Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
1,000 words
Organisational Strategy and Sustainability: Strategic and Sustainability Analysis of Engineers & Planners Company Ltd
This formative Organisational Strategy and Sustainability assessment requires students to act as a management consultant for BPP Consulting Group and provide a strategic and sustainability evaluation of ENGINEERS & PLANNERS COMPANY LTD for its Board of Directors. The task focuses on how internal capabilities, external market forces, sustainability pressures, ethical practices and responsible leadership shape the organisation’s strategy within an increasingly global business environment. Formative Assessment - Organisa… ENGINEERS & PLANNERS COMPANY LTD is described as a Ghanaian-owned mining and construction contracting company, established in 1997 and headquartered in Accra. Its activities include contract mining, road construction, tailings-dam construction, land reclamation and hard-rock mining, with operations in Ghana and Liberia. The company also owns Dzata Cement, a cement manufacturing facility in Tema with an annual production capacity of approximately 2.3 million metric tons. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa… The formative task addresses the first two learning outcomes of the summative assessment. LO1 – Strategic Environmental Analysis requires a brief but critical evaluation of the organisation’s internal resources and capabilities together with its external environment. Students should use one internal and one external strategic framework, with examples including PESTEL or Porter’s Five Forces, identify internal competencies, opportunities and threats, and consider how the organisation might respond to dynamic market forces in regions such as the European Union, Asia or North America. Sources of competitive advantage should also be identified from the internal analysis. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa… LO2 – Ethical, Sustainable and Responsible Practices requires students to assess how ENGINEERS & PLANNERS COMPANY LTD could integrate CSR, sustainability or ethical practice into its wider business strategy. The brief recommends applying one framework such as the Triple Bottom Line or Sustainable Supply Chain Management. The discussion should connect the sustainability analysis back to the strategic issues identified under LO1. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa… Students are also expected to consider how leadership shapes the organisation’s sustainability response, including engagement with stakeholders such as suppliers, customers and NGOs and the influence of regulatory frameworks such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals and relevant European Union legislation. One specific sustainability initiative should be briefly considered, such as product lifecycle management, eco-design, renewable-energy integration or supply-chain transparency. Formative Assessment - Organisa… The recommended report structure consists of an introduction, LO1 Strategic Environmental Analysis, LO2 Ethical, Sustainable and Responsible Practices, and a conclusion summarising recommended strategic and sustainability improvements. Suggested allocations are approximately 50 words for the introduction, 450 words for LO1, 450 words for LO2 and 50 words for the conclusion. Formative Assessment - Organisa… The total submission limit is 1,000 words, with the main body subject to the word-count restriction. The work must use third-person academic writing, professional formatting, appropriate tables and figures, and consistent Harvard citations. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Higher-quality work is expected to go beyond descriptive use of strategic models by critically evaluating the organisation’s internal and external environment, identifying key drivers of change, considering global and local influences on strategic choices, and linking sustainability and responsible-business practices to stakeholder expectations and regulatory pressures. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa…
Read Model Answer →
International Business / Strategic Management
200 words
Individual Reflection on Tencent’s Strategic Reorganisation and International Business Strategy
This International Business Strategy assessment is an individual reflective exercise based on a case-study discussion undertaken during Weeks 5–8 of the module. Its purpose is to develop students’ ability to critically reflect on learning experiences and use that reflection to improve future academic and professional performance. Students participate in approximately 30-minute seminar discussions in which theoretical concepts from the module are applied to real-world business cases with tutors and peers. IBS-0901-2025-+Reflection2-Ref For this entry, the selected case is Tencent: “third time lucky?”. The case examines how Tencent evolved from a Chinese instant-messaging company into a major technology group spanning messaging, gaming, entertainment, investment and cloud services. It focuses particularly on three major organisational reorganisations undertaken in 2005, 2012 and 2018 as the company attempted to address increasing organisational complexity, coordination problems, changing technologies and new strategic priorities. The 2005 restructuring responded to Tencent’s growing scale by dividing the organisation into major business and platform-development groups. By 2012, further growth and the success of products such as WeChat had created new organisational complexity, leading to a structure organised around seven distinct business groups. The case highlights that this arrangement subsequently contributed to a “silo culture”, creating difficulties in sharing ideas, data, code and customers across business units. The 2018 reorganisation responded to a strategic shift toward the “industrial internet”, including greater emphasis on cloud services, business-to-business solutions and digital transformation. Tencent reorganised around six major groups, including Cloud and Smart Industries, Platforms and Content, Interactive Entertainment, Corporate Development, WeChat, and Technology and Engineering, while also establishing a technical committee intended to improve internal coordination and data sharing. The case asks students to consider both the strategic rationale for each restructuring and whether the 2018 changes adequately addressed Tencent’s organisational challenges. The reflection itself must be between 150 and 250 words. Students should explain what the week’s topic and case study were about, what they learned from the discussion, how the conversation helped them apply theory to their final report, and what key insights they gained. They should also reflect on what went well, what challenges were encountered and what they would change if repeating the session. At least one reflective framework, such as Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle or Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle, must be applied. IBS-0901-2025-+Reflection2-Ref The wider learning outcomes emphasise strategic management theory, internationalisation, internal and external environmental influences, critical analysis of international organisations and the use of analytical tools to evaluate strategic options. The task therefore combines strategic thinking, international business analysis and reflective professional development. IBS-0901-2025-+Reflection2-Ref The accompanying Tencent case specifically asks students to consider why each major reorganisation occurred, whether the 2018 restructuring adequately addressed Tencent’s challenges, and what additional “hard” and “soft” implementation measures might have been necessary. Case+study+7
Read Model Answer →
Strategic Management / Sustainability / Responsible Leadership
2,500 words
Organisational Strategy and Sustainability: Strategic Evaluation of Engineers & Planners Company Ltd
This Consultancy Project Proposal assessment requires students to develop a professional and feasible research proposal addressing a current organisational issue or business challenge affecting an existing organisation. The work combines critical business analysis with research design, secondary-data methodology, ethics and visual communication through an accompanying one-page digital poster. MSc Management Summative Assess… The first task requires students to introduce the selected organisation and critically examine between one and three current challenges. The discussion must be evidence-based and supported by recent sources. Stronger work should connect the identified issues to current affairs, recent news, Sustainable Development Goals and relevant academic or company evidence. MSc Management Summative Assess… The second task requires development of a clear research aim, three objectives and, for stronger submissions, one or two research questions. Students must demonstrate awareness and application of research methodology using secondary research only, while incorporating both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The research design should be directly connected to the selected organisational challenges. MSc Management Summative Assess… The third task focuses on the research plan and ethical considerations. Students must explain ethical issues associated with secondary-data collection and support the discussion using credible literature. The accompanying poster should present a coherent research plan and demonstrate effective data-analysis and data-presentation skills through relevant graphs, charts, tables or descriptive statistics. MSc Management Summative Assess… The fourth task assesses the student's ability to critically organise and synthesise information into a coherent proposal. The written report should use recent, credible sources, while the poster should include a short reflection on challenges encountered when synthesising evidence for the proposed study. MSc Management Summative Assess… The report must be written in the third person and use Harvard referencing. The proposed structure allocates approximately 150 words to the introduction, 400 words to the challenge discussion, 150 words to the research aim and objectives, 500 words to methodology, 200 words to ethical considerations and 100 words to the conclusion. The digital poster has no formal word count but must fit on a single A4 page and use a readable 10–12 point font. MSc Management Summative Assess… MSc Management Summative Assess… Overall, the assessment develops skills in consultancy problem definition, research design, secondary-data analysis, mixed-method thinking, ethical research practice, critical synthesis and professional visual communication.
Read Model Answer →
Business Ethics
2,500 words
Success Through Business Ethics – Ethical Analysis of an FMCG Brand
This assessment is an individual written report for the Success Through Business Ethics module. The assignment requires students to critically examine ethical issues and challenges within a Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) brand and evaluate how ethical theories, decision-making approaches and leadership practices can be applied to understand unethical business behaviour. The report has a total word limit of 2,500 words and accounts for 100% of the assessment. Students are required to select an FMCG brand that has been involved in unethical practices between 2000 and 2025. The selected brand may originate or operate anywhere in the world and may still be operating or may have ceased operations. Students must ensure that sufficient information is available about the organisation and its external environment before selecting the company. The report begins with an introduction explaining the nature of business ethics and introducing the selected FMCG brand and the unethical business practices associated with it. The main analysis requires students to select three normative ethical theories, explain their key principles and critically evaluate whether the company's behaviour adhered to or violated those principles. Students must use this analysis to explain why the identified business practices can be considered unethical. A second analytical section requires students to choose either ethical decision-making or social accounting. The selected concept must be explained and then critically applied to the unethical practices of the chosen FMCG brand. A further analysis focuses on the leadership style of the company's leadership team. Students must explain the principles of the leadership style, consider its positive and negative aspects, and analyse how the leaders responded to the unethical business practices. The report concludes by summarising the key findings from the analysis and providing two important recommendations for the selected brand. The recommendations should be directly relevant to the unethical practices identified and should be justified using evidence and findings from the report. Where a selected company has ceased operating, recommendations should still be provided on the assumption that the brand is operating. The assessment develops students' ability to apply ethical frameworks to business decision-making, understand ethical decision-making and corporate social responsibility, align ethics and values with business contexts, analyse ethical challenges in business strategies and operations, and evaluate moral dilemmas using economic, legal and ethical considerations. The report must use Harvard referencing for in-text citations and the reference list, with the reference list organised alphabetically.
Read Model Answer →
Corporate Strategy
4,000 words
Strategic Case Study – Corporate Strategy
This Corporate Strategy assessment requires students to undertake a critical strategic analysis of a chosen organisation and develop evidence-based recommendations for its long-term growth and competitive position. The assignment is presented as a 4,000-word Strategic Case Study and focuses on analysing practical business situations through the application of corporate strategy theories, analytical tools and strategic frameworks. The assessment aims to develop students' ability to evaluate an organisation's competitive advantage, identify significant strategic challenges and opportunities, and propose practical strategies for sustainable growth. The report begins with an introduction explaining the purpose of the case study and identifying the selected company. The strategic positioning section then examines the organisation's current competitive advantage, differentiation from competitors, fundamental competencies and resources. Relevant theories and strategic frameworks should be applied to support the analysis. The external environment section requires a critical evaluation of industry attractiveness using Porter's Five Forces. Students must also examine the factors driving organisational change, compare the selected organisation with close rivals and provide strategic recommendations for addressing identified challenges. The international strategy section critically analyses the effectiveness of the company's existing international expansion strategy and requires students to propose a new expansion strategy for a geographical location in an international market. An appropriate internationalisation theory and market-entry mode should be applied to support the proposed strategy. The challenges and opportunities section examines major issues affecting the organisation, including areas such as market competition, technological disruption and regulatory change. Students must identify opportunities that could strengthen the company's competitive position and use an appropriate framework to consider the development, leadership and implementation of organisational change. The proposed leadership-driven strategy should also be reflected upon in relation to the company's strategic goals. The final main section provides two to three actionable strategic recommendations that the organisation should implement to sustain or enhance its competitive advantage. Students are also required to include an appendix of no more than 500 words containing concise explanations, models or frameworks demonstrating their understanding of theories and concepts relevant to the assessment. The appendix should support the main analysis and be clearly referenced within the report. The assessment develops several strategic management capabilities. The assessed learning outcomes include critically analysing a company's strategic position using analytical tools and theoretical frameworks; developing corporate-level strategies and considering their implementation and control; integrating innovative and sustainable practices into strategic planning; and using performance measurement instruments to assess strategic initiatives. The brief also aligns with CMI Level 7 Strategic Management and Leadership Practice units covering strategy development and strategic change. The submission is an individual written coursework assignment submitted through Turnitin. The written assignment must be submitted as a Microsoft Word document rather than PDF. Students must acknowledge and reference any AI tools used in developing the assignment and provide appropriate acknowledgement of all sources.
Read Model Answer →
Organisational Strategy and Sustainability
2,500 words
Strategic Evaluation and Analysis of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL)
This 2,500-word coursework for the MSc Management module Organisational Strategy and Sustainability requires a strategic evaluation and analysis of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL). The assignment is written from the perspective of a management consultant at BPP Consulting Group and is addressed to HUL’s Board of Directors. It focuses on HUL’s strategic management, sustainability initiatives and responsible leadership within a global business context. The report begins by examining HUL’s internal capabilities and external business environment. Students are required to apply one strategic model to analyse the internal environment and one model to assess the external environment, such as VRIO, PESTEL or Porter’s Five Forces. The analysis should identify internal competencies, external opportunities and threats, sources of competitive advantage, and the influence of global and local market dynamics on HUL’s strategic choices. Particular consideration may be given to key regions such as the European Union, Asia and North America. The second section evaluates HUL’s ethical, sustainable and responsible business practices. The brief requires the use of one framework, such as the Triple Bottom Line or Sustainable Supply Chain Management, to assess one selected area of CSR, sustainability or ethical practice. The discussion should consider stakeholder engagement, regulatory influences such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and European Union legislation, and one HUL sustainability initiative such as product lifecycle management, eco-design, renewable energy integration or supply chain transparency. The third section critically evaluates HUL’s strategic responses to current and future challenges, including climate change, artificial intelligence and digital disruption. One strategic framework, such as the Ansoff Matrix, Blue Ocean Strategy or VRIO, should be applied to evaluate strategic options and their implications for long-term sustainability, competitiveness and market relevance. The final section provides a personal leadership and sustainability reflection. Students select one leadership model, such as Goleman’s Emotional Intelligence, Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions or Transformational Leadership, and reflect on their learning from the previous sections. The reflection covers personal development, ethical, cross-cultural or sustainable leadership, career aspirations, and values-driven leadership. The report concludes by summarising recommended changes to HUL’s organisational strategy and sustainability initiatives. The assessment requires Harvard referencing and a professional academic structure. The main body has a 2,500-word limit, with suggested allocations of approximately 50 words for the introduction, 600 words each for LO1, LO2, LO3 and LO4, and 50 words for the conclusion. The cover page, contents, references and appendices are excluded from the word count.
Read Model Answer →
Business Ethics / Corporate Social Responsibility
2,500 words
Success Through Business Ethics (BS846) — Individual Report: Ethical Failure in an FMCG Brand, Moral Philosophy, Decision-Making and Leadership Response
This Level 7 individual report examines a real fast-moving consumer goods brand that was found to have engaged in unethical business practices between 2000 and 2023, and works through why the failure happened rather than simply recounting what occurred. The brand is selected on the basis that sufficient documented evidence exists about both the company and its external environment — regulatory findings, investigative journalism, financial disclosures and NGO reporting — so that every analytical claim can be supported rather than assumed. The introduction establishes what business ethics means as an academic field, drawing on recognised sources, before introducing the chosen brand and setting out concisely what the unethical practices were, when they came to light and who was harmed. The first and largest analytical section applies three moral philosophical bases from the module to the case. Each is used as a lens rather than described in isolation: the utilitarian calculation the company appears to have made and where its accounting of harm was deficient, the duty-based obligations to consumers, workers or communities that were breached regardless of outcome, and the character and organisational culture questions that virtue ethics raises about how such decisions became normal internally. The evaluation is genuinely critical — it identifies where the company's conduct could be partially defended under one framework while failing badly under another, which is where the analytical marks sit. The second section takes one of the two theoretical approaches offered and applies it in depth. Where ethical decision-making is chosen, the report traces the sequence of judgements that produced the outcome, examining awareness, intent, organisational pressure and the moral intensity of the issue. Where social accounting is chosen, it assesses what the company disclosed about its social and environmental impact against what was actually occurring, and what that gap reveals about the purpose its reporting served. The third section evaluates leadership. It characterises the prevailing leadership style from the evidence and then focuses on the response once the practices were exposed — whether leaders denied, deflected, settled quietly or accepted accountability — supported by tables, figures and quoted material showing the consequences in share price, revenue, regulatory penalties and documented social or environmental harm. Three concrete recommendations follow, each derived directly from a failure identified in the preceding analysis and justified specifically for this brand rather than offered as generic good practice, with a short conclusion drawing the sections together. Harvard referencing is applied in text and in an alphabetised reference list.
Read Model Answer →
Strategy and Innovation
Strategic Analysis and Innovation Strategy for a UK Organisation
This postgraduate Strategy and Innovation assessment requires students to conduct a detailed strategic analysis of an allocated organisation and present the findings through a series of professionally designed information dashboards. The purpose of the analysis is to establish the organisation's current strategic position and use the resulting evidence to recommend an appropriate and justifiable innovation strategy. The work is expected to demonstrate master's-level evaluation, interpretation and synthesis rather than descriptive or checklist-based analysis. The first major analytical area concerns the organisation's external environment. Students evaluate the broader business environment, analyse the firm's industry and undertake competitor analysis, including consideration of the organisation's strategic group. Analysis should concentrate on the most consequential environmental factors and integrate general and industry-level evidence rather than simply listing factors. Competitor evaluation can examine issues such as products and services, market commonality, positioning, distinctive value propositions, first-mover advantage and breakthrough innovation. The internal analysis examines the firm's resources, capabilities and sources of competitive advantage. Appropriate analytical techniques should be used to assess competitive resources and key capabilities, with the internal value chain helping to identify factors capable of supporting competitive advantage. Students must also evaluate the organisation's business-level strategy and consider whether its resources and capabilities support its competitive positioning. Corporate-level analysis considers the firm's degree of diversification, internationalisation strategy, growth through acquisitions, mergers or organic development, and any cooperative strategies. These elements should be evaluated against the organisation's capabilities, resources and competitive context. The analysis concludes by interpreting the evidence to establish the firm's overall strategic position and recommending an innovation strategy or approach to innovation. Presentation quality is also important: the report should use an effective combination of text, charts, diagrams and other graphical forms, with professional formatting and accurate referencing. Overview word count: approximately 330 words.
Read Model Answer →