800 words
Personal Development Plan: Academic, Employability and Career Development
This assessment requires students to develop a Personal Development Plan (PDP) related to their chosen field of work and future career pathway. The assignment is designed to support the development of academic, employability, professional and research-related skills while encouraging students to critically reflect on their current capabilities and identify areas for further development. The assessment consists of three interconnected components presented together as one document. The first component is a 750-word academic report that critically evaluates employment and entrepreneurial opportunities within the student's chosen field of work. Students are expected to use a range of relevant academic and professional sources to investigate the knowledge and skills required for their chosen career area, available employment opportunities, entrepreneurial opportunities and the challenges associated with the field. The chosen field must be clearly related to the student's study pathway specialism. The report should be presented in an appropriate academic structure, including an introduction and conclusion. The second component is a 750-word self-analysis and action plan. Students are required to critically reflect on their own strengths and weaknesses in relation to their chosen field of work or career path. The reflection should be supported by relevant academic and professional literature and should demonstrate awareness of personal qualities, employability requirements and areas requiring further development. Students must identify three specific action points for personal development that will enhance their readiness for their career goals. The third component is a portfolio of completed tasks, included as appendices to the assessment. These tasks provide evidence of the student's development and include activities relating to the chosen field of work, report planning, self-analysis and a SMART action plan. Evidence of completed tasks and Turnitin submission receipts is also required. The assessment encourages students to develop awareness of their personal strengths and weaknesses, engage in continuing self-development and build the skills required for employment and career progression. It also relates to research, employability and entrepreneurship competencies, including knowledge of hard and soft skills, systematic planning, critical analysis, professional development, ethical awareness, self-direction and independence. The complete assessment has a 1,500-word limit with a permitted variation of plus or minus 10%. Part 1 and Part 2 each contribute 40%, while the portfolio tasks contribute 10% and professional presentation contributes 10%. The assignment should be submitted as one professionally presented document and follow APA style guidelines.
Read Model Answer →
Global Supply Chain Management
1,800 words
Suez Canal Blockage: A Case Study of Global Supply Chain Disruption
This individual report examines the challenges faced by global supply chains as a result of the Suez Canal blockage and critically evaluates the factors that affected supply chain performance during the disruption. The assignment uses the Suez Canal blockage as a case study to explore the wider principles and practices of global supply chain management, with particular attention to supply chain disruption, risk management, resilience, logistics, supplier relationships and integrated supply chain performance. The report requires students to conduct preliminary research into the Suez Canal blockage and use relevant academic and practical sources to identify the major challenges created by the disruption. The case study focuses on the six-day stranding of the Ever Given and the resulting disruption to international supply chains and global trade. The assessment considers how a disruption at a strategically important global trade route can create wider consequences for organisations, logistics networks and supply chain operations. The analysis should identify the key factors that influenced supply chain performance and critically evaluate the effectiveness of the solutions implemented to resolve the disruption. Relevant global supply chain management theories, models and concepts should be clearly defined and applied to the case rather than simply described. The report should demonstrate an understanding of fundamental supply chain principles and consider how evolving trends and global issues can affect supply chain operations. The assignment also encourages consideration of important supply chain management areas covered within the unit, including risk management, resilience, outsourcing, supplier planning and selection, relationship management, supply chain integration, demand management, order management and customer service. These concepts should be connected to the Suez Canal blockage to provide a critical assessment of the challenges and possible approaches to improving supply chain resilience. The report must be presented in a formal and logically coherent report format and should provide evidence of critical reasoning through a wide range of relevant academic and practical sources. The conclusion should draw together the main findings, while recommendations should propose realistic approaches for addressing the supply chain issues identified in the case. The assessment is worth 30% of the overall unit mark and requires an individual report of 1,800 words, with a permitted variation of ±10%. The report is assessed across four main areas: use of theory and frameworks (25%), analysis and evaluation (30%), conclusions and recommendations (20%), and structure, presentation and referencing (25%). The marking criteria emphasise the application of relevant theoretical concepts, critical evaluation of academic and practical sources, a clear connection between theory and practice, realistic recommendations, logical structure, and appropriate in-text citations and referencing.
Read Model Answer →
Security of Connected Systems
4,500 words
CW: Security Evaluation
This assignment is an individual technical report focused on the security evaluation and strategic development of a rapidly expanding Internet of Things (IoT) systems developer based in Coventry. The client specialises in innovative IoT devices and systems for residential and commercial applications, particularly smart energy monitoring, and is planning to scale its operations and expand into new markets. The report is designed to provide practical and strategic guidance on how the organisation can achieve this growth while maintaining strong cybersecurity. The assignment requires students to act as an external IoT Security and Scaling Strategist and critically evaluate the organisation’s current and future security needs. The report covers four principal areas: organisational change strategy, secure design and development strategy, security audit strategy, and security recommendations. The organisational change section considers internal and external factors influencing growth, the development and implementation of an organisational strategy, monitoring against objectives, and approaches to leading and managing strategic change using relevant change management theories and models. The secure design and development section requires an overview and evaluation of possible secure design processes for IoT systems, including their strengths and weaknesses, followed by a recommendation for an appropriate process. The security audit section examines methods such as PTES and OWASP and develops a guide for conducting a security audit, including the testing methodology, rationale for each stage, and evaluation of different approaches. The security recommendations section requires a case study of an IoT security vulnerability, examination of where the security flaw was introduced, assessment of weaknesses in the secure design or audit process, consideration of the resulting security impact, and recommendations for improvement. The report should be written for a technical audience, particularly the client’s software development team, and should use appropriate structure, technical language, diagrams where useful, and APA referencing. The organisational strategy and strategic change proposal should be included in appendices and referenced within the main report. The assessment is worth 30 credits and has a maximum word count of 4,500 words, with the main sections weighted across organisational change, secure design, security auditing, security recommendations, and report structure.
Read Model Answer →
Global Supply Chain Management
4,200 words
Global Supply Chain Management – Gatwick Airport Northern Runway Expansion
This individual report examines several strategic and operational aspects of the global supply chain associated with the Gatwick Airport Northern Runway expansion. The assessment requires students to investigate the organisation and its current global supply chain challenges, while applying relevant supply chain management theories, frameworks and models to analyse its operations and develop strategic recommendations. The report begins by providing a background of the organisation, with particular attention to its current global supply chain issues and strategic supply chain relationships. Key areas of investigation include risk management, supply chain resilience, outsourcing, supplier planning and selection, supply chain integration, network design, leadership, benchmarking, decision-making, and the application of lean and agile approaches. These areas provide the basis for understanding how the organisation can manage its supply chain effectively within a complex and changing global environment. A critical evaluation of external factors affecting the organisation's global supply chain is also required through the use of a PESTEL analysis. This enables consideration of the political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal factors that may influence supply chain performance, risks, costs and strategic decisions. The report must then develop key strategic recommendations aimed at optimising the organisation's global supply chain. The recommendations should focus on reducing costs, supporting sustainability, improving operational efficiency and enhancing supply chain resilience. Each recommendation should be supported by appropriate supply chain management theories and models, such as agile supply chain approaches, lean supply chain principles and global sourcing strategies. Students are expected to provide a clear rationale for their recommendations using theoretical insights and relevant academic and professional literature. The assessment places emphasis on critical reasoning, wider reading and the ability to connect supply chain theory with practical organisational issues. A logically structured, professional and business-like report is required, supported by appropriate evidence and Harvard referencing. The marking criteria assess the use of theory and frameworks, critical analysis and evaluation, conclusions and recommendations, and the overall structure, presentation and referencing of the report. The assignment is worth 70% of the unit assessment and has a required length of approximately 4,200 words, with a permitted variation of ±10%. The report should demonstrate an understanding of global supply chain management practices and the ability to apply relevant theories and frameworks to analyse supply chain challenges and develop realistic strategic recommendations.
Read Model Answer →
500 words
Strategic Digital Marketing Campaign Planning Using the RACE Framework: Cambridge Museum of Technology
This Digital Leadership and Disruptive Innovation assessment requires students to act as digital marketing consultants for the Cambridge Museum of Technology and develop a strategic social media campaign focused on the Reach and Act stages of the RACE framework. The campaign is designed to increase awareness of the museum and encourage meaningful interaction using paid and owned content across Facebook and Instagram. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) The first deliverable is a two-page landscape campaign poster created in Canva. Page 1 focuses on Reach and should present a clear awareness objective, one Facebook paid advertisement mock-up, and one Instagram owned post. Page 2 focuses on Act and should include an engagement objective, one Instagram paid advertisement and one Facebook owned post. Each mock-up must be clearly labelled by platform, RACE phase and media type. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) The poster is expected to function as a strategic visual board, rather than a website or social feed simulation. It should demonstrate clear visual hierarchy, logical layout, consistent headings, spacing and alignment, and communicate how the Reach and Act strategies connect. The target audience persona should not appear on the poster itself. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) The second deliverable is a maximum 500-word written rationale. This should define a relevant target audience persona using demographic, psychographic and behavioural characteristics, and explain needs, motivations and online behaviour. The persona should be visually designed and embedded in the written document. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) The rationale must also justify the Reach content strategy, including platform choice, content format, targeting and budget considerations, and explain the Act engagement strategy, including tactics such as event promotion, interactive posts and comment prompts. Students should also explain how layout, visual structure and calls-to-action support user experience and engagement. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) The assessment requires application of relevant digital marketing theories and frameworks and at least five credible academic or industry sources, using Cite Them Right Harvard referencing. Suitable evidence can include peer-reviewed journal articles and recognised sources such as Mintel, Statista and industry reports. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) The marking scheme gives 30% to Reach, 30% to Act, 20% to the written rationale, and 20% to poster design, communication and professional presentation. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) Overall, the assessment integrates RACE-based campaign planning, paid and owned social media, audience segmentation, persona development, targeting, budget awareness, content strategy, UX principles and professional visual communication within a real cultural-organisation context. Important: the brief explicitly states that the applicable AI category is Category 2 – Proofreading only permitted, meaning AI may be used for proofreading but not for creating assessment content. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1)
Read Model Answer →
Cybersecurity / Information Security Auditing
3,000 words
Physical Security Audit of University Computing Facilities Using ISO/IEC 27002:2022
This postgraduate information-security coursework requires students to act as an IT Security Auditor working for CyberSAFE Auditors and conduct a professional physical-security audit of computing resources used by students at the University of Greenwich. The audit focuses on public student-study and open computing areas within the Dreadnought and Stephen Lawrence Buildings, with findings evaluated against relevant physical-security controls from ISO/IEC 27002:2022 Section 7. 202526 SL-COMP1431 CWK 2026-am … The project begins with planning and project-control activities. Students must define their audit tasks, plan the work independently and document progress through two Work-in-Progress reports, one produced near the beginning of the project and another approximately halfway through. Each WIP report is limited to 250 words and records completed activities, encountered or anticipated problems, planned next steps and potential risk areas. 202526 SL-COMP1431 CWK 2026-am … The second phase involves practical fieldwork. Students must visit the specified university buildings and decide on suitable audit methods, timetable and evidence-gathering procedures. The audit is restricted to public student areas and must not include staff rooms, seminar rooms or utility areas. Students must also comply with client-imposed constraints, including not communicating with university staff and approaching the audit from the perspective of an ordinary student rather than conducting highly technical operating-system or server-level investigation. 202526 SL-COMP1431 CWK 2026-am … 202526 SL-COMP1431 CWK 2026-am … The final professional audit report evaluates secure areas and equipment security, including physical security perimeters, entry controls, protection of rooms and facilities, working in secure areas, equipment siting, supporting utilities and cabling security. Findings should distinguish between expected controls and observed controls, identify gaps and provide justified recommendations for immediate and future management action. 202526 SL-COMP1431 CWK 2026-am … 202526 SL-COMP1431 CWK 2026-am … Assessment places particular emphasis on practical audit methodology, secure-area analysis, equipment security, audit conclusions, gap analysis, professional reporting and the two WIP reports. 202526 SL-COMP1431 CWK 2026-am … Overview word count: approximately 355 words. AI-use note: the brief states that this coursework does not lend itself to reliance on AI-based applications such as ChatGPT and emphasises original analysis, fieldwork and proper attribution of sources. 202526 SL-COMP1431 CWK 2026-am …
Read Model Answer →
Enterprise Business Start-up: Sustainable Business Plan, Fundraising Strategy and Entrepreneurial Reflection
Entrepreneurship, Business Start-up, Business Plan, Business Idea, Innovation, Sustainable Business, Market Gap, Market Research, Competitor Analysis, Customer Segmentation, Customer Profiles, Product Development, Marketing Strategy, Marketing Communications, Business Model, Costing, Pricing Strategy, Sales Forecasting, Revenue Model, Financial Planning, Founding Team, Core Competencies, Fundraising Strategy, Venture Capital, Angel Investment, Entrepreneurial Tendency, GET Test, Entrepreneurial Self-Assessment, Start-up Finance, Business Pitch
Read Model Answer →
Entrepreneurial Marketing
Entrepreneurial Marketing Business Idea Pitch: Market Opportunity, Value Proposition and Venture Viability
This Entrepreneurial Marketing assessment requires students to identify, research and present an entrepreneurial business idea that either addresses an identified customer need or exploits a recognised market opportunity. The idea may involve a new product or service and can be developed either as a personal start-up opportunity or as a new business proposition for an existing organisation. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… Students are expected to construct a concise business case around four core elements: the proposed business idea, the identified need or opportunity and resulting value proposition, an overview of the relevant market, and an appropriate entrepreneurial marketing strategy. The pitch should demonstrate how the proposed offering creates value and why the opportunity is commercially credible. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… The assessment provides three presentation routes. Students may deliver the pitch live to a panel, submit a five-minute narrated PowerPoint with a recorded response to the question of why the idea is strong, or submit the narrated presentation while also participating in the live Business Ideas Showcase. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… Students are expected to prepare approximately 6–10 PowerPoint slides, use in-text citations when external evidence is presented, and include a reference slide. The pitch should be concise, professional and supported by appropriate market research and business evidence. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… The marking criteria assess presentation and professionalism, verbal delivery, innovation and value proposition, market research and analysis, entrepreneurial marketing strategy, and overall business-case viability. Each of the main analytical components carries substantial weighting, with market research, marketing strategy, innovation and viability each contributing significantly to the final result. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… Overall, the assessment integrates opportunity recognition, value proposition development, market analysis, entrepreneurial marketing, venture viability and professional pitching skills within a practical start-up or business-development context. The brief specifies Cite Them Right Harvard referencing. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… 2) CW2 – Reflective Essay Field Content to enter Title Reflective Analysis of Entrepreneurial Capabilities, Product Development and Network-Based Opportunity Creation University University of Hertfordshire Subject Entrepreneurial Marketing / Entrepreneurship / Reflective Practice Module name Entrepreneurial Marketing Academic level Masters / Postgraduate Academic year 2025–2026 Assignment type MS Reflective writing Reference style Harvard Word count 1,000 words ±10% Amount (₹) Enter your internal project amount Key topics Entrepreneurial Marketing, Entrepreneurial Capabilities, Entrepreneurship, Reflective Practice, Product Development, Service Design, Opportunity Recognition, New Product Development, Teamwork, Networking, Business Start-up, Entrepreneurial Potential, Intrapreneurship, Personal Development, Business Application, Reflexive Practice, Entrepreneurial Confidence, Capability Development, Recommendations, Professional Reflection The assessment is an individual 1,000-word reflective essay worth 30% of the module. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… Assignment overview — ready to paste This Entrepreneurial Marketing reflective assessment requires students to critically evaluate their own entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial capabilities using learning from the module together with relevant life and work experience. The essay should use appropriate academic theories and frameworks to identify key strengths and development areas and make clear recommendations for improving future entrepreneurial potential. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… A major element of the reflection concerns the principles involved in designing a new product or service to meet an identified need. Students are expected to consider how entrepreneurial ideas are developed, how opportunities are recognised and how entrepreneurial capabilities influence the process of converting an idea into a viable proposition. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… The assessment also requires critical reflection on the importance of teams and networks in developing business-start-up opportunities and designing new services. The module learning outcomes emphasise the role of collaborative performance, networking and reflexive practice in strengthening entrepreneurial confidence and capability. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… Students should move beyond simple personal description and critically analyse their capabilities with reference to academic evidence. At least five academic references are required, and the work should use Cite Them Right referencing. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… The marking scheme allocates equal weighting to five areas: presentation, structure and reflective style; content and findings; intellectual curiosity and business application; critical analysis; and recommendations, with each area worth 20%. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… Overall, the assessment integrates self-reflection, entrepreneurial capability analysis, product and service design, team and network performance, academic theory and personal development planning. Its purpose is to demonstrate how reflective learning can support stronger entrepreneurial judgement, confidence and future business practice. The brief requires Cite Them Right Harvard referencing. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua…
Read Model Answer →
International Human Resource Management / International Business
800 words
Comparative Analysis of Cultural Factors Shaping Human Resource Staffing Strategies in International Enterprises
This individual international human resource management assessment examines how cultural and institutional differences influence recruitment and staffing decisions in international enterprises. Students take the role of an HR representative for VetDopomoga, a Ukraine-based international veterinary clinic chain planning to expand into either the United Kingdom or India. The final output is a concise academic poster of up to two pages and approximately 800 words ±10%, supported by appropriate visual material. Assignment 1_The Comparative An… The first component requires comparison of the United Kingdom and India with Ukraine. Students examine relevant cultural characteristics, including communication style, hierarchy and power distance, individualism versus collectivism and approaches to time, alongside institutional factors such as labour-market conditions and employment or regulatory environments. This comparison provides the contextual basis for evaluating how recruitment practices may need to change across markets. Assignment 1_The Comparative An… Students must then apply an appropriate international HR staffing strategy, choosing from ethnocentric, polycentric, regiocentric or geocentric approaches. Based on their analysis, they must recommend which market VetDopomoga should enter first and which should follow, providing clear evidence-based justification. Assignment 1_The Comparative An… A central theoretical component requires application of one cultural framework, selected from the Cultural Intelligence framework, Erin Meyer’s Culture Map, the GLOBE Project or Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory. Students focus on two dimensions from their selected framework and use them to evaluate the benefits and challenges associated with recruitment practices in Ukraine, the United Kingdom and India. Assignment 1_The Comparative An… The poster must also examine a recent cultural, economic or political event affecting the three national contexts and explain its implications for international recruitment and staffing. Examples suggested in the brief include changing social attitudes following COVID-19, economic shifts affecting demand for specialist labour and post-Brexit employment or migration policies. Assignment 1_The Comparative An… Students additionally research best-practice recruitment examples from international veterinary enterprises operating in the UK and India and identify practices VetDopomoga could adopt or adapt in each market. The final recommendation must identify the preferred first expansion destination and provide three evidence-based reasons supporting the decision. Assignment 1_The Comparative An… Assessment criteria place strong emphasis on content and findings, theoretical application, critical analysis, source quality and Harvard referencing, as well as poster presentation and structure. High-quality work is expected to go beyond description by applying cultural theory directly to HRM practices and critically evaluating the implications of cultural and institutional differences for international recruitment decisions. Assignment 1_The Comparative An… Assignment 1_The Comparative An…
Read Model Answer →
4,200 words
Global Supply Chain Strategy for the Gatwick Airport Northern Runway Expansion
This individual Global Supply Chain Management assessment requires students to prepare a professional strategic report on the supply chain implications of the Gatwick Airport Northern Runway expansion. The task focuses on applying contemporary supply chain theories, models and analytical techniques to a complex infrastructure development context, with particular attention to strategic relationships, operational efficiency, risk and resilience. Assignment Brief 2 - MBA013 Glo… The report begins by establishing the background to the organisation and examining its current global supply chain context. Students are expected to consider issues including strategic supplier and customer relationships, risk management, resilience, outsourcing, supplier planning and selection, integration, supply chain networks, leadership, benchmarking, decision-making, lean principles and agile supply chains. These areas provide the basis for evaluating how supply chain performance can be improved in a major airport expansion project. Assignment Brief 2 - MBA013 Glo… A key analytical component requires a PESTEL analysis to critically assess how external political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal factors may affect the organisation’s global supply chain. The purpose is not only to identify external pressures but to evaluate how those factors may influence sourcing, supplier management, cost, risk exposure, resilience and long-term strategic decision-making. Assignment Brief 2 - MBA013 Glo… The final part of the report develops strategic recommendations aimed at optimising supply chain performance. Recommendations should focus on reducing costs, supporting sustainability, improving operational efficiency and strengthening resilience. Students are expected to justify these proposals through explicit application of relevant theories and models such as lean supply chain, agile supply chain and global sourcing strategies, supported by appropriate academic and practical evidence. Assignment Brief 2 - MBA013 Glo… The marking criteria place substantial emphasis on theoretical application, critical analysis and the connection between theory and practice. The rubric allocates 25% to theory and frameworks, 30% to analysis and evaluation, 20% to conclusions and recommendations, and 25% to structure, presentation and referencing. Assignment Brief 2 - MBA013 Glo… Assignment Brief 2 - MBA013 Glo… Overall, the assessment develops competence in strategic supply chain analysis, infrastructure logistics, risk and resilience, supplier management, lean and agile operations, sustainability and evidence-based recommendation development. Overview word count: approximately 350 words. Important: the brief explicitly states that the report must be original and that students should not use AI to produce the work. Assignment Brief 2 - MBA013 Glo…
Read Model Answer →
Project Management / Professional Development / Business Strategy
5,000 words
Professional Project Portfolio and Strategic Business Presentation
This Level 7 assessment requires students to compile a comprehensive Portfolio of Evidence demonstrating their project contribution, reflective learning, professional skills and career development. The portfolio has a maximum length of 5,000 words and is designed to evidence both technical or disciplinary project engagement and the student’s development as a reflective professional. The assessment is organised into three main components: a Discipline Report, Project Work Logbook, and Career Development Plan. Assessment Overview The Discipline Report, worth 40% of the portfolio, provides an overview of the project and its conclusions, alongside a self-reflection on the student’s project experience. Students also complete a personal skills analysis and provide a confidential summary of their team’s delivery. This section therefore combines project understanding with critical self-evaluation, skills awareness and evaluation of collaborative performance. Assessment Overview The Project Work Logbook, worth 30%, records the student’s activities on a weekly basis. Students summarise the work completed each week and document problems or challenges encountered during the project together with the approaches used to resolve them. The marking criteria emphasise consistency, level of detail, organisation and the ability to identify and address project-related difficulties. Assessment Overview Assessment Overview The Career Development Plan, also worth 30%, requires students to define a realistic future career pathway, identify relevant jobs and organisations, and evaluate the skills and knowledge needed to progress toward those goals. Students must also complete an additional professional-development course, such as CPD or LinkedIn Learning, to demonstrate practical upskilling and continued professional development. Assessment Overview A related team presentation forms a second assessment activity. Teams of four to five students must present face to face for approximately 10–15 minutes to a small management-board audience. All team members are expected to contribute approximately equal content and speaking time, with provision for questions and answers. The presentation focuses on the team’s overall findings, analysis of the business problem, practical recommendations, proposed implementation approach and final conclusion. assessment Overview 1 Strong presentations are expected to be engaging, professionally structured and supported by relevant evidence, graphics, tables and other appropriate visual material. Higher-level work should move beyond description by applying theory critically to a real-world business problem, recognising the limitations and contextual applicability of theoretical concepts and producing recommendations that are appropriate to the organisation being analysed. assessment Overview 1 Overall, the assessment develops and evaluates project reflection, professional communication, teamwork, career planning, critical analysis, employability, problem solving and evidence-based business recommendation skills. It combines an individual reflective portfolio with a collaborative management-style presentation, allowing students to demonstrate both personal development and the ability to communicate project findings professionally.
Read Model Answer →
Operations Management / Business Simulation / Process Improvement
3,500 words
Operations and Simulation Analysis: Sam’s Sandwich Shop
This operations-management portfolio uses the Sam’s Sandwich Shop case study to examine service-process performance, simulation modelling, resource planning and operational improvement within a busy takeaway food environment. The case concerns a small sandwich outlet located in the departure lounge of Heathrow Airport Terminal 5, where rising terminal capacity is expected to increase customer demand over a five-month period. Students investigate how the store’s current sandwich assembly and service process performs under this growing demand and identify opportunities for operational improvement. MGT4924 Assignment instructions… The assessment consists of three related tasks. Task 1 – Arena Simulation Model requires students to develop a valid and functioning discrete-event simulation of the current system using Arena Simulation software. The model must accurately represent customer arrivals, ordering and payment, movement between the service counter and sandwich assembly area, preparation of meat, cheese and vegetarian sandwiches, resource constraints, queues and the possibility of sandwiches being rejected and remade. A commentary of up to 500 words must be included within the model to explain its main components and operation. MGT4924 Assignment instructions… MGT4924 Assignment instructions… The case provides defined operational resources, including three servers, two cash registers, one meat counter, one cheese counter and one vegetarian counter. The same server completes the full customer-service cycle, and customers join a single FIFO queue when both a server and cash register are not immediately available. The simulation must run for one week, equivalent to 168 hours, using multiple replications. MGT4924 Assignment instructions… Task 2 – Simulation Report requires a professional 1,000-word report analysing the system’s performance across the five-month period using results generated from the simulation study. Students must conduct experiments to determine suitable resource levels for each month and provide justified recommendations concerning the number of resources required for optimal operational performance. Tables and figures must be created independently in Excel rather than copied directly from Arena outputs. MGT4924 Assignment instructions… Task 3 – Operations Report requires a 2,000-word critical report examining two operations-management concepts in the context of Sam’s Sandwich Shop and the wider takeaway-food sector. Students analyse how the selected concepts are or could be implemented, identify associated operational problems and impacts, evaluate potential solutions, and consider relevant tools, techniques, methods and emerging technologies that could improve performance and competitive advantage. Two detailed and justified recommendations must be provided for each selected concept. MGT4924 Assignment instructions… Overall, the portfolio integrates discrete-event simulation, process analysis, resource optimisation, operational performance measurement and evidence-based operations-management decision making. Strong submissions are expected to move beyond simply reporting simulation outputs by critically analysing performance, evaluating experimental results, presenting high-quality data visualisations and producing logical, well-justified operational recommendations. MGT4924 Assignment instructions…
Read Model Answer →
Software Engineering / Enterprise Systems Development
3,000 words
Enterprise Software Engineering Development: ParkaLot Parking Management System Analysis, Design and Prototype
This Enterprise Software Engineering Development assessment is based on the ParkaLot Group, a fictional operator of multi-storey parking garages across major UK cities. The organisation currently relies on fragmented manual processes, basic barrier-based vehicle counting, local spreadsheets, on-site payment and inconsistent customer access arrangements. Students act as software engineering consultants and are required to analyse these operational weaknesses and design a centralised enterprise parking management system capable of supporting reservations, customer accounts, vehicle identification, billing, real-time occupancy monitoring, dynamic pricing and management reporting. COMP1471 CW 2526 The proposed ParkaLot platform is intended to integrate customers, parking spaces, reservations and billing across the garage network. Planned functionality includes online registration and reservation, recurring and corporate parking arrangements, licence-plate recognition, automated space allocation, sensor-based occupancy tracking, centralised monthly billing, electronic payments, promotional pricing and predictive overbooking. The system must also provide dashboards and historical reporting to assist management with capacity planning, staffing, pricing and operational decision-making. COMP1471 CW 2526 The coursework is completed in two main development phases. Phase 1 – Structured Analysis and Design requires an Entity Relationship Diagram representing the logical data model, a Data Flow Diagram including a Level 0 context diagram, and implementation of a prototype database. Phase 2 – Object-Oriented Development extends the system using object-oriented analysis, design principles and UML, with substantial business and user-interface functionality implemented using suitable OO technologies. COMP1471 CW 2526 The final report contains analysis of the 5 Ps of software engineering: Problem, Process, Project, Product and People. Students discuss the business problem and commercial risks, justify the development methodology followed, define resources and budget, document project artefacts and requirements, and identify the main stakeholders involved in the project. The technical design section includes the ERD, DFD, UML use-case model, at least three sequence diagrams, a detailed class diagram and discussion of design patterns. COMP1471 CW 2526 Students must additionally submit a functioning prototype that reflects the design and participate in acceptance testing and a live demonstration. Individual students are questioned on both theoretical and technical aspects of the submitted system. The assessment also evaluates group contribution, peer and self-assessment, personal reflection, research quality, communication and professional teamwork. COMP1471 CW 2526 The weighting places substantial emphasis on technical design and implementation: the UML design is worth 24 marks, the software prototype 15 marks, design patterns 6 marks, and acceptance testing/demonstration 25 marks. This makes the coursework strongly focused on demonstrating the relationship between requirements analysis, software architecture, UML modelling, implementation quality and working enterprise-system functionality. COMP1471 CW 2526
Read Model Answer →
Data Science / Data Management / Professional Practice
4,500 words
Tesla Data Science Professional Case Study: Data Management, Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Ethics
This composite case-study assessment for The Data Science Professional module requires students to critically analyse Tesla from several interconnected professional perspectives, including data management, artificial intelligence ethics, leadership, organisational development, entrepreneurship and business risk. The coursework is designed to combine technical data-science capability with strategic, ethical and managerial decision-making. a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44… Part A – Database Design and Distributed Frameworks focuses on data management. Students design an Entity-Relationship model and relational schema for a Tesla-related vehicle-hire business, identifying entities, relationships, cardinalities, identifiers, primary keys and foreign keys. The accompanying guidance specifies entities relating to vehicles, employees, outlets, clients, hire agreements, insurance, faults and employment records. a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44… 39cdc24cc46a13ddf444b8e7af838eb… The SQL component uses an Online Music database to examine Tesla customer preferences. Students create relational tables using Oracle standard SQL and write queries involving users, music, publishers, categories and download records. Evidence of implementation and query results must be provided using Oracle Live SQL. 39cdc24cc46a13ddf444b8e7af838eb… Part A also requires a critical assessment of the security, privacy and ethical implications of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving technology, connecting technical development with responsible data and AI practice. a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44… Part B – Leadership and Developing People requires critical evaluation of Tesla’s leadership model, organisational culture and their effects on employees and organisational performance. Students must propose a leadership and people-development strategy capable of supporting the organisation as it expands. a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44… Part C – Entrepreneurial Practice and Managing Risk examines a proposed Tesla spin-out venture developing innovative low-cost green hydrogen production systems. Students critically assess management support for the venture, propose an evidence-based approach to entrepreneurial risk, develop an entrepreneurial leadership role descriptor, and evaluate how GDPR and AI/data ethics may support or constrain entrepreneurial practice. a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44… Overall, the assessment integrates technical database design, SQL, data ethics, organisational leadership, entrepreneurship, sustainability and professional decision-making within a single Tesla-focused case study. Overview word count: approximately 360 words. Important: the assessment brief itself explicitly states that it must not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. So for a public Reference Library, use the metadata and your own finished work where permitted, but do not upload the assessment brief/guidance PDFs themselves publicly. a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44… The AI status is Amber: generative AI may be used for limited inspiring/planning purposes, but usage must be acknowledged with the tool, prompts and relevant evidence; the brief also specifically prohibits using LLMs to generate the Part A(3) essay. a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44… a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44…
Read Model Answer →
Business Consultancy / Digital Marketing / Social Media Marketing
3,000 words
You Keep Me Sane: Social Media Growth and Digital Product Marketing Live Business Project
his Extended Work Project is a live business consultancy assignment completed for You Keep Me Sane, a podcast and social-media brand seeking to expand its online audience and increase sales of its digital products. The organisation promotes its podcast across platforms including Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube and LinkedIn and identified a need for additional support with regular content creation, social-media scheduling and digital-product promotion. Project Brief_You Keep Me Sane … The client challenge focuses on improving the organisation's social-media presence while reducing the workload associated with producing and publishing content. The project brief specifically identifies the need to create reels, carousels and other social-media posts, potentially using Canva, and to support an existing Buffer-based scheduling process. The organisation aims to publish approximately three times per week while also promoting new digital products. The intended commercial outcomes are growth in social-media following and increased digital-product sales. Project Brief_You Keep Me Sane … The academic assessment requires students to document the project journey in chronological order, from the initial client brief and early meetings through planning, research, idea development, feedback, implementation, challenges and final outcomes. The 3,000-word report should explain the business context, methods and frameworks used, significant milestones, problems encountered, adaptations made and recommendations provided to the client. EWP 5TH MAY 2026 (1) EWP 5TH MAY 2026 (1) Professional reflection is also an important element of the project. Students are expected to evaluate team learning, skills development, project-management experience and the practical lessons gained from working on a genuine business challenge. The report should demonstrate critical thinking and reflective analysis rather than simply describing activities completed. EWP 5TH MAY 2026 (1) The accompanying 10-slide presentation mirrors the report and communicates the project overview, organisational background, initial brief, research, development process, challenges, outcomes, recommendations and learning in a concise visual format. EWP 5TH MAY 2026 (1) Overall, the project integrates live business consultancy, social-media strategy, content development, digital-product marketing, client engagement, teamwork, project management and reflective professional learning, with emphasis on demonstrating practical value created for the client organisation.
Read Model Answer →
Global Business Strategy
2,500 words
Global Business Strategy – Strategic Analysis of a Global Company
This assessment is an individual portfolio for the Global Business Strategy module. The assignment requires students to conduct a comprehensive strategic analysis of a named global company that is facing a significant business problem and to develop strategic options that can support the organisation's sustainable growth and future success. The selected company can be from any industry and may be a large or small global organisation. Students must identify a company that has experienced significant challenges during the past five years or is currently facing strategic difficulties. These may include loss of market position, inability to gain or regain market share, operational challenges, or declining revenues and profits. The assessment requires students to investigate the company's strategic purpose, vision, mission and objectives before examining the internal and external global business environment that may have contributed to its challenges. Relevant strategic theories and models should be applied to support the analysis. The portfolio is developed progressively across the semester. The first stage focuses on selecting the global company, identifying its key problem and analysing the internal and external business environment. The second stage examines sustainable business strategies, diversification and competitive advantage through a resource audit, together with an appropriate model for supporting global business growth. Students must also propose an appropriate mode and strategy for entering an international market in which the selected company does not currently operate. The third stage focuses on strategic change, leadership and governance. Students are expected to demonstrate an understanding of effective leadership styles, the role of leadership in strategic change, good governance and the importance of ethics in international business. Practical examples should be used to demonstrate how leadership, governance and ethical considerations can contribute to business growth. The fourth stage addresses good strategy execution and evaluation. Students must justify how the proposed strategy can be effectively implemented using available organisational resources and process management tools that support continuous improvement. The analysis should lead to strategic recommendations and an evaluation of how the proposed strategies could affect the company's future performance and competitiveness in the global market. After completing the individual portfolio tasks, students must prepare a summary report of approximately 1,000–1,500 words. This report should synthesise the key learning and insights gained from each task and demonstrate how the different strategic concepts have been applied to the selected organisation. The final e-portfolio is compiled as a single academic report in PebblePad and submitted as a PDF through Turnitin. The overall report should be approximately 2,500 words ±10%, excluding references and appendices, and sources should be cited using the ULBS Harvard referencing style.
Read Model Answer →
Leadership and Professional Development
2,500 words
Leadership Mindset – Professional Development Portfolio
This assessment is a Leadership Mindset Professional Development Portfolio designed to encourage students to think strategically about their career development, align their professional goals and demonstrate leadership potential. The assessment focuses on self-awareness, strategic planning, professional behavioural skills and the ability to develop an ongoing process of personal and professional growth. Students are required to complete a Portfolio through PebblePad, equivalent to 2,500 words. The portfolio is assessed on a Pass/Fail basis and students must complete all required sections before downloading the completed portfolio and submitting it through Turnitin. The portfolio does not require academic referencing because it is a self-reflection and professional development assessment. The portfolio consists of several key components, including a personal SWOT analysis, evidence of communication requesting feedback, a Personal Development Plan (PDP), a CV and a cover letter. The SWOT analysis requires students to identify their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in order to understand their current skills, identify development gaps and recognise opportunities for improvement. Students must also reflect on the Professional Development Pyramid or another suitable professional development model and select three behavioural skills or competencies they wish to develop. Examples include strategic thinking and leadership. Feedback must be requested from four to six people from the student's personal and professional network, such as family members, friends, peers, mentors, employers or colleagues. This feedback is then used to support the student's development priorities. The action-planning section requires students to reflect on the feedback received and identify three development priorities or goals. For each priority, at least two SMART actions must be established. The action plan should include specific steps, timelines and required resources, while also identifying potential obstacles and explaining how these obstacles may be addressed. The goals and actions should demonstrate a clear connection between the student's self-reflection, feedback and professional development objectives. The final reflection considers the value of the PebblePad portfolio process in shaping personal and professional growth. Students are expected to demonstrate an in-depth understanding of self-development and explain how their development process can be reviewed, revised and adapted for continuing professional growth. The assessment learning outcomes focus on reflection on personal strengths and areas for improvement, advanced critical thinking, problem-solving and decision-making, intercultural communication, inclusivity and sustainability, interview and presentation competencies, and the ability to articulate an adaptable self-development process. The marking criteria emphasise self-reflection, clarity of goals, strategic action planning, persuasive understanding of professional development, and clear and professional presentation.
Read Model Answer →
Integrated Communications
2,000 words
CW2 Communications Engagement Report – Client Stream
This assignment requires students to produce an individual 2,000-word Communications Engagement Report in the form of an engagement communications campaign for Stream. Stream is a collaboration between 16 UK water companies, supported by industry and civil society partners including the Open Data Institute, with the aim of unlocking the potential of water-sector data to benefit customers, society and the environment. The organisation has established data-sharing infrastructure designed to enable data to be used to generate insights, support innovation, improve decision-making and contribute to greater transparency across the water sector. The central focus of the assignment is to develop a communications campaign that attracts and engages the research and academic community. Stream has identified postgraduate and postdoctoral students, together with relevant university faculty leads, as an important priority audience because of their potential to transform published water-sector data into valuable research insights, innovative products and services. Relevant academic departments may include computer science, engineering, mathematics, environmental science, social science, town planning and business development. Students are expected to consider how this audience can be reached, segmented and prioritised according to its interest and willingness to engage with Stream. The proposed campaign should build awareness of Stream, communicate the value of accessing and using water-sector data, and encourage longer-term engagement between Stream, universities and students. Existing communication channels include LinkedIn, the Stream website and communications distributed through delivery partners such as the Open Data Institute and Aiimi, as well as Ofwat. Key campaign opportunities include Open Data Day in March and Open October in mid-October. These events should be considered as important campaign moments while also being integrated into a longer-term communications programme. The report should include an introduction and background to Stream, including brand history, market position, competitive analysis, the need for an engagement communications campaign and relevant market research. It should establish short-, medium- and long-term communication objectives with clear timeframes, define the target audience, and apply an appropriate theoretical framework to develop the communication strategy. Students must provide four recommended communication pieces supported by detailed rationale, together with a Gantt chart showing campaign timings and a clear campaign measurement approach. The report should conclude with a summary of the overall proposal. The assessment requires critical application of communication theories and concepts, research evidence and relevant literature. Students must demonstrate analysis, evaluation and justification rather than simply describing communication activities. A minimum of 15 high-quality references is required, including at least eight journal articles, using Cite Them Right Harvard referencing. The report is assessed on presentation and structure, intellectual curiosity and referencing, content and application, campaign integration, discussion, conclusion, recommendations, campaign timeframes and measurement.
Read Model Answer →
Management
5,000 words
Principles of Management – Tesco Management Report
This assessment requires students to produce a 5,000-word management report analysing the current management practices of Tesco. The report is written from the perspective of a business consultant and is intended for Tesco’s senior management team. Students are required to apply management theories, concepts and practices covered in the module, supported by appropriate academic literature, case study materials and independent research. The assessment also requires students to develop a personal Skills Development Plan and a 500-word Reflective Statement focused on their own management competencies and future career objectives. The report addresses four main tasks. Task 1 focuses on key management theories, concepts and practices and requires students to explain how management contributes to Tesco’s success and adds value. Students should discuss the four philosophies of the Competing Values Framework and identify one additional relevant management theory that supports the analysis of Tesco’s management approach. Task 2 evaluates management as a value-adding universal activity by examining the dynamics of the global business environment and how Tesco adapts its strategies and methods at global, national and local levels. Students may apply frameworks such as LoNG-PEST or Porter’s Five Forces and should identify one global opportunity and one global threat. Task 3 critically analyses the key principles and functions of management, including planning, organising, leading and controlling. Students must identify one internal challenge faced by Tesco and evaluate how management functions can be applied to address it, supported by an appropriate academic model such as Value Chain analysis, VRIO or Mendelow’s Matrix. Task 4 focuses on critical reflection and skills development. Students are required to complete a Personal SWOT, prepare a Skills Development Plan addressing their future career aims and objectives, and provide a 500-word Reflective Statement using an appropriate reflection model such as Borton, Kolb’s Cycle, Maslow’s or GROW. The reflection should focus on professional skills including self-management, problem-solving and decision-making. The report should conclude with recommended changes that Tesco should implement to improve its success. The assignment requires academic writing, critical analysis, evidence-based arguments and Harvard referencing. The main body consists of an introduction, four assessment tasks and a conclusion, while the cover page, contents, references and appendices are excluded from the 5,000-word limit. :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2} :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Read Model Answer →
2,000 words
Creative Marketing Plan for a Product Gap in the Smart Wearable Device Industry
This individual coursework requires students to develop a creative marketing plan for a new product concept within the smart wearable device industry. The assessment is a 2,000-word individual written report and accounts for 100% of the coursework assessment. Students are required to identify an existing product gap in the smart wearable device market, create a unique product concept that addresses the identified gap and develop a creative marketing plan designed to position the proposed product effectively in an increasingly competitive market. The central focus of the assignment is the application of innovative thinking and strategic marketing principles to the smart wearable device industry. Students must identify a meaningful gap or unmet opportunity within the market and use this as the foundation for developing their proposed product. The new concept should respond to consumer needs and demonstrate how innovation can create value within the wearable technology sector. The assignment therefore combines market understanding, product innovation and strategic marketing planning. The brief directs students to begin their preparation by studying Chapter 17 of Jobber and Ellis-Chadwick's *Principles and Practice of Marketing* (Ninth Edition, 2023). It also provides a range of Mintel reports and industry sources covering technology visions, wearable technology trends, digital platforms, healthcare applications, luxury brands, family technology habits and Generation X technology habits. These sources provide background for understanding the development and adoption of wearable technology and emerging opportunities in the market. The recommended supporting material also includes academic research on marketing and organisational performance. The brief specifically identifies Morgan's research on marketing and business performance and Hult's work on boundary-spanning marketing organisations and organisation theories. These sources can support the theoretical and strategic foundations of the proposed marketing plan and help connect marketing activities with broader organisational performance. The completed report should demonstrate the student's ability to recognise a product opportunity, develop an original smart wearable concept and translate that opportunity into a coherent marketing plan. The proposed concept should be clearly connected to the identified product gap and should demonstrate how the product could provide value to its intended consumers within the competitive smart device market. The marketing plan should therefore integrate creative product thinking with appropriate strategic marketing principles. The assignment is submitted through Blackboard, with the deadline stated as 14 January 2026. The assessment is returned within 20 days and feedback is provided in written form. The brief identifies the submission as a Summative Assessment: Individual Written Report and specifies a 2,000-word limit. Overall, the coursework provides an opportunity to apply marketing theory and contemporary industry evidence to a practical new-product scenario. The final report should demonstrate an understanding of the smart wearable technology market while presenting a distinctive product idea and a strategically considered marketing plan capable of addressing an identified market opportunity.
Read Model Answer →
Corporate Strategy
4,000 words
Strategic Case Study – Corporate Strategy
This Corporate Strategy assessment requires students to undertake a critical strategic analysis of a chosen organisation and develop evidence-based recommendations for its long-term growth and competitive position. The assignment is presented as a 4,000-word Strategic Case Study and focuses on analysing practical business situations through the application of corporate strategy theories, analytical tools and strategic frameworks. The assessment aims to develop students' ability to evaluate an organisation's competitive advantage, identify significant strategic challenges and opportunities, and propose practical strategies for sustainable growth. The report begins with an introduction explaining the purpose of the case study and identifying the selected company. The strategic positioning section then examines the organisation's current competitive advantage, differentiation from competitors, fundamental competencies and resources. Relevant theories and strategic frameworks should be applied to support the analysis. The external environment section requires a critical evaluation of industry attractiveness using Porter's Five Forces. Students must also examine the factors driving organisational change, compare the selected organisation with close rivals and provide strategic recommendations for addressing identified challenges. The international strategy section critically analyses the effectiveness of the company's existing international expansion strategy and requires students to propose a new expansion strategy for a geographical location in an international market. An appropriate internationalisation theory and market-entry mode should be applied to support the proposed strategy. The challenges and opportunities section examines major issues affecting the organisation, including areas such as market competition, technological disruption and regulatory change. Students must identify opportunities that could strengthen the company's competitive position and use an appropriate framework to consider the development, leadership and implementation of organisational change. The proposed leadership-driven strategy should also be reflected upon in relation to the company's strategic goals. The final main section provides two to three actionable strategic recommendations that the organisation should implement to sustain or enhance its competitive advantage. Students are also required to include an appendix of no more than 500 words containing concise explanations, models or frameworks demonstrating their understanding of theories and concepts relevant to the assessment. The appendix should support the main analysis and be clearly referenced within the report. The assessment develops several strategic management capabilities. The assessed learning outcomes include critically analysing a company's strategic position using analytical tools and theoretical frameworks; developing corporate-level strategies and considering their implementation and control; integrating innovative and sustainable practices into strategic planning; and using performance measurement instruments to assess strategic initiatives. The brief also aligns with CMI Level 7 Strategic Management and Leadership Practice units covering strategy development and strategic change. The submission is an individual written coursework assignment submitted through Turnitin. The written assignment must be submitted as a Microsoft Word document rather than PDF. Students must acknowledge and reference any AI tools used in developing the assignment and provide appropriate acknowledgement of all sources.
Read Model Answer →
Network Security
1,500 words
The Case Study – Network Security Planning and Upgrade
This individual assessment for the Network Security module requires students to work as network consultants and carry out network and security planning and an upgrade for an imaginary company. The assignment is titled “The Case study” and requires students to produce a written report presenting solutions to the problems identified within the case study. The assessment is worth 15 credits and requires approximately 1,500 words, with a permitted variation of ±10%. The coursework focuses on applying network security concepts and protocols to contemporary Internet and mobile-based solutions and technologies. Students are expected to analyse the requirements of the imaginary organisation, identify relevant network and security issues and propose appropriate planning and upgrade solutions. The report should demonstrate an understanding of network security technologies while considering the organisation's information assets and operational requirements. A significant part of the assessment concerns network performance. Students must provide recommendations and suggestions for addressing network performance issues identified in the case study. Where the proposed solution changes the existing network design, an appropriate network diagram should be included. The brief allows students to use tools such as Packet Tracer or other suitable applications to represent the proposed network design. The assignment also requires students to consider security policy and network protection. The existing security policy should be reviewed and recommendations should be made for improving it. Students are specifically instructed not to create a completely new security policy because the organisation already has one. In addition, the report should discuss how appropriate security measures could be implemented across the network. Detailed device configurations are not required, although relevant examples or configuration snippets are encouraged. Because the information provided in the case study is incomplete, students must identify and document their assumptions and requirements. This includes defining unspecified parameters such as network speeds, device features and existing policy details. The assumptions and requirements section is therefore an important part of the investigation and contributes to the assessment mark. The final report should summarise the key findings of the investigation and may recommend how any remaining IT support budget could be used. References must be included and used effectively to support the discussion. The marking criteria allocate 10% to the introduction, 10% to assumptions and requirements, 20% to improving performance, 20% to policy amendments, 20% to securing the network, 10% to the conclusion/summary and 10% to references. The assessed learning outcomes cover the application of network security concepts and protocols, critical evaluation and design of security policies, understanding of IT governance and its influence on organisational security policy, and critical review of current research and technological advances in network security. The brief also permits AI assistance, but any AI tools used must be referenced and their use summarised at the end of the report before the reference list.
Read Model Answer →
Entrepreneurship / Entrepreneurial Marketing
1,200 words
Reflective Analysis of Entrepreneurial Capabilities and Development: The GymBuddy Venture
This reflective Entrepreneurial Marketing assessment evaluates the development of the student's entrepreneurial capabilities through the GymBuddy business concept, a proposed fitness application designed to improve motivation and accountability among beginner gym users. The reflection examines how entrepreneurial learning, customer research and creativity frameworks changed the student's original approach from developing a highly complex product toward a more focused and testable business proposition. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… A central theme of the report is entrepreneurial self-assessment. Opportunity recognition is identified as an important strength, supported by interviews with beginner gym users and competitor analysis involving platforms such as Strava, MyFitnessPal and Nike Training Club. At the same time, the reflection identifies areas requiring development, particularly financial understanding, customer acquisition cost, lifetime value, conversion-rate analysis and negotiation capability. These strengths and weaknesses are used to establish priorities for future entrepreneurial development. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… The report also evaluates the evolution of the GymBuddy product using SCAMPER, Design Thinking and Lean Startup principles. Rather than pursuing a feature-heavy application, customer feedback leads to greater emphasis on simplicity, peer accountability, social competition and iterative validation. SCAMPER is applied to eliminate unnecessary features, substitute complex recommendations with simpler motivational mechanisms, combine useful functionality and adapt gamification to the needs of beginner users. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… Another major area of reflection concerns teams, networks and collaborative innovation. The student considers how group creativity exercises challenged the assumption that a venture should be developed independently and highlights the importance of mentors, developers, industry professionals and potential investors. The report links entrepreneurial networks with access to resources, opportunity identification, legitimacy and emotional support and proposes deliberate networking activities as part of future venture development. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… The visual development framework on page 3 summarises the entrepreneurial journey in five stages: GymBuddy concept and market research, capability assessment, product development and validation, teams and networks, and a time-based action plan. The reflection is structured using the Gibbs Reflective Cycle, linking experience with evaluation, analysis and future action. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… Overall, the assessment demonstrates reflective learning through the application of entrepreneurial theory to a practical start-up concept. It shows a shift from perfectionism toward rapid validation, customer-centred development, collaborative working and concrete action planning, while identifying financial management, negotiation and network development as important areas for continued improvement. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… Note: this file is a completed reflective submission rather than the original university assessment guideline, so the university, academic level and academic year should remain Not specified unless you also upload the official brief.
Read Model Answer →
Software Development Project
Software Development Project – Group Presentation, Demo Video and Peer Assessment
This group-based assessment for the Software Development Project module at Coventry University requires a team of five students to design, develop and demonstrate a full-stack software product of their choice. The project must use technologies or platforms agreed by the team and requires students to contribute to different aspects of the software development process, including design, implementation and testing. The assessment is worth 20 credits and is submitted as a 15-minute MP4 presentation and demonstration video, with a permitted variation of plus or minus 10%. The main component is a group presentation and demo video. Students must evaluate the key Agile techniques applied during development and project management, supported by evidence of using appropriate software tools. The presentation should demonstrate how Agile practices were applied to the group project and should address techniques such as user stories with story-point estimation, story mapping, sprint planning, task boards, work breakdown and burndown charts. The assessment also requires evaluation of project risks and the social, professional, legal and ethical issues associated with the software project. A second major component is the live demonstration of the software features developed by the group. Students must demonstrate the most significant or innovative features implemented using their selected technologies and platforms. The demonstration should show how the software meets business requirements and provide a clear rationale for the development decisions. The marking criteria assess the quality, complexity and creativity of the software, including front-end, computation and back-end development, live data inputs and, where applicable, Create, Read, Update and Delete (CRUD) operations. The assessment also includes an individual peer-assessment component. Each student must rate every other team member's contribution using a whole-number score from 0 to 10, with 10 representing the highest contribution. The peer assessment accounts for 10% of the overall assessment, while the group presentation accounts for 60% and the software features demonstration accounts for 30%. The module learning outcomes focus on evaluating and applying appropriate software development approaches such as Agile, applying current technologies and platforms to meet business requirements, evaluating software solutions against quality metrics, and evaluating commercial risks alongside professional, social, legal and ethical considerations. The brief also places the assessment in the Amber AI category, meaning AI may be used to assist, but any AI tools used during the research process must be acknowledged and relevant AI-generated information must be cited and referenced using Coventry University APA style.
Read Model Answer →
Entrepreneurship / Business Management / Enterprise
5,000 words
Enterprise Business Start-up: Innovative Business Plan, Fundraising Strategy and Entrepreneurial Reflection
This Enterprise Business Start-up assessment requires students to generate an innovative and sustainable business idea and develop it into a comprehensive start-up plan capable of guiding venture creation, attracting customers and supporting external fundraising. The module is assessed through two connected components: a 10-minute business pitch presented to an audience representing angel investors and venture capitalists, followed by a detailed individual business-plan portfolio. Assessment Brief Feb-May 2026 L… The principal written component is a 4,000-word detailed business plan. It begins with an executive summary before examining the proposed business idea, identified market gap, market research and competitor landscape. Students must then define appropriate customer profiles and segmentation, explain the development of the proposed product or service, and construct suitable marketing and communications strategies for reaching the intended market. Assessment Brief Feb-May 2026 L… A substantial part of the business plan focuses on the venture's financial and commercial viability. Students are expected to develop costing, pricing, sales and revenue projections alongside an appropriate business model. They must also identify the founding team, explain relevant roles and demonstrate the core competencies required to launch and develop the business successfully. Financials and business models receive particularly strong emphasis within the marking criteria. Assessment Brief Feb-May 2026 L… The written portfolio also includes a 1,000-word reflective component. Half of this section focuses on the student's fundraising strategy, including suitable funding sources and how potential investors or funders would be targeted, approached and secured. The other half critically reflects on the student's entrepreneurial tendency, personal experience and future skills development. Students are specifically required to complete the General Measure of Enterprising Tendency (GET) self-assessment and incorporate the results into their reflection. Assessment Brief Feb-May 2026 L… Assessment Brief Feb-May 2026 L… Overall, the assessment integrates entrepreneurial opportunity recognition, market analysis, customer segmentation, product development, marketing, start-up finance, business modelling, team capability, fundraising and reflective entrepreneurial development. The accompanying pitch additionally assesses visual quality, creativity, clarity of message, presentation skills, preparedness and professionalism. Assessment Brief Feb-May 2026 L… Assessment Brief Feb-May 2026 L… Important: the document does not explicitly specify a referencing style or academic level, so I would keep those fields as Not specified rather than assume Harvard or Masters.
Read Model Answer →
Consultancy Project
1,464 words
Enhancing Sustainable Supply Chain Practices through Digital Transformation: A Case Study of Unilever Plc
This consultancy project proposal examines how digital transformation can enhance sustainable supply chain practices at Unilever Plc. Unilever is presented as a multinational fast-moving consumer goods organisation operating across more than 190 markets, with a complex global supply chain and sustainability commitments linked to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The proposal focuses on the challenges associated with achieving supply chain transparency, managing fragmented sustainability data, and balancing sustainable sourcing and operational costs. The project investigates how emerging digital technologies, particularly blockchain, the Internet of Things (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI), could support greater transparency, traceability, operational efficiency and sustainability within Unilever's supply chain. The organisational analysis identifies issues including the complexity of tracing raw materials across multi-tier supply chains, fragmented procurement and sustainability information systems, and the tension between sustainability investments and short-term operational costs. The proposal also considers infrastructure readiness, data security and employee upskilling as factors affecting digital transformation. The research aims to examine how digital transformation technologies could improve sustainable supply chain planning at Unilever while supporting long-term business and environmental goals. Three objectives are established: examining sustainability challenges affecting Unilever's global supply chain, assessing how blockchain, IoT and AI could improve transparency, traceability and efficiency, and proposing strategic recommendations for integrating digital innovation into Unilever's sustainability framework. The central research question examines how digital transformation can contribute to an ethical, transparent and sustainable supply chain while maintaining operational efficiency. A qualitative exploratory case-study research design is proposed. The main emphasis is on secondary data, including Unilever's annual reports, sustainability information, digital transformation publications, company news, industry articles and analyst reports. Where feasible, primary data may be collected through semi-structured expert interviews and a short qualitative questionnaire. The proposed analysis includes thematic analysis, document review and descriptive statistics using relevant secondary numerical data. Validity is supported through triangulation, while reliability is addressed through consistent coding and an audit trail. The proposal also addresses ethical considerations, including research integrity, transparency, confidentiality, informed consent, anonymity, GDPR requirements, plagiarism avoidance, Harvard referencing and potential corporate bias or greenwashing. Overall, the project explores the potential contribution of digital innovation to Unilever's sustainability objectives and the wider responsible digitalisation of the FMCG supply chain.
Read Model Answer →
Business Strategy / Digital Business and Innovation
3,125 words
Safaricom Business Hub: Strategic B2B Digital Payment Platform for East African SMEs
This strategic business case proposes the Safaricom Business Hub, an integrated B2B digital-payment platform designed to support small and medium-sized enterprises across East Africa. The proposed solution responds to Safaricom’s need for digital diversification as traditional voice revenues mature, while leveraging the growth of M-Pesa and the wider transition toward digital financial services. The platform combines invoicing, bulk payments, cash-flow analytics and integrations with accounting systems such as Xero, QuickBooks and SAP. The report begins by analysing Safaricom’s current strategic position, including subscriber growth, revenue performance, declining voice services, M-Pesa transaction growth and market saturation. It then assesses the wider East African B2B digital-payment opportunity, considering market size, digital adoption, the SME population, regulatory developments, smartphone penetration and operational inefficiencies associated with manual invoicing and reconciliation. Competitive analysis evaluates Safaricom against established banking solutions, international fintech providers and specialist payment gateways. The strategic case identifies several potential advantages associated with Safaricom’s existing M-Pesa infrastructure, agent network, brand position and payment-services capabilities. The proposed Business Hub addresses fragmented SME financial processes through automated invoicing, bulk payment processing, real-time cash-flow analytics and integration with existing accounting platforms. The business plan also provides a four-phase implementation roadmap, covering MVP development, pilot testing, Kenyan market launch, regional expansion and ecosystem development. Financial projections consider customer growth, revenue, EBITDA, customer acquisition cost, lifetime value, payback and return on investment, alongside sensitivity scenarios for different levels of market adoption. Finally, the report evaluates competitive, regulatory and market-adoption risks and links the proposed investment to Safaricom’s broader strategic diversification objectives. Overall, the work integrates strategic analysis, fintech innovation, market opportunity assessment, implementation planning, financial modelling and risk evaluation to present a commercial case for expanding Safaricom’s digital financial-services ecosystem. Overview word count: approximately 340 words. One useful note for the public Reference Library: I would upload the clean original assignment/business plan rather than the AI-detection or similarity-report versions if you have it, because these two PDFs contain checker-report pages in addition to the coursework itself.
Read Model Answer →
Systems Analysis and Design
Systems Analysis and Design with UML – Individual Systems Design Assignment
This individual assignment forms Part 2 of the Systems Analysis and Design with UML assessment and contributes 50% of the overall module weighting. The uploaded guidance indicates that this component should continue directly from work completed in Part 1, meaning that the analysis and design developed previously should provide the foundation for the second-stage submission. The assignment is centred on the principles and practices of systems analysis and design using the Unified Modeling Language (UML). It is intended to demonstrate the application of structured analytical thinking and modelling techniques to the development or refinement of an information-system solution. Because Part 2 follows an earlier assessment component, continuity between the original problem definition, requirements and subsequent design work is likely to be an important aspect of the submission. Relevant areas may include requirements representation, system modelling, process and interaction analysis, object-oriented design and the use of appropriate UML artefacts to communicate system structure and behaviour. The work should therefore demonstrate how analytical findings are translated into coherent design decisions while maintaining alignment with the system requirements established during the earlier project stage. The assessment is individual and therefore should demonstrate independent understanding of the selected system, its requirements and the rationale underlying the proposed design. The uploaded summary confirms that this component is worth 50% of the module and has a submission deadline of 15 May 2026 at 17:00 GMT. Note: the actual detailed Part 2 brief is not contained in this uploaded summary, so specific UML diagrams, required sections, word count and marking criteria cannot be confirmed from this document alone. Entry 2 — Intelligent User Interfaces Part 1 Field Content to enter Title Smart Study Student Assistant: Intelligent User Interface Prototype University Not specified in the uploaded guideline Subject Intelligent User Interfaces / Human-Computer Interaction Module name Intelligent User Interfaces Academic level Not specified Academic year Not specified Assignment type Presentations and Academic Posters Reference style Not specified Word count Not applicable – maximum 10-minute pre-recorded prototype presentation Amount (₹) Enter your internal project amount Key topics Intelligent User Interfaces, Human-Computer Interaction, Smart Study Assistant, Student Productivity, Adaptive Interfaces, Personalised Learning, Study Planning, Question Generation, Low-Fidelity Prototyping, User-Centred Design, User Behaviour, Learning Progress, Educational Technology, UX Design, Personalisation Assignment overview This project prototype forms Part 1 of Intelligent User Interfaces and contributes 60% of the final module mark. The assessment requires a project prototype supported by a pre-recorded presentation of no more than ten minutes. The selected project concept is a Smart Study Student Assistant, positioned within education and student-productivity technology. The proposed system is an adaptive study-planning and note-based question-generation interface. Its purpose is to help students organise academic work by combining uploaded study notes, deadlines and information about user behaviour to generate personalised study plans and learning questions. The project addresses common problems including scattered study materials, missed deadlines, unclear schedules and the lack of personalised guidance on how and when students should study. The guidance specifically states that the solution should not be unnecessarily advanced. Instead, the design should focus on how the interface will be useful to different types of users. Low-fidelity material and supporting notes are also required, indicating that the project should demonstrate user-centred design thinking rather than focusing solely on technical sophistication. The intended goal is to provide personalised study plans, questions and guidance based on the student's notes and deadlines, supporting more consistent study habits and improved organisation. Tutor feedback describes the concept as relevant and well motivated but identifies one important weakness: the system's intelligent behaviour is currently under-specified. The tutor specifically recommends clarifying how study plans and question generation adapt according to user behaviour or learning progress. Accordingly, the prototype should communicate both the interface design and the adaptive logic that makes the system genuinely intelligent and user-centred. Entry 3 — Intelligent User Interfaces Part 2 Field Content to enter Title Intelligent User Interfaces – Individual Essay University Not specified in the uploaded guideline Subject Intelligent User Interfaces / Human-Computer Interaction Module name Intelligent User Interfaces Academic level Not specified Academic year Not specified Assignment type MS Essays Reference style Not specified Word count Not specified Amount (₹) Enter your internal project amount Key topics Intelligent User Interfaces, Human-Computer Interaction, Adaptive Interfaces, User-Centred Design, Intelligent Systems, Personalisation, User Experience, Educational Technology, Interaction Design, AI Interfaces Assignment overview This individual essay forms Part 2 of the Intelligent User Interfaces module and contributes 40% of the final module mark. The uploaded guidance identifies the submission deadline as 21 May 2026 at 16:00. The assessment belongs to the same Intelligent User Interfaces module as the Part 1 prototype project. The broader module context therefore concerns the design and evaluation of interfaces that use intelligent or adaptive behaviour to improve interaction between users and digital systems. Relevant considerations may include personalisation, adaptive interaction, usability, human-computer interaction, user behaviour and the responsible design of intelligent systems. However, the uploaded summary does not contain the actual Part 2 assessment brief, essay question, required word count, marking criteria or prescribed topic. It only confirms that the assessment is an individual essay worth 40% of the final mark. For that reason, the Reference Library overview should remain general rather than claiming that Part 2 specifically assesses the Smart Study Student Assistant. If the Part 2 essay is intended to continue or evaluate the Part 1 prototype, that relationship should only be added once the actual Part 2 assessment brief confirms it. The current document explicitly provides the Smart Study Student Assistant instructions under Subject 2, while no corresponding topic instructions are shown for Subject 3. So for Entry 3, I would keep the title and overview generic until the actual KV7005 Part 2 brief is uploaded.
Read Model Answer →
Management / Digital Transformation and Leadership
1,500 words
Leading Through Digital Change: Digital Transformation Report and Future Technology Poster
This Masters-level assessment for the Leading Through Digital Change module examines how organisations can respond strategically and effectively to rapid technological and digital transformation. Students take the role of a Digital Transformation Manager for one selected international organisation and prepare a professional Digital Transformation Report accompanied by an A4 digital poster. The purpose is to evaluate the organisation's current digital context and recommend changes that can strengthen competitive advantage and create sustainable business value. The first component requires critical evaluation and recommendation of one appropriate digital transformation strategic framework. Students may apply frameworks such as the McKinsey 4Ds, BCG Three Stages, Gartner's Six Steps or Cognizant's Four Pillars. The analysis should establish clear digital transformation objectives relevant to organisational functions such as operations, ICT and marketing, while using organisational evidence, academic research and practical examples to justify the proposed strategic direction. The second component is an academic poster evaluating two disruptive technologies or techniques expected to affect the chosen organisation, its industry, employment and the labour market over the next five years. Potential technologies include Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 5G connectivity, the Internet of Things, robotics, drone delivery, blockchain, augmented reality and virtual reality. The poster should combine academic literature with real-world examples to demonstrate the likely opportunities, challenges and wider organisational implications of technological disruption. The final component focuses on digital leadership. Students analyse and recommend two suitable leadership approaches for managing and supporting digital transformation. Relevant approaches may include agile leadership, ethical-tech leadership, people-oriented leadership, hyperaware agile leadership and Goleman's leadership styles. Overall, the assessment integrates digital strategy, innovation, emerging technologies and leadership. The wider module also covers digital transformation strategies, data-driven decision-making, leadership in the digital age, artificial intelligence in contemporary business, digital risk management and planning for the future. Reference style: Harvard. Main report word limit: 1,500 words. Poster: A4 size with no specified word count.
Read Model Answer →
Management / Business Management
5,000 words
Principles of Management: AstraZeneca Management Analysis and Skills Development Report
This Masters-level Principles of Management assignment examines the management practices, organisational environment and managerial functions of AstraZeneca plc. The assessment is structured as a 5,000-word management report in which the student acts as a business consultant and critically evaluates how management theories, concepts and practices contribute to organisational performance and value creation. The work requires the application of relevant academic literature alongside case-study evidence and independent research on AstraZeneca. The first part of the assessment considers key management theories and practices. Students are expected to examine how management contributes to AstraZeneca's success, apply an appropriate dimension of the Competing Values Framework, and select an additional relevant management theory. Suggested theoretical perspectives include Scientific Management, Bureaucratic Theory, Administrative Theory, Contingency Theory and Total Quality Management, although students are encouraged to select theories most appropriate to the organisation rather than applying every available model. The assignment also evaluates AstraZeneca within the global business environment. Frameworks such as LoNG-PEST or Porter's Five Forces may be used to analyse global, national and local influences, including significant opportunities and threats. Students then critically analyse an internal organisational challenge and consider how the core management functions of planning, organising, leading and controlling can be applied to address it. Supporting analytical approaches may include Value Chain analysis, VRIO and stakeholder analysis. A further component focuses on personal and professional development. Students complete a Personal SWOT analysis and construct a Skills Development Plan linked to future career aims. This is followed by a 500-word reflective statement examining personal management competencies, including self-management, problem-solving and decision-making. An appropriate reflective framework, such as Borton, Kolb or GROW, is applied to structure the reflection. Overall, the assessment integrates management theory, organisational analysis, global business considerations, managerial decision-making and reflective professional development. It is designed to demonstrate Level 7 critical analysis and the practical application of management concepts to a contemporary multinational organisation. The wider module covers management theories, stakeholder management, global management, planning and decision-making, human resource management, leadership, operations and finance for managers
Read Model Answer →
Business Intelligence / Data Analytics / Project Management
Business Intelligence and Data Analytics Dashboard for Project Progress Evaluation
This group assessment requires students to act as Project Analysts and critically evaluate the progress of a university project using business intelligence, data analytics and project management techniques. The scenario is based on Northumbria University London planning two major events: a Convocation and an associated Concert. Students must select one of these projects and assess its progress through a professionally structured presentation. The assessment requires students to begin by defining the main problem or opportunity associated with the selected project. They must then identify and analyse the project's key stakeholders and deliverables. A major component of the work involves evaluating project progress using suitable business intelligence and data analytics techniques and developing an appropriate dashboard, which may be created using Microsoft Excel or other suitable software. Students must not only present the dashboard but also critically analyse and justify its design, selected metrics, analytical methods and usefulness for project monitoring and decision-making. Because the projects are treated as already being in progress, students are permitted to create assumed or projected data to demonstrate their dashboards. The assessment does not primarily evaluate the accuracy of real project data; instead, it assesses students' ability to design, present and critically evaluate meaningful dashboards. Any assumed data should therefore remain realistic, internally consistent and relevant to the selected project. The presentation should conclude with evidence-based recommendations for the successful implementation and use of the proposed business intelligence or data analytics solution. Academic references and relevant examples must support the presentation, and a single reference list must be included. Assessment weighting places particular emphasis on application of BI tools and techniques (30%), followed by stakeholders and deliverables (20%) and justification of BI tools (20%). Project and opportunity analysis, conclusions and recommendations, and presentation/referencing are each worth 10%. The final assessment is a 15-minute group presentation followed by a 5-minute question-and-answer session. Every group member must contribute to the presentation. The PowerPoint submission is made electronically through Turnitin. Do not select Harvard automatically for this one. Unlike the previous Roehampton brief, this Northumbria brief requires academic references and a reference list but does not state a specific referencing style in the uploaded document.
Read Model Answer →
Engineering and Professional Practice
3,000 words
Internship Reflective Report and Poster Presentation — Professional Practice in an Industry Placement
An internship module assessment asks students to convert a period of workplace experience into evidenced academic reflection. It is not a report on what the host organisation does; it is an account of what changed in the student's own understanding of their discipline as a result of working outside the taught programme. The written component typically runs to around three thousand words and is built in weighted sections. An opening section covers how the placement was secured — the reasoning behind the choice, the search and application process, and what that process itself taught the student. The bulk of the marks then sit on the reflection proper: what the student actually did, how existing disciplinary knowledge held up when applied in an unfamiliar setting, and where gaps appeared. A final section addresses personal and professional development, supported by specific examples rather than general claims of having "grown in confidence." The second component is a short poster presentation summarising the placement and its learning, delivered live. Posters are assessed on professional presentation, clarity, correct referencing and balance — students commonly over-fill them with text that a viewer cannot read at presentation distance. Formatting requirements on this type of assessment are unusually prescriptive and carry marks: a cover page with name, student ID, tutor name and declared word count; a table of contents; page numbers; captions on every figure and table; specified font, size and line spacing; numbered headings; and a strict file-naming convention. Marks are lost here for no reason other than inattention. Note also that in-text citations and quotations usually count toward the word limit even when tables and references do not, and markers may simply stop reading once the limit is exceeded by more than the allowed margin. The defining challenge of reflective assessment at this level is criticality. Rubrics consistently distinguish description from evaluation: recounting tasks performed scores at the lower bands, while analysing why something was difficult, what it revealed about a gap in preparation, and what will be done differently scores at the top. Reflective frameworks give this structure, but they must organise genuine experience rather than substitute for it. This assessment is inherently personal — the content derives entirely from the student's own placement. Our support is therefore confined to guidance: explaining what distinguishes descriptive from critical reflection with worked examples, showing how a reflective framework structures a section, advising on poster layout and information density, checking formatting and referencing against the specification, and reviewing a student's own completed draft against the published rubric.
Read Model Answer →
Professional Development & Employability
2,100 words
Professional Development & Planning Portfolio — SWOT, Career Plan, UK CV & Interview Reflection
A Professional Development and Planning portfolio is a Level 7 employability assessment that asks postgraduate students to evidence their own professional growth rather than analyse an external case. It typically integrates three connected components into a single submission: a critical self-analysis with a forward-looking career plan, a set of job-application documents, and a reflective account of a practical employability exercise such as a recorded mock interview. The first component combines a SWOT analysis with a structured career development plan. Students are expected to move beyond listing traits, and instead show how each strength, weakness, opportunity and threat actually shapes their short- and long-term trajectory. Established reflective frameworks — Gibbs, Kolb, or comparable employability models — are commonly used to give the self-analysis theoretical grounding. The plan that follows usually requires a career vision, two or three SMART goals derived directly from the SWOT, an action plan with resources and timelines, and a strategy for reviewing the plan over time. Marks are lost most often where the components sit side by side without integration: a SWOT that never feeds the goals, or goals that are specific in form but generic in substance. The second component is a UK-format CV and a targeted cover letter for a real advertised role. UK conventions matter here — no photograph, no date of birth, no full address — alongside a concise personal statement, achievement-focused bullet points rather than duty lists, and visible evidence of research into the employer's values and strategic direction. The cover letter is expected to argue for candidacy rather than restate the CV, and is normally capped at one page. The third component is a reflection on a recorded practice interview, written against the platform's own scored feedback on speech rate, filler words, self-positioning and answer structure. Because this reflection must respond to individual results, it is inherently personal and cannot be written generically. Our support on this type of assessment is structured around guidance rather than production. Typical areas of help include: explaining what distinguishes a descriptive SWOT from an analytical one, showing how SMART goals should trace back to identified development needs, reviewing CV and cover letter formatting against UK employer expectations, clarifying how reflective models are applied at postgraduate level, and checking a completed draft against the assessment's own marking criteria before submission.
Read Model Answer →