Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Business Consultancy Project
5,000 words
Business Consultancy Project – Summative Coursework
This assessment requires students to complete a 5,000-word Business Consultancy Project designed to replicate the work of a professional consultant. The project accounts for 100% of the module assessment and requires students to investigate a clearly defined business issue, challenge or problem identified in the earlier Consultancy Project Proposal. Students must use the same client, topic and issue proposed in the previous submission unless a change has been strongly recommended through feedback or endorsed by the supervisor or tutor. The consultancy project requires deep and independent research using credible secondary sources, including recent peer-reviewed academic journals, industry reports and reputable business publications. The analysis should translate evidence into meaningful insights and actionable recommendations that create strategic value for the client organisation. The report must critically analyse the selected business problem rather than simply describe the organisation or relevant theories. The report should contain an Executive Summary, Introduction, Company/Client Overview, Problem Definition and Consultancy Focus, Stakeholder Analysis, Data Analysis and Framework Application, Recommendations and Conclusion, and a 500-word Employability Reflection. The Data Analysis and Framework Application section carries the largest indicative allocation at approximately 1,800 words and requires students to apply two or three relevant models or frameworks. Examples provided in the brief include SWOT, PESTLE, Porter’s Five Forces and the Balanced Scorecard. Students are also expected to present and interpret secondary data using appropriate tables, charts, Excel outputs or pivot tables. The Recommendations and Conclusion section should provide three actionable and prioritised recommendations supported by evidence, while considering implementation risks, barriers and anticipated benefits. The Employability Reflection should consider research, analytical, problem-solving, project management and communication skills, together with teamwork, leadership, ethical awareness, sustainability, personal development, career relevance and future professional growth. The assessment requires Harvard referencing throughout. The report should use professional formatting, third-person academic writing, numbered pages, correctly labelled tables and figures, and accurate in-text citations and references. The brief emphasises the use of recent and credible sources, with the majority of references expected to come from publications within the previous 6–12 months.
Read Model Answer →
Strategic Management in Healthcare
4,000 words
Strategic Management in Healthcare – Strategic Analysis and Strategy Formulation
This individual summative assessment for the Strategic Management in Healthcare module requires students to critically examine strategic management and strategic thinking within a healthcare organisation, hospital, clinical department or healthcare unit of their choice. The assessment is designed to develop students’ ability to apply strategic management concepts and analytical frameworks to a real healthcare setting, evaluate the internal and external factors affecting organisational performance, and formulate appropriate strategies in response to identified operational and competitive challenges. The assessment consists of a 4,000-word report with a 10% tolerance and accounts for 100% of the module assessment. Students must first select an organisation, clinical department or healthcare unit to use as the case setting. The report should begin with a concise introduction to the selected case setting, establishing its organisational context and providing a clear direction for the strategic analysis. The introduction should explain the relevant characteristics of the organisation or healthcare unit and provide sufficient background to understand the strategic issues examined in the report. The report must critically analyse the relevance of strategic management and strategic thinking to the selected healthcare setting. Rather than simply describing strategic management concepts, students are expected to explain why strategic planning and strategic thinking are important for the particular organisation or department and how they can support performance improvement, service development and responses to operational and competitive challenges. A central requirement is the application of three strategic analysis tools or frameworks. The assessment examples include SWOT, PESTLE, Balanced Scorecard, Value Chain, Porter’s Five Forces, Resource Based View and Blue Ocean Strategy. Students must apply at least one appropriate tool at each of three analytical levels: macro-environment analysis, service area or market analysis, and internal environment analysis. Before applying each tool, students should define the framework and critically justify why it is relevant, effective and suitable for the selected healthcare case setting. The analysis should be detailed and evidence-based rather than purely descriptive. Students are then required to develop a hierarchy of strategies based on the findings from the strategic analysis. Strategies should be formulated at three levels and should clearly respond to the issues identified through the external, market or service-area and internal analyses. The report should explain how the proposed strategies could help the healthcare organisation or unit improve performance and address its operational and competitive challenges. The relationship between the analysis, strategic recommendations and expected outcomes should be made explicit. The final component requires students to reflect on the relevance and usefulness of the strategic tools beyond the selected case study and in relation to their current or future professional role. The reflection should consider how the strategic frameworks and analytical approaches could be transferred to other organisational or professional situations. The assessment should use appropriate evidence from sources such as academic journal articles, books, websites, case studies and grey literature. Harvard referencing is required. The marking criteria place emphasis on the quality of the introduction and case context, critical discussion of strategic planning, quantitative and analytical application of three strategic tools, strategy formulation and evaluation, reflection on application relevance, and presentation and referencing. The assessment therefore requires an integrated connection between the healthcare case, strategic analysis, evidence, recommendations and reflection rather than isolated descriptions of strategic frameworks.
Read Model Answer →
Global Business Strategy
2,500 words
Global Business Strategy: Strategic Analysis and Growth of a Global Company
This Global Business Strategy assessment is an individual e-portfolio that requires students to conduct a comprehensive strategic analysis of a selected global company facing a significant business challenge. The assessment focuses on the identification and analysis of a real organisational problem, evaluation of the global business environment, development of sustainable strategic options, the role of strategic leadership, and recommendations for future growth and competitiveness. Students are required to select a global company from any industry and investigate challenges such as loss of market position, difficulties in gaining or regaining market share, operational challenges, or declining revenues and profits. Relevant strategic theories, models and academic evidence should be used throughout the analysis. The first stage focuses on selecting the organisation, identifying its strategic purpose, vision, mission and objectives, and analysing the significant problem affecting the company. Students are expected to investigate both internal and external aspects of the global business environment and identify factors that may have contributed to the organisation's challenges. Appropriate theories and strategic models should be applied to provide a critical analysis of the business context. The second stage examines sustainable business strategies, diversification and competitive advantage. Students are required to conduct a resource audit and use an appropriate strategic model to assess how the organisation can sustain competitive advantage. The assessment also requires students to propose an appropriate mode and strategy for entering an international market in which the selected company does not currently operate, supported by relevant theories and models. The third stage addresses strategic change, leadership and governance. Students must demonstrate an understanding of effective leadership styles and their relevance to strategic change, good governance and ethical business practices. The role of ethics in international business should be examined using relevant practical examples and evidence. The fourth stage focuses on good strategy execution, evaluation, recommendations and conclusion. Students are expected to justify how the selected organisation can execute strategy effectively using available resources and process management tools that support continuous improvement. At least two strategic options should be considered, with attention given to their feasibility, potential impact, alignment with organisational goals and available resources, as well as the role of leadership and leadership styles. The assessment concludes with a summary report of approximately 1,000–1,500 words, synthesising the key learning and insights gained from the individual tasks. The overall report should be approximately 2,500 words, excluding references and appendices, and should follow the ULBS Harvard referencing style. Evidence and artefacts may include business-journal articles, professional or government reports, relevant videos, analytical tables, competitive-position graphs and financial or balanced-scorecard information. The completed e-portfolio is compiled in PebblePad and submitted as a PDF through Turnitin.
Read Model Answer →
Business Consultancy Project: Strategic Analysis, Stakeholder Evaluation and Evidence-Based Recommendations
Business Consultancy, Strategic Management, Business Analysis, Consultancy Project, Stakeholder Analysis, Mendelow Matrix, Business Strategy, Data Analysis, Secondary Research, SWOT Analysis, PESTLE Analysis, Porter’s Five Forces, Balanced Scorecard, Ethics, Sustainability, UN Sustainable Development Goals, Recommendations, Risk Analysis, Implementation Barriers, Organisational Strategy, Business Problem Solving, Employability Skills, Professional Development, Reflective Practice, Project Management, Evidence-Based Decision-Making
Read Model Answer →
Business Management / Strategic Management
50,000 words
Starbucks Labour Relations and Unionisation: Strategic Business Consultancy Analysis
his Masters-level Business Project presents a strategic consultancy analysis of Starbucks, focusing on the company's ongoing labour-relations challenges, unionisation disputes and associated legal, operational and reputational implications. The project examines how employee relations and organised labour can develop from a human-resource concern into a wider strategic management issue affecting corporate governance, organisational performance, stakeholder trust and long-term brand value. The report follows the consultancy structure required by the Business Project assessment, beginning with identification of a current organisational challenge and the resulting issues affecting the client organisation. The official brief requires the selected challenge to be connected with current affairs, emerging industry trends and the organisation's wider business strategy. It also requires evaluation of both internal and external stakeholders and analysis using conceptual and numerical secondary data. In the completed project, Starbucks' labour dispute and unionisation environment are examined through several strategic-management frameworks. PESTLE analysis is used to assess political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental influences surrounding labour relations. SWOT analysis evaluates Starbucks' organisational strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, while Porter's Generic Strategies considers the relationship between differentiation, competitive positioning and labour-management practices. The project also applies stakeholder analysis to groups including senior leadership, employees, unions, regulators, customers, investors and other external stakeholders. A major part of the analysis considers stakeholder power, interest, legitimacy and urgency. The assessment brief specifically requires students to identify internal and external stakeholders, assess their power and interests, and evaluate how the investigated business challenge affects each stakeholder group. The project concludes with evidence-based strategic recommendations designed to improve labour relations, governance and organisational resilience. Recommendations include strengthening good-faith bargaining, developing more consistent labour-governance practices, improving workforce systems and employee participation, incorporating labour-relations indicators into ESG and corporate reporting, and adopting a coordinated legal and reputation-management strategy. Overall, the work demonstrates the application of strategic management, stakeholder analysis, corporate governance, HRM and secondary-data evaluation to a contemporary organisational challenge. The official assessment requires recommendations to arise directly from the critical analysis and to explain how they create strategic value for the client organisation and its wider industry. The completed submission itself is titled Business Project and focuses on Starbucks; its contents include the organisational challenge, purpose of the report, stakeholder impact, secondary-data evaluation, and recommendations and conclusion.
Read Model Answer →
People Practice / Human Resource Management
2,500 words
Business, Culture and Change in Context: Organisational Acquisition Case Study
This CIPD Level 3 assessment examines how the external business environment, organisational culture and planned change influence organisations and their people. The assessment is based on a case study involving Best Pharmacy Ever (BPE), a small group of local pharmacies considering the acquisition of Emrosu, a much larger national pharmacy chain with approximately 100 stores and an established online pharmacy operation. The acquisition creates significant implications for organisational structure, culture, technology, people practices and change management. Learners are required to provide written responses to nine case-based questions. The assessment begins by examining external factors that may affect the acquisition and identifying appropriate post-acquisition business goals. It also requires consideration of the organisations' products, services and customers and the ways technology could support people professionals, improve working practices and strengthen collaboration following organisational growth. A central component of the assessment concerns organisational culture. Learners must explain the meaning and importance of culture, consider organisations as interconnected systems, and assess how the actions of people professionals can influence wider organisational outcomes. The final questions focus on planned organisational change, the contribution people professionals can make during periods of transition and the potential impact of significant change on employees. The unit therefore develops understanding of environmental analysis, organisational systems, workplace culture, technology and effective change management from a people-practice perspective. Written answers should make clear and consistent use of the case study and demonstrate application of relevant people-practice concepts rather than providing generic theoretical descriptions. The required submission is approximately 2,500 words, with a permitted variation of ±10%, subject to the CIPD word-count policy.
Read Model Answer →