Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Business Strategy / Digital Business and Innovation
3,125 words
Safaricom Business Hub: Strategic B2B Digital Payment Platform for East African SMEs
This strategic business case proposes the Safaricom Business Hub, an integrated B2B digital-payment platform designed to support small and medium-sized enterprises across East Africa. The proposed solution responds to Safaricom’s need for digital diversification as traditional voice revenues mature, while leveraging the growth of M-Pesa and the wider transition toward digital financial services. The platform combines invoicing, bulk payments, cash-flow analytics and integrations with accounting systems such as Xero, QuickBooks and SAP. The report begins by analysing Safaricom’s current strategic position, including subscriber growth, revenue performance, declining voice services, M-Pesa transaction growth and market saturation. It then assesses the wider East African B2B digital-payment opportunity, considering market size, digital adoption, the SME population, regulatory developments, smartphone penetration and operational inefficiencies associated with manual invoicing and reconciliation. Competitive analysis evaluates Safaricom against established banking solutions, international fintech providers and specialist payment gateways. The strategic case identifies several potential advantages associated with Safaricom’s existing M-Pesa infrastructure, agent network, brand position and payment-services capabilities. The proposed Business Hub addresses fragmented SME financial processes through automated invoicing, bulk payment processing, real-time cash-flow analytics and integration with existing accounting platforms. The business plan also provides a four-phase implementation roadmap, covering MVP development, pilot testing, Kenyan market launch, regional expansion and ecosystem development. Financial projections consider customer growth, revenue, EBITDA, customer acquisition cost, lifetime value, payback and return on investment, alongside sensitivity scenarios for different levels of market adoption. Finally, the report evaluates competitive, regulatory and market-adoption risks and links the proposed investment to Safaricom’s broader strategic diversification objectives. Overall, the work integrates strategic analysis, fintech innovation, market opportunity assessment, implementation planning, financial modelling and risk evaluation to present a commercial case for expanding Safaricom’s digital financial-services ecosystem. Overview word count: approximately 340 words. One useful note for the public Reference Library: I would upload the clean original assignment/business plan rather than the AI-detection or similarity-report versions if you have it, because these two PDFs contain checker-report pages in addition to the coursework itself.
Read Model Answer →
Systems Analysis and Design
Systems Analysis and Design with UML – Individual Systems Design Assignment
This individual assignment forms Part 2 of the Systems Analysis and Design with UML assessment and contributes 50% of the overall module weighting. The uploaded guidance indicates that this component should continue directly from work completed in Part 1, meaning that the analysis and design developed previously should provide the foundation for the second-stage submission. The assignment is centred on the principles and practices of systems analysis and design using the Unified Modeling Language (UML). It is intended to demonstrate the application of structured analytical thinking and modelling techniques to the development or refinement of an information-system solution. Because Part 2 follows an earlier assessment component, continuity between the original problem definition, requirements and subsequent design work is likely to be an important aspect of the submission. Relevant areas may include requirements representation, system modelling, process and interaction analysis, object-oriented design and the use of appropriate UML artefacts to communicate system structure and behaviour. The work should therefore demonstrate how analytical findings are translated into coherent design decisions while maintaining alignment with the system requirements established during the earlier project stage. The assessment is individual and therefore should demonstrate independent understanding of the selected system, its requirements and the rationale underlying the proposed design. The uploaded summary confirms that this component is worth 50% of the module and has a submission deadline of 15 May 2026 at 17:00 GMT. Note: the actual detailed Part 2 brief is not contained in this uploaded summary, so specific UML diagrams, required sections, word count and marking criteria cannot be confirmed from this document alone. Entry 2 — Intelligent User Interfaces Part 1 Field Content to enter Title Smart Study Student Assistant: Intelligent User Interface Prototype University Not specified in the uploaded guideline Subject Intelligent User Interfaces / Human-Computer Interaction Module name Intelligent User Interfaces Academic level Not specified Academic year Not specified Assignment type Presentations and Academic Posters Reference style Not specified Word count Not applicable – maximum 10-minute pre-recorded prototype presentation Amount (₹) Enter your internal project amount Key topics Intelligent User Interfaces, Human-Computer Interaction, Smart Study Assistant, Student Productivity, Adaptive Interfaces, Personalised Learning, Study Planning, Question Generation, Low-Fidelity Prototyping, User-Centred Design, User Behaviour, Learning Progress, Educational Technology, UX Design, Personalisation Assignment overview This project prototype forms Part 1 of Intelligent User Interfaces and contributes 60% of the final module mark. The assessment requires a project prototype supported by a pre-recorded presentation of no more than ten minutes. The selected project concept is a Smart Study Student Assistant, positioned within education and student-productivity technology. The proposed system is an adaptive study-planning and note-based question-generation interface. Its purpose is to help students organise academic work by combining uploaded study notes, deadlines and information about user behaviour to generate personalised study plans and learning questions. The project addresses common problems including scattered study materials, missed deadlines, unclear schedules and the lack of personalised guidance on how and when students should study. The guidance specifically states that the solution should not be unnecessarily advanced. Instead, the design should focus on how the interface will be useful to different types of users. Low-fidelity material and supporting notes are also required, indicating that the project should demonstrate user-centred design thinking rather than focusing solely on technical sophistication. The intended goal is to provide personalised study plans, questions and guidance based on the student's notes and deadlines, supporting more consistent study habits and improved organisation. Tutor feedback describes the concept as relevant and well motivated but identifies one important weakness: the system's intelligent behaviour is currently under-specified. The tutor specifically recommends clarifying how study plans and question generation adapt according to user behaviour or learning progress. Accordingly, the prototype should communicate both the interface design and the adaptive logic that makes the system genuinely intelligent and user-centred. Entry 3 — Intelligent User Interfaces Part 2 Field Content to enter Title Intelligent User Interfaces – Individual Essay University Not specified in the uploaded guideline Subject Intelligent User Interfaces / Human-Computer Interaction Module name Intelligent User Interfaces Academic level Not specified Academic year Not specified Assignment type MS Essays Reference style Not specified Word count Not specified Amount (₹) Enter your internal project amount Key topics Intelligent User Interfaces, Human-Computer Interaction, Adaptive Interfaces, User-Centred Design, Intelligent Systems, Personalisation, User Experience, Educational Technology, Interaction Design, AI Interfaces Assignment overview This individual essay forms Part 2 of the Intelligent User Interfaces module and contributes 40% of the final module mark. The uploaded guidance identifies the submission deadline as 21 May 2026 at 16:00. The assessment belongs to the same Intelligent User Interfaces module as the Part 1 prototype project. The broader module context therefore concerns the design and evaluation of interfaces that use intelligent or adaptive behaviour to improve interaction between users and digital systems. Relevant considerations may include personalisation, adaptive interaction, usability, human-computer interaction, user behaviour and the responsible design of intelligent systems. However, the uploaded summary does not contain the actual Part 2 assessment brief, essay question, required word count, marking criteria or prescribed topic. It only confirms that the assessment is an individual essay worth 40% of the final mark. For that reason, the Reference Library overview should remain general rather than claiming that Part 2 specifically assesses the Smart Study Student Assistant. If the Part 2 essay is intended to continue or evaluate the Part 1 prototype, that relationship should only be added once the actual Part 2 assessment brief confirms it. The current document explicitly provides the Smart Study Student Assistant instructions under Subject 2, while no corresponding topic instructions are shown for Subject 3. So for Entry 3, I would keep the title and overview generic until the actual KV7005 Part 2 brief is uploaded.
Read Model Answer →
Management / Digital Transformation and Leadership
1,500 words
Leading Through Digital Change: Digital Transformation Report and Future Technology Poster
This Masters-level assessment for the Leading Through Digital Change module examines how organisations can respond strategically and effectively to rapid technological and digital transformation. Students take the role of a Digital Transformation Manager for one selected international organisation and prepare a professional Digital Transformation Report accompanied by an A4 digital poster. The purpose is to evaluate the organisation's current digital context and recommend changes that can strengthen competitive advantage and create sustainable business value. The first component requires critical evaluation and recommendation of one appropriate digital transformation strategic framework. Students may apply frameworks such as the McKinsey 4Ds, BCG Three Stages, Gartner's Six Steps or Cognizant's Four Pillars. The analysis should establish clear digital transformation objectives relevant to organisational functions such as operations, ICT and marketing, while using organisational evidence, academic research and practical examples to justify the proposed strategic direction. The second component is an academic poster evaluating two disruptive technologies or techniques expected to affect the chosen organisation, its industry, employment and the labour market over the next five years. Potential technologies include Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 5G connectivity, the Internet of Things, robotics, drone delivery, blockchain, augmented reality and virtual reality. The poster should combine academic literature with real-world examples to demonstrate the likely opportunities, challenges and wider organisational implications of technological disruption. The final component focuses on digital leadership. Students analyse and recommend two suitable leadership approaches for managing and supporting digital transformation. Relevant approaches may include agile leadership, ethical-tech leadership, people-oriented leadership, hyperaware agile leadership and Goleman's leadership styles. Overall, the assessment integrates digital strategy, innovation, emerging technologies and leadership. The wider module also covers digital transformation strategies, data-driven decision-making, leadership in the digital age, artificial intelligence in contemporary business, digital risk management and planning for the future. Reference style: Harvard. Main report word limit: 1,500 words. Poster: A4 size with no specified word count.
Read Model Answer →
Management / Business Management
5,000 words
Principles of Management: AstraZeneca Management Analysis and Skills Development Report
This Masters-level Principles of Management assignment examines the management practices, organisational environment and managerial functions of AstraZeneca plc. The assessment is structured as a 5,000-word management report in which the student acts as a business consultant and critically evaluates how management theories, concepts and practices contribute to organisational performance and value creation. The work requires the application of relevant academic literature alongside case-study evidence and independent research on AstraZeneca. The first part of the assessment considers key management theories and practices. Students are expected to examine how management contributes to AstraZeneca's success, apply an appropriate dimension of the Competing Values Framework, and select an additional relevant management theory. Suggested theoretical perspectives include Scientific Management, Bureaucratic Theory, Administrative Theory, Contingency Theory and Total Quality Management, although students are encouraged to select theories most appropriate to the organisation rather than applying every available model. The assignment also evaluates AstraZeneca within the global business environment. Frameworks such as LoNG-PEST or Porter's Five Forces may be used to analyse global, national and local influences, including significant opportunities and threats. Students then critically analyse an internal organisational challenge and consider how the core management functions of planning, organising, leading and controlling can be applied to address it. Supporting analytical approaches may include Value Chain analysis, VRIO and stakeholder analysis. A further component focuses on personal and professional development. Students complete a Personal SWOT analysis and construct a Skills Development Plan linked to future career aims. This is followed by a 500-word reflective statement examining personal management competencies, including self-management, problem-solving and decision-making. An appropriate reflective framework, such as Borton, Kolb or GROW, is applied to structure the reflection. Overall, the assessment integrates management theory, organisational analysis, global business considerations, managerial decision-making and reflective professional development. It is designed to demonstrate Level 7 critical analysis and the practical application of management concepts to a contemporary multinational organisation. The wider module covers management theories, stakeholder management, global management, planning and decision-making, human resource management, leadership, operations and finance for managers
Read Model Answer →
Business Intelligence / Data Analytics / Project Management
Business Intelligence and Data Analytics Dashboard for Project Progress Evaluation
This group assessment requires students to act as Project Analysts and critically evaluate the progress of a university project using business intelligence, data analytics and project management techniques. The scenario is based on Northumbria University London planning two major events: a Convocation and an associated Concert. Students must select one of these projects and assess its progress through a professionally structured presentation. The assessment requires students to begin by defining the main problem or opportunity associated with the selected project. They must then identify and analyse the project's key stakeholders and deliverables. A major component of the work involves evaluating project progress using suitable business intelligence and data analytics techniques and developing an appropriate dashboard, which may be created using Microsoft Excel or other suitable software. Students must not only present the dashboard but also critically analyse and justify its design, selected metrics, analytical methods and usefulness for project monitoring and decision-making. Because the projects are treated as already being in progress, students are permitted to create assumed or projected data to demonstrate their dashboards. The assessment does not primarily evaluate the accuracy of real project data; instead, it assesses students' ability to design, present and critically evaluate meaningful dashboards. Any assumed data should therefore remain realistic, internally consistent and relevant to the selected project. The presentation should conclude with evidence-based recommendations for the successful implementation and use of the proposed business intelligence or data analytics solution. Academic references and relevant examples must support the presentation, and a single reference list must be included. Assessment weighting places particular emphasis on application of BI tools and techniques (30%), followed by stakeholders and deliverables (20%) and justification of BI tools (20%). Project and opportunity analysis, conclusions and recommendations, and presentation/referencing are each worth 10%. The final assessment is a 15-minute group presentation followed by a 5-minute question-and-answer session. Every group member must contribute to the presentation. The PowerPoint submission is made electronically through Turnitin. Do not select Harvard automatically for this one. Unlike the previous Roehampton brief, this Northumbria brief requires academic references and a reference list but does not state a specific referencing style in the uploaded document.
Read Model Answer →
Engineering and Professional Practice
3,000 words
Internship Reflective Report and Poster Presentation — Professional Practice in an Industry Placement
An internship module assessment asks students to convert a period of workplace experience into evidenced academic reflection. It is not a report on what the host organisation does; it is an account of what changed in the student's own understanding of their discipline as a result of working outside the taught programme. The written component typically runs to around three thousand words and is built in weighted sections. An opening section covers how the placement was secured — the reasoning behind the choice, the search and application process, and what that process itself taught the student. The bulk of the marks then sit on the reflection proper: what the student actually did, how existing disciplinary knowledge held up when applied in an unfamiliar setting, and where gaps appeared. A final section addresses personal and professional development, supported by specific examples rather than general claims of having "grown in confidence." The second component is a short poster presentation summarising the placement and its learning, delivered live. Posters are assessed on professional presentation, clarity, correct referencing and balance — students commonly over-fill them with text that a viewer cannot read at presentation distance. Formatting requirements on this type of assessment are unusually prescriptive and carry marks: a cover page with name, student ID, tutor name and declared word count; a table of contents; page numbers; captions on every figure and table; specified font, size and line spacing; numbered headings; and a strict file-naming convention. Marks are lost here for no reason other than inattention. Note also that in-text citations and quotations usually count toward the word limit even when tables and references do not, and markers may simply stop reading once the limit is exceeded by more than the allowed margin. The defining challenge of reflective assessment at this level is criticality. Rubrics consistently distinguish description from evaluation: recounting tasks performed scores at the lower bands, while analysing why something was difficult, what it revealed about a gap in preparation, and what will be done differently scores at the top. Reflective frameworks give this structure, but they must organise genuine experience rather than substitute for it. This assessment is inherently personal — the content derives entirely from the student's own placement. Our support is therefore confined to guidance: explaining what distinguishes descriptive from critical reflection with worked examples, showing how a reflective framework structures a section, advising on poster layout and information density, checking formatting and referencing against the specification, and reviewing a student's own completed draft against the published rubric.
Read Model Answer →
Professional Development & Employability
2,100 words
Professional Development & Planning Portfolio — SWOT, Career Plan, UK CV & Interview Reflection
A Professional Development and Planning portfolio is a Level 7 employability assessment that asks postgraduate students to evidence their own professional growth rather than analyse an external case. It typically integrates three connected components into a single submission: a critical self-analysis with a forward-looking career plan, a set of job-application documents, and a reflective account of a practical employability exercise such as a recorded mock interview. The first component combines a SWOT analysis with a structured career development plan. Students are expected to move beyond listing traits, and instead show how each strength, weakness, opportunity and threat actually shapes their short- and long-term trajectory. Established reflective frameworks — Gibbs, Kolb, or comparable employability models — are commonly used to give the self-analysis theoretical grounding. The plan that follows usually requires a career vision, two or three SMART goals derived directly from the SWOT, an action plan with resources and timelines, and a strategy for reviewing the plan over time. Marks are lost most often where the components sit side by side without integration: a SWOT that never feeds the goals, or goals that are specific in form but generic in substance. The second component is a UK-format CV and a targeted cover letter for a real advertised role. UK conventions matter here — no photograph, no date of birth, no full address — alongside a concise personal statement, achievement-focused bullet points rather than duty lists, and visible evidence of research into the employer's values and strategic direction. The cover letter is expected to argue for candidacy rather than restate the CV, and is normally capped at one page. The third component is a reflection on a recorded practice interview, written against the platform's own scored feedback on speech rate, filler words, self-positioning and answer structure. Because this reflection must respond to individual results, it is inherently personal and cannot be written generically. Our support on this type of assessment is structured around guidance rather than production. Typical areas of help include: explaining what distinguishes a descriptive SWOT from an analytical one, showing how SMART goals should trace back to identified development needs, reviewing CV and cover letter formatting against UK employer expectations, clarifying how reflective models are applied at postgraduate level, and checking a completed draft against the assessment's own marking criteria before submission.
Read Model Answer →