Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
500 words
Reflective Account – Data Collection Practices
This individual assessment requires students to complete practical data collection exercises and write a 400–500 word reflective account based on their experience. The assessment is designed to develop understanding of different data collection methods and encourage students to connect the practical exercises completed in the laboratory with research methods and concepts covered during lectures. Students are required to complete two main types of data collection practice. The first involves questionnaire tests, which students attend during their allocated practical sessions. The second involves a series of recorded interaction exercises involving ChatGPT and human participants. Students must follow the supplied study instructions, use the specified prompts where required, record the requested activities using a camera such as a phone, and upload the relevant files to a designated OneDrive folder. The briefing also requires students to complete and sign the participant consent form and submit it with their collected data. The reflective account should summarise the methods learned during the module lectures and the methods exercised during the laboratory sessions. Students should demonstrate their overall understanding of how data collection works, why data collection is important in research, and how knowledge of data collection methods can be improved through practical experience. The reflection must address several key research and methodological questions. Students should explain how they would design a research question based on the collected data and identify the PICO elements relevant to the research. They should discuss what type of research could be conducted using the data and define an example of a machine learning problem that could be investigated. The reflection should also consider the participant experience by identifying areas of the data collection process that could be improved. Students are additionally asked to consider how they would design a similar data collection project themselves and whether they would make any changes to the methods, procedures or participant experience. The assessment therefore combines practical experience with critical reflection on research design, data collection, research questions, PICO, machine learning applications and methodological improvement. The final reflective account is a Canvas submission and should remain within the specified 400–500 word range. The assessment briefing states that students are marked based on the submitted report, making the reflective account the primary assessed component of the activity.
Read Model Answer →
Leadership and Change
3,000 words
Leadership and Change – Reflective Learning Portfolio
This 3,000-word coursework is a reflective learning portfolio focused on leadership, organisational change and reflective practice. The assessment is worth 100% of the module mark and is structured into four individual components. It is designed to assess leadership capabilities such as strategic thinking, emotional intelligence, communication, adaptability, team building, ethical decision-making and change management, while encouraging students to connect leadership theories and self-assessment tools with their own development. Component 1 focuses on individual leadership style and requires students to provide the results of the Fastest MBTI Test and critically reflect on what the outcome means in relation to their preferred leadership style. Students are expected to connect their MBTI results with leadership approaches covered in the module, including the Situated Leadership model. This component represents 20% of the assessment and has a suggested length of 600 words. Component 2 examines team roles. Students must present evidence from their Team Roles Test, identify their preferred team role and explain why it suits them. They must then identify two other Belbin team roles that would be important when building a team and explain their relevance. Connections can also be made between the Team Roles Test, Belbin’s framework and the results of the Conflict Management questionnaire. This component contributes 20% and has a suggested length of 600 words. Component 3 requires students to develop an individual organisational change plan in response to a fictional case study in which ARU is considering the adoption of AI to mark student coursework assignments and examinations. The plan evaluates change enablers and barriers, stakeholder involvement, ethical considerations and resource constraints. Students then develop an implementation strategy using a suitable change-management framework such as Lewin’s Change Model or Kotter’s 8-Step Model, including stakeholder engagement, communication, resistance management and strategies for sustaining change. This component represents 30% and has a suggested length of 900 words. Component 4 is a 900-word reflective account of what students learned about leadership while working as part of a team to design the organisational change plan. The reflection considers how leadership emerged, team collaboration, missing or required roles, conflict management and personal development. Students may structure the reflection using Kolb’s Reflective Learning Cycle or Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle and support their discussion with theories such as transformational, situational and distributed leadership, as well as Belbin’s team-role framework. Overall, the learning outcomes require students to critically reflect on their leadership style, evaluate classical and contemporary leadership theories, understand organisational change processes and develop evidence-based change strategies. The assessment also emphasises reflective practice and personal leadership development through experiential learning in a group setting.
Read Model Answer →
Professional Development & Employability
2,100 words
Professional Development & Planning Portfolio — SWOT, Career Plan, UK CV & Interview Reflection
A Professional Development and Planning portfolio is a Level 7 employability assessment that asks postgraduate students to evidence their own professional growth rather than analyse an external case. It typically integrates three connected components into a single submission: a critical self-analysis with a forward-looking career plan, a set of job-application documents, and a reflective account of a practical employability exercise such as a recorded mock interview. The first component combines a SWOT analysis with a structured career development plan. Students are expected to move beyond listing traits, and instead show how each strength, weakness, opportunity and threat actually shapes their short- and long-term trajectory. Established reflective frameworks — Gibbs, Kolb, or comparable employability models — are commonly used to give the self-analysis theoretical grounding. The plan that follows usually requires a career vision, two or three SMART goals derived directly from the SWOT, an action plan with resources and timelines, and a strategy for reviewing the plan over time. Marks are lost most often where the components sit side by side without integration: a SWOT that never feeds the goals, or goals that are specific in form but generic in substance. The second component is a UK-format CV and a targeted cover letter for a real advertised role. UK conventions matter here — no photograph, no date of birth, no full address — alongside a concise personal statement, achievement-focused bullet points rather than duty lists, and visible evidence of research into the employer's values and strategic direction. The cover letter is expected to argue for candidacy rather than restate the CV, and is normally capped at one page. The third component is a reflection on a recorded practice interview, written against the platform's own scored feedback on speech rate, filler words, self-positioning and answer structure. Because this reflection must respond to individual results, it is inherently personal and cannot be written generically. Our support on this type of assessment is structured around guidance rather than production. Typical areas of help include: explaining what distinguishes a descriptive SWOT from an analytical one, showing how SMART goals should trace back to identified development needs, reviewing CV and cover letter formatting against UK employer expectations, clarifying how reflective models are applied at postgraduate level, and checking a completed draft against the assessment's own marking criteria before submission.
Read Model Answer →