Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Secure Design and Development
2,000 words
Secure Design and Development – PixelForge Nexus (UITS)
This assessment for Coventry University’s Secure Design and Development module requires students to design and develop a functional secure online system with the aid of a Large Language Model (LLM). The assignment is based on a practical scenario involving Creative SkillZ LLC and its proposed “PixelForge Nexus” system. The submission combines a functional prototype, an individual 2,000-word report, source code hosted in the Coventry University GitHub environment, and a video report demonstrating the completed prototype. The PixelForge Nexus prototype is intended to provide secure project management and basic asset and resource management for a game-development environment. Core functionality includes adding and removing projects, viewing active projects, assigning developers to projects, allowing developers to view their assigned projects, uploading project documents, and allowing authorised users to access documents associated with their projects. The system must implement privilege separation between Admin, Project Lead and Developer roles. Security is a central requirement of the assignment. Administrators are responsible for managing projects and user accounts, Project Leads can assign developers and upload project documents, while Developers can view assigned projects and associated documents. The system must include a robust login mechanism with secure password hashing and storage, with Multi-Factor Authentication recommended as an additional security measure. Proposed pages include Sign In/Register, a role-based User Dashboard, Account Settings and a Project Details page. The practical assessment evaluates four major areas: System Design, Security Testing and Analysis, System Development, and Formal Methods. System design requires consideration of secure design principles and their application to the development lifecycle. Security testing requires critical evaluation of security techniques, identification of issues and proposed mitigation measures. System development requires a functional prototype that follows the proposed design and considers legal and ethical requirements. Formal methods require a behavioural model and appropriate verification techniques to establish whether the system meets its specification. The individual report must document the methods and techniques used to develop the prototype and discuss the stages of the development lifecycle, including specification, design and development. It must also explain the deployment and testing approach, limitations of the prototype, possible improvements, security techniques and the formal model used. The submission must include links to the Coventry University GitHub repository and Microsoft OneDrive video, while the required appendix contains the LLM prompt history and other resources used with APA-style referencing.
Read Model Answer →
Business Strategy / Digital Business and Innovation
3,125 words
Safaricom Business Hub: Strategic B2B Digital Payment Platform for East African SMEs
This strategic business case proposes the Safaricom Business Hub, an integrated B2B digital-payment platform designed to support small and medium-sized enterprises across East Africa. The proposed solution responds to Safaricom’s need for digital diversification as traditional voice revenues mature, while leveraging the growth of M-Pesa and the wider transition toward digital financial services. The platform combines invoicing, bulk payments, cash-flow analytics and integrations with accounting systems such as Xero, QuickBooks and SAP. The report begins by analysing Safaricom’s current strategic position, including subscriber growth, revenue performance, declining voice services, M-Pesa transaction growth and market saturation. It then assesses the wider East African B2B digital-payment opportunity, considering market size, digital adoption, the SME population, regulatory developments, smartphone penetration and operational inefficiencies associated with manual invoicing and reconciliation. Competitive analysis evaluates Safaricom against established banking solutions, international fintech providers and specialist payment gateways. The strategic case identifies several potential advantages associated with Safaricom’s existing M-Pesa infrastructure, agent network, brand position and payment-services capabilities. The proposed Business Hub addresses fragmented SME financial processes through automated invoicing, bulk payment processing, real-time cash-flow analytics and integration with existing accounting platforms. The business plan also provides a four-phase implementation roadmap, covering MVP development, pilot testing, Kenyan market launch, regional expansion and ecosystem development. Financial projections consider customer growth, revenue, EBITDA, customer acquisition cost, lifetime value, payback and return on investment, alongside sensitivity scenarios for different levels of market adoption. Finally, the report evaluates competitive, regulatory and market-adoption risks and links the proposed investment to Safaricom’s broader strategic diversification objectives. Overall, the work integrates strategic analysis, fintech innovation, market opportunity assessment, implementation planning, financial modelling and risk evaluation to present a commercial case for expanding Safaricom’s digital financial-services ecosystem. Overview word count: approximately 340 words. One useful note for the public Reference Library: I would upload the clean original assignment/business plan rather than the AI-detection or similarity-report versions if you have it, because these two PDFs contain checker-report pages in addition to the coursework itself.
Read Model Answer →
Systems Analysis and Design
Systems Analysis and Design with UML – Individual Systems Design Assignment
This individual assignment forms Part 2 of the Systems Analysis and Design with UML assessment and contributes 50% of the overall module weighting. The uploaded guidance indicates that this component should continue directly from work completed in Part 1, meaning that the analysis and design developed previously should provide the foundation for the second-stage submission. The assignment is centred on the principles and practices of systems analysis and design using the Unified Modeling Language (UML). It is intended to demonstrate the application of structured analytical thinking and modelling techniques to the development or refinement of an information-system solution. Because Part 2 follows an earlier assessment component, continuity between the original problem definition, requirements and subsequent design work is likely to be an important aspect of the submission. Relevant areas may include requirements representation, system modelling, process and interaction analysis, object-oriented design and the use of appropriate UML artefacts to communicate system structure and behaviour. The work should therefore demonstrate how analytical findings are translated into coherent design decisions while maintaining alignment with the system requirements established during the earlier project stage. The assessment is individual and therefore should demonstrate independent understanding of the selected system, its requirements and the rationale underlying the proposed design. The uploaded summary confirms that this component is worth 50% of the module and has a submission deadline of 15 May 2026 at 17:00 GMT. Note: the actual detailed Part 2 brief is not contained in this uploaded summary, so specific UML diagrams, required sections, word count and marking criteria cannot be confirmed from this document alone. Entry 2 — Intelligent User Interfaces Part 1 Field Content to enter Title Smart Study Student Assistant: Intelligent User Interface Prototype University Not specified in the uploaded guideline Subject Intelligent User Interfaces / Human-Computer Interaction Module name Intelligent User Interfaces Academic level Not specified Academic year Not specified Assignment type Presentations and Academic Posters Reference style Not specified Word count Not applicable – maximum 10-minute pre-recorded prototype presentation Amount (₹) Enter your internal project amount Key topics Intelligent User Interfaces, Human-Computer Interaction, Smart Study Assistant, Student Productivity, Adaptive Interfaces, Personalised Learning, Study Planning, Question Generation, Low-Fidelity Prototyping, User-Centred Design, User Behaviour, Learning Progress, Educational Technology, UX Design, Personalisation Assignment overview This project prototype forms Part 1 of Intelligent User Interfaces and contributes 60% of the final module mark. The assessment requires a project prototype supported by a pre-recorded presentation of no more than ten minutes. The selected project concept is a Smart Study Student Assistant, positioned within education and student-productivity technology. The proposed system is an adaptive study-planning and note-based question-generation interface. Its purpose is to help students organise academic work by combining uploaded study notes, deadlines and information about user behaviour to generate personalised study plans and learning questions. The project addresses common problems including scattered study materials, missed deadlines, unclear schedules and the lack of personalised guidance on how and when students should study. The guidance specifically states that the solution should not be unnecessarily advanced. Instead, the design should focus on how the interface will be useful to different types of users. Low-fidelity material and supporting notes are also required, indicating that the project should demonstrate user-centred design thinking rather than focusing solely on technical sophistication. The intended goal is to provide personalised study plans, questions and guidance based on the student's notes and deadlines, supporting more consistent study habits and improved organisation. Tutor feedback describes the concept as relevant and well motivated but identifies one important weakness: the system's intelligent behaviour is currently under-specified. The tutor specifically recommends clarifying how study plans and question generation adapt according to user behaviour or learning progress. Accordingly, the prototype should communicate both the interface design and the adaptive logic that makes the system genuinely intelligent and user-centred. Entry 3 — Intelligent User Interfaces Part 2 Field Content to enter Title Intelligent User Interfaces – Individual Essay University Not specified in the uploaded guideline Subject Intelligent User Interfaces / Human-Computer Interaction Module name Intelligent User Interfaces Academic level Not specified Academic year Not specified Assignment type MS Essays Reference style Not specified Word count Not specified Amount (₹) Enter your internal project amount Key topics Intelligent User Interfaces, Human-Computer Interaction, Adaptive Interfaces, User-Centred Design, Intelligent Systems, Personalisation, User Experience, Educational Technology, Interaction Design, AI Interfaces Assignment overview This individual essay forms Part 2 of the Intelligent User Interfaces module and contributes 40% of the final module mark. The uploaded guidance identifies the submission deadline as 21 May 2026 at 16:00. The assessment belongs to the same Intelligent User Interfaces module as the Part 1 prototype project. The broader module context therefore concerns the design and evaluation of interfaces that use intelligent or adaptive behaviour to improve interaction between users and digital systems. Relevant considerations may include personalisation, adaptive interaction, usability, human-computer interaction, user behaviour and the responsible design of intelligent systems. However, the uploaded summary does not contain the actual Part 2 assessment brief, essay question, required word count, marking criteria or prescribed topic. It only confirms that the assessment is an individual essay worth 40% of the final mark. For that reason, the Reference Library overview should remain general rather than claiming that Part 2 specifically assesses the Smart Study Student Assistant. If the Part 2 essay is intended to continue or evaluate the Part 1 prototype, that relationship should only be added once the actual Part 2 assessment brief confirms it. The current document explicitly provides the Smart Study Student Assistant instructions under Subject 2, while no corresponding topic instructions are shown for Subject 3. So for Entry 3, I would keep the title and overview generic until the actual KV7005 Part 2 brief is uploaded.
Read Model Answer →