Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Applied Modelling and Visualisation
2,500 words
Applied Modelling and Visualisation – Hexawing Airways Passenger Satisfaction Analysis
This assessment is a 2,500-word consultancy report for the Applied Modelling and Visualisation module within the MSc Management with Data Analytics programme at BPP University. The assignment requires students to work as Data Analytics Consultants for the fictional Hexawing Airways and analyse a passenger satisfaction dataset containing more than 103,000 records from the airline's database. The purpose of the assessment is to apply machine learning, data analysis and visualisation techniques to identify factors that influence passenger satisfaction and communicate meaningful findings to a varied corporate audience, including the Chief Executive Officer, senior flight personnel and cabin crew. The dataset contains a range of passenger and flight-related features, including gender, satisfaction status, age, age band, type of travel, travel class, flight distance, destination, continent and ratings for services such as inflight Wi-Fi, online booking, gate location, food and drink, online boarding, seat comfort, inflight entertainment, onboard service, leg room, baggage handling, check-in service, inflight service and cleanliness. It also includes departure and arrival delay information. These variables provide the basis for exploratory analysis, predictive modelling and visual communication of passenger satisfaction patterns. The assessment requires the development of a data-driven solution using Python and relevant Python libraries. Students must follow an established analytical methodology such as PPDAC or CRISP-DM and demonstrate an Extract, Transform and Load process, data preparation, exploratory data analysis and appropriate visualisations. Two analytical models must be selected, trained and tested to predict passenger satisfaction. The available modelling approaches include Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, Bagging, Random Forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost, Artificial Neural Networks or another appropriate state-of-the-art algorithm. The second task requires critical analysis of the two selected models, including their strengths and limitations, an explanation of the chosen loss function, discussion of accuracy metrics and a comparison table of model performance. The third task focuses on communicating findings through data visualisation, including outputs such as correlation matrices, heat maps and confusion matrices. The analysis should explain how exploratory data analysis guided model selection and how visualisation techniques communicate insights effectively. The final report should demonstrate the ability to formulate data-driven solutions, critically evaluate analytical models and appraise data visualisation techniques. The assessment also requires independent research, appropriate academic referencing and supporting evidence from the analytical process. A pre-run Python notebook must be embedded in the MS Word submission or provided through an appropriate shared link.
Read Model Answer →
Artificial Intelligence / Machine Vision / Computer Vision
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Vision: Neural Network-Based Image Processing Application
This postgraduate Artificial Intelligence and Machine Vision coursework requires students to design, implement and critically evaluate a neural network-based image-processing application addressing a real-world problem. Students may select an application such as medical imaging, plant or fruit classification, skin cancer detection, object detection or image segmentation and must demonstrate an appropriate end-to-end machine vision workflow. CN7023 Coursework T2 25-26 (1) The project begins with a clear definition of the selected real-world problem, the objectives of the proposed solution and its potential practical impact. Students are expected to demonstrate creativity in selecting and designing their approach, explain the neural-network or image-processing methods adopted and justify why the selected techniques are suitable for the chosen dataset and application. CN7023 Coursework T2 25-26 (1) A substantial component focuses on simulation and implementation. Students describe the dataset, including its source, size, classes and representative images, before explaining how image data were encoded and preprocessed for use within the chosen neural network. The report must then document the selected network architecture, learning algorithm and procedures used for training, validation and testing. CN7023 Coursework T2 25-26 (1) Model performance must be communicated using quantitative and visual evidence. Required outputs include test-set accuracy, accuracy curves across training, validation and testing, and a confusion matrix supported by appropriate explanation. Students must also critically analyse the results, identify factors affecting model performance and discuss alternative methods or simulation changes that could improve the solution. CN7023 Coursework T2 25-26 (1) The coursework permits several technical routes, including combining image processing with artificial neural networks, deep learning or computer vision, or focusing on one of these approaches independently. Development may be completed using MATLAB or Python. The wider module covers artificial neural networks, CNNs, digital image processing, image restoration, compression, segmentation, classification and ethical, legal, privacy and social issues associated with AI systems. CN7023 Coursework T2 25-26 (1) Module handbook 2526-B (1) Overview word count: approximately 335 words. Important note: the coursework cover page labels the assignment as “Individual Assignment 100%,” but the module handbook clarifies that the coursework report itself contributes 50% of the module, with the remaining marks allocated to MATLAB course completion (20%), lab tasks (15%) and presentation (15%). For the Reference Library, I would use the handbook’s 50% report weighting if you need to record the assessment contribution.
Read Model Answer →
Artificial Intelligence
2,000 words
End-to-End Applied AI Development — Comparative Machine Learning and Neural Network Modelling on a Public Dataset
This assessment runs a complete applied AI development cycle end to end: problem definition, dataset selection, preprocessing, model building, optimisation, evaluation and critical reflection. Students identify a real-world problem themselves, formulate a research question from it, and source a suitable dataset from a recognised public repository such as UCI, Kaggle, Data.gov or OpenML. Dataset choice carries more weight than students expect. It must be genuinely suitable for supervised learning, complex enough to make preprocessing and feature engineering meaningful, and — critically — structured so that a traditional machine learning approach and a deep learning approach can be sensibly compared on it. A dataset too small or too clean makes the neural network component pointless; one too large or too noisy makes the whole pipeline unfinishable within the page limit. The source must be referenced and the choice explicitly justified against the research problem. The modelling requirement is fixed: at least two supervised machine learning models, plus one artificial neural network built in a mainstream deep learning framework, all trained and tested. The comparison between them is the analytical core of the work. Reporting that the neural network scored higher is not an answer; explaining why, in terms of the data's structure and each model's inductive assumptions, is. Marks are distributed across problem framing, the traditional models, the deep learning model, evaluation and critical analysis including responsible AI considerations, and academic communication. That responsible AI component is easy to overlook and is not decorative — it asks what the model's limitations mean for anyone who might rely on it. Presentation requirements are specific. The report is page-limited rather than purely word-limited, and every plot must be described in the text while also being legible enough to communicate on its own — a common failure is dense default library output pasted in without axis labels or scale. The implementation is documented in a notebook combining markdown and code cells so the development process is visible, not just the final result, and submissions typically include the cleaned dataset alongside the code. The strongest submissions treat the notebook and the report as one argument. Weaker ones produce a working notebook and then write a report that describes it, rather than a report that uses it as evidence. Our support on assessments of this type is guidance-based. Typical areas of help include: advising on whether a candidate dataset can actually support the required model comparison, explaining how to justify preprocessing decisions, clarifying which evaluation metrics suit which problem type and why accuracy alone is often misleading, showing how to structure a critical limitations and responsible AI discussion, checking Harvard referencing, and reviewing a student's own draft against the published marking criteria.
Read Model Answer →