Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Business Research Methods
3,500 words
Business Research Methods – Research Methodologies, Research Instrument and Research Dissemination
This individual assessment for the Business Research Methods module requires students to produce a structured report of no more than 3,500 words. The assessment is designed to develop students’ ability to identify and justify a suitable business research problem, critically evaluate research methodologies, design an appropriate research instrument, and consider how potential research findings could be effectively communicated to relevant audiences. The report consists of three interconnected sections that require students to demonstrate critical research skills and an understanding of how research can contribute to knowledge and practical decision-making. Section 1 focuses on comparing two research methodologies. Students select a topic of interest or a business problem relevant to their degree specialism, such as strategy, supply chain management, international business and economics, marketing, finance, or human resources. They first explain and justify the selected research problem and formulate a research question. Students then review relevant academic literature, justify the selection of key readings, and demonstrate the scope of the literature through a visual presentation such as a mind map, Venn diagram, or literature map. The section concludes with a detailed critical evaluation of at least two established research methodologies, considering their application, contribution to theory and research, advantages, limitations, constraints, and potential research gaps. Section 2 focuses on the development of a research instrument. Students design an appropriate instrument for their proposed research, such as an interview guide, survey questionnaire, or another suitable data-collection tool. The instrument is provided in an appendix, while the main report includes a reflection explaining how and why it was designed. Students are not required to collect data for this assessment. The section concludes by evaluating the expected value of the proposed instrument and its potential contribution to answering the research question. Section 3 addresses research dissemination. Students identify the audiences that could benefit from the potential research findings and explain why those audiences are relevant. They also consider appropriate methods of communicating research outcomes, including suitable summaries, media, report design, and potential partners such as public organisations, NGOs, associations, or industry. The assessment requires Harvard referencing and a bibliography containing at least 12 relevant journal articles, including at least six published within the previous 24 months. The report is assessed on the clarity of the research problem, depth of literature analysis, critical evaluation of research methods, quality of the proposed research instrument, understanding of research dissemination, and overall academic presentation.
Read Model Answer →
Critical Analysis of Computational Algorithms: Research Paper Evaluation and Complexity Analysis
This postgraduate Computer Science coursework requires students to undertake a critical technical analysis of a computational algorithm presented in a prescribed academic research paper. Students select one paper from the available options and demonstrate that they understand both the research problem addressed by the authors and the algorithmic solution proposed. The assessment contributes 30% of the overall module grade and is completed individually. assignment The available research papers cover several algorithmic topics, including an improved Dijkstra shortest-path algorithm for sparse networks, a modified merge-sort approach for large-scale datasets, parallel merge sort with load balancing, and a Prim-based algorithm for hierarchical clustering. Students must extract the principal algorithm from their selected paper and explain its purpose, inputs, outputs and operating procedure. A major component involves identifying the research question and computational problem addressed by the selected study. Students then reproduce or extract the proposed algorithm in pseudocode form and clearly identify the information supplied to the algorithm and the outputs it generates. The algorithm must also be explained step by step using straightforward language so that its operation can be understood without relying exclusively on formal notation. The coursework further requires a detailed time-complexity analysis, demonstrating understanding of how computational requirements grow with input size and how the proposed technique compares with alternative or conventional approaches. Students must critically evaluate the algorithm’s strengths, weaknesses, performance characteristics and limitations, and suggest potential improvements where appropriate. The marking rubric gives substantial emphasis to five areas: identifying the computational problem and research questions, extracting the proposed algorithm, identifying inputs and outputs, explaining the algorithm clearly, analysing its time complexity, and critically evaluating its strengths and weaknesses. assignment The written submission must be 800–1,000 words, although the inputs/outputs, pseudocode and time-complexity sections are excluded from that limit. Figures and images are not permitted, and the work must be submitted using the prescribed coursework template in DOC/DOCX format. Overview word count: approximately 340 words. AI-use note: the guideline permits generative AI only for proofreading. AI tools are explicitly not permitted to create the assessed work itself. assignment
Read Model Answer →
Computer Science / Research Methods / Specialist Research
2,800 words
Research Specialism Report: Critical Review of Open Research Questions in Computer Science
This Advanced Research Topics in Computer Science assessment requires students to critically examine a research paper associated with their chosen MSc specialism and demonstrate an understanding of how established research techniques are used to create and extend knowledge in computer science. Eligible specialisms include Artificial Intelligence, Networking, Cyber Security, Software Engineering and Data Science. The assessment is intended to prepare students for deeper independent research as part of their Master's project. 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… Students begin by providing a clear introduction to their selected research specialism and explaining the broader research area in a way that is accessible to readers with general computer-science knowledge. The report then identifies the open research question presented in the relevant 7COM1084 specialist lecture paper, explains the problem in detail and evaluates why it is scientifically significant or relevant to a real-world application. 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… A substantial literature-review section requires students to examine existing and related research beyond the specialist lecture paper. The aim is to identify what previous work has achieved, explain why existing approaches do not fully solve the research problem and identify further unresolved questions. 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… The research-methods section focuses on the approaches used in the selected specialist paper. Students are expected to describe and critically evaluate those methods, considering both their strengths and limitations. They must then propose an alternative or extended research approach that could build on the published work and investigate related open problems, drawing on principles of experimental design and theoretical or practical research. 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… The final reflective component asks students to explain their personal investment in the research area, including why the selected question interests them and how their own strengths and prior experience would support future research in that domain. 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… The report must not exceed 2,800 words ±10%, must use the Harvard referencing system, and must include at least 20 references, one of which must be the relevant 7COM1084 specialist paper. 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… 7COM1084+Research+specialism+re… Overall, the assessment integrates research specialism knowledge, literature review, open-problem identification, methodological critique, research design, future-work development and scholarly communication within a Level 7 computer-science research context.
Read Model Answer →
Computer Science
2,800 words
Specialism Research Report
The Specialism Research Report is an individual assessment for the Advanced Research Topics in Computer Science module. The assignment provides students with an opportunity to develop a deeper understanding of a selected computer science research specialism and to investigate an open research question within that area. The available research specialisms are Artificial Intelligence, Networking, Cyber Security, Software Engineering and Data Science. Students are expected to examine the research specialism associated with their degree route and develop their understanding of current research challenges, established techniques and potential future research directions. The report requires students to provide an overview of the research paper presented in the relevant 7COM1084 Research Specialism Lecture. The report must identify and explain the research question addressed by the specialist paper, consider why the research problem is scientifically interesting or relevant to a real-world application, and investigate possible approaches for addressing the question. Students must also identify further research that could build upon the existing work and consider their own personal strengths, interests and experience in relation to the proposed research. The report is structured into five main sections. The first section, Introduction of Research Specialism, provides a general overview of the selected research area and is intended to be accessible to readers with broad computer science knowledge. The second section, Open Research Question, identifies and explains the research problem discussed in the specialist lecture paper and considers its scientific or practical significance. The third section, Existing and Related Work, provides a literature review of research beyond the specialist paper, identifies limitations in existing approaches and discusses related open research problems. The fourth section, Research Approach, examines the methods used in the specialist paper, evaluates their strengths and weaknesses, and proposes an approach for extending the research. The fifth section, Personal Investment, explains the student's interest in the research question and evaluates their personal strengths and experience relevant to conducting the proposed research. Students are expected to use module reading materials and secondary research to support their discussion. The report must use Harvard referencing and include at least 20 references, including the 7COM1084 specialist paper. The references are excluded from the word count. The submission must not exceed 2,800 words, with a permitted range of ±10%. The assessment develops students' ability to understand established research techniques, identify research problems from relevant literature, propose alternative solutions, critically evaluate research literature, develop approaches for future research and communicate research knowledge effectively in a scholarly manner.
Read Model Answer →
Artificial Intelligence
2,000 words
End-to-End Applied AI Development — Comparative Machine Learning and Neural Network Modelling on a Public Dataset
This assessment runs a complete applied AI development cycle end to end: problem definition, dataset selection, preprocessing, model building, optimisation, evaluation and critical reflection. Students identify a real-world problem themselves, formulate a research question from it, and source a suitable dataset from a recognised public repository such as UCI, Kaggle, Data.gov or OpenML. Dataset choice carries more weight than students expect. It must be genuinely suitable for supervised learning, complex enough to make preprocessing and feature engineering meaningful, and — critically — structured so that a traditional machine learning approach and a deep learning approach can be sensibly compared on it. A dataset too small or too clean makes the neural network component pointless; one too large or too noisy makes the whole pipeline unfinishable within the page limit. The source must be referenced and the choice explicitly justified against the research problem. The modelling requirement is fixed: at least two supervised machine learning models, plus one artificial neural network built in a mainstream deep learning framework, all trained and tested. The comparison between them is the analytical core of the work. Reporting that the neural network scored higher is not an answer; explaining why, in terms of the data's structure and each model's inductive assumptions, is. Marks are distributed across problem framing, the traditional models, the deep learning model, evaluation and critical analysis including responsible AI considerations, and academic communication. That responsible AI component is easy to overlook and is not decorative — it asks what the model's limitations mean for anyone who might rely on it. Presentation requirements are specific. The report is page-limited rather than purely word-limited, and every plot must be described in the text while also being legible enough to communicate on its own — a common failure is dense default library output pasted in without axis labels or scale. The implementation is documented in a notebook combining markdown and code cells so the development process is visible, not just the final result, and submissions typically include the cleaned dataset alongside the code. The strongest submissions treat the notebook and the report as one argument. Weaker ones produce a working notebook and then write a report that describes it, rather than a report that uses it as evidence. Our support on assessments of this type is guidance-based. Typical areas of help include: advising on whether a candidate dataset can actually support the required model comparison, explaining how to justify preprocessing decisions, clarifying which evaluation metrics suit which problem type and why accuracy alone is often misleading, showing how to structure a critical limitations and responsible AI discussion, checking Harvard referencing, and reviewing a student's own draft against the published marking criteria.
Read Model Answer →