Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
International Business Strategy
250 words
Individual Reflection on Case Study Discussion – International Business Strategy
This assignment is an individual reflective assessment for the International Business Strategy module. It focuses on developing students’ ability to critically reflect on their learning experiences and identify how learning from classroom discussions can improve their future academic and professional performance. The assessment is based on a Case Study Discussion undertaken during one of the teaching weeks from Week 5 to Week 8. Students are required to select one of the case studies discussed during the relevant seminar sessions and reflect on their learning from the discussion. The case-study discussions provide an opportunity to explore important issues in the business world, apply concepts introduced through Canvas preparation and face-to-face teaching, and exchange ideas with tutors and peers. The reflection therefore connects theoretical knowledge with practical business situations and encourages students to consider how strategic management concepts can be applied to real-world organisations. The reflective task requires students to explain the topic and case study discussed during their selected week, identify what they learned from the discussion, and consider how the experience helped them develop their ability to apply theories to their chosen company. Students should also reflect on their key takeaways, what went well during the discussion, challenges they encountered, and what they would change if they were to repeat the experience. The reflection should be between 150 and 250 words and should use an appropriate reflective framework, such as Gibbs' Reflective Cycle or Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle, to structure the discussion. Harvard referencing should be used where applicable. The assessment develops critical reflection, strategic thinking, international business understanding and the ability to connect academic concepts with practical business cases. The assessment is worth 15% of the module and is submitted through Canvas. The marking criteria consider the quality of reflection, critical analysis, personal learning insights, presentation and structure, intellectual curiosity, referencing, content and discussion.
Read Model Answer →
Entrepreneurial Marketing
Entrepreneurial Marketing Business Idea Pitch: Market Opportunity, Value Proposition and Venture Viability
This Entrepreneurial Marketing assessment requires students to identify, research and present an entrepreneurial business idea that either addresses an identified customer need or exploits a recognised market opportunity. The idea may involve a new product or service and can be developed either as a personal start-up opportunity or as a new business proposition for an existing organisation. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… Students are expected to construct a concise business case around four core elements: the proposed business idea, the identified need or opportunity and resulting value proposition, an overview of the relevant market, and an appropriate entrepreneurial marketing strategy. The pitch should demonstrate how the proposed offering creates value and why the opportunity is commercially credible. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… The assessment provides three presentation routes. Students may deliver the pitch live to a panel, submit a five-minute narrated PowerPoint with a recorded response to the question of why the idea is strong, or submit the narrated presentation while also participating in the live Business Ideas Showcase. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… Students are expected to prepare approximately 6–10 PowerPoint slides, use in-text citations when external evidence is presented, and include a reference slide. The pitch should be concise, professional and supported by appropriate market research and business evidence. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… The marking criteria assess presentation and professionalism, verbal delivery, innovation and value proposition, market research and analysis, entrepreneurial marketing strategy, and overall business-case viability. Each of the main analytical components carries substantial weighting, with market research, marketing strategy, innovation and viability each contributing significantly to the final result. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… Overall, the assessment integrates opportunity recognition, value proposition development, market analysis, entrepreneurial marketing, venture viability and professional pitching skills within a practical start-up or business-development context. The brief specifies Cite Them Right Harvard referencing. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… 2) CW2 – Reflective Essay Field Content to enter Title Reflective Analysis of Entrepreneurial Capabilities, Product Development and Network-Based Opportunity Creation University University of Hertfordshire Subject Entrepreneurial Marketing / Entrepreneurship / Reflective Practice Module name Entrepreneurial Marketing Academic level Masters / Postgraduate Academic year 2025–2026 Assignment type MS Reflective writing Reference style Harvard Word count 1,000 words ±10% Amount (₹) Enter your internal project amount Key topics Entrepreneurial Marketing, Entrepreneurial Capabilities, Entrepreneurship, Reflective Practice, Product Development, Service Design, Opportunity Recognition, New Product Development, Teamwork, Networking, Business Start-up, Entrepreneurial Potential, Intrapreneurship, Personal Development, Business Application, Reflexive Practice, Entrepreneurial Confidence, Capability Development, Recommendations, Professional Reflection The assessment is an individual 1,000-word reflective essay worth 30% of the module. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… Assignment overview — ready to paste This Entrepreneurial Marketing reflective assessment requires students to critically evaluate their own entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial capabilities using learning from the module together with relevant life and work experience. The essay should use appropriate academic theories and frameworks to identify key strengths and development areas and make clear recommendations for improving future entrepreneurial potential. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… A major element of the reflection concerns the principles involved in designing a new product or service to meet an identified need. Students are expected to consider how entrepreneurial ideas are developed, how opportunities are recognised and how entrepreneurial capabilities influence the process of converting an idea into a viable proposition. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… The assessment also requires critical reflection on the importance of teams and networks in developing business-start-up opportunities and designing new services. The module learning outcomes emphasise the role of collaborative performance, networking and reflexive practice in strengthening entrepreneurial confidence and capability. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… Students should move beyond simple personal description and critically analyse their capabilities with reference to academic evidence. At least five academic references are required, and the work should use Cite Them Right referencing. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… The marking scheme allocates equal weighting to five areas: presentation, structure and reflective style; content and findings; intellectual curiosity and business application; critical analysis; and recommendations, with each area worth 20%. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… Overall, the assessment integrates self-reflection, entrepreneurial capability analysis, product and service design, team and network performance, academic theory and personal development planning. Its purpose is to demonstrate how reflective learning can support stronger entrepreneurial judgement, confidence and future business practice. The brief requires Cite Them Right Harvard referencing. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua…
Read Model Answer →
International Business / Strategic Management
200 words
Individual Reflection on Tencent’s Strategic Reorganisation and International Business Strategy
This International Business Strategy assessment is an individual reflective exercise based on a case-study discussion undertaken during Weeks 5–8 of the module. Its purpose is to develop students’ ability to critically reflect on learning experiences and use that reflection to improve future academic and professional performance. Students participate in approximately 30-minute seminar discussions in which theoretical concepts from the module are applied to real-world business cases with tutors and peers. IBS-0901-2025-+Reflection2-Ref For this entry, the selected case is Tencent: “third time lucky?”. The case examines how Tencent evolved from a Chinese instant-messaging company into a major technology group spanning messaging, gaming, entertainment, investment and cloud services. It focuses particularly on three major organisational reorganisations undertaken in 2005, 2012 and 2018 as the company attempted to address increasing organisational complexity, coordination problems, changing technologies and new strategic priorities. The 2005 restructuring responded to Tencent’s growing scale by dividing the organisation into major business and platform-development groups. By 2012, further growth and the success of products such as WeChat had created new organisational complexity, leading to a structure organised around seven distinct business groups. The case highlights that this arrangement subsequently contributed to a “silo culture”, creating difficulties in sharing ideas, data, code and customers across business units. The 2018 reorganisation responded to a strategic shift toward the “industrial internet”, including greater emphasis on cloud services, business-to-business solutions and digital transformation. Tencent reorganised around six major groups, including Cloud and Smart Industries, Platforms and Content, Interactive Entertainment, Corporate Development, WeChat, and Technology and Engineering, while also establishing a technical committee intended to improve internal coordination and data sharing. The case asks students to consider both the strategic rationale for each restructuring and whether the 2018 changes adequately addressed Tencent’s organisational challenges. The reflection itself must be between 150 and 250 words. Students should explain what the week’s topic and case study were about, what they learned from the discussion, how the conversation helped them apply theory to their final report, and what key insights they gained. They should also reflect on what went well, what challenges were encountered and what they would change if repeating the session. At least one reflective framework, such as Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle or Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle, must be applied. IBS-0901-2025-+Reflection2-Ref The wider learning outcomes emphasise strategic management theory, internationalisation, internal and external environmental influences, critical analysis of international organisations and the use of analytical tools to evaluate strategic options. The task therefore combines strategic thinking, international business analysis and reflective professional development. IBS-0901-2025-+Reflection2-Ref The accompanying Tencent case specifically asks students to consider why each major reorganisation occurred, whether the 2018 restructuring adequately addressed Tencent’s challenges, and what additional “hard” and “soft” implementation measures might have been necessary. Case+study+7
Read Model Answer →
Entrepreneurship / Leadership and Management
3,500 words
Entrepreneurial Practice: Strategic Analysis, New Venture Development and Professional Reflection
This individual Entrepreneurial Practice assessment requires students to critically analyse a real organisational issue using one of the approved employer case studies and develop an entrepreneurial business proposal aligned with the organisation’s needs. The complete assessment is structured as a 3,500-word-equivalent portfolio consisting of a written report, briefing notes, a narrated PowerPoint presentation and a professional reflection. Entrepreneurial Practice Assign… Task 1 is a 1,500-word organisational analysis worth 30% of the marks. Students critically examine the challenges facing the selected organisation using appropriate strategic-analysis tools. They must also evaluate the organisation’s leadership models and communication strategies and assess their impact on employees, organisational culture and performance. The section concludes with three justified recommendations intended to improve organisational performance. Entrepreneurial Practice Assign… Task 2A consists of 1,000-word briefing notes focused on a proposed entrepreneurial venture. Students critically appraise the stages of entrepreneurial practice from idea generation through to delivery, including the benefits of the proposed venture and suitable funding sources. The task also requires analysis of business risk-management strategies and critical evaluation of the entrepreneurial traits, characteristics, skills and competencies needed to position the proposed venture strategically. Entrepreneurial Practice Assign… Task 2B converts the business proposal into a short narrated PowerPoint pitch. The presentation communicates the rationale and organisational benefits of the business idea, funding opportunities, key risks and mitigation approaches, and the entrepreneurial competencies needed for successful implementation. The intended audience includes employees, managers, senior management and the Board of Directors, so professional communication and persuasive presentation are important. Entrepreneurial Practice Assign… Task 3 is a 500-word personal and professional reflection based on an area of the CMI Code of Conduct and Practice. Students may use reflective frameworks such as Gibbs, Kolb, Rolfe or Burton and explain how the selected professional principle applies to their current or future career. Entrepreneurial Practice Assign… Overall, the assessment integrates strategic analysis, leadership, entrepreneurship, venture development, funding, risk management, professional communication and reflective practice. Overview word count: approximately 360 words. AI-use note: the assignment is classified as AI Amber. AI may be used only within the permitted support categories, and students must disclose which AI tools were used and briefly explain how they were used. Entrepreneurial Practice Assign… Important for your public Reference Library: the brief explicitly states that the document and its case-study materials must not be passed to third parties or posted on any website or social-media platform. Therefore, do not upload this assessment brief itself publicly. Only publish the finished student work if you have the right to do so and it does not reproduce restricted case-study material. Entrepreneurial Practice Assign… Entrepreneurial Practice Assign…
Read Model Answer →
Business Consultancy Project: Strategic Analysis, Stakeholder Evaluation and Evidence-Based Recommendations
Business Consultancy, Strategic Management, Business Analysis, Consultancy Project, Stakeholder Analysis, Mendelow Matrix, Business Strategy, Data Analysis, Secondary Research, SWOT Analysis, PESTLE Analysis, Porter’s Five Forces, Balanced Scorecard, Ethics, Sustainability, UN Sustainable Development Goals, Recommendations, Risk Analysis, Implementation Barriers, Organisational Strategy, Business Problem Solving, Employability Skills, Professional Development, Reflective Practice, Project Management, Evidence-Based Decision-Making
Read Model Answer →
Entrepreneurial Practice
3,500 words
Entrepreneurial Practice – Critical Analysis, Business Venture Proposal and Reflective Practice
This assessment for the Entrepreneurial Practice module requires students to critically analyse a real organisational issue using one of three specified employer case study videos and develop a proposal for a new business venture. The assessment is an individual 3,500-word equivalent portfolio consisting of three tasks: a 1,500-word report, a 1,000-word briefing note, a narrated two-slide PowerPoint presentation, and a 500-word reflective personal and professional account. Students must select only one of the three case studies provided: Paragon, Reliance Housing, or Ovo Biomanufacturing. The chosen case study must be used consistently across the relevant tasks. Task 1 requires a short report based on the selected employer case study. Students must critically and strategically analyse the challenges and issues facing the organisation using one or more appropriate strategic analysis tools. The report must also critically evaluate the organisation's leadership model or models and communication strategies, including their impact on employee and organisational culture and performance. Finally, students must provide three justified recommendations designed to enable and improve organisational performance. This section is 1,500 words and represents 30% of the assessment. Task 2A requires a 1,000-word briefing note based on the same case study. It involves a critical appraisal of the phases of entrepreneurial practice from the idea stage through to delivery, including the benefits and potential funding sources for the proposed new business venture. Students must also critically analyse strategies for addressing and managing risks within the proposed venture and critically appraise the entrepreneurial traits, characteristics, skills and competences required for strategically positioning the new venture within the organisation. Task 2B requires a two-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation lasting three minutes. The presentation should pitch the proposed business idea to an audience of employees, managers, senior managers and the Board of Directors within the case study organisation. It should explain what informed the new business idea, its benefits to the organisation, potential funding prospects, risks and risk-management strategies, and the entrepreneurial traits, characteristics, skills and competences required for strategic positioning. Task 3 is a 500-word reflective personal and professional account. Students must select a professional area from the CMI Code of Conduct and Practice and reflect on how it can be applied to their current or future professional career. The brief allows the use of reflective models such as Gibbs, Kolb, Rolfe or Burton, or another appropriate professional and systematic reflective model. The assessment develops skills in communication, creative thinking, integrity, adaptability and completing tasks, with particular emphasis on leadership and entrepreneurial skills. The learning outcomes include evaluating ethical and inclusive approaches to leadership, diversity and entrepreneurship; reflecting critically on entrepreneurial practice and effective leadership; understanding principles for leading and developing people; understanding leadership and development strategy; and understanding entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial practice in strategic contexts. The submission requires Task 1, the Task 2A briefing note and Task 3 to be combined into one MS Word document, while Task 2B must be submitted separately as a narrated PowerPoint with audio. The written work should include a cover sheet, page numbers, Arial 12-point font and 1.5 line spacing. References and appendices are excluded from the word count, while words in tables count towards the final word count. The assessment also carries a 10% allocation for referencing and structured presentation across the three tasks. The assignment brief places particular importance on using the selected case study as the foundation for the analysis. Wider research may be used, but the primary focus should remain on the case study interview, CMI materials, module-related models and content. Students are expected to apply relevant models, tools and methods discussed in seminars and CMI learning journeys and support their analysis with appropriate evidence and academic literature.
Read Model Answer →
Entrepreneurship / Entrepreneurial Marketing
1,200 words
Reflective Analysis of Entrepreneurial Capabilities and Development: The GymBuddy Venture
This reflective Entrepreneurial Marketing assessment evaluates the development of the student's entrepreneurial capabilities through the GymBuddy business concept, a proposed fitness application designed to improve motivation and accountability among beginner gym users. The reflection examines how entrepreneurial learning, customer research and creativity frameworks changed the student's original approach from developing a highly complex product toward a more focused and testable business proposition. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… A central theme of the report is entrepreneurial self-assessment. Opportunity recognition is identified as an important strength, supported by interviews with beginner gym users and competitor analysis involving platforms such as Strava, MyFitnessPal and Nike Training Club. At the same time, the reflection identifies areas requiring development, particularly financial understanding, customer acquisition cost, lifetime value, conversion-rate analysis and negotiation capability. These strengths and weaknesses are used to establish priorities for future entrepreneurial development. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… The report also evaluates the evolution of the GymBuddy product using SCAMPER, Design Thinking and Lean Startup principles. Rather than pursuing a feature-heavy application, customer feedback leads to greater emphasis on simplicity, peer accountability, social competition and iterative validation. SCAMPER is applied to eliminate unnecessary features, substitute complex recommendations with simpler motivational mechanisms, combine useful functionality and adapt gamification to the needs of beginner users. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… Another major area of reflection concerns teams, networks and collaborative innovation. The student considers how group creativity exercises challenged the assumption that a venture should be developed independently and highlights the importance of mentors, developers, industry professionals and potential investors. The report links entrepreneurial networks with access to resources, opportunity identification, legitimacy and emotional support and proposes deliberate networking activities as part of future venture development. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… The visual development framework on page 3 summarises the entrepreneurial journey in five stages: GymBuddy concept and market research, capability assessment, product development and validation, teams and networks, and a time-based action plan. The reflection is structured using the Gibbs Reflective Cycle, linking experience with evaluation, analysis and future action. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… Overall, the assessment demonstrates reflective learning through the application of entrepreneurial theory to a practical start-up concept. It shows a shift from perfectionism toward rapid validation, customer-centred development, collaborative working and concrete action planning, while identifying financial management, negotiation and network development as important areas for continued improvement. Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Refle… Note: this file is a completed reflective submission rather than the original university assessment guideline, so the university, academic level and academic year should remain Not specified unless you also upload the official brief.
Read Model Answer →
Leadership and Change
3,000 words
Leadership and Change – Reflective Learning Portfolio
This 3,000-word coursework is a reflective learning portfolio focused on leadership, organisational change and reflective practice. The assessment is worth 100% of the module mark and is structured into four individual components. It is designed to assess leadership capabilities such as strategic thinking, emotional intelligence, communication, adaptability, team building, ethical decision-making and change management, while encouraging students to connect leadership theories and self-assessment tools with their own development. Component 1 focuses on individual leadership style and requires students to provide the results of the Fastest MBTI Test and critically reflect on what the outcome means in relation to their preferred leadership style. Students are expected to connect their MBTI results with leadership approaches covered in the module, including the Situated Leadership model. This component represents 20% of the assessment and has a suggested length of 600 words. Component 2 examines team roles. Students must present evidence from their Team Roles Test, identify their preferred team role and explain why it suits them. They must then identify two other Belbin team roles that would be important when building a team and explain their relevance. Connections can also be made between the Team Roles Test, Belbin’s framework and the results of the Conflict Management questionnaire. This component contributes 20% and has a suggested length of 600 words. Component 3 requires students to develop an individual organisational change plan in response to a fictional case study in which ARU is considering the adoption of AI to mark student coursework assignments and examinations. The plan evaluates change enablers and barriers, stakeholder involvement, ethical considerations and resource constraints. Students then develop an implementation strategy using a suitable change-management framework such as Lewin’s Change Model or Kotter’s 8-Step Model, including stakeholder engagement, communication, resistance management and strategies for sustaining change. This component represents 30% and has a suggested length of 900 words. Component 4 is a 900-word reflective account of what students learned about leadership while working as part of a team to design the organisational change plan. The reflection considers how leadership emerged, team collaboration, missing or required roles, conflict management and personal development. Students may structure the reflection using Kolb’s Reflective Learning Cycle or Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle and support their discussion with theories such as transformational, situational and distributed leadership, as well as Belbin’s team-role framework. Overall, the learning outcomes require students to critically reflect on their leadership style, evaluate classical and contemporary leadership theories, understand organisational change processes and develop evidence-based change strategies. The assessment also emphasises reflective practice and personal leadership development through experiential learning in a group setting.
Read Model Answer →
Business Management / Strategy
2,467 words
Contemporary Issues in Business (BS729) — Reflective Portfolio: Case Trends, Stakeholder Perspectives and Management Frameworks
This Level 7 portfolio accumulates across a semester of case-based workshops and is submitted as a single document combining reflective writing with sustained critical discussion. The assessment rewards demonstrable personal development as much as analytical knowledge, so the writing is first-person where it needs to be and evidential throughout. The reflective component presents six workshop reflections, each no longer than 150 words and each structured through one of the established reflective models introduced in the module — Gibbs' Reflective Cycle, Kolb's Learning Cycle, Schön's framework or the ERA framework. These are not summaries of what the case was about. Each one identifies where the analysis could have been sharper, what was missed in the live discussion and why, what will be repeated and what will be done differently, with the emphasis falling on transferable learning about how business problems are diagnosed and decisions taken under uncertainty rather than on the particulars of any single case. The larger critical component works through three connected questions. The first examines how contemporary trends studied in the module affect businesses both positively and negatively, drawing on two specific cases but deliberately reaching beyond them to consider consequences across whole industries — the trend, not the company, is the unit of analysis. The second addresses why identifying stakeholders and understanding their perspectives is critical to sound decision-making, using one module case to demonstrate it. Competing interests are mapped explicitly, the power and legitimacy of each group considered, and stakeholder theory used to argue why a manager who weighs only shareholder interest arrives at a worse decision. The third question turns to the management tools and frameworks applied during the module, using two cases to show how a particular tool was selected, what it revealed that unstructured analysis would have missed, and equally where it fell short. This includes judgement about when each framework is and is not appropriate, since selecting the right tool for the problem is itself the skill being assessed. Harvard referencing is applied consistently across all sections, with academic sources supporting the theoretical claims and practitioner sources grounding the industry discussion. Portfolio items are collected through PebblePad across the semester and consolidated into one file for submission, the class participation element being tracked separately by the lecturer across the case discussion sessions.
Read Model Answer →
Computing and Digital Technologies
3,000 words
Contemporary Computing and Digital Technologies: AI Agents Hackathon Reflective Report
This postgraduate reflective assessment forms part of the Contemporary Computing and Digital Technologies module and is based on experiential learning undertaken through an AI-focused hackathon. The hackathon theme, “AI Agents Unleashed – Building the Future of Automation,” requires MSc students from computing-related disciplines to collaborate on intelligent agent-based solutions capable of automating complex tasks, solving real-world problems and supporting human decision-making. The hackathon encourages students to investigate agent-based system design, intelligent automation and responsible AI development. Potential applications include autonomous cybersecurity monitoring, multi-agent systems for information gathering and decision support, automated data pipelines, intelligent software-development assistants, and conversational systems such as virtual tutors or career coaches. Students may use code-based approaches or platforms such as Flowise, Microsoft Power Automate and Make.com, while more advanced implementations can use technologies including LangChain, AutoGen, Python-based agent SDKs, APIs and large language models. The 3,000-word Individual Reflective Report, worth 70% of the module assessment, evaluates the student's learning and professional development arising from these experiential activities. The first component is a 2,000-word Portfolio of Evidence, requiring evidence-based reflection on participation in the hackathon. Students should evaluate their leadership and teamwork competencies using concrete evidence such as screenshots, code commits and feedback while identifying key lessons for personal and professional development. They must also consider how the experience applies to future research, career development or professional practice. The remaining 1,000 words comprise a Critical Self-Reflection examining the student's personal contribution and achievement of learning-contract goals. Students are expected to critically consider challenges encountered, how those challenges were addressed, lessons learned and their development as effective collaborative team members. Overall, the assessment integrates technical experimentation, reflective practice, teamwork, leadership, professional development and responsible use of emerging AI technologies, supported by a structured portfolio of evidence
Read Model Answer →
Technical Evaluation and Professional Reflection on a Cloud-Based Machine Learning Fraud Detection Solution
This individual technical evaluative report forms the reflective and critical component of the Machine Learning on Cloud module. It builds directly upon a group project involving the development of a machine learning solution for financial fraud detection. The report requires each student to critically evaluate the technical decisions made within the group solution while also reflecting on their individual contribution, teamwork experience and professional development. The first component, Technical Evaluation, accounts for 50% of the individual assessment and has a suggested allocation of approximately 1,000 words. Students critically examine the group’s machine learning solution, including the approaches adopted for data preprocessing, model selection and evaluation. They are expected to discuss the suitability of the chosen techniques and metrics, identify limitations and explain how individual technical decisions affected the final performance and outcome of the fraud-detection solution. The second component, Reflection and Professional Issues, also accounts for 50% and has a suggested allocation of approximately 1,000 words. Students reflect critically on their personal contribution to the project and their experience of working within a team. The discussion addresses challenges encountered, lessons learned and how the experience contributed to technical and professional development. Professional and ethical considerations form an important part of the reflection. Relevant issues include algorithmic bias, fairness, sustainability and data privacy, particularly in relation to machine learning applications within financial services and cloud environments. Students are also required to attach their Seminar Activity Tracker as an appendix, providing evidence of weekly participation and knowledge development. The assessment therefore combines technical critique with reflective practice, requiring students to demonstrate that they understand not only how a machine learning solution was developed, but also why specific technical decisions were made, their consequences, the limitations of the resulting system and the wider ethical and professional implications of deploying AI on cloud infrastructure. Overview word count: approximately 315 words. The brief also states that AI may assist with areas such as grammar, structure, organisation of ideas and suggestions, but the main content, analysis and conclusions must be the student's own work, and AI use must be declared.
Read Model Answer →
Cyber Security / Penetration Testing
2,400 words
Grey-Box Penetration Testing: Vulnerability Assessment, Exploitation and Mitigation
This technical cyber-security project presents an authorised grey-box penetration test conducted within a controlled virtual laboratory environment. The objective is to assess the security posture of a deliberately vulnerable target system, identify weaknesses in exposed network services, demonstrate how those weaknesses could be exploited, evaluate their security and organisational impact, and recommend appropriate mitigation measures. The assessment follows a practical penetration-testing workflow supported by technical evidence, screenshots, activity records and academic research. The project begins with laboratory configuration, network discovery, service enumeration and vulnerability analysis. Tools including Kali Linux, Metasploitable, VMware, Nmap, Netcat and Metasploit are used across the testing lifecycle. Identified services are mapped to known vulnerabilities before controlled exploitation is undertaken and the resulting access is documented. The activity log records the progression from environment setup and network scanning through vulnerability identification, exploitation, evidence collection and final reporting. Five principal attack vectors are examined. These include the vsftpd 2.3.4 FTP backdoor, Samba username-map-script exploitation, an UnrealIRCd backdoor, insecure Java Remote Method Invocation and a misconfigured DistCC service. The practical demonstrations show how vulnerable or incorrectly configured services can permit unauthorised command execution and, in several cases, privileged shell access. For each vulnerability, the report explains the weakness, exploitation process, observed result, security impact and proposed mitigation. Recommended controls include patching or upgrading obsolete services, disabling unnecessary services, implementing firewall restrictions, strengthening authentication and input validation, restricting access to authorised systems, applying least privilege and monitoring suspicious activity. The project also incorporates group management and reflective practice. Team members perform specialised roles covering laboratory configuration, reconnaissance, vulnerability analysis, exploitation and documentation. Individual reflection considers technical performance, teamwork, evidence management and future skills development, demonstrating how structured collaboration contributes to an effective penetration-testing engagement. Important: unlike the earlier assignment briefs, these uploads appear to be completed student/project materials rather than the official 7COM1068 assessment brief. Therefore I would not invent the university, academic level or academic year. If you upload the actual 7COM1068 assignment guideline, I can fill those fields exactly.
Read Model Answer →
People Practice / Human Resource Management
2,000 words
Core Behaviours for People Professionals: Ethics, Professional Values and CPD
This CIPD Level 3 assessment focuses on the core behaviours expected of people professionals, with particular emphasis on ethical practice, professional values, inclusive behaviour and continuing professional development. The unit considers behaviours that people professionals should apply consistently, including when working in unfamiliar or challenging situations, to support ethical, inclusive and professionally responsible workplaces. The assessment is structured around a job-application scenario for an HR/L&D Assistant position at Nuvascare Ltd, a home-based care organisation employing more than 200 care professionals. Nuvascare emphasises honesty, kindness, openness, teamwork, learning and ethical professional behaviour, and candidates are therefore required to demonstrate how their own experience aligns with these expectations. Learners respond to five areas of assessment. They must explain ethical principles and professional values and provide an example demonstrating how a personal or professional value has influenced behaviour. They must also provide examples of complying with relevant regulation and law in a professional or educational context. The assessment additionally examines behaviours associated with effective teamwork, including contributing views, clarifying problems and working collaboratively with others. Learners then explain how they keep their professional knowledge current and identify methods used to follow developments within the people profession. The final component requires evidence of active continuing professional development (CPD). Learners provide a CPD record containing at least two recent development activities and reflect on how these activities affected their knowledge, capability or professional practice. Written responses to Questions 1–4 should total approximately 2,000 words ±10%. The CPD record is submitted as additional evidence and is excluded from the word count.
Read Model Answer →
Professional Development & Employability
2,100 words
Professional Development & Planning Portfolio — SWOT, Career Plan, UK CV & Interview Reflection
A Professional Development and Planning portfolio is a Level 7 employability assessment that asks postgraduate students to evidence their own professional growth rather than analyse an external case. It typically integrates three connected components into a single submission: a critical self-analysis with a forward-looking career plan, a set of job-application documents, and a reflective account of a practical employability exercise such as a recorded mock interview. The first component combines a SWOT analysis with a structured career development plan. Students are expected to move beyond listing traits, and instead show how each strength, weakness, opportunity and threat actually shapes their short- and long-term trajectory. Established reflective frameworks — Gibbs, Kolb, or comparable employability models — are commonly used to give the self-analysis theoretical grounding. The plan that follows usually requires a career vision, two or three SMART goals derived directly from the SWOT, an action plan with resources and timelines, and a strategy for reviewing the plan over time. Marks are lost most often where the components sit side by side without integration: a SWOT that never feeds the goals, or goals that are specific in form but generic in substance. The second component is a UK-format CV and a targeted cover letter for a real advertised role. UK conventions matter here — no photograph, no date of birth, no full address — alongside a concise personal statement, achievement-focused bullet points rather than duty lists, and visible evidence of research into the employer's values and strategic direction. The cover letter is expected to argue for candidacy rather than restate the CV, and is normally capped at one page. The third component is a reflection on a recorded practice interview, written against the platform's own scored feedback on speech rate, filler words, self-positioning and answer structure. Because this reflection must respond to individual results, it is inherently personal and cannot be written generically. Our support on this type of assessment is structured around guidance rather than production. Typical areas of help include: explaining what distinguishes a descriptive SWOT from an analytical one, showing how SMART goals should trace back to identified development needs, reviewing CV and cover letter formatting against UK employer expectations, clarifying how reflective models are applied at postgraduate level, and checking a completed draft against the assessment's own marking criteria before submission.
Read Model Answer →