Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Business Consultancy Project
5,000 words
Business Consultancy Project – Summative Coursework
This assessment requires students to complete a 5,000-word Business Consultancy Project designed to replicate the work of a professional consultant. The project accounts for 100% of the module assessment and requires students to investigate a clearly defined business issue, challenge or problem identified in the earlier Consultancy Project Proposal. Students must use the same client, topic and issue proposed in the previous submission unless a change has been strongly recommended through feedback or endorsed by the supervisor or tutor. The consultancy project requires deep and independent research using credible secondary sources, including recent peer-reviewed academic journals, industry reports and reputable business publications. The analysis should translate evidence into meaningful insights and actionable recommendations that create strategic value for the client organisation. The report must critically analyse the selected business problem rather than simply describe the organisation or relevant theories. The report should contain an Executive Summary, Introduction, Company/Client Overview, Problem Definition and Consultancy Focus, Stakeholder Analysis, Data Analysis and Framework Application, Recommendations and Conclusion, and a 500-word Employability Reflection. The Data Analysis and Framework Application section carries the largest indicative allocation at approximately 1,800 words and requires students to apply two or three relevant models or frameworks. Examples provided in the brief include SWOT, PESTLE, Porter’s Five Forces and the Balanced Scorecard. Students are also expected to present and interpret secondary data using appropriate tables, charts, Excel outputs or pivot tables. The Recommendations and Conclusion section should provide three actionable and prioritised recommendations supported by evidence, while considering implementation risks, barriers and anticipated benefits. The Employability Reflection should consider research, analytical, problem-solving, project management and communication skills, together with teamwork, leadership, ethical awareness, sustainability, personal development, career relevance and future professional growth. The assessment requires Harvard referencing throughout. The report should use professional formatting, third-person academic writing, numbered pages, correctly labelled tables and figures, and accurate in-text citations and references. The brief emphasises the use of recent and credible sources, with the majority of references expected to come from publications within the previous 6–12 months.
Read Model Answer →
Business
800 words
Individual Reflection on Group Research Presentation
This assignment is an individual written reflection based on a group research presentation completed for the Principles of International Business module. The assessment requires students to reflect on both the research topic explored by their group and the process of working collaboratively to develop and deliver the group presentation. The reflection has a word count of 800 words and should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the student's individual experience, contribution and learning. The first part of the reflection introduces the research topic investigated by the group. Students are expected to provide a concise summary of the subject explored and establish the context for their reflection. This provides an opportunity to explain the focus of the group's research and the main area investigated. The second area focuses on the group project experience. Students should reflect on their own contribution to the group presentation and evaluate how effectively the group collaborated. The reflection should consider aspects of teamwork such as communication, presentation, time management and conflict resolution. Students should also discuss what they learned from undertaking the research project, including critical reading and thinking, development of the research topic, data collection and analysis, and the process of making recommendations. Importantly, the reflection should include at least one specific example of how a problem was identified and resolved during the group process. The final area focuses on research skills development. Students should identify the research skills they developed while conducting the chosen research topic and provide examples of how these skills were applied during the group research project. They should also discuss challenges encountered while completing the project and explain how they addressed or overcame those challenges. Overall, the assignment is designed to encourage students to critically reflect on their group research and presentation experience, rather than simply describe what happened. It provides an opportunity to consider individual contributions, teamwork, research capabilities, problem-solving and personal learning gained through the project. The assessment therefore combines reflection on the international business research topic with evaluation of collaborative working and the development of research skills.
Read Model Answer →
800 words
Individual Reflection on Group Research Presentation and Research Skills Development
This assessment is an individual 800-word reflective piece that requires students to reflect on their experience of completing a group research project and delivering a group presentation. The reflection focuses on the research topic explored by the group, the student's individual contribution to the presentation, the effectiveness of group collaboration, the development of research skills and the challenges encountered throughout the research process. The reflection begins with an introduction to the research topic investigated by the group. Students are expected to provide a concise summary of the topic explored and establish the context for their subsequent reflection. The discussion should demonstrate an understanding of the research undertaken by the group and provide a clear foundation for evaluating the student's experience. The second area focuses on the group project experience. Students should describe their individual contributions to the group presentation and critically reflect on how effectively the group worked together. The reflection should consider aspects of teamwork such as communication, presentation skills, time management and conflict resolution. Students should also identify what they learned from both the teamwork process and the research project, including areas such as critical reading and thinking, research topic development, data collection and analysis, and making recommendations. At least one specific example of how a problem was resolved during the group process must be included to demonstrate practical reflection on the team's experience. The third area focuses on research skills development. Students should identify the research skills they developed while conducting the chosen research topic and provide specific examples of how these skills were applied during the group research project. The reflection should also discuss challenges experienced while completing the research and explain how those challenges were addressed or overcome. Overall, the assessment requires students to move beyond simply describing what happened and provide meaningful reflection on their learning and development. The reflection should demonstrate how participation in the group research project contributed to the development of teamwork, communication, research, analytical and problem-solving skills. It should also consider how these skills can support future academic and professional activities. The assessment is marked using four criteria: presentation and structure of the reflection, breadth and depth of reflection, research skills development, and group presentation experience. The rubric allocates 10 points to presentation and structure, 30 points to breadth and depth of reflection, 40 points to research skills development and 20 points to group presentation experience, for a total of 100 points. The assessment instructions also state that students must not use AI tools for the assignment.
Read Model Answer →
Operations and Supply Chain Management
2,000 words
Operations and Supply Chain Management – Individual Reflective Report
This assessment is an individual 2,000-word reflective report for the Operations and Supply Chain Management module at De Montfort University. The report requires students to reflect critically on their experience of completing Assessment One and to demonstrate how their learning developed throughout the project. The assessment focuses on reflective practice, application of relevant theories, critical analysis of team and project experiences, and the development of an action plan for future professional practice. The report begins with an introduction explaining why reflection on practice is important and connecting reflective practice to relevant learning theories where appropriate. Students are required to identify the particular areas they will focus on within the report and explain why these areas are important and interesting to explore. This section establishes the purpose and scope of the reflection and provides a foundation for the critical discussion that follows. The main body should use appropriate sub-headings to organise the discussion into different areas. Students should explain how the team collectively established specific approaches relating to the topics selected in Assessment One. The report should then examine how the approach changed as the project progressed and connect these changes to relevant theories. Both successful and unsuccessful aspects of the project should be critically considered, rather than simply describing what happened. Detailed examples from the situation analysis and problem-solving components of Assessment One should be used to support the arguments and demonstrate meaningful reflection. The report should demonstrate critical understanding of operations and supply chain management issues, including the ability to critically appraise and adapt to tangible, intangible and information-related aspects of the global supply chain. It should also reflect on capacity planning and process design decisions relating to the production of goods and services. The emphasis is on connecting practical project experience with relevant academic concepts and theories. The conclusion should identify the key learning points gained from the project process and the consultancy presentation. Students should reflect on how these experiences have contributed to their knowledge, skills and professional development. The final part of the report should present a clear action plan explaining how the learning gained from the project will be taken forward into the student's future career. The assessment is worth 30% of the module and has a required length of 2,000 words, with an accepted range of 1,800–2,200 words. Assessment criteria include introduction and rationale, application of theory and concepts, critical analysis and evaluation, conclusion and action plan, and academic skills including Harvard referencing, source quality and quantity, structure and presentation.
Read Model Answer →
Entrepreneurial Marketing
Entrepreneurial Marketing Business Idea Pitch: Market Opportunity, Value Proposition and Venture Viability
This Entrepreneurial Marketing assessment requires students to identify, research and present an entrepreneurial business idea that either addresses an identified customer need or exploits a recognised market opportunity. The idea may involve a new product or service and can be developed either as a personal start-up opportunity or as a new business proposition for an existing organisation. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… Students are expected to construct a concise business case around four core elements: the proposed business idea, the identified need or opportunity and resulting value proposition, an overview of the relevant market, and an appropriate entrepreneurial marketing strategy. The pitch should demonstrate how the proposed offering creates value and why the opportunity is commercially credible. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… The assessment provides three presentation routes. Students may deliver the pitch live to a panel, submit a five-minute narrated PowerPoint with a recorded response to the question of why the idea is strong, or submit the narrated presentation while also participating in the live Business Ideas Showcase. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… Students are expected to prepare approximately 6–10 PowerPoint slides, use in-text citations when external evidence is presented, and include a reference slide. The pitch should be concise, professional and supported by appropriate market research and business evidence. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… The marking criteria assess presentation and professionalism, verbal delivery, innovation and value proposition, market research and analysis, entrepreneurial marketing strategy, and overall business-case viability. Each of the main analytical components carries substantial weighting, with market research, marketing strategy, innovation and viability each contributing significantly to the final result. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… Overall, the assessment integrates opportunity recognition, value proposition development, market analysis, entrepreneurial marketing, venture viability and professional pitching skills within a practical start-up or business-development context. The brief specifies Cite Them Right Harvard referencing. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… 2) CW2 – Reflective Essay Field Content to enter Title Reflective Analysis of Entrepreneurial Capabilities, Product Development and Network-Based Opportunity Creation University University of Hertfordshire Subject Entrepreneurial Marketing / Entrepreneurship / Reflective Practice Module name Entrepreneurial Marketing Academic level Masters / Postgraduate Academic year 2025–2026 Assignment type MS Reflective writing Reference style Harvard Word count 1,000 words ±10% Amount (₹) Enter your internal project amount Key topics Entrepreneurial Marketing, Entrepreneurial Capabilities, Entrepreneurship, Reflective Practice, Product Development, Service Design, Opportunity Recognition, New Product Development, Teamwork, Networking, Business Start-up, Entrepreneurial Potential, Intrapreneurship, Personal Development, Business Application, Reflexive Practice, Entrepreneurial Confidence, Capability Development, Recommendations, Professional Reflection The assessment is an individual 1,000-word reflective essay worth 30% of the module. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… Assignment overview — ready to paste This Entrepreneurial Marketing reflective assessment requires students to critically evaluate their own entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial capabilities using learning from the module together with relevant life and work experience. The essay should use appropriate academic theories and frameworks to identify key strengths and development areas and make clear recommendations for improving future entrepreneurial potential. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… A major element of the reflection concerns the principles involved in designing a new product or service to meet an identified need. Students are expected to consider how entrepreneurial ideas are developed, how opportunities are recognised and how entrepreneurial capabilities influence the process of converting an idea into a viable proposition. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… The assessment also requires critical reflection on the importance of teams and networks in developing business-start-up opportunities and designing new services. The module learning outcomes emphasise the role of collaborative performance, networking and reflexive practice in strengthening entrepreneurial confidence and capability. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… Students should move beyond simple personal description and critically analyse their capabilities with reference to academic evidence. At least five academic references are required, and the work should use Cite Them Right referencing. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… The marking scheme allocates equal weighting to five areas: presentation, structure and reflective style; content and findings; intellectual curiosity and business application; critical analysis; and recommendations, with each area worth 20%. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… Overall, the assessment integrates self-reflection, entrepreneurial capability analysis, product and service design, team and network performance, academic theory and personal development planning. Its purpose is to demonstrate how reflective learning can support stronger entrepreneurial judgement, confidence and future business practice. The brief requires Cite Them Right Harvard referencing. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua…
Read Model Answer →
Project Management / Professional Development / Business Strategy
5,000 words
Professional Project Portfolio and Strategic Business Presentation
This Level 7 assessment requires students to compile a comprehensive Portfolio of Evidence demonstrating their project contribution, reflective learning, professional skills and career development. The portfolio has a maximum length of 5,000 words and is designed to evidence both technical or disciplinary project engagement and the student’s development as a reflective professional. The assessment is organised into three main components: a Discipline Report, Project Work Logbook, and Career Development Plan. Assessment Overview The Discipline Report, worth 40% of the portfolio, provides an overview of the project and its conclusions, alongside a self-reflection on the student’s project experience. Students also complete a personal skills analysis and provide a confidential summary of their team’s delivery. This section therefore combines project understanding with critical self-evaluation, skills awareness and evaluation of collaborative performance. Assessment Overview The Project Work Logbook, worth 30%, records the student’s activities on a weekly basis. Students summarise the work completed each week and document problems or challenges encountered during the project together with the approaches used to resolve them. The marking criteria emphasise consistency, level of detail, organisation and the ability to identify and address project-related difficulties. Assessment Overview Assessment Overview The Career Development Plan, also worth 30%, requires students to define a realistic future career pathway, identify relevant jobs and organisations, and evaluate the skills and knowledge needed to progress toward those goals. Students must also complete an additional professional-development course, such as CPD or LinkedIn Learning, to demonstrate practical upskilling and continued professional development. Assessment Overview A related team presentation forms a second assessment activity. Teams of four to five students must present face to face for approximately 10–15 minutes to a small management-board audience. All team members are expected to contribute approximately equal content and speaking time, with provision for questions and answers. The presentation focuses on the team’s overall findings, analysis of the business problem, practical recommendations, proposed implementation approach and final conclusion. assessment Overview 1 Strong presentations are expected to be engaging, professionally structured and supported by relevant evidence, graphics, tables and other appropriate visual material. Higher-level work should move beyond description by applying theory critically to a real-world business problem, recognising the limitations and contextual applicability of theoretical concepts and producing recommendations that are appropriate to the organisation being analysed. assessment Overview 1 Overall, the assessment develops and evaluates project reflection, professional communication, teamwork, career planning, critical analysis, employability, problem solving and evidence-based business recommendation skills. It combines an individual reflective portfolio with a collaborative management-style presentation, allowing students to demonstrate both personal development and the ability to communicate project findings professionally.
Read Model Answer →
Software Engineering / Enterprise Systems Development
3,000 words
Enterprise Software Engineering Development: ParkaLot Parking Management System Analysis, Design and Prototype
This Enterprise Software Engineering Development assessment is based on the ParkaLot Group, a fictional operator of multi-storey parking garages across major UK cities. The organisation currently relies on fragmented manual processes, basic barrier-based vehicle counting, local spreadsheets, on-site payment and inconsistent customer access arrangements. Students act as software engineering consultants and are required to analyse these operational weaknesses and design a centralised enterprise parking management system capable of supporting reservations, customer accounts, vehicle identification, billing, real-time occupancy monitoring, dynamic pricing and management reporting. COMP1471 CW 2526 The proposed ParkaLot platform is intended to integrate customers, parking spaces, reservations and billing across the garage network. Planned functionality includes online registration and reservation, recurring and corporate parking arrangements, licence-plate recognition, automated space allocation, sensor-based occupancy tracking, centralised monthly billing, electronic payments, promotional pricing and predictive overbooking. The system must also provide dashboards and historical reporting to assist management with capacity planning, staffing, pricing and operational decision-making. COMP1471 CW 2526 The coursework is completed in two main development phases. Phase 1 – Structured Analysis and Design requires an Entity Relationship Diagram representing the logical data model, a Data Flow Diagram including a Level 0 context diagram, and implementation of a prototype database. Phase 2 – Object-Oriented Development extends the system using object-oriented analysis, design principles and UML, with substantial business and user-interface functionality implemented using suitable OO technologies. COMP1471 CW 2526 The final report contains analysis of the 5 Ps of software engineering: Problem, Process, Project, Product and People. Students discuss the business problem and commercial risks, justify the development methodology followed, define resources and budget, document project artefacts and requirements, and identify the main stakeholders involved in the project. The technical design section includes the ERD, DFD, UML use-case model, at least three sequence diagrams, a detailed class diagram and discussion of design patterns. COMP1471 CW 2526 Students must additionally submit a functioning prototype that reflects the design and participate in acceptance testing and a live demonstration. Individual students are questioned on both theoretical and technical aspects of the submitted system. The assessment also evaluates group contribution, peer and self-assessment, personal reflection, research quality, communication and professional teamwork. COMP1471 CW 2526 The weighting places substantial emphasis on technical design and implementation: the UML design is worth 24 marks, the software prototype 15 marks, design patterns 6 marks, and acceptance testing/demonstration 25 marks. This makes the coursework strongly focused on demonstrating the relationship between requirements analysis, software architecture, UML modelling, implementation quality and working enterprise-system functionality. COMP1471 CW 2526
Read Model Answer →
Business Consultancy / Digital Marketing / Social Media Marketing
3,000 words
You Keep Me Sane: Social Media Growth and Digital Product Marketing Live Business Project
his Extended Work Project is a live business consultancy assignment completed for You Keep Me Sane, a podcast and social-media brand seeking to expand its online audience and increase sales of its digital products. The organisation promotes its podcast across platforms including Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube and LinkedIn and identified a need for additional support with regular content creation, social-media scheduling and digital-product promotion. Project Brief_You Keep Me Sane … The client challenge focuses on improving the organisation's social-media presence while reducing the workload associated with producing and publishing content. The project brief specifically identifies the need to create reels, carousels and other social-media posts, potentially using Canva, and to support an existing Buffer-based scheduling process. The organisation aims to publish approximately three times per week while also promoting new digital products. The intended commercial outcomes are growth in social-media following and increased digital-product sales. Project Brief_You Keep Me Sane … The academic assessment requires students to document the project journey in chronological order, from the initial client brief and early meetings through planning, research, idea development, feedback, implementation, challenges and final outcomes. The 3,000-word report should explain the business context, methods and frameworks used, significant milestones, problems encountered, adaptations made and recommendations provided to the client. EWP 5TH MAY 2026 (1) EWP 5TH MAY 2026 (1) Professional reflection is also an important element of the project. Students are expected to evaluate team learning, skills development, project-management experience and the practical lessons gained from working on a genuine business challenge. The report should demonstrate critical thinking and reflective analysis rather than simply describing activities completed. EWP 5TH MAY 2026 (1) The accompanying 10-slide presentation mirrors the report and communicates the project overview, organisational background, initial brief, research, development process, challenges, outcomes, recommendations and learning in a concise visual format. EWP 5TH MAY 2026 (1) Overall, the project integrates live business consultancy, social-media strategy, content development, digital-product marketing, client engagement, teamwork, project management and reflective professional learning, with emphasis on demonstrating practical value created for the client organisation.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Cloud Computing
2,000 words
Technical Evaluation and Professional Reflection on a Cloud-Based Machine Learning Fraud Detection Solution
This postgraduate individual assessment critically evaluates a cloud-based machine learning solution for financial fraud detection developed as part of a preceding group project. The scenario concerns a financial services organisation seeking to detect fraudulent transactions in order to reduce financial losses and strengthen customer security. The individual report requires students to examine both the technical quality of the developed solution and their own professional contribution to the project. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … The first component, Technical Evaluation, accounts for 50% of the assessment and has a suggested allocation of approximately 1,000 words. Students critically analyse the group solution with particular attention to data preprocessing, machine learning model choices, evaluation metrics and technical limitations. The analysis should go beyond description by explaining how specific modelling and design decisions influenced the final outcomes of the fraud-detection system. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … The second component, Reflection and Professional Issues, also accounts for 50% and is approximately 1,000 words. Students critically reflect on their personal contribution, teamwork experience, challenges encountered and lessons learned during the project. The discussion also addresses wider professional and ethical considerations associated with AI and cloud-based machine learning, including bias, fairness, sustainability and data privacy. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … The assessment is designed to demonstrate critical understanding of machine learning methods, cloud-computing architectures, practical development of machine learning solutions and awareness of the social, ethical and sustainability implications of AI technologies. A Seminar Activity Tracker must also be included as an appendix to provide evidence of weekly participation and knowledge development. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … Higher-level performance requires a comprehensive connection between technical decisions and outcomes alongside deep reflection on teamwork, professional development, ethics, fairness and sustainability. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … Overview word count: approximately 300 words. AI-use note: the brief permits AI for limited support such as grammar improvement, structure, organising ideas and suggestions. The student's main content, analysis and conclusions must remain their own, and any AI use must be declared. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief …
Read Model Answer →
Computing and Digital Technologies
3,000 words
Contemporary Computing and Digital Technologies: AI Agents Hackathon Reflective Report
This postgraduate reflective assessment forms part of the Contemporary Computing and Digital Technologies module and is based on experiential learning undertaken through an AI-focused hackathon. The hackathon theme, “AI Agents Unleashed – Building the Future of Automation,” requires MSc students from computing-related disciplines to collaborate on intelligent agent-based solutions capable of automating complex tasks, solving real-world problems and supporting human decision-making. The hackathon encourages students to investigate agent-based system design, intelligent automation and responsible AI development. Potential applications include autonomous cybersecurity monitoring, multi-agent systems for information gathering and decision support, automated data pipelines, intelligent software-development assistants, and conversational systems such as virtual tutors or career coaches. Students may use code-based approaches or platforms such as Flowise, Microsoft Power Automate and Make.com, while more advanced implementations can use technologies including LangChain, AutoGen, Python-based agent SDKs, APIs and large language models. The 3,000-word Individual Reflective Report, worth 70% of the module assessment, evaluates the student's learning and professional development arising from these experiential activities. The first component is a 2,000-word Portfolio of Evidence, requiring evidence-based reflection on participation in the hackathon. Students should evaluate their leadership and teamwork competencies using concrete evidence such as screenshots, code commits and feedback while identifying key lessons for personal and professional development. They must also consider how the experience applies to future research, career development or professional practice. The remaining 1,000 words comprise a Critical Self-Reflection examining the student's personal contribution and achievement of learning-contract goals. Students are expected to critically consider challenges encountered, how those challenges were addressed, lessons learned and their development as effective collaborative team members. Overall, the assessment integrates technical experimentation, reflective practice, teamwork, leadership, professional development and responsible use of emerging AI technologies, supported by a structured portfolio of evidence
Read Model Answer →
Technical Evaluation and Professional Reflection on a Cloud-Based Machine Learning Fraud Detection Solution
This individual technical evaluative report forms the reflective and critical component of the Machine Learning on Cloud module. It builds directly upon a group project involving the development of a machine learning solution for financial fraud detection. The report requires each student to critically evaluate the technical decisions made within the group solution while also reflecting on their individual contribution, teamwork experience and professional development. The first component, Technical Evaluation, accounts for 50% of the individual assessment and has a suggested allocation of approximately 1,000 words. Students critically examine the group’s machine learning solution, including the approaches adopted for data preprocessing, model selection and evaluation. They are expected to discuss the suitability of the chosen techniques and metrics, identify limitations and explain how individual technical decisions affected the final performance and outcome of the fraud-detection solution. The second component, Reflection and Professional Issues, also accounts for 50% and has a suggested allocation of approximately 1,000 words. Students reflect critically on their personal contribution to the project and their experience of working within a team. The discussion addresses challenges encountered, lessons learned and how the experience contributed to technical and professional development. Professional and ethical considerations form an important part of the reflection. Relevant issues include algorithmic bias, fairness, sustainability and data privacy, particularly in relation to machine learning applications within financial services and cloud environments. Students are also required to attach their Seminar Activity Tracker as an appendix, providing evidence of weekly participation and knowledge development. The assessment therefore combines technical critique with reflective practice, requiring students to demonstrate that they understand not only how a machine learning solution was developed, but also why specific technical decisions were made, their consequences, the limitations of the resulting system and the wider ethical and professional implications of deploying AI on cloud infrastructure. Overview word count: approximately 315 words. The brief also states that AI may assist with areas such as grammar, structure, organisation of ideas and suggestions, but the main content, analysis and conclusions must be the student's own work, and AI use must be declared.
Read Model Answer →
Cyber Security / Penetration Testing
2,400 words
Grey-Box Penetration Testing: Vulnerability Assessment, Exploitation and Mitigation
This technical cyber-security project presents an authorised grey-box penetration test conducted within a controlled virtual laboratory environment. The objective is to assess the security posture of a deliberately vulnerable target system, identify weaknesses in exposed network services, demonstrate how those weaknesses could be exploited, evaluate their security and organisational impact, and recommend appropriate mitigation measures. The assessment follows a practical penetration-testing workflow supported by technical evidence, screenshots, activity records and academic research. The project begins with laboratory configuration, network discovery, service enumeration and vulnerability analysis. Tools including Kali Linux, Metasploitable, VMware, Nmap, Netcat and Metasploit are used across the testing lifecycle. Identified services are mapped to known vulnerabilities before controlled exploitation is undertaken and the resulting access is documented. The activity log records the progression from environment setup and network scanning through vulnerability identification, exploitation, evidence collection and final reporting. Five principal attack vectors are examined. These include the vsftpd 2.3.4 FTP backdoor, Samba username-map-script exploitation, an UnrealIRCd backdoor, insecure Java Remote Method Invocation and a misconfigured DistCC service. The practical demonstrations show how vulnerable or incorrectly configured services can permit unauthorised command execution and, in several cases, privileged shell access. For each vulnerability, the report explains the weakness, exploitation process, observed result, security impact and proposed mitigation. Recommended controls include patching or upgrading obsolete services, disabling unnecessary services, implementing firewall restrictions, strengthening authentication and input validation, restricting access to authorised systems, applying least privilege and monitoring suspicious activity. The project also incorporates group management and reflective practice. Team members perform specialised roles covering laboratory configuration, reconnaissance, vulnerability analysis, exploitation and documentation. Individual reflection considers technical performance, teamwork, evidence management and future skills development, demonstrating how structured collaboration contributes to an effective penetration-testing engagement. Important: unlike the earlier assignment briefs, these uploads appear to be completed student/project materials rather than the official 7COM1068 assessment brief. Therefore I would not invent the university, academic level or academic year. If you upload the actual 7COM1068 assignment guideline, I can fill those fields exactly.
Read Model Answer →
People Practice / Human Resource Management
2,000 words
Core Behaviours for People Professionals: Ethics, Professional Values and CPD
This CIPD Level 3 assessment focuses on the core behaviours expected of people professionals, with particular emphasis on ethical practice, professional values, inclusive behaviour and continuing professional development. The unit considers behaviours that people professionals should apply consistently, including when working in unfamiliar or challenging situations, to support ethical, inclusive and professionally responsible workplaces. The assessment is structured around a job-application scenario for an HR/L&D Assistant position at Nuvascare Ltd, a home-based care organisation employing more than 200 care professionals. Nuvascare emphasises honesty, kindness, openness, teamwork, learning and ethical professional behaviour, and candidates are therefore required to demonstrate how their own experience aligns with these expectations. Learners respond to five areas of assessment. They must explain ethical principles and professional values and provide an example demonstrating how a personal or professional value has influenced behaviour. They must also provide examples of complying with relevant regulation and law in a professional or educational context. The assessment additionally examines behaviours associated with effective teamwork, including contributing views, clarifying problems and working collaboratively with others. Learners then explain how they keep their professional knowledge current and identify methods used to follow developments within the people profession. The final component requires evidence of active continuing professional development (CPD). Learners provide a CPD record containing at least two recent development activities and reflect on how these activities affected their knowledge, capability or professional practice. Written responses to Questions 1–4 should total approximately 2,000 words ±10%. The CPD record is submitted as additional evidence and is excluded from the word count.
Read Model Answer →
mgt
This module requires you to complete two assessments: a group presentation (25%) and an individual report (75%). In the group presentation, your team must analyse a chosen industry using strategic tools such as PESTEL analysis, Porter’s Five Forces, and competitor/strategic group analysis. The presentation should critically evaluate the external and industry environment, include graphs, charts, and academic references, and demonstrate strong teamwork and confident delivery during the 15-minute presentation and 5-minute Q&A session. The individual report requires you to select a company from the recommended list and critically evaluate its strategic challenges, business ethics, sustainability practices, and/or organisational culture issues. You must analyse the impact of these issues on the company, provide well-justified recommendations, suggest suitable leadership and management approaches, and support all arguments using relevant strategic and leadership theories. The work should be analytical rather than descriptive, properly referenced with in-text citations, professionally formatted, and based on extensive research.
Read Model Answer →