Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Managing Customer Experience
2,500 words
Customer Experience Strategy: Critical Evaluation of a Global Mobile Phone Brand
This assessment requires a 2,500-word business report critically evaluating the customer experience (CX) strategy of one company operating within the global mobile phone industry. Students must select one company from Samsung, Apple, Huawei or Google and analyse its customer experience strategy within one specific country in which the company operates. The report is written from the perspective of a CX consultant and is intended for the Board of Directors of the selected company. Relevant customer experience concepts, academic literature and practical business applications should be incorporated throughout the report. The first part of the report examines the concept of customer experience and its importance to business success. The analysis should consider the role of CX, the mutual benefits created for the company and its customers, the effect of CX on business and financial performance, and specific examples of how the selected brand has used customer experience to achieve competitive advantage. The second part evaluates how the selected company delivers a seamless omnichannel customer experience. This requires consideration of customer personas and customer journey mapping and their contribution to developing an effective customer strategy. Students must create a detailed customer persona based on research and data analysis, covering the profile, goals, pain points and motivations of the selected customer. A customer journey map should then identify stages, needs, activities, feelings, pain points and opportunities for improvement. The report should evaluate the effectiveness of the company's customer journey and suggest practical improvements. The words contained within the recommended customer persona and customer journey map templates are excluded from the 2,500-word limit. The third part evaluates the effectiveness of the company's use of customer experience metrics to measure the quality of its relationship with customers. Students must discuss three CX metrics covered in the module and critically assess their benefits, limitations and relevance to the selected company. The analysis should explain why these metrics would be useful for measuring the mutually beneficial relationship between the company and its customers. The final part critically reflects on the company's ability to create a customer-centric culture in an increasingly digital environment. This includes evaluating CX leadership and CX governance, as well as one additional critical success factor such as people, CX structure, strategy and process, or innovation. The report should conclude by evaluating the overall quality of the company's relationship with its customers and proposing practical ways to improve customer experience in the era of increasing digitalisation. The assessment addresses four learning outcomes relating to the importance of customer experience, organisational CX performance metrics, seamless omnichannel customer journeys and customer experience strategies in the context of rapid digitalisation. The submission must use Harvard referencing and an academic business-report style.
Read Model Answer →
Global Supply Chain Management
1,800 words
Suez Canal Blockage: A Case Study of Global Supply Chain Disruption
This individual report examines the challenges faced by global supply chains as a result of the Suez Canal blockage and critically evaluates the factors that affected supply chain performance during the disruption. The assignment uses the Suez Canal blockage as a case study to explore the wider principles and practices of global supply chain management, with particular attention to supply chain disruption, risk management, resilience, logistics, supplier relationships and integrated supply chain performance. The report requires students to conduct preliminary research into the Suez Canal blockage and use relevant academic and practical sources to identify the major challenges created by the disruption. The case study focuses on the six-day stranding of the Ever Given and the resulting disruption to international supply chains and global trade. The assessment considers how a disruption at a strategically important global trade route can create wider consequences for organisations, logistics networks and supply chain operations. The analysis should identify the key factors that influenced supply chain performance and critically evaluate the effectiveness of the solutions implemented to resolve the disruption. Relevant global supply chain management theories, models and concepts should be clearly defined and applied to the case rather than simply described. The report should demonstrate an understanding of fundamental supply chain principles and consider how evolving trends and global issues can affect supply chain operations. The assignment also encourages consideration of important supply chain management areas covered within the unit, including risk management, resilience, outsourcing, supplier planning and selection, relationship management, supply chain integration, demand management, order management and customer service. These concepts should be connected to the Suez Canal blockage to provide a critical assessment of the challenges and possible approaches to improving supply chain resilience. The report must be presented in a formal and logically coherent report format and should provide evidence of critical reasoning through a wide range of relevant academic and practical sources. The conclusion should draw together the main findings, while recommendations should propose realistic approaches for addressing the supply chain issues identified in the case. The assessment is worth 30% of the overall unit mark and requires an individual report of 1,800 words, with a permitted variation of ±10%. The report is assessed across four main areas: use of theory and frameworks (25%), analysis and evaluation (30%), conclusions and recommendations (20%), and structure, presentation and referencing (25%). The marking criteria emphasise the application of relevant theoretical concepts, critical evaluation of academic and practical sources, a clear connection between theory and practice, realistic recommendations, logical structure, and appropriate in-text citations and referencing.
Read Model Answer →
Global Supply Chain Management
4,200 words
Global Supply Chain Management – Gatwick Airport Northern Runway Expansion
This individual report examines several strategic and operational aspects of the global supply chain associated with the Gatwick Airport Northern Runway expansion. The assessment requires students to investigate the organisation and its current global supply chain challenges, while applying relevant supply chain management theories, frameworks and models to analyse its operations and develop strategic recommendations. The report begins by providing a background of the organisation, with particular attention to its current global supply chain issues and strategic supply chain relationships. Key areas of investigation include risk management, supply chain resilience, outsourcing, supplier planning and selection, supply chain integration, network design, leadership, benchmarking, decision-making, and the application of lean and agile approaches. These areas provide the basis for understanding how the organisation can manage its supply chain effectively within a complex and changing global environment. A critical evaluation of external factors affecting the organisation's global supply chain is also required through the use of a PESTEL analysis. This enables consideration of the political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal factors that may influence supply chain performance, risks, costs and strategic decisions. The report must then develop key strategic recommendations aimed at optimising the organisation's global supply chain. The recommendations should focus on reducing costs, supporting sustainability, improving operational efficiency and enhancing supply chain resilience. Each recommendation should be supported by appropriate supply chain management theories and models, such as agile supply chain approaches, lean supply chain principles and global sourcing strategies. Students are expected to provide a clear rationale for their recommendations using theoretical insights and relevant academic and professional literature. The assessment places emphasis on critical reasoning, wider reading and the ability to connect supply chain theory with practical organisational issues. A logically structured, professional and business-like report is required, supported by appropriate evidence and Harvard referencing. The marking criteria assess the use of theory and frameworks, critical analysis and evaluation, conclusions and recommendations, and the overall structure, presentation and referencing of the report. The assignment is worth 70% of the unit assessment and has a required length of approximately 4,200 words, with a permitted variation of ±10%. The report should demonstrate an understanding of global supply chain management practices and the ability to apply relevant theories and frameworks to analyse supply chain challenges and develop realistic strategic recommendations.
Read Model Answer →
Computational Algorithms and Paradigms
1,000 words
Computational Algorithm Analysis – Research Paper Algorithm
This individual coursework for the Computational Algorithms and Paradigms module requires students to thoroughly analyse a computational algorithm proposed in a research paper selected from the list of research papers provided on Canvas. The purpose of the assessment is to develop students' ability to understand, explain and critically evaluate computational algorithms presented in academic research. Students must first identify and describe the computational problem addressed by the selected research paper and clearly state the research questions investigated by the authors. They must then extract the main computational algorithm proposed in the paper and present it in pseudocode. The assessment also requires students to clearly identify the inputs required by the algorithm and the outputs produced by it. The coursework consists of six main analytical sections. The first section focuses on the computational problem and research questions addressed in the selected paper. Students are expected to provide an accurate description of the problem and explain the research questions that the proposed algorithm attempts to address. The second section requires the proposed computational algorithm to be represented using suitable pseudocode. The third section identifies and explains the algorithm's inputs and outputs. The fourth section requires students to explain the proposed algorithm using simple and understandable language. The explanation should demonstrate a clear understanding of how the algorithm operates rather than simply reproducing the description provided in the research paper. The fifth section focuses on analysing the time complexity of the proposed algorithm. Students should evaluate the computational cost of the algorithm and explain its time complexity appropriately. The final section requires a critical evaluation of the algorithm's strengths and weaknesses. Students should identify the advantages and limitations of the proposed approach and discuss potential improvements where appropriate. This section should demonstrate critical thinking about the effectiveness, efficiency and practical applicability of the algorithm. The coursework has a total word count requirement of 800–1,000 words. The inputs and outputs, pseudocode and time-complexity analysis sections are excluded from this word-count limit. The template requires approximately 250 words for the computational problem and research questions, approximately 250 words for the simple explanation of the algorithm, and approximately 300 words for the strengths and weaknesses evaluation. Students must report the word count for sections 1, 4 and 6 after completing the assignment. The submitted work must be original and is subject to plagiarism and collusion checks through Turnitin. The assessment brief also states that generative AI tools may be used for proofreading but are not permitted for creating the coursework content. No figures or images are permitted, and the coursework must be submitted using the provided Word template in DOC or DOCX format.
Read Model Answer →
1,000 words
Organisational Strategy and Sustainability: Strategic and Sustainability Analysis of Engineers & Planners Company Ltd
This formative Organisational Strategy and Sustainability assessment requires students to act as a management consultant for BPP Consulting Group and provide a strategic and sustainability evaluation of ENGINEERS & PLANNERS COMPANY LTD for its Board of Directors. The task focuses on how internal capabilities, external market forces, sustainability pressures, ethical practices and responsible leadership shape the organisation’s strategy within an increasingly global business environment. Formative Assessment - Organisa… ENGINEERS & PLANNERS COMPANY LTD is described as a Ghanaian-owned mining and construction contracting company, established in 1997 and headquartered in Accra. Its activities include contract mining, road construction, tailings-dam construction, land reclamation and hard-rock mining, with operations in Ghana and Liberia. The company also owns Dzata Cement, a cement manufacturing facility in Tema with an annual production capacity of approximately 2.3 million metric tons. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa… The formative task addresses the first two learning outcomes of the summative assessment. LO1 – Strategic Environmental Analysis requires a brief but critical evaluation of the organisation’s internal resources and capabilities together with its external environment. Students should use one internal and one external strategic framework, with examples including PESTEL or Porter’s Five Forces, identify internal competencies, opportunities and threats, and consider how the organisation might respond to dynamic market forces in regions such as the European Union, Asia or North America. Sources of competitive advantage should also be identified from the internal analysis. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa… LO2 – Ethical, Sustainable and Responsible Practices requires students to assess how ENGINEERS & PLANNERS COMPANY LTD could integrate CSR, sustainability or ethical practice into its wider business strategy. The brief recommends applying one framework such as the Triple Bottom Line or Sustainable Supply Chain Management. The discussion should connect the sustainability analysis back to the strategic issues identified under LO1. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa… Students are also expected to consider how leadership shapes the organisation’s sustainability response, including engagement with stakeholders such as suppliers, customers and NGOs and the influence of regulatory frameworks such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals and relevant European Union legislation. One specific sustainability initiative should be briefly considered, such as product lifecycle management, eco-design, renewable-energy integration or supply-chain transparency. Formative Assessment - Organisa… The recommended report structure consists of an introduction, LO1 Strategic Environmental Analysis, LO2 Ethical, Sustainable and Responsible Practices, and a conclusion summarising recommended strategic and sustainability improvements. Suggested allocations are approximately 50 words for the introduction, 450 words for LO1, 450 words for LO2 and 50 words for the conclusion. Formative Assessment - Organisa… The total submission limit is 1,000 words, with the main body subject to the word-count restriction. The work must use third-person academic writing, professional formatting, appropriate tables and figures, and consistent Harvard citations. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Higher-quality work is expected to go beyond descriptive use of strategic models by critically evaluating the organisation’s internal and external environment, identifying key drivers of change, considering global and local influences on strategic choices, and linking sustainability and responsible-business practices to stakeholder expectations and regulatory pressures. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa…
Read Model Answer →
Research Methods / Project Management / Computer and Information Sciences
3,000 words
Critical Literature Review in Research Methods and Project Management
This Research Methods and Project Management assessment develops students’ ability to search for, evaluate, critically analyse and synthesise academic literature within a computing or information-science research area. Students work within an allocated group to conduct a structured literature search and critically evaluate research papers relevant to an assigned theme, before using the combined group literature corpus to produce an individual literature review. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… Each group member must identify and critically analyse a minimum of five academic papers using the supplied Critical Paper Summary template. These individual summaries are then combined into a single group document and shared so that all team members can use the collective body of research. The quality of this component depends on the relevance and academic quality of the selected papers and the depth of critical evaluation rather than simple description. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… The main individual component is a 3,000-word critical literature review, worth 60% of the assessment. Students must use the literature identified and summarised through the group activity and critically discuss the research associated with their allocated topic. The review should synthesise the literature into a coherent discussion rather than presenting disconnected paper summaries, demonstrating criticality, clear structure and effective academic writing. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… A further 20% is awarded for an individual research and meeting log, maintained through Blackboard. Students are expected to record their research progress, contribution to the group, approach to collaboration and reflections on the literature-review process. Stronger logs demonstrate detailed evidence of active participation, reflective insight and professional collaboration rather than merely listing completed tasks. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… The assessment directly evaluates the ability to apply project-management principles to a computing-related research activity and to search, evaluate and develop a critical literature review. Wider module outcomes also emphasise research techniques, data and information analysis, professional research practice, ethics, risk, legal issues, societal considerations and sustainability. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… The marking structure allocates 20% to the combined critical paper analysis, 20% to the research/meeting log and 60% to the individual literature review. Higher-performing work is expected to use high-quality and directly relevant academic sources, demonstrate strong critical analysis, synthesise evidence across the research theme, maintain a professional academic structure and apply accurate Harvard referencing throughout. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… Important for the public Reference Library: the brief states that ChatGPT or other AI tools must not be used to generate text or fill in assessment-template sections. Any AI use that supports the work or thinking must be declared, referenced and accompanied by a prompt log in an appendix. Therefore, this entry should be used only as a high-level public description of the assessment rather than as directly submissible student content. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste…
Read Model Answer →
Entrepreneurship / Leadership and Management
3,500 words
Entrepreneurial Practice: Strategic Analysis, New Venture Development and Professional Reflection
This individual Entrepreneurial Practice assessment requires students to critically analyse a real organisational issue using one of the approved employer case studies and develop an entrepreneurial business proposal aligned with the organisation’s needs. The complete assessment is structured as a 3,500-word-equivalent portfolio consisting of a written report, briefing notes, a narrated PowerPoint presentation and a professional reflection. Entrepreneurial Practice Assign… Task 1 is a 1,500-word organisational analysis worth 30% of the marks. Students critically examine the challenges facing the selected organisation using appropriate strategic-analysis tools. They must also evaluate the organisation’s leadership models and communication strategies and assess their impact on employees, organisational culture and performance. The section concludes with three justified recommendations intended to improve organisational performance. Entrepreneurial Practice Assign… Task 2A consists of 1,000-word briefing notes focused on a proposed entrepreneurial venture. Students critically appraise the stages of entrepreneurial practice from idea generation through to delivery, including the benefits of the proposed venture and suitable funding sources. The task also requires analysis of business risk-management strategies and critical evaluation of the entrepreneurial traits, characteristics, skills and competencies needed to position the proposed venture strategically. Entrepreneurial Practice Assign… Task 2B converts the business proposal into a short narrated PowerPoint pitch. The presentation communicates the rationale and organisational benefits of the business idea, funding opportunities, key risks and mitigation approaches, and the entrepreneurial competencies needed for successful implementation. The intended audience includes employees, managers, senior management and the Board of Directors, so professional communication and persuasive presentation are important. Entrepreneurial Practice Assign… Task 3 is a 500-word personal and professional reflection based on an area of the CMI Code of Conduct and Practice. Students may use reflective frameworks such as Gibbs, Kolb, Rolfe or Burton and explain how the selected professional principle applies to their current or future career. Entrepreneurial Practice Assign… Overall, the assessment integrates strategic analysis, leadership, entrepreneurship, venture development, funding, risk management, professional communication and reflective practice. Overview word count: approximately 360 words. AI-use note: the assignment is classified as AI Amber. AI may be used only within the permitted support categories, and students must disclose which AI tools were used and briefly explain how they were used. Entrepreneurial Practice Assign… Important for your public Reference Library: the brief explicitly states that the document and its case-study materials must not be passed to third parties or posted on any website or social-media platform. Therefore, do not upload this assessment brief itself publicly. Only publish the finished student work if you have the right to do so and it does not reproduce restricted case-study material. Entrepreneurial Practice Assign… Entrepreneurial Practice Assign…
Read Model Answer →
Computer Science / Algorithms / Computational Complexity
Modified Merge Sort for Large-Scale Data: Algorithm Analysis, Complexity and Evaluation
This Computational Algorithms and Paradigms assignment critically examines a modified merge sort algorithm designed for large-scale datasets. The work focuses on the computational problem of sorting very large collections of data efficiently while preserving the stability and predictable complexity associated with classical merge sort. The analysed approach replaces recursive processing with an iterative successive-merging strategy intended to reduce stack overhead and improve practical performance on large datasets. Dubba ramesh(up) The first section identifies the underlying computational problem and frames the main research questions. These include how standard merge sort can be modified to improve large-scale performance, whether recursion can be replaced with a non-recursive iterative process, whether the proposed double-merge technique reduces resource consumption, and how its computational performance compares with classical merge sort. Dubba ramesh(up) A technical section then reconstructs the algorithm in pseudocode. The modified process begins with subsequences of size one and repeatedly merges adjacent sorted subsequences, doubling the merge size after each iteration until the entire dataset is sorted. This bottom-up approach removes the recursive decomposition used in conventional merge sort. Dubba ramesh(up) The assignment also identifies the algorithm's principal inputs and outputs. Inputs include the dataset, number of elements, subsequence boundaries and temporary storage required during merging. The resulting output is a fully sorted and stable sequence. Dubba ramesh(up) Complexity analysis shows that the modified algorithm processes approximately n elements across log₂(n) merging levels, resulting in O(n log n) time complexity in both best and worst cases. Because an auxiliary array is used during merging, the reported space complexity is O(n). Dubba ramesh(up) The final critical evaluation highlights the main benefits of the modified approach, including removal of recursive-call overhead, greater stability when processing very large datasets, predictable performance and preservation of merge-sort stability. Its main limitation is the continued requirement for auxiliary memory during the merge operation. The work also notes that the performance advantages are most relevant for large-scale datasets and may be less significant for smaller inputs. Dubba ramesh(up) Overall, the assignment integrates algorithm interpretation, pseudocode extraction, input-output analysis, complexity analysis and critical evaluation within the context of large-scale sorting. Note: this upload appears to be the completed student response rather than the original assessment brief, so the referencing style and exact formal overall word limit are not stated. I would leave the reference-style field as Not specified unless you also upload the official 7COM1078 guideline.
Read Model Answer →
Computer Science / Research Methods / Specialist Research
2,800 words
Research Specialism Report: Critical Review of Open Research Questions in Computer Science
This Advanced Research Topics in Computer Science assessment requires students to critically examine a research paper associated with their chosen MSc specialism and demonstrate an understanding of how established research techniques are used to create and extend knowledge in computer science. Eligible specialisms include Artificial Intelligence, Networking, Cyber Security, Software Engineering and Data Science. The assessment is intended to prepare students for deeper independent research as part of their Master's project. 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… Students begin by providing a clear introduction to their selected research specialism and explaining the broader research area in a way that is accessible to readers with general computer-science knowledge. The report then identifies the open research question presented in the relevant 7COM1084 specialist lecture paper, explains the problem in detail and evaluates why it is scientifically significant or relevant to a real-world application. 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… A substantial literature-review section requires students to examine existing and related research beyond the specialist lecture paper. The aim is to identify what previous work has achieved, explain why existing approaches do not fully solve the research problem and identify further unresolved questions. 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… The research-methods section focuses on the approaches used in the selected specialist paper. Students are expected to describe and critically evaluate those methods, considering both their strengths and limitations. They must then propose an alternative or extended research approach that could build on the published work and investigate related open problems, drawing on principles of experimental design and theoretical or practical research. 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… The final reflective component asks students to explain their personal investment in the research area, including why the selected question interests them and how their own strengths and prior experience would support future research in that domain. 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… The report must not exceed 2,800 words ±10%, must use the Harvard referencing system, and must include at least 20 references, one of which must be the relevant 7COM1084 specialist paper. 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… Overall, the assessment integrates research specialism knowledge, literature review, open-problem identification, methodological critique, research design, future-work development and scholarly communication within a Level 7 computer-science research context.
Read Model Answer →
Data Science / Data Management / Professional Practice
4,500 words
Tesla Data Science Professional Case Study: Data Management, Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Ethics
This composite case-study assessment for The Data Science Professional module requires students to critically analyse Tesla from several interconnected professional perspectives, including data management, artificial intelligence ethics, leadership, organisational development, entrepreneurship and business risk. The coursework is designed to combine technical data-science capability with strategic, ethical and managerial decision-making. a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44… Part A – Database Design and Distributed Frameworks focuses on data management. Students design an Entity-Relationship model and relational schema for a Tesla-related vehicle-hire business, identifying entities, relationships, cardinalities, identifiers, primary keys and foreign keys. The accompanying guidance specifies entities relating to vehicles, employees, outlets, clients, hire agreements, insurance, faults and employment records. a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44… 39cdc24cc46a13ddf444b8e7af838eb… The SQL component uses an Online Music database to examine Tesla customer preferences. Students create relational tables using Oracle standard SQL and write queries involving users, music, publishers, categories and download records. Evidence of implementation and query results must be provided using Oracle Live SQL. 39cdc24cc46a13ddf444b8e7af838eb… Part A also requires a critical assessment of the security, privacy and ethical implications of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving technology, connecting technical development with responsible data and AI practice. a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44… Part B – Leadership and Developing People requires critical evaluation of Tesla’s leadership model, organisational culture and their effects on employees and organisational performance. Students must propose a leadership and people-development strategy capable of supporting the organisation as it expands. a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44… Part C – Entrepreneurial Practice and Managing Risk examines a proposed Tesla spin-out venture developing innovative low-cost green hydrogen production systems. Students critically assess management support for the venture, propose an evidence-based approach to entrepreneurial risk, develop an entrepreneurial leadership role descriptor, and evaluate how GDPR and AI/data ethics may support or constrain entrepreneurial practice. a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44… Overall, the assessment integrates technical database design, SQL, data ethics, organisational leadership, entrepreneurship, sustainability and professional decision-making within a single Tesla-focused case study. Overview word count: approximately 360 words. Important: the assessment brief itself explicitly states that it must not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. So for a public Reference Library, use the metadata and your own finished work where permitted, but do not upload the assessment brief/guidance PDFs themselves publicly. a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44… The AI status is Amber: generative AI may be used for limited inspiring/planning purposes, but usage must be acknowledged with the tool, prompts and relevant evidence; the brief also specifically prohibits using LLMs to generate the Part A(3) essay. a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44… a82a1aa6a2e7a3268ad021c4f5b3d44…
Read Model Answer →
Leadership / Digital Leadership / Business Management
4,000 words
Leadership in a Digital Age: Critical Self-Analysis, AI Transformation and Personal Development
This Leadership in a Digital Age assessment requires students to critically analyse their leadership strengths, behaviours and development needs within contemporary digital environments. The individual 4,000-word report combines academic leadership theory, diagnostic self-assessment, professional reflection, digital transformation and forward-looking personal development. Its central purpose is to demonstrate self-awareness and evaluate how leadership capabilities must evolve in response to technological, organisational and workforce change. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… The first section requires critical evaluation of two or three contemporary leadership theories or models in relation to digital leadership. Students should avoid outdated approaches and instead examine how relevant theories align with the behaviours and characteristics required of leaders operating in technology-enabled organisations. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… The second section focuses on self-analysis. Students use diagnostic tools relating to areas such as temperament, workplace culture, motivation, emotional control, management skills and Belbin team roles. Results should be reported and interpreted before being used to construct a personal SWOT analysis concentrating specifically on leadership characteristics relevant to the digital age. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… A further component examines the leadership of hybrid, multi-generational teams. Students identify challenges that may arise in such environments and evaluate leadership capabilities and behaviours that could address them. Ethical, social and legal responsibilities associated with digital leadership must also be considered. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… The report additionally evaluates how digital leaders can use Artificial Intelligence to support digital transformation and organisational performance. Appropriate workplace examples may involve machine learning, predictive analytics, intelligent automation or generative AI, with consideration of required resources such as data infrastructure, organisational skills and external partnerships. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… The final section requires a Personal Development Plan containing justified leadership-development objectives, learning activities, measurable success criteria and timescales. These objectives should emerge directly from the earlier self-analysis and demonstrate how the student intends to become a more effective leader in a current or future digital role. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… Overall, the assessment integrates leadership theory, reflective self-evaluation, hybrid-team management, AI-driven transformation and structured professional development within the context of leadership in the digital age.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Cloud Computing / Artificial Intelligence
4,004 words
Cloud-Based Machine Learning for Financial Fraud Detection
This Machine Learning on Cloud assessment requires students to design, implement and critically evaluate a cloud-oriented machine-learning solution for financial fraud detection. Working as a group, students address a scenario in which a financial-services organisation requires an automated model capable of detecting fraudulent transactions, reducing financial losses and improving customer security. The project combines machine-learning development with critical evaluation of cloud infrastructure, data preparation, model performance and responsible AI considerations. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … The project begins with a cloud feasibility study comparing at least two major machine-learning platforms such as Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud Platform. Students evaluate factors including performance, scalability, cost, compliance, system integration and vendor lock-in before providing a justified recommendation. The project then moves into Exploratory Data Analysis, where patterns, anomalies and correlations within the fraud dataset are investigated using visualisations such as heatmaps, histograms and boxplots. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … A substantial part of the assessment focuses on data preprocessing and class imbalance. Students are expected to clean and transform the dataset, apply scaling and encoding, perform feature engineering and investigate techniques such as SMOTE, undersampling and cost-sensitive learning. These decisions must be justified in terms of their potential effect on predictive performance. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … Students must then select and train at least two machine-learning models. Suggested algorithms include Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost and Neural Networks. Appropriate cross-validation and hyperparameter-tuning procedures should be applied, followed by systematic evaluation using precision, recall, F1-score, AUC and precision-recall curves. Supporting visualisations should include confusion matrices, ROC curves and feature-importance analysis. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … The final component addresses professionalism and ethics in cloud-based AI, including bias, fairness, transparency, data privacy and environmental sustainability. Overall, the project integrates cloud-platform selection, exploratory analytics, preprocessing, imbalanced-data handling, predictive modelling, model evaluation and ethical AI into an applied financial fraud-detection solution. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … Note: the uploaded brief does not explicitly name a referencing system. If your portal requires a selection, I would use Not specified rather than assume Harvard.
Read Model Answer →
Statistical Programming / Data Science / Business Analytics
Statistical Programming with R: Data Analysis, Probability, Regression and Business Decision-Making
This Statistical Programming assessment evaluates students' ability to apply statistical techniques and R programming to practical data-science and business decision-making problems. The individual assessment combines descriptive statistics, data preparation, visualisation, probability, regression, correlation and sampling, requiring students to demonstrate both conceptual statistical understanding and practical implementation in RStudio. The module learning outcomes emphasise the application of statistical methods to large and real-world datasets, critical evaluation of analytical techniques and awareness of legal, cultural and ethical issues associated with data analysis and dissemination. KL7012 - Statistical Programmin… The early tasks examine fundamental statistical reasoning. Students interpret weight-loss data comparing exercise classes with gym-only workouts using sample size, mean, mode and standard deviation, and explain an appropriate method for dealing with missing data, including its advantages and disadvantages. KL7012 - Statistical Programmin… A substantial practical component uses a cystic fibrosis dataset containing variables such as age, sex, height, weight, body-mass-related measurements, forced expiratory volume, residual volume, functional residual capacity, total lung capacity and maximum expiratory pressure. Students import the data into an R data frame, generate descriptive summaries and interpret the results. They then use scatterplots to investigate relationships between variables and sex-stratified boxplots to identify possible outliers. KL7012 - Statistical Programmin… The assessment also covers major probability models. Students apply probability concepts to healthcare survival, helpdesk email arrivals and fuel-demand scenarios, while also discussing how changing assumptions or real-world conditions can affect interpretation. These exercises assess understanding of statistical distributions and their application to operational and managerial decision-making. KL7012 - Statistical Programmin… Further analytical tasks examine linear regression and correlation. Students analyse the relationship between temperature and converted sugar in a chemical process, use a regression model to estimate the expected response at a specified temperature, and interpret relevant summary statistics. They also calculate and evaluate the suitability of a correlation coefficient for examining the relationship between advertising activity and product purchases. KL7012 - Statistical Programmin… The final and most substantial task involves a real-world M1 traffic-speed investigation for a manufacturing organisation. Students must design an appropriate sampling strategy, collect data from the specified Traffic England source, conduct statistical analysis in RStudio and develop evidence-based conclusions. The statistical report for this task is limited to 1,500 words and should include sampling methodology, collected data, statistical analysis, results, conclusions and relevant background research, supported by appropriate graphs, tables and charts. Raw data and RStudio calculations must be included in an appendix. KL7012 - Statistical Programmin… Overall, the assessment integrates statistical theory with R-based practical analysis, covering descriptive statistics, probability, visualisation, missing-data treatment, regression, correlation, sampling and critical interpretation of results in healthcare, operational and business contexts.
Read Model Answer →
Leading Through Digital Change
2,500 words
Leading Through Digital Change (CW1)
The Leading Through Digital Change (CW1) assessment is a summative coursework assignment for MSc Management programmes at BPP University Business School. The assessment accounts for 100% of the module marks, with a minimum of 50% required to pass. Students must submit the assessment through Turnitin and follow the Harvard Referencing System. The coursework consists of a 1,500-word business report together with an A4-size poster. The assessment requires the student to act as a Digital Transformation Consultant responsible for coordinating technology expertise within an organisation. The Chief Information Officer (CIO) requires a Digital Transformation Report and Poster that evaluate and recommend changes designed to maintain competitive advantage and create business value. Students must select one organisation from the options provided in the assessment brief: Tata Motors, Meezan Bank Limited, Hulu, or Puma SE. Part 1 addresses the Digital Transformation Strategic Framework and is linked to Learning Outcome 1. The student must critically review and propose one appropriate digital transformation framework for the selected organisation. The brief specifies that one framework should be used from McKinsey 4Ds, BCG 3 Stages, Gartner's 6 Steps or Cognizant's 4 Pillars. The section should also include digital transformation objectives supporting areas such as operations, ICT and marketing. Part 2 addresses Future Digital Trends and Learning Outcome 2. Students must design a poster evaluating two disruptive technologies or techniques likely to affect the smartphone industry, employment and the labour market over the next five years. Suggested technologies include Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 5G Connectivity, Internet of Things, Robotics, Drone Delivery, Blockchain, and Augmented or Virtual Reality. Academic literature and real-life examples should support the discussion. Part 3 addresses Digital Leadership Recommendations and Learning Outcome 3. Students must analyse and propose two appropriate digital leadership styles that the selected organisation should develop to effectively manage and support digital transformation. The brief identifies possible approaches including hyperaware agile leadership, ethical-tech leadership, people-oriented leadership, agile leadership and Goleman's six leadership styles, while allowing other relevant approaches. The required report structure includes the BPP University administration cover sheet, table of contents, list of abbreviations where appropriate, introduction, Part 1, Part 2 (Poster), Part 3, conclusion, references and appendix where required. The main business report is limited to 1,500 words, while the poster has no separate word limit but must fit on A4 paper. The report must be written in the third person, use professional formatting, include page numbers, correctly label tables and figures, and use Harvard in-text citations and references. The marking criteria emphasise critical evaluation rather than simple description. Higher performance requires evidence of extensive personal research, critical analysis of digital transformation frameworks, emerging technologies and leadership approaches, supported by academic literature and real-world examples. The rubric also expects strong links between the organisation's technological challenges, transformation objectives, disruptive technologies and proposed leadership approaches.
Read Model Answer →
Principles of Data Science
3,000 words
Principles of Data Science – Predictive Modelling and Data Analysis
This individual assessment for the Principles of Data Science module requires students to select, apply and critically evaluate data science methods, tools and techniques using one of three provided datasets and its associated scenario. The main assessment takes the form of a 3,000-word report in which students explore their chosen dataset, identify an appropriate predictive modelling approach, build and evaluate models, interpret the findings and critically reflect on the overall process and outcomes. The assessment addresses the principles and foundations of data science, statistical methods, data preparation, visualisation, predictive modelling, decision making and the critical evaluation of data science techniques and tools. Students begin by exploring the selected dataset to understand its structure, characteristics and limitations. Although the supplied datasets have already been cleaned, students may undertake additional data preparation or transformation where necessary. Any preprocessing decisions must be justified in relation to the requirements of the selected analytical methods. Feature selection should also be considered as part of preparing the data for model development. The assessment requires students to identify suitable forms of analysis for the selected scenario and justify their choice of methods. At least two different techniques must be used to develop models with predictive capacity for the response variable in the chosen dataset. The models must be trained and tested consistently, using the same training and test datasets so that their performance can be compared fairly. Where appropriate, students should also provide insight into feature importance and explain the contribution of relevant variables to predictive performance. Model performance must be evaluated using suitable metrics, followed by a clear description of the findings and recommendations appropriate for the intended audience. The report should document the complete analytical workflow, including data exploration, preprocessing, feature selection, model development, testing and evaluation. Students are expected to explain and justify the decisions made throughout the process rather than simply presenting code or model results. The assessment also requires students to demonstrate practical proficiency in data science tools and techniques. The brief expects the use of R for completing the assignment and requires evidence of important elements of the code, although the complete code does not need to be submitted. Data visualisation must be used to support the written discussion and communicate relevant findings effectively. The assessment is evaluated across theoretical knowledge and method selection, data exploration and processing, technical application and model evaluation, communication of findings, and overall presentation and referencing. The assessment therefore combines technical implementation with critical analysis, requiring students to explain why particular methods were selected, evaluate their effectiveness and consider the limitations and implications of the resulting findings. A separate second assessment component accompanies the written report. This component requires a presentation of the key findings from the written work using a maximum of five slides and a presentation duration of no more than seven minutes. It should summarise the dataset, methods, key findings and project outcomes while providing critical reflective commentary on lessons learned, factors affecting success and potential real-world applications.
Read Model Answer →
Corporate Strategy
4,000 words
Strategic Case Study – Corporate Strategy
This Corporate Strategy assessment requires students to undertake a critical strategic analysis of a chosen organisation and develop evidence-based recommendations for its long-term growth and competitive position. The assignment is presented as a 4,000-word Strategic Case Study and focuses on analysing practical business situations through the application of corporate strategy theories, analytical tools and strategic frameworks. The assessment aims to develop students' ability to evaluate an organisation's competitive advantage, identify significant strategic challenges and opportunities, and propose practical strategies for sustainable growth. The report begins with an introduction explaining the purpose of the case study and identifying the selected company. The strategic positioning section then examines the organisation's current competitive advantage, differentiation from competitors, fundamental competencies and resources. Relevant theories and strategic frameworks should be applied to support the analysis. The external environment section requires a critical evaluation of industry attractiveness using Porter's Five Forces. Students must also examine the factors driving organisational change, compare the selected organisation with close rivals and provide strategic recommendations for addressing identified challenges. The international strategy section critically analyses the effectiveness of the company's existing international expansion strategy and requires students to propose a new expansion strategy for a geographical location in an international market. An appropriate internationalisation theory and market-entry mode should be applied to support the proposed strategy. The challenges and opportunities section examines major issues affecting the organisation, including areas such as market competition, technological disruption and regulatory change. Students must identify opportunities that could strengthen the company's competitive position and use an appropriate framework to consider the development, leadership and implementation of organisational change. The proposed leadership-driven strategy should also be reflected upon in relation to the company's strategic goals. The final main section provides two to three actionable strategic recommendations that the organisation should implement to sustain or enhance its competitive advantage. Students are also required to include an appendix of no more than 500 words containing concise explanations, models or frameworks demonstrating their understanding of theories and concepts relevant to the assessment. The appendix should support the main analysis and be clearly referenced within the report. The assessment develops several strategic management capabilities. The assessed learning outcomes include critically analysing a company's strategic position using analytical tools and theoretical frameworks; developing corporate-level strategies and considering their implementation and control; integrating innovative and sustainable practices into strategic planning; and using performance measurement instruments to assess strategic initiatives. The brief also aligns with CMI Level 7 Strategic Management and Leadership Practice units covering strategy development and strategic change. The submission is an individual written coursework assignment submitted through Turnitin. The written assignment must be submitted as a Microsoft Word document rather than PDF. Students must acknowledge and reference any AI tools used in developing the assignment and provide appropriate acknowledgement of all sources.
Read Model Answer →
Network Security
1,500 words
The Case Study – Network Security Planning and Upgrade
This individual assessment for the Network Security module requires students to work as network consultants and carry out network and security planning and an upgrade for an imaginary company. The assignment is titled “The Case study” and requires students to produce a written report presenting solutions to the problems identified within the case study. The assessment is worth 15 credits and requires approximately 1,500 words, with a permitted variation of ±10%. The coursework focuses on applying network security concepts and protocols to contemporary Internet and mobile-based solutions and technologies. Students are expected to analyse the requirements of the imaginary organisation, identify relevant network and security issues and propose appropriate planning and upgrade solutions. The report should demonstrate an understanding of network security technologies while considering the organisation's information assets and operational requirements. A significant part of the assessment concerns network performance. Students must provide recommendations and suggestions for addressing network performance issues identified in the case study. Where the proposed solution changes the existing network design, an appropriate network diagram should be included. The brief allows students to use tools such as Packet Tracer or other suitable applications to represent the proposed network design. The assignment also requires students to consider security policy and network protection. The existing security policy should be reviewed and recommendations should be made for improving it. Students are specifically instructed not to create a completely new security policy because the organisation already has one. In addition, the report should discuss how appropriate security measures could be implemented across the network. Detailed device configurations are not required, although relevant examples or configuration snippets are encouraged. Because the information provided in the case study is incomplete, students must identify and document their assumptions and requirements. This includes defining unspecified parameters such as network speeds, device features and existing policy details. The assumptions and requirements section is therefore an important part of the investigation and contributes to the assessment mark. The final report should summarise the key findings of the investigation and may recommend how any remaining IT support budget could be used. References must be included and used effectively to support the discussion. The marking criteria allocate 10% to the introduction, 10% to assumptions and requirements, 20% to improving performance, 20% to policy amendments, 20% to securing the network, 10% to the conclusion/summary and 10% to references. The assessed learning outcomes cover the application of network security concepts and protocols, critical evaluation and design of security policies, understanding of IT governance and its influence on organisational security policy, and critical review of current research and technological advances in network security. The brief also permits AI assistance, but any AI tools used must be referenced and their use summarised at the end of the report before the reference list.
Read Model Answer →
Digital Security Risk and Audit
2,000 words
Digital Security Risk and Audit – Information Security Audit of ABC Air
This individual coursework for the Digital Security Risk and Audit module requires students to prepare a 2,000-word information security audit report based on a case study involving ABC Air, a small aircraft service company responsible for aircraft maintenance for civil operators. The company records information including aircraft flying hours, servicing time, engineers' man-hours and related maintenance activities. An external contractor has also provided a report outlining a possible solution for ABC Air. Students are required to assess the information security risks associated with the scenario, complete an information security audit and produce a professional report, clearly identifying any assumptions made during the analysis. The assessment requires students to examine risk assessment, identification and analysis as part of the audit process. A suitable auditing approach must be selected and justified, with students considering either a general risk-based approach or a specific control-based approach. The report should explain why the selected approach is appropriate for the ABC Air scenario and demonstrate how it can be applied to the organisation's information security environment. The coursework also requires consideration of potential cyber attacks and their use within an integrated fault event analysis. Students must identify relevant information security threats and examine how an attack could affect the organisation and its information assets. The report should further identify appropriate standards, best practices or guidelines that could be used to mitigate information security breaches. These should be critically evaluated, including discussion of their advantages and disadvantages rather than simply being listed. The assessment develops students' ability to apply information security governance and audit practices within legal, ethical and professional contexts. It also requires consideration of recognised industry frameworks such as COBIT and international standards including the ISO 27000 series. Students are expected to perform systematic risk assessment and analysis, critically evaluate information assurance reference models, and select appropriate information security audit strategies for complex real-world scenarios. The marking criteria place particular emphasis on the quality of the information security audit, identification and adoption of appropriate international standards and frameworks, and critical evaluation of the benefits and limitations of security audit frameworks. The assessment allocates 20% to identifying and applying an appropriate audit approach, 50% to completing the conceptual information security audit and assurance, and 30% to interpreting and critically evaluating information assurance reference models. The report is an individual assessment and must be submitted as a PDF through Aula/Turnitin. The brief states that APA referencing should be used for the work and that all sources and any AI tools used must be acknowledged.
Read Model Answer →
Digital Data Acquisition, Recovery and Analysis
1,500 words
Digital Data Acquisition, Recovery and Analysis – Autonomous Vehicle Forensics
This individual coursework for the Digital Data Acquisition, Recovery and Analysis module requires students to produce a 1,500-word technical research paper critically investigating autonomous vehicle (AV) forensics. The assignment focuses on the challenges, methodologies and tools involved in extracting, preserving, analysing and interpreting digital evidence from autonomous vehicles and their associated systems. The work specifically considers how forensic evidence can be used to reconstruct events and establish accountability following accidents, security breaches or system malfunctions. The assignment examines the increasing importance of digital evidence generated by intelligent transportation systems and smart vehicles. Students are expected to consider data produced by different sources within an autonomous vehicle ecosystem, including LiDAR, radar and GPS sensors, vehicle control units and connected infrastructure. The report should explore how these different forms of information can be collected and forensically preserved while maintaining their evidential value for subsequent investigation and analysis. The coursework requires a detailed technical analysis rather than a general overview of autonomous vehicles or digital forensics. Students are expected to engage with academic literature, industry frameworks and technical examples, while providing critical insights into the subject. The report should analyse the practical challenges associated with AV forensics and critically examine the tools and methodologies that can be applied to obtain and interpret evidence from autonomous vehicle environments. Legal, ethical and privacy considerations form an important part of the assignment. The report should examine issues surrounding the use of autonomous vehicle evidence, including legal responsibility, regulatory considerations, privacy implications and ethical challenges associated with collecting and analysing potentially sensitive vehicle and user data. These considerations should be connected to the wider forensic investigation process and the reliability and admissibility of digital evidence. The required report should follow an academic research-paper structure, including a cover page, abstract, keywords, table of contents, clearly organised sections and subsections, references and an appendix where required. The brief requires APA referencing and a reference list at the end of the paper. Students are expected to use their own words and critically analyse the literature rather than simply summarising existing research. The assessment evaluates five equally weighted areas: structure and presentation with supporting references; balance, objectivity, critical evaluation and original insight; identification of AV-forensics challenges and quality of analysis; analysis of tools and methodologies used in AV forensics; and understanding of AV forensics together with its legal, professional and ethical considerations. Each area contributes 20% to the assessment.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning and Big Data
2,000 words
Machine Learning for Big Data
This assignment for the Machine Learning and Big Data module requires students to produce a 2,000-word individual report demonstrating their understanding and practical application of machine learning techniques to big data. The assessment is worth 15 credits and is structured around five interconnected areas: data in big data, machine learning architecture, model deployment, model evaluation, and the machine learning lifecycle. The first part focuses on identifying and evaluating suitable datasets for a selected big data topic and determining whether the datasets are appropriate for the intended machine learning application. Students are expected to examine the characteristics of their data and apply appropriate pre-processing approaches, including consideration of attribute selection and data preparation. The second part addresses machine learning modelling architecture. Students must develop an appropriate architecture for their big data application and may compare alternative architectural approaches. The report should explain the selected machine learning techniques and demonstrate how they operate as part of the proposed system. Practical considerations such as performance, scalability, fault tolerance, technology usage and reliability should also be considered. The third part requires students to implement and deploy the proposed data and machine learning model. This includes testing, visualising and evaluating the resulting outcomes. The fourth part requires critical evaluation of the dataset selection, modelling design, implementation and application, including assessment of whether the selected machine learning techniques are appropriate for the intended purpose. The final part focuses on the complete project lifecycle. Students are expected to critically reflect on the work undertaken, identify what they have learned, evaluate the development process and explain how the machine learning application could be improved in a future implementation. The assessment develops five learning outcomes covering big data sources and applications, machine learning techniques, practical application of machine learning tools, critical evaluation of techniques and tools, and the ability to follow a complete big data analysis lifecycle. The marking criteria allocate 20% to each of these five areas. The assignment is submitted as an individual written report. The brief states that Microsoft Word should be used rather than PDF and requires students to acknowledge sources and any AI tools used in accordance with the stated AI policy.
Read Model Answer →
Secure Design and Development
2,000 words
Secure Design and Development – PixelForge Nexus (UITS)
This assessment for Coventry University’s Secure Design and Development module requires students to design and develop a functional secure online system with the aid of a Large Language Model (LLM). The assignment is based on a practical scenario involving Creative SkillZ LLC and its proposed “PixelForge Nexus” system. The submission combines a functional prototype, an individual 2,000-word report, source code hosted in the Coventry University GitHub environment, and a video report demonstrating the completed prototype. The PixelForge Nexus prototype is intended to provide secure project management and basic asset and resource management for a game-development environment. Core functionality includes adding and removing projects, viewing active projects, assigning developers to projects, allowing developers to view their assigned projects, uploading project documents, and allowing authorised users to access documents associated with their projects. The system must implement privilege separation between Admin, Project Lead and Developer roles. Security is a central requirement of the assignment. Administrators are responsible for managing projects and user accounts, Project Leads can assign developers and upload project documents, while Developers can view assigned projects and associated documents. The system must include a robust login mechanism with secure password hashing and storage, with Multi-Factor Authentication recommended as an additional security measure. Proposed pages include Sign In/Register, a role-based User Dashboard, Account Settings and a Project Details page. The practical assessment evaluates four major areas: System Design, Security Testing and Analysis, System Development, and Formal Methods. System design requires consideration of secure design principles and their application to the development lifecycle. Security testing requires critical evaluation of security techniques, identification of issues and proposed mitigation measures. System development requires a functional prototype that follows the proposed design and considers legal and ethical requirements. Formal methods require a behavioural model and appropriate verification techniques to establish whether the system meets its specification. The individual report must document the methods and techniques used to develop the prototype and discuss the stages of the development lifecycle, including specification, design and development. It must also explain the deployment and testing approach, limitations of the prototype, possible improvements, security techniques and the formal model used. The submission must include links to the Coventry University GitHub repository and Microsoft OneDrive video, while the required appendix contains the LLM prompt history and other resources used with APA-style referencing.
Read Model Answer →
Emerging Technology and Cloud Computing
5,000 words
Emerging Technology and Cloud Computing – SafeCloud Project
This MSc Management coursework for BPP University’s Emerging Technology and Cloud Computing module is a 5,000-word formal business report based on the SafeCloud project at AlwaysUp Ltd., a manufacturing company specialising in power-electric equipment for buildings and critical installations. The assignment examines how emerging technologies, Big Data and cloud computing can support AlwaysUp Ltd.’s international expansion, real-time equipment monitoring, personalised preventive maintenance, data-driven decision-making, and secure management of equipment and client information. The company is seeking to expand from the UK into European markets through distributor partnerships and ultimately achieve global reach. The report requires the identification and critical evaluation of two emerging technologies that can improve AlwaysUp Ltd.’s support and equipment-care services. Students must evaluate the benefits and limitations of each technology within a manufacturing context and use real-world examples to support the analysis. The assignment specifically assesses the ability to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding and critical evaluation of emerging technologies in business. The second task focuses on designing and evaluating a cloud-based Big Data architecture that integrates the two selected emerging technologies. The proposed architecture must include an architecture diagram and should be evaluated in terms of scalability, security, cost-effectiveness, real-time data processing and decision-making. The solution should address AlwaysUp Ltd.’s business requirements and enable the collection, storage and analysis of equipment-related data. The third task examines data protection, ethical considerations, project risks and resource requirements associated with implementing the proposed solution. This includes consideration of data protection and ethical issues arising from the selected technologies, implementation risks, and the human, technological and other resources required. The fourth task analyses the strengths and weaknesses of the combined emerging technologies and Big Data architecture and considers their application to AlwaysUp Ltd.’s business strategy. The report must conclude with a proposed route forward based on the findings. The required report structure consists of an introduction of approximately 500 words, four main tasks of approximately 1,000 words each, a conclusion of approximately 500 words, Harvard-style references and optional appendices.
Read Model Answer →
Data Visualisation / Business Intelligence
2,500 words
Data Visualisation (BS666) — Business Analyst Client Report: Dashboard Development, Tool Evaluation and Accessibility in Power BI and Tableau
This Level 7 resit assessment takes the form of a single client-facing report written from the position of a qualified business analyst. Rather than assembling semester activities, it asks for one sustained piece of analytical writing that carries a business case from raw open data through to a defended set of visualisations and the decisions they support. The report opens by identifying a data source drawn from an approved open repository and setting out the business problem the client faces. Provenance, structure, granularity and known limitations of the dataset are examined honestly at this stage, since every downstream claim rests on them, and all data is referenced in full — including data appearing inside charts, as the brief specifically requires. The main body works through three connected strands of critical evaluation. The first traces the development sequence of the visualisations themselves: how the data was prepared and cleaned, why particular chart types were selected over the alternatives available, how layout and interactivity were arranged for the intended audience, and how the design changed across iterations once weaknesses became visible. At least three completed visualisations are then evaluated individually and critically — what each one reveals, where each falls short, and what a reader could reasonably conclude from it. The second strand compares Power BI and Tableau as working environments for this specific dataset rather than in the abstract. Data connectivity, transformation and calculation capability, visual flexibility, publishing and sharing, licensing and governance are all weighed against what the client actually needs, with the practical friction encountered during the build reported rather than smoothed over. The third strand addresses accessibility and cognitive processing. It examines how each platform handles colour contrast and colour-vision deficiency, text alternatives, keyboard navigation and screen reader support, and then moves into the perceptual side — pre-attentive attributes, data-ink economy, chart junk, working memory limits and how visual encoding choices either reduce or inflate the effort a reader must spend to extract meaning. The argument connects this directly to decision quality in organisations with diverse analytical literacy. Findings are reported at length and translated into concrete business implications, with a conclusion that states what the client should do and on what evidence. The submission follows the prescribed structure throughout: title page, executive summary, contents, introduction, business problem, main evaluative section, findings, conclusion, Harvard reference list and appendices, presented as a single file for Turnitin.
Read Model Answer →
Data Management / Business Analytics
2,500 words
Data Design Management (BS514) — Data Strategy Consultancy: Relational Database Design, SQL Implementation and Pipeline Transformation
This Level 7 assessment places the writer in the role of a Data Strategy and Analytics Consultant appointed by an organisation operating in a realistic industry sector. The brief is entirely simulated, so the work sets out a defensible set of assumptions about the organisation's data environment before any design begins, and populates the resulting database with synthetic but realistic records. The deliverable is a slide deck carrying full explanatory notes, submitted as a single PDF, and weighted across three connected tasks. Task one establishes the business case. It describes how the chosen organisation currently collects, stores and uses data across customer interactions, sales transactions, operational processes and digital channels, and identifies where that fragmented picture costs the business in efficiency, resource use, retention and decision quality. A SWOT analysis benchmarks the organisation against a named real-world competitor in the same sector, drawing on publicly available market information rather than assertion. The section closes with a critical evaluation of modern relational database advancements — cloud-hosted SQL services, distributed architectures and data warehousing — assessed not in the abstract but against what each would actually change about this organisation's business model. Task two carries the heaviest weighting and is the technical core. Key business entities are identified from the scenario, a current-state data flow diagram traces how data moves from collection points through to storage and reporting with the existing ETL approach made explicit, and a future-state ER diagram is then built with full attributes, primary and foreign keys, relationships and cardinality. The design is normalised to third normal form with the decomposition reasoning shown. Implementation follows in SQL: tables created with appropriate integrity constraints, at least ten realistic sample records inserted per table, and five business questions answered through working queries — highest-performing product or campaign, average conversion by category, workload distribution across staff, accounts with overdue or pending items, and most effective service channel. Outputs accompany every script. A transformation demonstrating query optimisation is included with before-and-after samples so the improvement is evidenced rather than claimed. Task three steps back to the technology decision. Two widely used data processing platforms are compared in tabular form across integration, cleaning, transformation and automation capability, judged specifically against this organisation's constraints, with a reasoned justification for the tool finally selected. The transformed dataset is then used to answer two management-level questions — where investment should be prioritised and how retention might be improved from observed behavioural patterns — each interpreted briefly and tied back to a concrete recommendation. Slide structure follows the prescribed layout, SQL scripts sit in the notes section, and the complete script file is reproduced in the appendix.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning and Deep Learning
2,000 words
Development and Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Healthcare Classification
This individual technical assessment focuses on the design, development, analysis and evaluation of a deep learning solution for a healthcare-related classification problem. Students select one of two provided scenarios: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) detection using ultrasound images or heartbeat classification using electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. The objective is to develop an appropriate deep learning approach and demonstrate critical understanding of the complete machine learning workflow, from initial data exploration through to model evaluation and reflection. Students may either design and train a deep learning model from scratch or customise and fine-tune an existing pre-trained architecture. The complete work is presented through a single Jupyter Notebook integrating Python code, technical discussion, results and visualisations. The notebook must clearly define the selected healthcare problem, explain its significance, justify methodological and architectural choices, and critically evaluate the resulting solution. The first stage involves exploratory data analysis and preprocessing, including investigation of class distributions, data imbalance and relevant patterns. Students prepare the data through techniques such as normalisation, augmentation, train-validation-test splitting and appropriate handling of class imbalance. This is followed by model design, training, validation and hyperparameter tuning, with the architecture selected according to the characteristics of the data and classification task. Model performance must then be evaluated using appropriate classification measures, including precision, recall, F1-score, ROC curves and area under the curve (AUC). The developed model should also be compared against suitable benchmark approaches, which may include traditional machine learning algorithms or alternative deep learning architectures. This comparison should identify the relative strengths and limitations of the proposed solution. The final component requires clear visual presentation and critical reflection on the complete modelling process, including limitations, challenges and opportunities for improvement. Importantly, grading prioritises methodological rigour, analytical depth and critical evaluation rather than simply achieving the highest predictive accuracy. Overview word count: approximately 330 words. AI restriction: this brief only permits automated AI tools for spelling and grammar checking. It explicitly prohibits tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini or Copilot from authoring assessment text or code; any permitted AI use must also be acknowledged.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
1,000 words
End-to-End Machine Learning Model Development, Tuning and Evaluation
This Level 7 Machine Learning and Intelligent Agents assessment requires students to develop and document an end-to-end machine-learning solution, covering the complete workflow from data preparation through model training, tuning, testing and evaluation. Students select an appropriate dataset or scenario, formulate a research question and determine whether the problem is most appropriately addressed through supervised learning, unsupervised learning or reinforcement learning. Suitable machine-learning techniques must then be implemented to create a model that can be systematically trained and tested. The assignment requires students to follow a structured machine-learning development process and document the complete development journey. The report should explain the selected scenario, data collection or dataset, Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA), rationale for selecting particular machine-learning methods, model training, fine-tuning and evaluation. Model performance must be assessed using appropriate established metrics, with relevant published research used to justify methodological decisions and support the interpretation of results. The technical implementation should demonstrate the ability to identify the performance of machine-learning algorithms, implement machine-learning approaches using one or more object-oriented programming languages, and determine which algorithms are most appropriate for a particular analytical brief. These requirements directly correspond to the module learning outcomes relating to machine-learning performance, implementation and algorithm selection. Students are advised to document their work within a Jupyter Notebook, combining Markdown explanations with executable code. The notebook may be submitted directly or converted to PDF. Alternatively, students may prepare the 1,000-word report in Microsoft Word, provided that the Python code is included within the submitted document. Assessment is divided into three principal areas: Introduction (20 marks), Machine Learning Process (40 marks), and Evaluation of Model Performance (40 marks). Higher-level work is expected to demonstrate strong understanding of machine-learning concepts, a functioning and thoroughly tested implementation, appropriate selection of algorithms and critical evaluation of the developed solution. Overall, the assessment integrates research-question formulation, data exploration, algorithm selection, programming, model optimisation and evidence-based evaluation within a reproducible machine-learning workflow. All academic sources must be presented using Harvard referencing.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Cloud Computing
3,984 words
Machine Learning on Cloud: Fraud Detection Model Design, Training and Evaluation
This postgraduate group project focuses on the design, development and critical evaluation of a cloud-based machine learning solution for financial fraud detection. The scenario involves a financial services organisation seeking to detect fraudulent transactions in order to reduce financial losses and improve customer security. Students are required to analyse an appropriate dataset, develop a machine learning solution, evaluate its effectiveness and critically consider the suitability of cloud technologies for deployment. The project begins with a cloud feasibility study, requiring critical comparison of at least two major machine learning platforms such as Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud Platform. Evaluation criteria include performance, scalability, cost, compliance, integration and vendor lock-in, followed by a justified recommendation. Students then conduct exploratory data analysis to identify patterns, anomalies and correlations using appropriate visualisations such as heatmaps, histograms and boxplots. A substantial component addresses data preprocessing and class imbalance. Students are expected to clean and transform the data, apply scaling and encoding, perform feature engineering and investigate approaches such as SMOTE, undersampling and cost-sensitive learning. Each preprocessing choice must be justified in terms of its potential impact on model performance. Students must select and train at least two machine learning models, with suggested approaches including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost and Neural Networks. Model development incorporates cross-validation and hyperparameter tuning. Evaluation uses fraud-relevant measures including Precision, Recall, F1 score, AUC and precision-recall curves, supported by confusion matrices, ROC curves and feature-importance visualisations. The project concludes with critical consideration of professional and ethical issues in cloud-based AI, including bias, fairness, transparency, data privacy and sustainability. The overall assessment therefore integrates cloud-platform evaluation, machine learning development, imbalanced classification, model evaluation and responsible AI practice. Overview word count: approximately 340 words.
Read Model Answer →
Business Intelligence / Data Analytics / Project Management
Business Intelligence and Data Analytics for Project Progress Evaluation
This assessment for the Data Analytics and Project Management for Business Intelligence module requires students to critically evaluate the progress of a live-style project through the application of business intelligence and data analytics techniques. Working as a group of Project Analysts, students select either a Convocation project or Concert project associated with Northumbria University London and prepare a professional presentation assessing its progress, stakeholders, deliverables and performance. The assessment begins with development of a clear project problem or opportunity statement, followed by identification and analysis of the key stakeholders and deliverables associated with the selected project. Students then use Business Intelligence and Data Analytics techniques to examine project progress and communicate findings through dashboards. The assessment permits the use of Microsoft Excel or other suitable software for dashboard development. A central part of the task is the creation and critical evaluation of a project dashboard. Students are expected to use realistic assumed or projected data where necessary, as the assessment is designed to test the ability to design, interpret and critically evaluate dashboards rather than the accuracy of real project data. The data should therefore be internally consistent, relevant to the selected project and capable of generating meaningful management insights. Students must also critically justify their chosen BI and analytics tools, explaining how the dashboard supports project monitoring and informed decision-making. The assessment concludes with recommendations for the successful implementation and use of a Business Intelligence or Data Analytics solution within the selected project. Academic references and relevant examples should be used to support the analysis. The marking criteria place the greatest emphasis on application of BI tools and techniques (30%), followed by stakeholders and deliverables (20%) and justification of BI tools (20%). Project and opportunity analysis, conclusion and recommendations, and presentation and referencing each contribute a further 10%. Higher-performing work is expected to demonstrate critical evaluation, meaningful dashboard insights, strong theoretical or industry justification and professionally presented recommendations. If the file you want to upload is the resubmission report instead Use the same University, Subject and Module Name, but change these fields: Title: Business Intelligence and Project Analytics: Individual Critical Analysis of Project Performance Assignment type: MS Technical and Scientific Writing Word count: 1,500–2,000 words Key topics: Business Intelligence, Data Analytics, Project Management, Stakeholder Analysis, BI Tools, Dashboard Evaluation, Project Opportunity Analysis, Project Deliverables, Critical Analysis, Project Recommendations The resubmission is an individual written report in which the student selects only one area from the original project—Project & Opportunity Analysis, Stakeholders & Deliverables, Application of BI Tools & Techniques, Justification of BI Tools, or Conclusion & Recommendations—and develops it in depth. It should use the same Convocation or Concert project context while demonstrating independent critical analysis, reflection and application of theory.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
1,011 words
End-to-End Machine Learning Model Development, Testing and Evaluation
This Level 7 Machine Learning and Intelligent Agents assignment requires students to develop and document an end-to-end machine-learning solution, covering the complete process from data preparation through model training, tuning, testing and evaluation. Students independently select a suitable dataset or scenario, formulate an appropriate research question and determine whether the problem should be addressed using supervised learning, unsupervised learning or reinforcement learning. Appropriate machine-learning algorithms must then be implemented to create a model capable of being trained and objectively tested. The assessment encourages the use of a structured machine-learning development methodology. Students are expected to explain the selected scenario and data source, perform suitable data preparation and Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA), and provide a reasoned justification for the machine-learning methods selected. The development process should demonstrate how the chosen algorithms are trained and fine-tuned before their performance is evaluated using established and relevant metrics. Published academic research should be incorporated to justify methodological choices and support the interpretation of results. The technical work is normally documented within a Jupyter Notebook, combining Markdown explanations with executable code cells. Alternatively, the report may be produced in Microsoft Word provided that the Python implementation is included. The assignment therefore assesses both conceptual understanding and practical programming competence. Students must demonstrate an ability to identify the performance of machine-learning algorithms, implement machine-learning techniques using an object-oriented programming language, and evaluate which algorithms are appropriate for a particular analytical brief. Assessment places particular emphasis on three areas: the Introduction, the Machine Learning Process, and the Evaluation of Model Performance. The marking criteria reward strong understanding of machine-learning concepts, a functioning and thoroughly tested implementation, appropriate selection of algorithms, and critical evaluation of the final solution. At the highest achievement level, implementations are expected to work without exception, satisfy the required functionality, demonstrate comprehensive testing and extend beyond the basic requirements. Overall, the assignment combines research-question formulation, data analysis, algorithm selection, machine-learning implementation, model optimisation and evidence-based evaluation within a reproducible technical workflow. All academic sources and supporting material must be presented using Harvard referencing.
Read Model Answer →
Management / Digital Transformation and Leadership
1,500 words
Leading Through Digital Change: Digital Transformation Report and Future Technology Poster
This Masters-level assessment for the Leading Through Digital Change module examines how organisations can respond strategically and effectively to rapid technological and digital transformation. Students take the role of a Digital Transformation Manager for one selected international organisation and prepare a professional Digital Transformation Report accompanied by an A4 digital poster. The purpose is to evaluate the organisation's current digital context and recommend changes that can strengthen competitive advantage and create sustainable business value. The first component requires critical evaluation and recommendation of one appropriate digital transformation strategic framework. Students may apply frameworks such as the McKinsey 4Ds, BCG Three Stages, Gartner's Six Steps or Cognizant's Four Pillars. The analysis should establish clear digital transformation objectives relevant to organisational functions such as operations, ICT and marketing, while using organisational evidence, academic research and practical examples to justify the proposed strategic direction. The second component is an academic poster evaluating two disruptive technologies or techniques expected to affect the chosen organisation, its industry, employment and the labour market over the next five years. Potential technologies include Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 5G connectivity, the Internet of Things, robotics, drone delivery, blockchain, augmented reality and virtual reality. The poster should combine academic literature with real-world examples to demonstrate the likely opportunities, challenges and wider organisational implications of technological disruption. The final component focuses on digital leadership. Students analyse and recommend two suitable leadership approaches for managing and supporting digital transformation. Relevant approaches may include agile leadership, ethical-tech leadership, people-oriented leadership, hyperaware agile leadership and Goleman's leadership styles. Overall, the assessment integrates digital strategy, innovation, emerging technologies and leadership. The wider module also covers digital transformation strategies, data-driven decision-making, leadership in the digital age, artificial intelligence in contemporary business, digital risk management and planning for the future. Reference style: Harvard. Main report word limit: 1,500 words. Poster: A4 size with no specified word count.
Read Model Answer →
Artificial Intelligence
2,000 words
End-to-End Applied AI Development — Comparative Machine Learning and Neural Network Modelling on a Public Dataset
This assessment runs a complete applied AI development cycle end to end: problem definition, dataset selection, preprocessing, model building, optimisation, evaluation and critical reflection. Students identify a real-world problem themselves, formulate a research question from it, and source a suitable dataset from a recognised public repository such as UCI, Kaggle, Data.gov or OpenML. Dataset choice carries more weight than students expect. It must be genuinely suitable for supervised learning, complex enough to make preprocessing and feature engineering meaningful, and — critically — structured so that a traditional machine learning approach and a deep learning approach can be sensibly compared on it. A dataset too small or too clean makes the neural network component pointless; one too large or too noisy makes the whole pipeline unfinishable within the page limit. The source must be referenced and the choice explicitly justified against the research problem. The modelling requirement is fixed: at least two supervised machine learning models, plus one artificial neural network built in a mainstream deep learning framework, all trained and tested. The comparison between them is the analytical core of the work. Reporting that the neural network scored higher is not an answer; explaining why, in terms of the data's structure and each model's inductive assumptions, is. Marks are distributed across problem framing, the traditional models, the deep learning model, evaluation and critical analysis including responsible AI considerations, and academic communication. That responsible AI component is easy to overlook and is not decorative — it asks what the model's limitations mean for anyone who might rely on it. Presentation requirements are specific. The report is page-limited rather than purely word-limited, and every plot must be described in the text while also being legible enough to communicate on its own — a common failure is dense default library output pasted in without axis labels or scale. The implementation is documented in a notebook combining markdown and code cells so the development process is visible, not just the final result, and submissions typically include the cleaned dataset alongside the code. The strongest submissions treat the notebook and the report as one argument. Weaker ones produce a working notebook and then write a report that describes it, rather than a report that uses it as evidence. Our support on assessments of this type is guidance-based. Typical areas of help include: advising on whether a candidate dataset can actually support the required model comparison, explaining how to justify preprocessing decisions, clarifying which evaluation metrics suit which problem type and why accuracy alone is often misleading, showing how to structure a critical limitations and responsible AI discussion, checking Harvard referencing, and reviewing a student's own draft against the published marking criteria.
Read Model Answer →
Operations and Supply Chain Management
1,800 words
Strategic Sourcing and Supply Chain Resilience Under Global Uncertainty — A Firm-Level Critical Evaluation
This type of postgraduate coursework asks students to take a single real firm — a British company, or a multinational with substantial UK operations — and critically evaluate how its sourcing and supply chain strategy has adapted to a decade of sustained disruption: the pandemic, geopolitical conflict, tariff volatility, and departure from the European single market. The analytical scope is broad but the depth expectation is narrow. Students choose one or two themes rather than surveying all of them: insourcing versus outsourcing and location decisions; single versus multi-sourcing across supplier segments or regions; how supplier selection and monitoring criteria have shifted toward reliability and geographic proximity; alignment between sourcing decisions and wider corporate objectives; supplier and customer relationship management under cross-border friction; inventory tactics such as stockpiling and safety stock repositioning; digital adoption for visibility and compliance; sustainable sourcing under cost pressure; or risk management around currency, customs and compliance. The evidence base is deliberately mixed. Alongside academic literature, students are expected to draw on annual reports, shareholder briefings, company statements, practitioner journals and recent news coverage — with a minimum spread of credible sources across both categories, and some of the non-academic material drawn from the most recent year so the analysis reflects current firm behaviour rather than historical commentary. At least one theoretical framework from the module or the wider literature must be applied to the firm's decisions, and at least one recent documented practice must be examined with specific sourcing. Two requirements distinguish strong submissions. The first is criticality: the brief explicitly separates evaluation from description, and marks weight critical analysis most heavily. Reporting what a firm did is not the task; assessing whether it was the right response, and what opportunities and risks it created, is. The second is the recommendation — at least one specific, actionable proposal with steps, anticipated obstacles, expected outcomes, and a clear line back to the firm's own stated goals. A generic suggestion to "diversify suppliers" fails this test; a costed, sequenced proposal grounded in the firm's actual constraints does not. Word-count conventions are stricter than students often expect: in-text references, tables, illustrations and front matter typically count, while appendices and the reference list do not. Our support on assessments of this type is guidance-based. Typical areas of help include: narrowing a firm and theme so the analysis fits the word limit, explaining the difference between description and critical evaluation with worked examples, clarifying how a theoretical framework should structure an argument rather than sit decoratively in a paragraph, checking source mix and Harvard referencing consistency, and reviewing a completed draft against the published assessment weightings.
Read Model Answer →