Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Cyber Security / Ethical Hacking / Penetration Testing
4,000 words
Ethical Hacking and Penetration Testing: Vulnerability Exploitation, Privilege Escalation and Mitigation
This Ethical Hacking and Penetration Testing coursework requires students to conduct a practical CTF-style penetration test against a set of authorised target machines and produce a professional technical report documenting the compromise of one selected target. The assessment evaluates practical exploitation skills alongside the ability to analyse risk, explain attack vectors and recommend effective security controls. 8598ba8d8fff5a38af8d427a4ce8f84… The practical element requires students to identify vulnerabilities in multiple target systems, exploit those weaknesses to gain low-privileged access and then perform privilege escalation to obtain root-level access. Successful completion of each stage produces flags, with separate user and root flags contributing directly to the practical marks. Brief descriptions of the attack vectors and payloads used must also be recorded. 8598ba8d8fff5a38af8d427a4ce8f84… The written report focuses in detail on one compromised machine. Students must explain the reconnaissance and vulnerability-identification process, including the techniques used to discover services, web content and potential attack surfaces. The marking criteria specifically recognise appropriate reconnaissance tools such as Nmap and FFUF and reward clear justification of methods and links between reconnaissance results and identified threats. 8598ba8d8fff5a38af8d427a4ce8f84… 8598ba8d8fff5a38af8d427a4ce8f84… A further component requires a formal risk rating for the discovered vulnerabilities. Students should use a recognised risk-classification approach, such as OWASP or SANS, justify the assigned severity and discuss relevant social, legal and ethical considerations. Higher-performing work is expected to connect those considerations directly to the specific vulnerabilities identified. 8598ba8d8fff5a38af8d427a4ce8f84… The exploit section should explain the technical cause of the vulnerability, describe the exploitation process and present relevant example payloads. Mitigation recommendations must then be linked directly to the vulnerabilities discovered, with clear explanations of where the weakness occurs and how it can be remediated. 8598ba8d8fff5a38af8d427a4ce8f84… Overall, the coursework integrates reconnaissance, vulnerability analysis, exploitation, privilege escalation, risk assessment, ethical and legal considerations, technical reporting and defensive mitigation within an authorised penetration-testing environment. Important: this brief states that it is for Coventry University Group students' own use and must not be passed to third parties or posted publicly. 8598ba8d8fff5a38af8d427a4ce8f84… So for your public Reference Library, use an original summary like the one above rather than uploading the assessment brief itself.
Read Model Answer →
Ethical Hacking
2,500 words
Ethical Hacking – Professional Penetration Testing Report
This resit coursework for the Ethical Hacking module at Coventry University requires students to conduct a professional penetration testing examination of a small office environment represented by a number of virtual machines. The purpose of the assessment is to evaluate the security of the target environment, identify vulnerabilities, demonstrate appropriate exploitation techniques within the authorised assessment environment, and produce professional recommendations for improving the security of the systems. The assignment carries 15 credits and requires a report of approximately 2,000 words, with a permitted variation of ±10%. The report should follow a structured penetration-testing approach. The first section covers reconnaissance and target analysis, requiring students to investigate the target environment and identify its structure, services and potential attack surfaces. The marking criteria emphasise the use of appropriate tools to identify network structure and services and the identification of vulnerabilities during the scanning process. Students are expected to analyse the results rather than simply reproduce the output of scanning tools. The second section focuses on exploitation. Students must describe in detail the steps taken and the tools used to exploit relevant vulnerabilities identified during the assessment. The marking criteria distinguish between compromising the desktop and gaining access to the server, with higher achievement involving multiple relevant vulnerabilities and successful access through more than one vulnerability. The report should provide appropriate screenshots and sample sessions to support the findings. The third section addresses post-exploitation activities. Students are required to document and analyse activities carried out after gaining access to the target systems. Examples identified in the marking criteria include dumping password hashes and creating a persistent backdoor. For server assessment, the criteria also consider activities such as obtaining root access or establishing a persistent connection. The report should explain the significance of the activities rather than merely listing technical actions. The fourth section provides recommendations for securing the target machines. Recommendations must address all vulnerabilities identified during the assessment, not only vulnerabilities that were successfully exploited. Security issues should be discussed using an established risk-rating approach such as OWASP, and proposed countermeasures should be relevant to the specific vulnerabilities discovered. The report should also analyse how vulnerabilities relate to one another and fit within the wider security context. The final section presents the conclusions, including an evaluation of the penetration-testing work and alternative approaches that could have been taken. The overall learning outcomes require students to critically discuss the legal, technical and ethical scope of ethical hacking, evaluate penetration-testing methodologies and security assessment tools, analyse vulnerabilities, and professionally report penetration-test outcomes with suitable countermeasures.
Read Model Answer →
Network Systems and Administration
3,500 words
Network Systems and Administration – Linux System and Network Administration Portfolio
This assessment is an individual portfolio for the Network Systems and Administration unit. It consists of two quizzes and a report based on a case study involving the development, implementation, configuration, testing, maintenance, and evaluation of a network solution using an industry-standard network operating system. The report requires students to justify their design and implementation decisions, provide a detailed testing strategy, develop a maintenance and disaster recovery plan, and critically evaluate the completed solution. The case study concerns Piranha, a small organisation in which the business owner has been maintaining a server containing information relating to finance, management, production, and sales. The student is required to undertake the role of Network Systems Administrator and configure an appropriate Linux-based network environment. The practical work includes creating a new user account with root access, confirming root privileges, verifying access to company files, and configuring group-based access controls for finance, management, production, and sales directories. Students must then establish a client-server network by installing a Linux distribution on a separate virtual machine in VirtualBox. SSH connections are required to verify user access and the configured file permissions. The assessment also requires students to use Wireshark to observe network traffic during SSH sessions, report on packet types and encryption, identify potential security vulnerabilities, and recommend improvements such as SSH keys and unique passwords. A maintenance schedule and a brief disaster recovery or backup strategy must also be proposed. The final report must document the practical work with clear explanations and screenshots showing commands, user accounts, and results. The report should be between 1,500 and 3,500 words. The assessment also includes Linux Essentials and Networking Essentials final grades. The marking criteria cover system and network administration, the maintenance plan, reflection and report writing, screenshots, references, and Harvard referencing.
Read Model Answer →