Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Business Consultancy Project: Strategic Analysis, Stakeholder Evaluation and Evidence-Based Recommendations
Business Consultancy, Strategic Management, Business Analysis, Consultancy Project, Stakeholder Analysis, Mendelow Matrix, Business Strategy, Data Analysis, Secondary Research, SWOT Analysis, PESTLE Analysis, Porter’s Five Forces, Balanced Scorecard, Ethics, Sustainability, UN Sustainable Development Goals, Recommendations, Risk Analysis, Implementation Barriers, Organisational Strategy, Business Problem Solving, Employability Skills, Professional Development, Reflective Practice, Project Management, Evidence-Based Decision-Making
Read Model Answer →
Computing
Independent Critical Analysis 30
Independent Critical Analysis 30 is an individual assessment that develops students' ability to critically analyse ethical, social, legal and professional issues arising from a computing-related scenario. The assessment is worth 30% of the overall module assessment and requires students to respond to three questions relating to the ethical and professional issues presented in the scenario. Students are expected to apply the specific analytical techniques or approaches identified in the assessment instructions when developing their responses. The assessment focuses on the critical examination of ethical issues and professional responsibilities within contemporary computing contexts. Students are expected to identify relevant ethical concerns and provide a reasoned justification for their analysis. The marking criteria emphasise the identification of a single ethical issue or ethical risk, followed by a structured analysis using the EHAZOP Framework. Higher-level responses are expected to provide clear justification for the ethical issue selected, examine the associated consequences, and demonstrate a systematic and critical approach to the scenario. A second component focuses on ethical risk analysis using the Ethical OS Toolkit. Students are expected to identify an ethical risk associated with the scenario and justify their selection through a structured analysis. The assessment therefore requires students to consider the potential consequences of computing-related decisions and to demonstrate an understanding of how ethical risks can be identified and evaluated. The final component addresses professional issues. Students are expected to identify relevant professional principles and apply an appropriate professional code of conduct, such as the ACM or BCS Code of Conduct, to the scenario. The analysis should explain which professional principles are relevant and provide a reasoned justification for their application. The marking criteria place emphasis on systematic analysis, appropriate justification and understanding of responsible computing practice. The assessment therefore connects ethical decision-making with professional responsibilities and standards. The assignment also assesses broader module learning outcomes relating to ethical standards, contemporary computing contexts, legal and professional issues, and the ability to critically analyse high-profile cases or case studies. Students are required to submit the provided answer sheet containing the scenario and three questions. The assessment brief states that submissions are subject to Turnitin and that students must follow the specified submission requirements.
Read Model Answer →
Digital Security Risk and Audit
2,000 words
Digital Security Risk and Audit – Information Security Audit of ABC Air
This individual coursework for the Digital Security Risk and Audit module requires students to prepare a 2,000-word information security audit report based on a case study involving ABC Air, a small aircraft service company responsible for aircraft maintenance for civil operators. The company records information including aircraft flying hours, servicing time, engineers' man-hours and related maintenance activities. An external contractor has also provided a report outlining a possible solution for ABC Air. Students are required to assess the information security risks associated with the scenario, complete an information security audit and produce a professional report, clearly identifying any assumptions made during the analysis. The assessment requires students to examine risk assessment, identification and analysis as part of the audit process. A suitable auditing approach must be selected and justified, with students considering either a general risk-based approach or a specific control-based approach. The report should explain why the selected approach is appropriate for the ABC Air scenario and demonstrate how it can be applied to the organisation's information security environment. The coursework also requires consideration of potential cyber attacks and their use within an integrated fault event analysis. Students must identify relevant information security threats and examine how an attack could affect the organisation and its information assets. The report should further identify appropriate standards, best practices or guidelines that could be used to mitigate information security breaches. These should be critically evaluated, including discussion of their advantages and disadvantages rather than simply being listed. The assessment develops students' ability to apply information security governance and audit practices within legal, ethical and professional contexts. It also requires consideration of recognised industry frameworks such as COBIT and international standards including the ISO 27000 series. Students are expected to perform systematic risk assessment and analysis, critically evaluate information assurance reference models, and select appropriate information security audit strategies for complex real-world scenarios. The marking criteria place particular emphasis on the quality of the information security audit, identification and adoption of appropriate international standards and frameworks, and critical evaluation of the benefits and limitations of security audit frameworks. The assessment allocates 20% to identifying and applying an appropriate audit approach, 50% to completing the conceptual information security audit and assurance, and 30% to interpreting and critically evaluating information assurance reference models. The report is an individual assessment and must be submitted as a PDF through Aula/Turnitin. The brief states that APA referencing should be used for the work and that all sources and any AI tools used must be acknowledged.
Read Model Answer →