Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Academic and Employability Skills and Research Methods and Masters Dissertation
1,800 words
Personal Development Plan: Academic, Employability and Career Development
This assessment requires students to develop a Personal Development Plan (PDP) related to their chosen field of work and future career pathway. The assignment is designed to support the development of academic, employability, professional and research-related skills while encouraging students to critically reflect on their current capabilities and identify areas for further development. The assessment consists of three interconnected components presented together as one document. The first component is a 750-word academic report that critically evaluates employment and entrepreneurial opportunities within the student's chosen field of work. Students are expected to use a range of relevant academic and professional sources to investigate the knowledge and skills required for their chosen career area, available employment opportunities, entrepreneurial opportunities and the challenges associated with the field. The chosen field must be clearly related to the student's study pathway specialism. The report should be presented in an appropriate academic structure, including an introduction and conclusion. The second component is a 750-word self-analysis and action plan. Students are required to critically reflect on their own strengths and weaknesses in relation to their chosen field of work or career path. The reflection should be supported by relevant academic and professional literature and should demonstrate awareness of personal qualities, employability requirements and areas requiring further development. Students must identify three specific action points for personal development that will enhance their readiness for their career goals. The third component is a portfolio of completed tasks, included as appendices to the assessment. These tasks provide evidence of the student's development and include activities relating to the chosen field of work, report planning, self-analysis and a SMART action plan. Evidence of completed tasks and Turnitin submission receipts is also required. The assessment encourages students to develop awareness of their personal strengths and weaknesses, engage in continuing self-development and build the skills required for employment and career progression. It also relates to research, employability and entrepreneurship competencies, including knowledge of hard and soft skills, systematic planning, critical analysis, professional development, ethical awareness, self-direction and independence. The complete assessment has a 1,500-word limit with a permitted variation of plus or minus 10%. Part 1 and Part 2 each contribute 40%, while the portfolio tasks contribute 10% and professional presentation contributes 10%. The assignment should be submitted as one professionally presented document and follow APA style guidelines.
Read Model Answer →
Entrepreneurial Marketing
Entrepreneurial Marketing Business Idea Pitch: Market Opportunity, Value Proposition and Venture Viability
This Entrepreneurial Marketing assessment requires students to identify, research and present an entrepreneurial business idea that either addresses an identified customer need or exploits a recognised market opportunity. The idea may involve a new product or service and can be developed either as a personal start-up opportunity or as a new business proposition for an existing organisation. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… Students are expected to construct a concise business case around four core elements: the proposed business idea, the identified need or opportunity and resulting value proposition, an overview of the relevant market, and an appropriate entrepreneurial marketing strategy. The pitch should demonstrate how the proposed offering creates value and why the opportunity is commercially credible. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… The assessment provides three presentation routes. Students may deliver the pitch live to a panel, submit a five-minute narrated PowerPoint with a recorded response to the question of why the idea is strong, or submit the narrated presentation while also participating in the live Business Ideas Showcase. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… Students are expected to prepare approximately 6–10 PowerPoint slides, use in-text citations when external evidence is presented, and include a reference slide. The pitch should be concise, professional and supported by appropriate market research and business evidence. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… The marking criteria assess presentation and professionalism, verbal delivery, innovation and value proposition, market research and analysis, entrepreneurial marketing strategy, and overall business-case viability. Each of the main analytical components carries substantial weighting, with market research, marketing strategy, innovation and viability each contributing significantly to the final result. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… Overall, the assessment integrates opportunity recognition, value proposition development, market analysis, entrepreneurial marketing, venture viability and professional pitching skills within a practical start-up or business-development context. The brief specifies Cite Them Right Harvard referencing. CW1 Business Idea Pitch Present… 2) CW2 – Reflective Essay Field Content to enter Title Reflective Analysis of Entrepreneurial Capabilities, Product Development and Network-Based Opportunity Creation University University of Hertfordshire Subject Entrepreneurial Marketing / Entrepreneurship / Reflective Practice Module name Entrepreneurial Marketing Academic level Masters / Postgraduate Academic year 2025–2026 Assignment type MS Reflective writing Reference style Harvard Word count 1,000 words ±10% Amount (₹) Enter your internal project amount Key topics Entrepreneurial Marketing, Entrepreneurial Capabilities, Entrepreneurship, Reflective Practice, Product Development, Service Design, Opportunity Recognition, New Product Development, Teamwork, Networking, Business Start-up, Entrepreneurial Potential, Intrapreneurship, Personal Development, Business Application, Reflexive Practice, Entrepreneurial Confidence, Capability Development, Recommendations, Professional Reflection The assessment is an individual 1,000-word reflective essay worth 30% of the module. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… Assignment overview — ready to paste This Entrepreneurial Marketing reflective assessment requires students to critically evaluate their own entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial capabilities using learning from the module together with relevant life and work experience. The essay should use appropriate academic theories and frameworks to identify key strengths and development areas and make clear recommendations for improving future entrepreneurial potential. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… A major element of the reflection concerns the principles involved in designing a new product or service to meet an identified need. Students are expected to consider how entrepreneurial ideas are developed, how opportunities are recognised and how entrepreneurial capabilities influence the process of converting an idea into a viable proposition. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… The assessment also requires critical reflection on the importance of teams and networks in developing business-start-up opportunities and designing new services. The module learning outcomes emphasise the role of collaborative performance, networking and reflexive practice in strengthening entrepreneurial confidence and capability. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… Students should move beyond simple personal description and critically analyse their capabilities with reference to academic evidence. At least five academic references are required, and the work should use Cite Them Right referencing. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… The marking scheme allocates equal weighting to five areas: presentation, structure and reflective style; content and findings; intellectual curiosity and business application; critical analysis; and recommendations, with each area worth 20%. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua… Overall, the assessment integrates self-reflection, entrepreneurial capability analysis, product and service design, team and network performance, academic theory and personal development planning. Its purpose is to demonstrate how reflective learning can support stronger entrepreneurial judgement, confidence and future business practice. The brief requires Cite Them Right Harvard referencing. CW2 Reflective Essay (Individua…
Read Model Answer →
Project Management / Professional Development / Business Strategy
5,000 words
Professional Project Portfolio and Strategic Business Presentation
This Level 7 assessment requires students to compile a comprehensive Portfolio of Evidence demonstrating their project contribution, reflective learning, professional skills and career development. The portfolio has a maximum length of 5,000 words and is designed to evidence both technical or disciplinary project engagement and the student’s development as a reflective professional. The assessment is organised into three main components: a Discipline Report, Project Work Logbook, and Career Development Plan. Assessment Overview The Discipline Report, worth 40% of the portfolio, provides an overview of the project and its conclusions, alongside a self-reflection on the student’s project experience. Students also complete a personal skills analysis and provide a confidential summary of their team’s delivery. This section therefore combines project understanding with critical self-evaluation, skills awareness and evaluation of collaborative performance. Assessment Overview The Project Work Logbook, worth 30%, records the student’s activities on a weekly basis. Students summarise the work completed each week and document problems or challenges encountered during the project together with the approaches used to resolve them. The marking criteria emphasise consistency, level of detail, organisation and the ability to identify and address project-related difficulties. Assessment Overview Assessment Overview The Career Development Plan, also worth 30%, requires students to define a realistic future career pathway, identify relevant jobs and organisations, and evaluate the skills and knowledge needed to progress toward those goals. Students must also complete an additional professional-development course, such as CPD or LinkedIn Learning, to demonstrate practical upskilling and continued professional development. Assessment Overview A related team presentation forms a second assessment activity. Teams of four to five students must present face to face for approximately 10–15 minutes to a small management-board audience. All team members are expected to contribute approximately equal content and speaking time, with provision for questions and answers. The presentation focuses on the team’s overall findings, analysis of the business problem, practical recommendations, proposed implementation approach and final conclusion. assessment Overview 1 Strong presentations are expected to be engaging, professionally structured and supported by relevant evidence, graphics, tables and other appropriate visual material. Higher-level work should move beyond description by applying theory critically to a real-world business problem, recognising the limitations and contextual applicability of theoretical concepts and producing recommendations that are appropriate to the organisation being analysed. assessment Overview 1 Overall, the assessment develops and evaluates project reflection, professional communication, teamwork, career planning, critical analysis, employability, problem solving and evidence-based business recommendation skills. It combines an individual reflective portfolio with a collaborative management-style presentation, allowing students to demonstrate both personal development and the ability to communicate project findings professionally.
Read Model Answer →
Leadership / Digital Leadership / Business Management
4,000 words
Leadership in a Digital Age: Critical Self-Analysis, AI Transformation and Personal Development
This Leadership in a Digital Age assessment requires students to critically analyse their leadership strengths, behaviours and development needs within contemporary digital environments. The individual 4,000-word report combines academic leadership theory, diagnostic self-assessment, professional reflection, digital transformation and forward-looking personal development. Its central purpose is to demonstrate self-awareness and evaluate how leadership capabilities must evolve in response to technological, organisational and workforce change. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… The first section requires critical evaluation of two or three contemporary leadership theories or models in relation to digital leadership. Students should avoid outdated approaches and instead examine how relevant theories align with the behaviours and characteristics required of leaders operating in technology-enabled organisations. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… The second section focuses on self-analysis. Students use diagnostic tools relating to areas such as temperament, workplace culture, motivation, emotional control, management skills and Belbin team roles. Results should be reported and interpreted before being used to construct a personal SWOT analysis concentrating specifically on leadership characteristics relevant to the digital age. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… A further component examines the leadership of hybrid, multi-generational teams. Students identify challenges that may arise in such environments and evaluate leadership capabilities and behaviours that could address them. Ethical, social and legal responsibilities associated with digital leadership must also be considered. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… The report additionally evaluates how digital leaders can use Artificial Intelligence to support digital transformation and organisational performance. Appropriate workplace examples may involve machine learning, predictive analytics, intelligent automation or generative AI, with consideration of required resources such as data infrastructure, organisational skills and external partnerships. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… The final section requires a Personal Development Plan containing justified leadership-development objectives, learning activities, measurable success criteria and timescales. These objectives should emerge directly from the earlier self-analysis and demonstrate how the student intends to become a more effective leader in a current or future digital role. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… Overall, the assessment integrates leadership theory, reflective self-evaluation, hybrid-team management, AI-driven transformation and structured professional development within the context of leadership in the digital age.
Read Model Answer →
Leadership and Professional Development
2,500 words
Leadership Mindset – Professional Development Portfolio
This assessment is a Leadership Mindset Professional Development Portfolio designed to encourage students to think strategically about their career development, align their professional goals and demonstrate leadership potential. The assessment focuses on self-awareness, strategic planning, professional behavioural skills and the ability to develop an ongoing process of personal and professional growth. Students are required to complete a Portfolio through PebblePad, equivalent to 2,500 words. The portfolio is assessed on a Pass/Fail basis and students must complete all required sections before downloading the completed portfolio and submitting it through Turnitin. The portfolio does not require academic referencing because it is a self-reflection and professional development assessment. The portfolio consists of several key components, including a personal SWOT analysis, evidence of communication requesting feedback, a Personal Development Plan (PDP), a CV and a cover letter. The SWOT analysis requires students to identify their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in order to understand their current skills, identify development gaps and recognise opportunities for improvement. Students must also reflect on the Professional Development Pyramid or another suitable professional development model and select three behavioural skills or competencies they wish to develop. Examples include strategic thinking and leadership. Feedback must be requested from four to six people from the student's personal and professional network, such as family members, friends, peers, mentors, employers or colleagues. This feedback is then used to support the student's development priorities. The action-planning section requires students to reflect on the feedback received and identify three development priorities or goals. For each priority, at least two SMART actions must be established. The action plan should include specific steps, timelines and required resources, while also identifying potential obstacles and explaining how these obstacles may be addressed. The goals and actions should demonstrate a clear connection between the student's self-reflection, feedback and professional development objectives. The final reflection considers the value of the PebblePad portfolio process in shaping personal and professional growth. Students are expected to demonstrate an in-depth understanding of self-development and explain how their development process can be reviewed, revised and adapted for continuing professional growth. The assessment learning outcomes focus on reflection on personal strengths and areas for improvement, advanced critical thinking, problem-solving and decision-making, intercultural communication, inclusivity and sustainability, interview and presentation competencies, and the ability to articulate an adaptable self-development process. The marking criteria emphasise self-reflection, clarity of goals, strategic action planning, persuasive understanding of professional development, and clear and professional presentation.
Read Model Answer →
Engineering and Environment Advanced Practice London Campus Research Project
3,000 words
LD7152 – AP Research Project
The LD7152 AP Research Project is a postgraduate research and reflective assessment for students studying within the MSc Computing Framework or MSc International Project Management programme. The module focuses on developing students as independent researchers and requires them to reflect critically on their research strategy, activities, learning and personal development. The assessment is designed to encourage students to recognise their achievements, identify challenges encountered during the research process and evaluate how their research experience has contributed to their academic and professional development. The assessment consists of two components: a 3,000-word Reflective Individual Report worth 80% and a 10-minute Poster Presentation worth 20%. Students are expected to work independently while receiving supervisory guidance. The reflective report requires students to demonstrate critical engagement with knowledge discovery and reflect on their educational development in relation to the challenges experienced during their research project. The report is structured around four main areas. The first section, Finding a Research Topic, is approximately 500 words and requires students to explain their chosen topic, why it was selected, the research tools and search techniques used, the Library collections explored, the research aims and objectives, and relevant discussions or recommendations from their supervisor. The second section, Professional Activities, is approximately 500 words and focuses on research development tasks, scheduling, the independent researcher role, challenges such as time management, and communication with the supervisor. The third section, Literature Review and Research Work, is approximately 1,500 words. It requires a critical review of relevant literature with appropriate citation, discussion of the research method and major research activities, and consideration of the feasibility, challenges and recommendations associated with the selected method. The fourth section, Reflection of Research Project, is approximately 500 words and focuses on achievements, contributions, strengths and weaknesses, continuous self-development and employability. Students are expected to reflect on areas including decision making, problem solving, communication and influencing, technical skills, collaboration, innovation and proactivity. The second assessment component is a 10-minute poster presentation. The poster should provide an overview of the research activities and communicate what the student learned during the research process. It should balance visual and textual information and include the research objectives and significance, a summary of the literature review and research method, key research findings, and conclusions and recommendations. The report must include a cover page, table of contents, page numbers and captions for figures and tables. The required formatting includes Times New Roman, 12-point font, numbered headings and approximately 1.2–1.3 line spacing. The assessment brief permits Harvard or APA referencing. The report is submitted electronically through Turnitin on Blackboard. The module is assessed on a Pass/Fail basis, with students required to achieve 50% or above to pass. The assessment also evaluates critical reflection, application of knowledge, independent learning, communication of complex ideas, personal development and reflection on technical leadership.
Read Model Answer →
Leadership and Change
3,000 words
Leadership and Change – Reflective Learning Portfolio
This 3,000-word coursework is a reflective learning portfolio focused on leadership, organisational change and reflective practice. The assessment is worth 100% of the module mark and is structured into four individual components. It is designed to assess leadership capabilities such as strategic thinking, emotional intelligence, communication, adaptability, team building, ethical decision-making and change management, while encouraging students to connect leadership theories and self-assessment tools with their own development. Component 1 focuses on individual leadership style and requires students to provide the results of the Fastest MBTI Test and critically reflect on what the outcome means in relation to their preferred leadership style. Students are expected to connect their MBTI results with leadership approaches covered in the module, including the Situated Leadership model. This component represents 20% of the assessment and has a suggested length of 600 words. Component 2 examines team roles. Students must present evidence from their Team Roles Test, identify their preferred team role and explain why it suits them. They must then identify two other Belbin team roles that would be important when building a team and explain their relevance. Connections can also be made between the Team Roles Test, Belbin’s framework and the results of the Conflict Management questionnaire. This component contributes 20% and has a suggested length of 600 words. Component 3 requires students to develop an individual organisational change plan in response to a fictional case study in which ARU is considering the adoption of AI to mark student coursework assignments and examinations. The plan evaluates change enablers and barriers, stakeholder involvement, ethical considerations and resource constraints. Students then develop an implementation strategy using a suitable change-management framework such as Lewin’s Change Model or Kotter’s 8-Step Model, including stakeholder engagement, communication, resistance management and strategies for sustaining change. This component represents 30% and has a suggested length of 900 words. Component 4 is a 900-word reflective account of what students learned about leadership while working as part of a team to design the organisational change plan. The reflection considers how leadership emerged, team collaboration, missing or required roles, conflict management and personal development. Students may structure the reflection using Kolb’s Reflective Learning Cycle or Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle and support their discussion with theories such as transformational, situational and distributed leadership, as well as Belbin’s team-role framework. Overall, the learning outcomes require students to critically reflect on their leadership style, evaluate classical and contemporary leadership theories, understand organisational change processes and develop evidence-based change strategies. The assessment also emphasises reflective practice and personal leadership development through experiential learning in a group setting.
Read Model Answer →
Organisational Strategy and Sustainability
2,500 words
Strategic Evaluation and Analysis of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL)
This 2,500-word coursework for the MSc Management module Organisational Strategy and Sustainability requires a strategic evaluation and analysis of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL). The assignment is written from the perspective of a management consultant at BPP Consulting Group and is addressed to HUL’s Board of Directors. It focuses on HUL’s strategic management, sustainability initiatives and responsible leadership within a global business context. The report begins by examining HUL’s internal capabilities and external business environment. Students are required to apply one strategic model to analyse the internal environment and one model to assess the external environment, such as VRIO, PESTEL or Porter’s Five Forces. The analysis should identify internal competencies, external opportunities and threats, sources of competitive advantage, and the influence of global and local market dynamics on HUL’s strategic choices. Particular consideration may be given to key regions such as the European Union, Asia and North America. The second section evaluates HUL’s ethical, sustainable and responsible business practices. The brief requires the use of one framework, such as the Triple Bottom Line or Sustainable Supply Chain Management, to assess one selected area of CSR, sustainability or ethical practice. The discussion should consider stakeholder engagement, regulatory influences such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and European Union legislation, and one HUL sustainability initiative such as product lifecycle management, eco-design, renewable energy integration or supply chain transparency. The third section critically evaluates HUL’s strategic responses to current and future challenges, including climate change, artificial intelligence and digital disruption. One strategic framework, such as the Ansoff Matrix, Blue Ocean Strategy or VRIO, should be applied to evaluate strategic options and their implications for long-term sustainability, competitiveness and market relevance. The final section provides a personal leadership and sustainability reflection. Students select one leadership model, such as Goleman’s Emotional Intelligence, Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions or Transformational Leadership, and reflect on their learning from the previous sections. The reflection covers personal development, ethical, cross-cultural or sustainable leadership, career aspirations, and values-driven leadership. The report concludes by summarising recommended changes to HUL’s organisational strategy and sustainability initiatives. The assessment requires Harvard referencing and a professional academic structure. The main body has a 2,500-word limit, with suggested allocations of approximately 50 words for the introduction, 600 words each for LO1, LO2, LO3 and LO4, and 50 words for the conclusion. The cover page, contents, references and appendices are excluded from the word count.
Read Model Answer →
Business Management / Strategy
2,467 words
Contemporary Issues in Business (BS729) — Reflective Portfolio: Case Trends, Stakeholder Perspectives and Management Frameworks
This Level 7 portfolio accumulates across a semester of case-based workshops and is submitted as a single document combining reflective writing with sustained critical discussion. The assessment rewards demonstrable personal development as much as analytical knowledge, so the writing is first-person where it needs to be and evidential throughout. The reflective component presents six workshop reflections, each no longer than 150 words and each structured through one of the established reflective models introduced in the module — Gibbs' Reflective Cycle, Kolb's Learning Cycle, Schön's framework or the ERA framework. These are not summaries of what the case was about. Each one identifies where the analysis could have been sharper, what was missed in the live discussion and why, what will be repeated and what will be done differently, with the emphasis falling on transferable learning about how business problems are diagnosed and decisions taken under uncertainty rather than on the particulars of any single case. The larger critical component works through three connected questions. The first examines how contemporary trends studied in the module affect businesses both positively and negatively, drawing on two specific cases but deliberately reaching beyond them to consider consequences across whole industries — the trend, not the company, is the unit of analysis. The second addresses why identifying stakeholders and understanding their perspectives is critical to sound decision-making, using one module case to demonstrate it. Competing interests are mapped explicitly, the power and legitimacy of each group considered, and stakeholder theory used to argue why a manager who weighs only shareholder interest arrives at a worse decision. The third question turns to the management tools and frameworks applied during the module, using two cases to show how a particular tool was selected, what it revealed that unstructured analysis would have missed, and equally where it fell short. This includes judgement about when each framework is and is not appropriate, since selecting the right tool for the problem is itself the skill being assessed. Harvard referencing is applied consistently across all sections, with academic sources supporting the theoretical claims and practitioner sources grounding the industry discussion. Portfolio items are collected through PebblePad across the semester and consolidated into one file for submission, the class participation element being tracked separately by the lecturer across the case discussion sessions.
Read Model Answer →
Engineering and Professional Practice
3,000 words
Internship Reflective Report and Poster Presentation — Professional Practice in an Industry Placement
An internship module assessment asks students to convert a period of workplace experience into evidenced academic reflection. It is not a report on what the host organisation does; it is an account of what changed in the student's own understanding of their discipline as a result of working outside the taught programme. The written component typically runs to around three thousand words and is built in weighted sections. An opening section covers how the placement was secured — the reasoning behind the choice, the search and application process, and what that process itself taught the student. The bulk of the marks then sit on the reflection proper: what the student actually did, how existing disciplinary knowledge held up when applied in an unfamiliar setting, and where gaps appeared. A final section addresses personal and professional development, supported by specific examples rather than general claims of having "grown in confidence." The second component is a short poster presentation summarising the placement and its learning, delivered live. Posters are assessed on professional presentation, clarity, correct referencing and balance — students commonly over-fill them with text that a viewer cannot read at presentation distance. Formatting requirements on this type of assessment are unusually prescriptive and carry marks: a cover page with name, student ID, tutor name and declared word count; a table of contents; page numbers; captions on every figure and table; specified font, size and line spacing; numbered headings; and a strict file-naming convention. Marks are lost here for no reason other than inattention. Note also that in-text citations and quotations usually count toward the word limit even when tables and references do not, and markers may simply stop reading once the limit is exceeded by more than the allowed margin. The defining challenge of reflective assessment at this level is criticality. Rubrics consistently distinguish description from evaluation: recounting tasks performed scores at the lower bands, while analysing why something was difficult, what it revealed about a gap in preparation, and what will be done differently scores at the top. Reflective frameworks give this structure, but they must organise genuine experience rather than substitute for it. This assessment is inherently personal — the content derives entirely from the student's own placement. Our support is therefore confined to guidance: explaining what distinguishes descriptive from critical reflection with worked examples, showing how a reflective framework structures a section, advising on poster layout and information density, checking formatting and referencing against the specification, and reviewing a student's own completed draft against the published rubric.
Read Model Answer →