Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Financial Performance Management
3,500 words
Financial Performance Management – Financial Performance, Balanced Scorecard and Integrated Reporting
This individual assessment for the Financial Performance Management module requires students to produce a comprehensive analysis of the financial and non-financial performance of an international organisation and its closest competitor. The assessment is designed to develop students’ ability to evaluate organisational performance using financial analysis techniques, critically assess strategic performance-management frameworks, and examine the benefits and challenges associated with Integrated Reporting. The report has a maximum length of 3,500 words, with a 10% tolerance, excluding references, tables, figures and appendices, and accounts for 100% of the summative assessment. The first part of the report focuses on financial performance using ratio analysis. Students must select an international organisation as Company A and identify its closest competitor as Company B. The competitor should be selected using appropriate criteria, including comparable operating activities, industry, country and financial characteristics. Students are expected to obtain financial statements covering at least the most recent two years available for analysis. The ratio analysis should cover a broad range of areas, including liquidity, working capital cycle, profitability, leverage and valuation. Students should calculate and interpret relevant ratios, compare performance between the two organisations and across different years, and critically discuss the overall financial position. Input data and calculations may be presented in the main report or appendix, supported by appropriate tables and graphs. The second part examines Kaplan and Norton’s Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Students must critically evaluate the relevant Balanced Scorecard literature and consider whether the traditional model remains appropriate in contemporary business environments. The report should discuss possible limitations or areas for improvement and then develop a proposed Balanced Scorecard specifically for Company A. The proposed scorecard should be linked to the organisation’s strategy and vision and should identify suitable objectives, measures and critical success factors. The third part focuses on Integrated Reporting. Students must critically analyse the potential benefits and challenges of adopting Integrated Reporting for Company A, using relevant academic literature and the International Integrated Reporting framework. The discussion should consider how Integrated Reporting combines financial, non-financial, historical and forward-looking information and how it can help stakeholders understand an organisation’s use of resources and prospects for long-term sustainable success. The report should follow an appropriate academic structure, including an introduction, financial performance analysis, Balanced Scorecard analysis, Integrated Reporting analysis and conclusion. Harvard referencing is required, supported by a comprehensive range of relevant academic and professional sources. The recommended structure allocates approximately 1,000 words to each main question, with approximately 250 words for the introduction and conclusion.
Read Model Answer →
Enterprise Business Start-up: Sustainable Business Plan, Fundraising Strategy and Entrepreneurial Reflection
Entrepreneurship, Business Start-up, Business Plan, Business Idea, Innovation, Sustainable Business, Market Gap, Market Research, Competitor Analysis, Customer Segmentation, Customer Profiles, Product Development, Marketing Strategy, Marketing Communications, Business Model, Costing, Pricing Strategy, Sales Forecasting, Revenue Model, Financial Planning, Founding Team, Core Competencies, Fundraising Strategy, Venture Capital, Angel Investment, Entrepreneurial Tendency, GET Test, Entrepreneurial Self-Assessment, Start-up Finance, Business Pitch
Read Model Answer →
Entrepreneurship / Entrepreneurial Marketing
1,200 words
Reflective Analysis of Entrepreneurial Capabilities and Development: The GymBuddy Venture
This reflective Entrepreneurial Marketing assessment evaluates the development of the student's entrepreneurial capabilities through the GymBuddy business concept, a proposed fitness application designed to improve motivation and accountability among beginner gym users. The reflection examines how entrepreneurial learning, customer research and creativity frameworks changed the student's original approach from developing a highly complex product toward a more focused and testable business proposition. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… A central theme of the report is entrepreneurial self-assessment. Opportunity recognition is identified as an important strength, supported by interviews with beginner gym users and competitor analysis involving platforms such as Strava, MyFitnessPal and Nike Training Club. At the same time, the reflection identifies areas requiring development, particularly financial understanding, customer acquisition cost, lifetime value, conversion-rate analysis and negotiation capability. These strengths and weaknesses are used to establish priorities for future entrepreneurial development. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… The report also evaluates the evolution of the GymBuddy product using SCAMPER, Design Thinking and Lean Startup principles. Rather than pursuing a feature-heavy application, customer feedback leads to greater emphasis on simplicity, peer accountability, social competition and iterative validation. SCAMPER is applied to eliminate unnecessary features, substitute complex recommendations with simpler motivational mechanisms, combine useful functionality and adapt gamification to the needs of beginner users. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… Another major area of reflection concerns teams, networks and collaborative innovation. The student considers how group creativity exercises challenged the assumption that a venture should be developed independently and highlights the importance of mentors, developers, industry professionals and potential investors. The report links entrepreneurial networks with access to resources, opportunity identification, legitimacy and emotional support and proposes deliberate networking activities as part of future venture development. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… The visual development framework on page 3 summarises the entrepreneurial journey in five stages: GymBuddy concept and market research, capability assessment, product development and validation, teams and networks, and a time-based action plan. The reflection is structured using the Gibbs Reflective Cycle, linking experience with evaluation, analysis and future action. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… Overall, the assessment demonstrates reflective learning through the application of entrepreneurial theory to a practical start-up concept. It shows a shift from perfectionism toward rapid validation, customer-centred development, collaborative working and concrete action planning, while identifying financial management, negotiation and network development as important areas for continued improvement. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… Note: this file is a completed reflective submission rather than the original university assessment guideline, so the university, academic level and academic year should remain Not specified unless you also upload the official brief.
Read Model Answer →
International Marketing and Brand Management
6,000 words
International Marketing and Brand Management – International Brand Expansion Project
This individual project report for the International Marketing and Brand Management module focuses on analysing a selected brand and developing a strategy for its expansion into a new international market. Students must select a brand that is currently available in a limited number of countries or within a particular region and that has a physical market offering. The completed case study must be between 4,000 and 6,000 words, with 6,000 words specified as the maximum. The first part of the assignment focuses on Brand Analysis. Students are required to introduce the selected brand and examine its brand portfolio and geographical availability. The analysis must also consider the brand’s elements and evaluate its brand equity using Keller’s Customer-Based Brand Equity (CBBE) model. Students must additionally identify and analyse an appropriate brand mantra. These elements are intended to provide a comprehensive understanding of the brand’s existing market position and identity. The second part examines potential international markets for the selected brand. Students must conduct SLEPT analyses of three culturally distinct markets that the brand could potentially enter. Each market must also be assessed through competitor analysis. This section requires students to consider the wider market environment and competitive conditions when evaluating potential international expansion opportunities. The third part develops the Strategy for Market Entry. Students must select and justify one new international market for the brand to enter and recommend an appropriate market entry strategy. The report must also provide recommendations regarding standardisation or adaptation using a marketing mix framework. In addition, students must identify the intended Points of Parity (POP) and Points of Differentiation (POD) that would support the brand’s positioning in the selected international market. The assignment requires students to integrate relevant academic models and theories into the brand case rather than simply describing them. Sources used to support models, theories, claims and arguments must be appropriately referenced using Harvard referencing, both through in-text citations and in the final reference list. Students are also encouraged to use appropriately referenced images and figures to illustrate their case study. Assessment weighting is divided equally across the three substantive sections, with Brand Analysis accounting for 30%, International Market Analyses for 30%, and Strategy for Market Entry for 30%. The remaining 10% assesses presentation, including the range and quality of sources, Harvard referencing, clarity of writing and presentation, and quality of discussion.
Read Model Answer →
Entrepreneurship / Business Management / Enterprise
5,000 words
Enterprise Business Start-up: Innovative Business Plan, Fundraising Strategy and Entrepreneurial Reflection
This Enterprise Business Start-up assessment requires students to generate an innovative and sustainable business idea and develop it into a comprehensive start-up plan capable of guiding venture creation, attracting customers and supporting external fundraising. The module is assessed through two connected components: a 10-minute business pitch presented to an audience representing angel investors and venture capitalists, followed by a detailed individual business-plan portfolio. Assessment Brief Feb-May 2026 L… The principal written component is a 4,000-word detailed business plan. It begins with an executive summary before examining the proposed business idea, identified market gap, market research and competitor landscape. Students must then define appropriate customer profiles and segmentation, explain the development of the proposed product or service, and construct suitable marketing and communications strategies for reaching the intended market. Assessment Brief Feb-May 2026 L… A substantial part of the business plan focuses on the venture's financial and commercial viability. Students are expected to develop costing, pricing, sales and revenue projections alongside an appropriate business model. They must also identify the founding team, explain relevant roles and demonstrate the core competencies required to launch and develop the business successfully. Financials and business models receive particularly strong emphasis within the marking criteria. Assessment Brief Feb-May 2026 L… The written portfolio also includes a 1,000-word reflective component. Half of this section focuses on the student's fundraising strategy, including suitable funding sources and how potential investors or funders would be targeted, approached and secured. The other half critically reflects on the student's entrepreneurial tendency, personal experience and future skills development. Students are specifically required to complete the General Measure of Enterprising Tendency (GET) self-assessment and incorporate the results into their reflection. Assessment Brief Feb-May 2026 L… Assessment Brief Feb-May 2026 L… Overall, the assessment integrates entrepreneurial opportunity recognition, market analysis, customer segmentation, product development, marketing, start-up finance, business modelling, team capability, fundraising and reflective entrepreneurial development. The accompanying pitch additionally assesses visual quality, creativity, clarity of message, presentation skills, preparedness and professionalism. Assessment Brief Feb-May 2026 L… Assessment Brief Feb-May 2026 L… Important: the document does not explicitly specify a referencing style or academic level, so I would keep those fields as Not specified rather than assume Harvard or Masters.
Read Model Answer →
Strategy and Innovation
Strategic Analysis and Innovation Strategy for a UK Organisation
This postgraduate Strategy and Innovation assessment requires students to conduct a detailed strategic analysis of an allocated organisation and present the findings through a series of professionally designed information dashboards. The purpose of the analysis is to establish the organisation's current strategic position and use the resulting evidence to recommend an appropriate and justifiable innovation strategy. The work is expected to demonstrate master's-level evaluation, interpretation and synthesis rather than descriptive or checklist-based analysis. The first major analytical area concerns the organisation's external environment. Students evaluate the broader business environment, analyse the firm's industry and undertake competitor analysis, including consideration of the organisation's strategic group. Analysis should concentrate on the most consequential environmental factors and integrate general and industry-level evidence rather than simply listing factors. Competitor evaluation can examine issues such as products and services, market commonality, positioning, distinctive value propositions, first-mover advantage and breakthrough innovation. The internal analysis examines the firm's resources, capabilities and sources of competitive advantage. Appropriate analytical techniques should be used to assess competitive resources and key capabilities, with the internal value chain helping to identify factors capable of supporting competitive advantage. Students must also evaluate the organisation's business-level strategy and consider whether its resources and capabilities support its competitive positioning. Corporate-level analysis considers the firm's degree of diversification, internationalisation strategy, growth through acquisitions, mergers or organic development, and any cooperative strategies. These elements should be evaluated against the organisation's capabilities, resources and competitive context. The analysis concludes by interpreting the evidence to establish the firm's overall strategic position and recommending an innovation strategy or approach to innovation. Presentation quality is also important: the report should use an effective combination of text, charts, diagrams and other graphical forms, with professional formatting and accurate referencing. Overview word count: approximately 330 words.
Read Model Answer →
Entrepreneurship and Business Start-up
5,000 words
Enterprise Start-up Portfolio — Business Plan, Fundraising Strategy and Entrepreneurial Self-Assessment
An enterprise start-up portfolio assessment asks students to originate a business idea and build the full supporting case for it, then present that case both in writing and as a recorded investor pitch. It is a pass/fail module structure in which every component must be passed individually — a strong business plan cannot compensate for a weak pitch, or vice versa. The written portfolio divides into two unequal halves. The larger part is the business plan itself, built to a fixed section structure with prescribed word allocations: an executive summary; the business idea set against an identified market gap, with market research and competitor analysis; customer profiles and segmentation; product development; marketing and communications; financials and business models covering costing, pricing, sales and revenue; and the founding team with its core competencies. The word allocations are not decorative — financials carry the single largest weighting in both the word budget and the marking rubric, which tells students where analytical depth is expected and where concision is. The smaller part is reflective. It covers the fundraising strategy — which funding sources are realistic for this venture, and how each would be targeted, approached and secured — and the student's own entrepreneurial tendency, informed by a standardised self-assessment instrument taken online. The rubric here rewards critical self-reflection over description: reporting a test result scores poorly; interpreting what the result means for how this founder should build a team and where they need support scores well. The pitch component is assessed on visual and audio quality, content and message, comprehension, delivery, and evident preparation. Technical execution carries real marks, which students routinely underestimate. Two things separate strong submissions. The first is internal consistency: the revenue model must follow from the pricing, the pricing from the customer segment, the segment from the identified gap. Plans that read as seven separate essays under seven headings lose marks even when each section is individually competent. The second is specificity in the financials — costing assumptions stated and justified, rather than round numbers presented without derivation. Note that assessments of this type commonly require the student to retain all drafts and earlier versions of their work, and to sign a detailed declaration itemising exactly how any AI tools were used. Our support on assessments of this type is guidance-based. Typical areas of help include: explaining what a market gap argument needs to be credible, showing how competitor analysis should be structured rather than listed, clarifying how costing and pricing assumptions should be built and presented, reviewing whether a fundraising strategy matches the venture's actual stage, explaining how reflective writing is assessed at postgraduate level, and checking a completed draft against the published rubric.
Read Model Answer →