Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Managing the Global Supply Chain and Sustainability
2,500 words
Managing the Global Supply Chain and Sustainability – Individual Company Case Analysis
This assessment is an individual company case analysis for the Level 7 module Managing the Global Supply Chain and Sustainability. Students are required to select a real organisation of any size, type, industry or country and produce a comprehensive analysis of one operations performance objective. The available performance objectives are cost, dependability, flexibility, speed and quality. The report should identify current issues faced by the chosen organisation in relation to the selected objective and critically analyse the factors affecting its performance. Students are expected to apply relevant theories, concepts and tools covered during lectures and seminars to the selected company case. Rather than providing only descriptive explanations of theoretical concepts, the assessment requires students to demonstrate how these concepts can be applied to understand the organisation's operational or supply chain challenges. The analysis should consider how relevant theories, models or tools could contribute to improving the company's performance. The report should also provide a critical discussion of appropriate performance-improvement practices. These may include the use of digital technologies, sustainability practices, supply chain strategies, operational approaches or other relevant methods. Students should relate these practices directly to the findings from their chosen company case and consider their practical implications. Academic evidence and real-world examples should be used to support the analysis, with appropriate attention given to supply chain and operations management literature. The assessment is designed to develop students' ability to understand supply chain strategies, assess their contribution to agility, viability and sustainability, propose practical solutions to modern logistics and supply chain challenges, and evaluate how digital technologies and sustainability practices can improve supply chain performance. The report should therefore demonstrate analysis, application of theory, critical evaluation and evidence-based recommendations rather than simply describing the organisation or its supply chain. The individual report has a maximum length of 2,500 words, excluding references, tables, figures and appendices. It must include a contents page, be spell-checked and follow the specified formatting requirements. The report should use Arial 12-point font, 1.5 line spacing, A4 page size and 2.54 cm margins. Academic sources such as journal articles and books should be used, and all sources cited within the report must appear in a Harvard-style reference list. The report is submitted through Moodle Turnitin as a Word document.
Read Model Answer →
Cloud and Big Data Technologies
2,500 words
Cloud and Big Data Technologies – Summative Assessment: Cloud and Big Data Security Application
This summative assessment for the CST4067 Cloud and Big Data Technologies module requires students to design, implement and evaluate an individual cloud and big data security application. The assessment focuses on applying techniques for the complex transformation and processing of data within distributed and cloud-based environments, while considering security, privacy and access-control requirements. Students are expected to develop a practical application and document its design, implementation and evaluation through a technical report and a short demonstration video. Students are given flexibility to select their own project idea, provided that the proposed application is appropriately scoped for the available development period and demonstrates relevant cloud, big data and security technologies. Suggested project areas include data science applications using SQL, MongoDB and cloud storage, privacy-preserving data processing such as Differential Privacy, multi-party authentication, group-based security and access control, Multi-Level Security, Attribute-Based Encryption, and distributed or cloud-based applications incorporating security protocols such as SSH, SSL or IPSEC and access-control mechanisms such as RBAC. The Design and Implementation Document should be no longer than 2,500 words and should explain the major design and implementation aspects of the project. Expected content includes an introduction covering the aims, objectives, project concept, security concepts and cloud technologies used; a requirements specification addressing programme behaviour and security requirements; analysis and design covering protocols, access control and interaction, sequence diagrams or process specifications; implementation details explaining what was achieved and how it was developed; and an evaluation and conclusion discussing successful and unsuccessful aspects, problems encountered and lessons learned. Relevant references, including tutorials, books and academic articles, should also be provided using Harvard or IEEE referencing. The assessment also requires students to submit the implemented Cloud and Big Data Security application together with a highlight demonstration video. The video must be no longer than seven minutes and should demonstrate the main features of the application, including relevant interactions, implementation highlights, security features and, where appropriate, attack scenarios. Assessment is based on the Design and Implementation Document, originality, advanced features, and the effort and quality demonstrated in the application. The assessment specification places particular importance on original development, clear documentation of any tutorials or existing resources used, and evidence that the student understands the technologies implemented. Suggested technologies and project ideas include Google Cloud, Hadoop, Spark, cloud storage, data pipelines, security protocols, access control and privacy-preserving techniques.
Read Model Answer →
Data Visualisation / Business Intelligence
2,500 words
Data Visualisation (BS666) — Business Analyst Client Report: Dashboard Development, Tool Evaluation and Accessibility in Power BI and Tableau
This Level 7 resit assessment takes the form of a single client-facing report written from the position of a qualified business analyst. Rather than assembling semester activities, it asks for one sustained piece of analytical writing that carries a business case from raw open data through to a defended set of visualisations and the decisions they support. The report opens by identifying a data source drawn from an approved open repository and setting out the business problem the client faces. Provenance, structure, granularity and known limitations of the dataset are examined honestly at this stage, since every downstream claim rests on them, and all data is referenced in full — including data appearing inside charts, as the brief specifically requires. The main body works through three connected strands of critical evaluation. The first traces the development sequence of the visualisations themselves: how the data was prepared and cleaned, why particular chart types were selected over the alternatives available, how layout and interactivity were arranged for the intended audience, and how the design changed across iterations once weaknesses became visible. At least three completed visualisations are then evaluated individually and critically — what each one reveals, where each falls short, and what a reader could reasonably conclude from it. The second strand compares Power BI and Tableau as working environments for this specific dataset rather than in the abstract. Data connectivity, transformation and calculation capability, visual flexibility, publishing and sharing, licensing and governance are all weighed against what the client actually needs, with the practical friction encountered during the build reported rather than smoothed over. The third strand addresses accessibility and cognitive processing. It examines how each platform handles colour contrast and colour-vision deficiency, text alternatives, keyboard navigation and screen reader support, and then moves into the perceptual side — pre-attentive attributes, data-ink economy, chart junk, working memory limits and how visual encoding choices either reduce or inflate the effort a reader must spend to extract meaning. The argument connects this directly to decision quality in organisations with diverse analytical literacy. Findings are reported at length and translated into concrete business implications, with a conclusion that states what the client should do and on what evidence. The submission follows the prescribed structure throughout: title page, executive summary, contents, introduction, business problem, main evaluative section, findings, conclusion, Harvard reference list and appendices, presented as a single file for Turnitin.
Read Model Answer →
Data Visualisation / Business Intelligence
2,500 words
Data Visualisation (BS664) — Portfolio: Tableau and Power BI Dashboard Development for Evidence-Based Decision-Making
This Level 7 portfolio accumulates work across a full semester of data visualisation study and is submitted as one continuous document combining reflective writing, tool evaluation and an applied dashboard project. The emphasis throughout falls on interpretative rigour — showing not just that a visualisation was built, but why each design decision serves the decision-maker who has to act on it. The first activity documents sustained critical participation across the module's weekly discussion topics. Five or more substantive responses are evidenced with dated screenshots, each paired with the corresponding workshop date, and each grounded in both academic literature and practitioner sources rather than opinion alone. Live URLs to the Power BI and Tableau dashboards built during the module are included, and the activity closes with a consolidated review of how understanding developed across the units. The second activity covers formal training completion in both platforms, with certificates and badges reproduced, and then turns to accessibility. It examines the visualisations produced during that training against accessibility principles — colour contrast and colour-blind safe palettes, text alternatives, chart type legibility, cognitive load — and argues why accessibility is not a compliance afterthought but a determinant of whether a dashboard actually informs decisions inside a global organisation with a diverse user base. The third activity is a structured comparison of Tableau and Power BI, conducted through the evaluative frameworks introduced in workshops rather than a feature checklist. Benefits and limitations are weighed across data connectivity, calculation capability, visual flexibility, licensing and cost, collaboration and governance, and organisational fit. The section ends with a reasoned recommendation of one platform for the applied work that follows, with the trade-offs of that choice acknowledged openly. The fourth and largest activity is the applied project. A dataset is selected from an approved open source and its provenance, quality and limitations discussed. The target business, its stakeholder groups and the varying analytical literacy of the intended audience are analysed, because these determine what the dashboard must show and how plainly. The report then walks through the full development sequence — data preparation and cleaning, chart selection and justification, layout and interactivity, iteration in response to identified weaknesses — with screenshots evidencing each stage. Findings are reported and translated into specific, evidence-based decisions the business could take on the strength of them. The submission follows the prescribed structure with title page, contents, introduction, business problem, main analysis, findings, Harvard reference list and appendices, presented as a single file.
Read Model Answer →
Global Supply Chain Management / Operations Management
2,494 words
Global Supply Chain and Operations Performance: Company Case Analysis
This Level 7 individual assignment requires students to produce a 2,500-word company case analysis examining an important operations performance issue within a real organisation. Students may select an organisation of any size, type, industry or country and must concentrate their analysis on one operations performance objective: cost, dependability, flexibility, speed or quality. The report requires students to identify the current challenges faced by the chosen organisation in relation to the selected performance objective and critically examine those challenges using relevant operations and supply chain management theories, concepts and analytical tools. Rather than providing only a descriptive account of organisational activities, students are expected to apply appropriate theoretical frameworks to the case and evaluate how these concepts could contribute to improved organisational and supply chain performance. A significant component of the assignment involves critically discussing appropriate best practices for performance improvement. These may include digital technologies, sustainability practices or other relevant operational and supply chain approaches. Students should connect these practices directly to findings from their chosen company case and assess their practical relevance, opportunities and limitations. Academic literature and appropriate real-world evidence should be used throughout to substantiate the analysis and recommendations. The assignment evaluates students' ability to analyse supply chain and operations problems, apply academic theory to organisational practice, and develop evidence-based conclusions and practical recommendations. The marking rubric places substantial emphasis on analysis and discussion (30%), application of theory (30%), and conclusions and recommendations (30%), with the remaining 10% allocated to presentation, logical structure, English expression and correct referencing. The report must use Harvard referencing, include a contents page, and follow the specified academic formatting requirements, including Arial size 12, 1.5 line spacing and A4 pages with 2.54 cm margins.
Read Model Answer →