Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
500 words
Reflective Account – Data Collection Practices
This individual assessment requires students to complete practical data collection exercises and write a 400–500 word reflective account based on their experience. The assessment is designed to develop understanding of different data collection methods and encourage students to connect the practical exercises completed in the laboratory with research methods and concepts covered during lectures. Students are required to complete two main types of data collection practice. The first involves questionnaire tests, which students attend during their allocated practical sessions. The second involves a series of recorded interaction exercises involving ChatGPT and human participants. Students must follow the supplied study instructions, use the specified prompts where required, record the requested activities using a camera such as a phone, and upload the relevant files to a designated OneDrive folder. The briefing also requires students to complete and sign the participant consent form and submit it with their collected data. The reflective account should summarise the methods learned during the module lectures and the methods exercised during the laboratory sessions. Students should demonstrate their overall understanding of how data collection works, why data collection is important in research, and how knowledge of data collection methods can be improved through practical experience. The reflection must address several key research and methodological questions. Students should explain how they would design a research question based on the collected data and identify the PICO elements relevant to the research. They should discuss what type of research could be conducted using the data and define an example of a machine learning problem that could be investigated. The reflection should also consider the participant experience by identifying areas of the data collection process that could be improved. Students are additionally asked to consider how they would design a similar data collection project themselves and whether they would make any changes to the methods, procedures or participant experience. The assessment therefore combines practical experience with critical reflection on research design, data collection, research questions, PICO, machine learning applications and methodological improvement. The final reflective account is a Canvas submission and should remain within the specified 400–500 word range. The assessment briefing states that students are marked based on the submitted report, making the reflective account the primary assessed component of the activity.
Read Model Answer →
Identifying Psychological States of Human Subjects via Machine Learning Algorithms
This research project investigates the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques to the identification of human psychological states. The study collects multimodal information from participants during structured conversational interactions and combines these data with established psychological and demographic measures. The research explores whether machine learning algorithms can identify patterns associated with psychological states using behavioural, physiological and conversational information. Participants take part in structured conversations involving both artificial intelligence and another human participant. The conversational activities include emotional reflection, cognitive challenges and open-ended discussion. During the emotional reflection activity, participants discuss experiences such as happiness, stress and coping strategies. The cognitive component includes memory tasks, riddles, planning questions and problem-solving or moral-dilemma questions. The final component involves an open conversation around topics such as travel, artificial intelligence, books or films. The ChatGPT interaction is designed to provide a consistent conversational structure while allowing participants to respond naturally. The study collects several forms of multimodal data. These include voice recordings, video recordings showing participants' facial expressions, spoken conversation transcripts and EEG data. Additional demographic and lifestyle information may also be collected. The research materials describe factors such as age, marital status, weight, height, disability, smoking, drinking, academic performance, family income, family size and physical exercise. Established questionnaires are also used to obtain information about participants' experiences and psychological states. Machine learning techniques are subsequently applied to the collected datasets to identify patterns that may be associated with psychological states. The research materials describe potential applications of AI in psychological assessment, predictive analytics, emotion recognition, monitoring and prevention, personalised treatment and AI-assisted mental health support. The broader objective is to investigate whether computational approaches can contribute to earlier identification of psychological difficulties and support more accessible and personalised approaches to mental health assessment. The project also places emphasis on participant welfare, informed consent, confidentiality and secure handling of research data. Participants are informed that they can withdraw their data up to completion of the study and are provided with support information if participation raises concerns or emotional discomfort. The consent documentation confirms that participants are informed about voice, video and photographic recording, data handling and access arrangements. The supplied materials also contain separate instructions for a conversational AI study in which participants interact with ChatGPT for at least ten minutes. The interaction is recorded and the resulting conversation transcript is retained for research purposes. The project therefore provides a multimodal research setting for examining human psychological states through conversational, behavioural and machine-learning approaches.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning on Big Data
3,000 words
Machine Learning on Big Data using PySpark
This group assessment for the Machine Learning on Big Data module requires students to apply machine learning techniques to a large real-world dataset using PySpark DataFrame and Spark ML. The coursework is designed to develop practical understanding of big data processing, machine learning implementation, model optimisation and evaluation. Students work in groups of three or four and complete a machine learning project using a suitable large dataset obtained from a benchmarking source such as Kaggle, their workplace or another valid resource. The recommended dataset size is between 300 MB and 1 GB. The main task requires students to select a dataset containing multiple classes rather than a binary classification problem and develop an appropriate machine learning solution. The project begins with loading and preprocessing the data using PySpark DataFrame. Students are expected to address issues such as missing values, data normalisation, feature engineering and class imbalance. For text datasets, additional preprocessing techniques such as stemming, lemmatisation and TF-IDF may be applied. Students must then select and implement an appropriate machine learning method using PySpark MLlib or the Spark ML package. The brief permits approaches including multiclass classification, clustering, ensemble learning and text mining. Model parameters must be optimised using techniques such as grid search or random search. Students are required to evaluate their trained models using suitable metrics, including accuracy, F1-score, precision, recall and classification matrices where appropriate. The brief encourages students to maintain model accuracy and robustness above 90% for the highest possible mark and to discuss steps taken to address bias and variance. The results must be visualised or printed clearly, with appropriate interpretation and analysis of the findings. Students must also consider Legal, Social, Ethical and Professional (LSEP) issues throughout the project. Each student selects one LSEP principle and discusses relevant concerns such as dataset bias, privacy or ethical implications, together with suitable mitigation strategies. The final report should be approximately 3,000 words with a tolerance of ±10% and submitted as a single HTML report using the template provided on the module Moodle site. The report should consolidate the individual contributions of all group members into one comprehensive and user-friendly analytics report. The main assessment is weighted 60% for the report and 40% for the group presentation. The presentation is conducted online through Microsoft Teams, and all group members must participate. The assessment evaluates understanding of Spark, preprocessing, modelling, optimisation, evaluation and the ability to explain and interpret the implemented solution.
Read Model Answer →
German Electricity Load Forecasting Using Time Series and Machine Learning Models
This individual assessment focuses on analysing and forecasting German electricity load using time-series analysis, statistical forecasting models and machine-learning approaches. Students are required to work with publicly available electricity data from the Open Power System Data platform and investigate the characteristics of the German time series before developing and comparing a range of forecasting models. The project combines exploratory data analysis, time-series modelling, regression-based forecasting and neural-network modelling, with particular emphasis on critical evaluation of modelling choices and forecast performance. The first stage requires students to retrieve the 60-minute electricity data and isolate the German data using the country identifier “DE”. The data should be aggregated into weekly and daily values using tools such as Pandas, with observations retained from 1 January 2015 through October 2020. Students must produce initial plots and conduct exploratory data analysis to identify the main components of the time series, including possible trend and seasonal patterns. Time-series analysis should then be performed to investigate and test for non-stationarity. The modelling component begins with benchmark forecasting methods such as Mean, Naive, Seasonal Naive and Drift forecasts. Students are required to use a two-year forecast horizon and compare the performance of these benchmark approaches. An autoregressive modelling approach must then be developed using SARIMA where appropriate. Students must identify suitable model parameters using the AIC likelihood method, considering the required combinations of p, d, q, P, D and Q parameters. Model fit should be assessed through residual analysis, including inspection of residual distributions and autocorrelation plots. Forecasts should include confidence intervals and performance should be evaluated using suitable metrics such as RMSE. The assessment also requires an exogenous temperature variable to be incorporated into a SARIMAX model. Berlin is specified as the representative location for German temperature data. Students must recognise the distinction between a true operational forecast and an explanatory or conditional forecast when future observed temperature values are used. The temperature variable should also be used to produce weekly forecasts. Further modelling requires students to apply a feature-based regression model, such as Random Forest or Gradient Boosting Regression, to the weekly electricity-load and temperature data. The final modelling stage uses hourly data with a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network. Students must conduct a literature review relating to LSTM applications for the forecasting task, build and tune the model, evaluate its performance and forecast the final two years of available data. The report must critically compare the models rather than simply present numerical results. Students must address specific questions concerning improvement over the Seasonal Naive benchmark, prevention of data leakage when constructing temperature lag features, SARIMAX parameter choices, the value and availability of temperature and holiday covariates, and the relative interpretability and complexity of SARIMAX, feature-based and neural-network models. Students must also recommend one model for operational use based on accuracy, uncertainty, interpretability and maintenance considerations. The final report should be 6–8 pages and include model forecast plots, an evaluation-metrics comparison table, critical discussion of the results, comparison with real data, future improvements and appropriate references. Students must also create a GitHub repository containing the codebase and follow appropriate coding practices. The submitted code must reproduce the figures, models and numerical values presented in the report.
Read Model Answer →
Data Science
1,000 words
Individual Project – Image Segmentation
This individual project focuses on image segmentation using a subset of the ADE20K dataset. The assessment requires students to investigate viable image segmentation models, analyse and visualise the provided data, develop appropriate data preprocessing procedures, train a segmentation model and critically evaluate the resulting performance. The assignment is worth 25% of the module assessment and is designed to assess students’ ability to apply research methods to a data science problem, communicate analytical findings effectively and select appropriate methods while understanding their advantages and limitations. Students are required to work with the provided ADE20K dataset and produce a model capable of semantic segmentation for four specified object classes: person, car, book and airplane. The model must identify which regions of an unlabelled image correspond to these four classes. The assignment specifically requires semantic segmentation rather than simply identifying whether an object is present. Treating the task as binary segmentation, where all objects are considered a single foreground class, will result in a significant penalty. The project requires students to investigate different approaches and models, perform exploratory data analysis, develop suitable preprocessing procedures and customise their selected model or models to improve performance. Students may use more than one model, although at least one model must be partially or fully trained by the student. Where multiple models are used, comparison with pretrained models is encouraged. Potential approaches include segmentation architectures such as U-Net and Mask R-CNN, with appropriate model selection justified through relevant literature and experimental evidence. The report should contain at least four core sections: an Introduction incorporating a literature review, Data Description and Exploratory Data Analysis, Methodology, and Results and Discussion. The literature review should cite at least three relevant research papers. The results section should include evaluation of three test images using the developed model and comparison with relevant published literature. Students are expected to provide a critical analysis of their work rather than simply reporting numerical results, explaining the reasons for observed outcomes and considering how modelling and implementation choices affected performance. The assessment also requires a documented Google Colab notebook containing the implemented steps used to train and evaluate the model. The notebook should be accessible to markers and should demonstrate the preprocessing, model development, training and evaluation process. The report must be between 700 and 1,000 words, excluding references and code, and should include code in text format as an appendix rather than screenshots. Figures and tables should have clear captions explaining what they present and their source. Assessment criteria include literature review and context, dataset description and exploratory data analysis, implementation quality, quality of analysis and critical discussion, and report quality and structure. Strong work is expected to demonstrate appropriate model selection, effective preprocessing and augmentation, suitable evaluation metrics such as Intersection over Union (IoU) and Dice score, meaningful visualisation and a critical interpretation of results and limitations.
Read Model Answer →
Leadership in a Digital Age
4,000 words
Leadership in a Digital Age: Leadership Strengths and Development Needs
This individual assessment for the Leadership in a Digital Age module requires students to produce a 4,000-word report that critically analyses their leadership strengths and development needs within the context of the digital age. The assessment places particular emphasis on critical reflection, self-awareness, contemporary leadership theory and continuous professional development. Students are expected to apply relevant leadership models and frameworks, use evidence from diagnostic assessments and connect their personal development to the skills and behaviours required of effective digital leaders. The report is structured into five main sections. The first section critically reviews contemporary leadership models and theories in relation to digital leadership. Students are expected to select two or three relevant leadership theories, explain their key principles and critically evaluate their relevance to digital leadership traits and characteristics. The assessment encourages the selection of contemporary approaches rather than outdated leadership theories and requires students to demonstrate clear links between theory and the demands of leading in digitally changing environments. The second section focuses on self-analysis. Students identify relevant digital leadership traits and conduct a thorough evaluation of their own leadership characteristics using a range of diagnostic tools. The assessment identifies tools covering temperament, workplace culture, motivation at work, emotional control and management skills, together with other available university diagnostic assessments. Students should report and interpret their results and use the findings to develop a personal SWOT analysis focused specifically on digital leadership strengths and areas requiring development. The third section examines leadership capabilities and behaviours when leading a hybrid, multi-generation team. Students should consider themselves working as a digital leader responsible for such a team, identify potential challenges and propose appropriate solutions. The discussion should evaluate how leadership capabilities and behaviours can be applied in practice or within a future role. Particular attention must be given to the ethical, social and legal responsibilities of digital leaders towards team members. The fourth section critically evaluates how artificial intelligence can support digital leadership and accelerate organisational digital transformation. Students should use a workplace example to demonstrate how emerging technologies such as machine learning, predictive analytics, intelligent automation or generative AI could improve operations, decision-making or innovation. The analysis should consider organisational benefits as well as the resources required to implement and sustain AI-driven transformation, including data infrastructure, skills and partnerships. The final section requires a Personal Development Plan based on the findings from the earlier analysis. Students should identify personal development objectives that demonstrate their ability to develop the competencies required of an effective digital leader. The plan should establish future leadership goals, learning activities, measurable success criteria and realistic timescales. Overall, the assessment requires students to integrate leadership theory, self-awareness, digital transformation, AI, team management and continuous professional development into a coherent critical analysis of their leadership development.
Read Model Answer →
Applied Modelling and Visualisation
2,500 words
Applied Modelling and Visualisation – Hexawing Airways Passenger Satisfaction Analysis
This assessment is a 2,500-word consultancy report for the Applied Modelling and Visualisation module within the MSc Management with Data Analytics programme at BPP University. The assignment requires students to work as Data Analytics Consultants for the fictional Hexawing Airways and analyse a passenger satisfaction dataset containing more than 103,000 records from the airline's database. The purpose of the assessment is to apply machine learning, data analysis and visualisation techniques to identify factors that influence passenger satisfaction and communicate meaningful findings to a varied corporate audience, including the Chief Executive Officer, senior flight personnel and cabin crew. The dataset contains a range of passenger and flight-related features, including gender, satisfaction status, age, age band, type of travel, travel class, flight distance, destination, continent and ratings for services such as inflight Wi-Fi, online booking, gate location, food and drink, online boarding, seat comfort, inflight entertainment, onboard service, leg room, baggage handling, check-in service, inflight service and cleanliness. It also includes departure and arrival delay information. These variables provide the basis for exploratory analysis, predictive modelling and visual communication of passenger satisfaction patterns. The assessment requires the development of a data-driven solution using Python and relevant Python libraries. Students must follow an established analytical methodology such as PPDAC or CRISP-DM and demonstrate an Extract, Transform and Load process, data preparation, exploratory data analysis and appropriate visualisations. Two analytical models must be selected, trained and tested to predict passenger satisfaction. The available modelling approaches include Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, Bagging, Random Forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost, Artificial Neural Networks or another appropriate state-of-the-art algorithm. The second task requires critical analysis of the two selected models, including their strengths and limitations, an explanation of the chosen loss function, discussion of accuracy metrics and a comparison table of model performance. The third task focuses on communicating findings through data visualisation, including outputs such as correlation matrices, heat maps and confusion matrices. The analysis should explain how exploratory data analysis guided model selection and how visualisation techniques communicate insights effectively. The final report should demonstrate the ability to formulate data-driven solutions, critically evaluate analytical models and appraise data visualisation techniques. The assessment also requires independent research, appropriate academic referencing and supporting evidence from the analytical process. A pre-run Python notebook must be embedded in the MS Word submission or provided through an appropriate shared link.
Read Model Answer →
Leading Through Digital Change
1,500 words
Digital Transformation Report and Poster
This assessment requires students to act as a Senior Digital Transformation Manager and produce a Digital Transformation Report and Poster for one selected sports retail organisation. The purpose of the assessment is to evaluate the organisation's current digital environment and recommend changes that can help it maintain competitive advantage and create business value in response to continuing digital change, changing consumer expectations, e-commerce growth, sustainability requirements, digital innovation and supply chain resilience. The assessment consists of three connected sections addressing digital transformation strategy, future digital trends and digital leadership. The first section requires students to critically review and propose an appropriate digital transformation strategic framework for their selected organisation. Students must select and apply one framework from McKinsey's 4Ds, BCG's 3 Stages, Gartner's 6 Steps or Cognizant's 4 Pillars. The framework should be applied to the chosen organisation rather than simply described. The analysis should also establish digital transformation objectives that support key business functions such as operations, ICT and marketing, with relevant examples and evidence from research used to strengthen the discussion. The second section requires the design of an A4 poster evaluating two disruptive technologies or techniques that are likely to influence the smartphone industry, employment and the labour market over the next five years. Potential technologies identified in the brief include Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 5G connectivity, Internet of Things, robotics, drone delivery, blockchain, augmented reality and virtual reality. The poster should communicate the expected impact of the selected technologies using academic literature and real-life examples. The third section focuses on digital leadership. Students must analyse and propose two appropriate digital leadership styles that the selected organisation should develop to effectively manage and support digital transformation. Possible approaches include hyperaware agile leadership, ethical technology leadership, people-oriented leadership, agile leadership and Goleman's leadership styles. The recommendations should be supported by relevant theories, academic literature and real organisational examples. The assessment is aligned with three learning outcomes. These address the application of management and leadership strategies during digital change, critical assessment of the impact of digital change on markets, organisations and employees, and evaluation of the leadership attributes and skills required to manage organisations and people in digitally changing environments. The final submission must include a clear introduction and conclusion, demonstrate intellectual originality and critical analysis, use appropriate academic evidence and follow Harvard referencing. The report is limited to 1,500 words, excluding the A4 poster, and students must select only one of the specified sports retail organisations for their analysis. The selected organisation should be analysed consistently across the strategic framework, future technology and digital leadership sections.
Read Model Answer →
Data Science / Time Series Analysis / Machine Learning
Time Series Modelling Case Study: Oil Price Forecasting with ARMA and Alternative Models
This Time Series Modelling Case Study requires students to analyse real-world oil-price time-series data and develop forecasting models capable of predicting future values. The assessment combines traditional statistical time-series techniques with an alternative forecasting approach, requiring students to demonstrate practical modelling skills, critical research engagement and evidence-based interpretation of forecasting results. The coursework is completed individually and contributes 40% of the assessment. assing,,, (1) The assessment is divided into three main parts. Part 1 focuses on developing an ARMA-based forecasting model using daily oil-price data covering approximately 2024 to 2026. Students begin with exploratory data analysis and initial visualisation before testing whether the time series is stationary. Where necessary, appropriate transformations or differencing must be applied to obtain stationarity. Students then define an ARMA model and identify suitable p, d and q parameters using an AIC-based model-selection procedure across the parameter ranges specified in the brief. assing,,, (1) Model adequacy must be assessed using diagnostic analysis. Students inspect residuals, generate additional ACF plots, examine residual distributions and evaluate prediction performance using appropriate metrics such as RMSE. The selected model is then used to forecast oil prices 24 months into the future, with appropriate confidence intervals added to communicate forecast uncertainty. assing,,, (1) Part 2 requires students to research and implement an alternative forecasting approach. Suggested examples include LSTM and Prophet, although another appropriate model may be proposed. Students conduct a literature review supporting the alternative method, build and where relevant hyperparameter-tune the model, generate another 24-month forecast, visualise predictions and confidence intervals, and calculate suitable evaluation metrics. This component is intended to demonstrate independent research and the ability to propose an alternative solution rather than relying only on the conventional ARMA approach. assing,,, (1) Part 3 consists of a 6–8 page technical report explaining the modelling process, forecasting results and resulting inferences. The report should provide a critical analysis rather than simply reproducing numerical outputs. Students are expected to explain why results occurred, justify modelling choices, evaluate how those choices influenced performance, compare forecasts with subsequently observed real data where possible, and construct a coherent narrative supported by plots, images, summary statistics and academic literature. Future improvements to the modelling approach should also be critically discussed. assing,,, (1) Submission consists of both the report and working code. The code may be submitted directly or through an accessible Colab or GitHub repository and must reproduce all models, figures and numerical results presented in the report. The assessment allocates 60% of the marks to code and 40% to the report. Within the coding component, modelling and forecasting completion accounts for 40 marks and code quality and annotation for 20 marks. The report is assessed on analysis and inference, methodological justification, comparison of the two modelling approaches, presentation quality, figures and use of appropriate references. assing,,, (1) Key technical expectations include appropriate testing for stationarity, use of methods such as ADF, ACF, PACF and differencing, systematic model selection, forecasting, evaluation and clear comparison between the traditional ARMA model and the chosen alternative approach. Higher-quality work is expected to interpret what the forecasts mean, identify potential improvements and demonstrate sound technical communication rather than merely reporting model outputs. assing,,, (1) Important for the public Reference Library: the brief explicitly states that students must not use generative AI to write the report, and the rubric indicates that AI text-generation use may result in zero marks for the whole assignment. Therefore, the public entry should remain a high-level description of the assessment rather than material intended for direct submission. assing,,, (1)
Read Model Answer →
Digital Transformation / Management and Leadership
1,500 words
Leading Through Digital Change: Digital Transformation Strategy, Emerging Technologies and Leadership
This postgraduate assessment requires students to act as a Digital Transformation Consultant and evaluate how a selected organisation should respond to accelerating technological change. Students choose one organisation from the options provided in the brief and prepare a Digital Transformation Report and accompanying poster designed to recommend changes that can help the organisation maintain competitive advantage and create business value. Summative_Assessment_Leading_Th… The first section focuses on a Digital Transformation Strategic Framework. Students must critically review and apply one recognised framework, choosing from the McKinsey 4Ds, BCG 3 Stages, Gartner’s 6 Steps or Cognizant’s 4 Pillars. The analysis should identify appropriate digital-transformation objectives and explain how these can support business functions such as operations, ICT and marketing. Higher-level work is expected to move beyond description and critically evaluate recent digital initiatives and organisational challenges. Summative_Assessment_Leading_Th… The second component is an A4 poster examining future digital trends. Students must evaluate two disruptive technologies or techniques likely to influence the relevant industry, employment and the labour market over the next five years. Suggested technologies include artificial intelligence and machine learning, 5G connectivity, IoT, robotics, drone delivery, blockchain, augmented reality and virtual reality. Academic literature and real-world examples are expected to support the evaluation. Summative_Assessment_Leading_Th… The third section addresses Digital Leadership. Students analyse and recommend two leadership styles that could support organisational transformation. Relevant approaches may include hyperaware agile leadership, ethical-tech leadership, people-oriented leadership, agile leadership and Goleman’s leadership styles. The analysis should explain how leadership capabilities can support collaboration, organisational networks and people during digital change. Summative_Assessment_Leading_Th… The final submission should contain a clear introduction, conclusion and Harvard-referenced evidence, and must be written in the third person with professional academic presentation. Summative_Assessment_Leading_Th… Overview word count: approximately 330 words.
Read Model Answer →
Artificial Intelligence / International Business
3,000 words
AI Innovation Consultancy: Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Solutions for Business Problems
This individual consultancy assessment requires students to act as an AI Innovation Consultant and evaluate how artificial intelligence could address a significant real-world business problem. Students select one industry—such as healthcare, retail, FinTech, manufacturing or agriculture—and concentrate on a single clearly defined organisational challenge rather than comparing multiple sectors. Potential issues include long waiting times, high operating costs, fraud and risk, poor customer experience or inefficient supply chains. The report develops a practical AI solution by identifying suitable technologies such as machine learning, natural language processing or computer vision and explaining how they would operate within the chosen organisational context. Students are not required to build an AI system; instead, the emphasis is on demonstrating business-level technical understanding, critical thinking and the ability to assess whether the proposed technology can realistically integrate with existing organisational processes. The analysis considers the capabilities and limitations of AI, technical feasibility, integration requirements and the skills or organisational capabilities required for implementation. Students must also critically examine ethical, legal and social implications, including issues such as algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability, privacy and regulatory obligations such as UK GDPR. Appropriate risk-mitigation measures should be proposed. A substantial element of the report develops the business case for AI adoption. Students evaluate implementation costs and expected benefits, estimate return on investment, identify assumptions and commercial risks, and assess the overall strategic value of the solution to the organisation. The report concludes with clear recommendations, implementation priorities and a final judgement on whether the proposed AI initiative is feasible and worthwhile. The assessment places strong emphasis on critical analysis, technical understanding, business acumen and professional communication. Students are expected to support arguments with credible academic, industry and government evidence and include at least two professional visualisations such as frameworks, diagrams or tables. Harvard referencing is required throughout. Overview word count: approximately 330 words. The brief also allows authorised use of generative AI for idea generation, drafting/structuring and proofreading, provided the student verifies accuracy, references appropriately and submits the required GenAI declaration.
Read Model Answer →
Big Data Analytics / Machine Learning
3,000 words
Machine Learning on Big Data Using PySpark: Large-Scale Data Analysis and Predictive Modelling
This group-based Machine Learning on Big Data project requires students to apply machine learning techniques to a large real-world dataset using PySpark DataFrames and Spark machine-learning libraries. Students select a substantial dataset, ideally between approximately 300 MB and 1 GB, from sources such as Kaggle, workplace data or other valid repositories, and develop an end-to-end big-data analytics workflow. CN7030 CRWK 26T1 The project begins with data loading and preprocessing using PySpark. Students are expected to handle missing values, perform data normalisation and feature engineering, identify class imbalance and propose appropriate mitigation strategies. Where text datasets are selected, additional preprocessing may include stemming, lemmatization and TF-IDF representation. CN7030 CRWK 26T1 The modelling stage requires implementation of an appropriate machine-learning approach using PySpark MLlib or Spark ML. The brief expects a multiclass rather than binary classification problem and allows techniques including multiclass classification, ensemble learning, clustering and text mining. Students must justify their model choice and consider model robustness, bias and variance when attempting to improve predictive performance. CN7030 CRWK 26T1 Students then perform hyperparameter tuning using techniques such as grid search or random search and evaluate the resulting model with appropriate measures. Relevant evaluation outputs may include accuracy, F1-score, precision, recall and a confusion matrix. Results should also be visualised or clearly presented and interpreted to identify meaningful patterns and performance characteristics. CN7030 CRWK 26T1 The project additionally requires consideration of Legal, Social, Ethical and Professional (LSEP) issues. Students discuss potential ethical concerns associated with their dataset, including bias and privacy risks, and propose suitable mitigation strategies. The final work is consolidated into a single user-friendly HTML analytics report that clearly presents the group's preprocessing, modelling, optimisation, evaluation and interpretation. CN7030 CRWK 26T1 CN7030 CRWK 26T1 Overview word count: approximately 335 words. If you are also uploading the presentation separately to the Reference Library, that should be a second entry under “Presentations and Academic Posters”, because the presentation forms a distinct 40% component and assesses understanding of Spark, preprocessing, modelling, optimisation, evaluation and responses to examiner questions. CN7030 CRWK 26T1
Read Model Answer →
Data Mining / Data Science
Customer Service Escalation Risk Analytics Using Data Mining and Machine Learning
This advanced Data Mining assessment applies the Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) process to a realistic customer-service risk scenario. Acting as a Data Scientist, students analyse a historical Customer Service Escalation Risk dataset to help an organisation identify early indicators of dissatisfaction and operational bottlenecks that may lead to serious or legal customer escalations. The resulting analysis is intended to support strategic decisions relating to staffing, employee training, customer-journey improvement and escalation prevention. CMP-7023B_Assessement_2 (2) The dataset incorporates customer demographics, account characteristics, communication channels, issue categories, operational measures such as waiting times, transfers and SLA breaches, behavioural indicators including sentiment and response delays, and commercial variables such as monthly fees and contract value. The target variable, escalation_level, contains four categories: No escalation, Minor escalation, Serious escalation and Legal escalation. CMP-7023B_Assessement_2 (2) Students begin with data exploration and visualisation, producing appropriate descriptive statistics and identifying patterns, distributions and potential data-quality concerns. They then perform data cleansing, transformation, feature engineering and preprocessing. Variables that may introduce leakage or unreliable predictions because of their meaning, timing or quality must be critically assessed and justified. CMP-7023B_Assessement_2 (2) The supervised-learning stage requires students to develop, tune and compare predictive models using techniques such as k-nearest neighbours, Decision Trees, Support Vector Machines, ensemble methods or neural networks. Appropriate multiclass evaluation metrics must be used, alongside interpretation of influential variables and model behaviour. CMP-7023B_Assessement_2 (2) The assessment also includes unsupervised learning, requiring comparison of clustering methods such as K-Means and hierarchical clustering after removal of the target variable. Students may apply encoding, normalisation and dimensionality-reduction methods such as PCA or t-SNE and must interpret how the resulting clusters relate to escalation behaviour. CMP-7023B_Assessement_2 (2) Overall, the project assesses independent analytical judgement, modelling justification, comparative evaluation and clear communication of actionable findings for both technical and executive audiences. CMP-7023B_Assessement_2 (2) Overview word count: approximately 340 words. AI-use note: AI tools may only assist with small, specific code snippets. Any AI-generated code must be clearly acknowledged and cited, while the analysis, coding decisions, interpretation and final evaluation must remain the student's own work. CMP-7023B_Assessement_2 (2)
Read Model Answer →
Leadership / Digital Leadership / Business Management
4,000 words
Leadership in a Digital Age: Critical Self-Analysis, AI Transformation and Personal Development
This Leadership in a Digital Age assessment requires students to critically analyse their leadership strengths, behaviours and development needs within contemporary digital environments. The individual 4,000-word report combines academic leadership theory, diagnostic self-assessment, professional reflection, digital transformation and forward-looking personal development. Its central purpose is to demonstrate self-awareness and evaluate how leadership capabilities must evolve in response to technological, organisational and workforce change. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… The first section requires critical evaluation of two or three contemporary leadership theories or models in relation to digital leadership. Students should avoid outdated approaches and instead examine how relevant theories align with the behaviours and characteristics required of leaders operating in technology-enabled organisations. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… The second section focuses on self-analysis. Students use diagnostic tools relating to areas such as temperament, workplace culture, motivation, emotional control, management skills and Belbin team roles. Results should be reported and interpreted before being used to construct a personal SWOT analysis concentrating specifically on leadership characteristics relevant to the digital age. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… A further component examines the leadership of hybrid, multi-generational teams. Students identify challenges that may arise in such environments and evaluate leadership capabilities and behaviours that could address them. Ethical, social and legal responsibilities associated with digital leadership must also be considered. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… The report additionally evaluates how digital leaders can use Artificial Intelligence to support digital transformation and organisational performance. Appropriate workplace examples may involve machine learning, predictive analytics, intelligent automation or generative AI, with consideration of required resources such as data infrastructure, organisational skills and external partnerships. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… The final section requires a Personal Development Plan containing justified leadership-development objectives, learning activities, measurable success criteria and timescales. These objectives should emerge directly from the earlier self-analysis and demonstrate how the student intends to become a more effective leader in a current or future digital role. NUL Assessment Brief LD7090 202… Overall, the assessment integrates leadership theory, reflective self-evaluation, hybrid-team management, AI-driven transformation and structured professional development within the context of leadership in the digital age.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Cloud Computing / Artificial Intelligence
4,004 words
Cloud-Based Machine Learning for Financial Fraud Detection
This Machine Learning on Cloud assessment requires students to design, implement and critically evaluate a cloud-oriented machine-learning solution for financial fraud detection. Working as a group, students address a scenario in which a financial-services organisation requires an automated model capable of detecting fraudulent transactions, reducing financial losses and improving customer security. The project combines machine-learning development with critical evaluation of cloud infrastructure, data preparation, model performance and responsible AI considerations. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … The project begins with a cloud feasibility study comparing at least two major machine-learning platforms such as Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud Platform. Students evaluate factors including performance, scalability, cost, compliance, system integration and vendor lock-in before providing a justified recommendation. The project then moves into Exploratory Data Analysis, where patterns, anomalies and correlations within the fraud dataset are investigated using visualisations such as heatmaps, histograms and boxplots. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … A substantial part of the assessment focuses on data preprocessing and class imbalance. Students are expected to clean and transform the dataset, apply scaling and encoding, perform feature engineering and investigate techniques such as SMOTE, undersampling and cost-sensitive learning. These decisions must be justified in terms of their potential effect on predictive performance. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … Students must then select and train at least two machine-learning models. Suggested algorithms include Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost and Neural Networks. Appropriate cross-validation and hyperparameter-tuning procedures should be applied, followed by systematic evaluation using precision, recall, F1-score, AUC and precision-recall curves. Supporting visualisations should include confusion matrices, ROC curves and feature-importance analysis. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … The final component addresses professionalism and ethics in cloud-based AI, including bias, fairness, transparency, data privacy and environmental sustainability. Overall, the project integrates cloud-platform selection, exploratory analytics, preprocessing, imbalanced-data handling, predictive modelling, model evaluation and ethical AI into an applied financial fraud-detection solution. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … Note: the uploaded brief does not explicitly name a referencing system. If your portal requires a selection, I would use Not specified rather than assume Harvard.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Cloud Computing
2,000 words
Technical Evaluation and Professional Reflection on a Cloud-Based Machine Learning Fraud Detection Solution
This postgraduate individual assessment critically evaluates a cloud-based machine learning solution for financial fraud detection developed as part of a preceding group project. The scenario concerns a financial services organisation seeking to detect fraudulent transactions in order to reduce financial losses and strengthen customer security. The individual report requires students to examine both the technical quality of the developed solution and their own professional contribution to the project. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … The first component, Technical Evaluation, accounts for 50% of the assessment and has a suggested allocation of approximately 1,000 words. Students critically analyse the group solution with particular attention to data preprocessing, machine learning model choices, evaluation metrics and technical limitations. The analysis should go beyond description by explaining how specific modelling and design decisions influenced the final outcomes of the fraud-detection system. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … The second component, Reflection and Professional Issues, also accounts for 50% and is approximately 1,000 words. Students critically reflect on their personal contribution, teamwork experience, challenges encountered and lessons learned during the project. The discussion also addresses wider professional and ethical considerations associated with AI and cloud-based machine learning, including bias, fairness, sustainability and data privacy. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … The assessment is designed to demonstrate critical understanding of machine learning methods, cloud-computing architectures, practical development of machine learning solutions and awareness of the social, ethical and sustainability implications of AI technologies. A Seminar Activity Tracker must also be included as an appendix to provide evidence of weekly participation and knowledge development. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … Higher-level performance requires a comprehensive connection between technical decisions and outcomes alongside deep reflection on teamwork, professional development, ethics, fairness and sustainability. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief … Overview word count: approximately 300 words. AI-use note: the brief permits AI for limited support such as grammar improvement, structure, organising ideas and suggestions. The student's main content, analysis and conclusions must remain their own, and any AI use must be declared. NUL - LD7187 -Assessment Brief …
Read Model Answer →
Applied Data Science
500 words
Critique of a Data Science Book and Selected Chapter
This assignment requires students to critically evaluate a selected data science book and a specific chapter from that book. Students must choose one book from the list provided in the assignment, read the preface or introduction to understand the intended audience, and then select a chapter that is relevant to their interests, existing knowledge and learning objectives. The available books cover a range of data science and analytical subjects, including practical time series analysis, machine learning with Python, Python-based data science, technical analysis, Bayesian statistics and artificial intelligence applications. The main purpose of the assignment is to develop the student's ability to engage critically with technical literature rather than simply summarising its content. The critique should identify the selected book and its intended audience, clearly state the chosen chapter and explain the reasons for selecting it. Students are expected to consider what they hoped to learn from the selected material and then critically assess whether the chapter achieved these objectives. The assessment should consider the clarity, usefulness and accessibility of the material, as well as the extent to which it contributes to the student's understanding of data science concepts. Students should also discuss additional knowledge they would like to gain from the book and identify particular aspects that were either helpful or less useful. This may include the quality of explanations, examples, technical depth, practical applications, organisation of material and relevance to the student's existing knowledge. The critique should demonstrate engagement with the selected chapter and provide reasoned observations rather than simply describing what the author has written. The final submission is a 500-word critique with a permitted variation of plus or minus 10 percent, meaning the expected range is approximately 450–550 words. The text must be written as a continuous narrative and should not use subheadings for the individual assessment points. The headline should follow the format “Critique of <book title> by <book author>”, with the student's name and student ID as the subtitle. The assignment assesses both technical presentation and content, including grammar, writing style, word count, completeness, breadth and depth of the book assessment, critical analysis and evidence of engagement with the selected material. Students must submit text that can be processed by Turnitin.
Read Model Answer →
Leading Through Digital Change
2,500 words
Leading Through Digital Change (CW1)
The Leading Through Digital Change (CW1) assessment is a summative coursework assignment for MSc Management programmes at BPP University Business School. The assessment accounts for 100% of the module marks, with a minimum of 50% required to pass. Students must submit the assessment through Turnitin and follow the Harvard Referencing System. The coursework consists of a 1,500-word business report together with an A4-size poster. The assessment requires the student to act as a Digital Transformation Consultant responsible for coordinating technology expertise within an organisation. The Chief Information Officer (CIO) requires a Digital Transformation Report and Poster that evaluate and recommend changes designed to maintain competitive advantage and create business value. Students must select one organisation from the options provided in the assessment brief: Tata Motors, Meezan Bank Limited, Hulu, or Puma SE. Part 1 addresses the Digital Transformation Strategic Framework and is linked to Learning Outcome 1. The student must critically review and propose one appropriate digital transformation framework for the selected organisation. The brief specifies that one framework should be used from McKinsey 4Ds, BCG 3 Stages, Gartner's 6 Steps or Cognizant's 4 Pillars. The section should also include digital transformation objectives supporting areas such as operations, ICT and marketing. Part 2 addresses Future Digital Trends and Learning Outcome 2. Students must design a poster evaluating two disruptive technologies or techniques likely to affect the smartphone industry, employment and the labour market over the next five years. Suggested technologies include Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 5G Connectivity, Internet of Things, Robotics, Drone Delivery, Blockchain, and Augmented or Virtual Reality. Academic literature and real-life examples should support the discussion. Part 3 addresses Digital Leadership Recommendations and Learning Outcome 3. Students must analyse and propose two appropriate digital leadership styles that the selected organisation should develop to effectively manage and support digital transformation. The brief identifies possible approaches including hyperaware agile leadership, ethical-tech leadership, people-oriented leadership, agile leadership and Goleman's six leadership styles, while allowing other relevant approaches. The required report structure includes the BPP University administration cover sheet, table of contents, list of abbreviations where appropriate, introduction, Part 1, Part 2 (Poster), Part 3, conclusion, references and appendix where required. The main business report is limited to 1,500 words, while the poster has no separate word limit but must fit on A4 paper. The report must be written in the third person, use professional formatting, include page numbers, correctly label tables and figures, and use Harvard in-text citations and references. The marking criteria emphasise critical evaluation rather than simple description. Higher performance requires evidence of extensive personal research, critical analysis of digital transformation frameworks, emerging technologies and leadership approaches, supported by academic literature and real-world examples. The rubric also expects strong links between the organisation's technological challenges, transformation objectives, disruptive technologies and proposed leadership approaches.
Read Model Answer →
Data Mining
Data Mining – Classification, Model Optimisation and Evaluation
This individual Data Mining assignment requires students to apply the techniques covered in the module using the WEKA data mining platform. The assessment is worth 40% and focuses on practical application of machine learning and data mining methods, requiring students to configure algorithms, analyse datasets, optimise model parameters, evaluate classification performance and explain their technical choices and results. The assignment also assesses the ability to critically evaluate different algorithms and models of data mining. The assignment includes several tasks covering different stages of the data mining process. Students are required to work with supplied datasets and use appropriate preprocessing and classification techniques. The datasets include a balanced screenshot dataset containing processed screenshots classified into categories such as "Okay" and "Bad", where the objective is to train a model capable of identifying inappropriate content. The data has been processed using PCA to provide a smaller four-dimensional representation while protecting privacy and reducing the size of the data. Another supplied dataset concerns furniture reviews, containing positive ("pos") and negative ("neg") written feedback, with the objective of building a model that can determine whether a furniture review belongs to either class. The assessment evaluates students' ability to understand and describe the datasets, including the number of instances, number of columns, data types and relevant statistical information. For text-based data, students must apply appropriate vectorisation and describe the resulting dataset characteristics. Students must also consider class imbalance and apply an appropriate method where necessary, explaining how the chosen approach affects the distribution of instances between the classes. A significant component of the assignment involves classification algorithms and parameter optimisation. The assessment requires students to work with algorithms including Naive Bayes, LibSVM and J48. Students must investigate appropriate parameters and perform parameter searches or fine grid searches to identify suitable configurations. They must explain the selected parameters, their impact on the model and the reasoning behind the chosen values. Model performance must be evaluated using appropriate validation techniques, including cross-validation. Students are required to compare the algorithms using results such as overall accuracy and confusion matrices. The assignment expects students to identify an appropriate or best-performing algorithm in the context of the dataset and to provide a clear explanation of the comparison rather than simply reporting numerical results. The rubric places emphasis on accurate configuration, clear explanation of parameter choices, dataset analysis, class-balance treatment, parameter optimisation, cross-validation and critical comparison of algorithm strengths and weaknesses. High-quality work should explain both the technical process and the implications of the results, with results presented clearly through appropriate tables, confusion matrices and graphical outputs where required. The submission must be a single PDF document containing the report and must not exceed 10 pages. Students are instructed to include their student ID at the beginning of the report but not their name or other identifying details so that marking remains anonymous. Screenshots are specifically required to demonstrate use of the student's ID number as the random seed; other WEKA results should be presented in the student's own tables or result formats. The brief also states that no research beyond the material covered in the module is required and therefore no citations or reference list are required. The assignment explicitly prohibits the use of Generative AI tools for creating content and prohibits using GenAI tools or proofreading services for proofreading. Students are expected to complete the practical work themselves and explain their own technical choices and results.
Read Model Answer →
Principles of Data Science
3,000 words
Principles of Data Science – Predictive Modelling and Data Analysis
This individual assessment for the Principles of Data Science module requires students to select, apply and critically evaluate data science methods, tools and techniques using one of three provided datasets and its associated scenario. The main assessment takes the form of a 3,000-word report in which students explore their chosen dataset, identify an appropriate predictive modelling approach, build and evaluate models, interpret the findings and critically reflect on the overall process and outcomes. The assessment addresses the principles and foundations of data science, statistical methods, data preparation, visualisation, predictive modelling, decision making and the critical evaluation of data science techniques and tools. Students begin by exploring the selected dataset to understand its structure, characteristics and limitations. Although the supplied datasets have already been cleaned, students may undertake additional data preparation or transformation where necessary. Any preprocessing decisions must be justified in relation to the requirements of the selected analytical methods. Feature selection should also be considered as part of preparing the data for model development. The assessment requires students to identify suitable forms of analysis for the selected scenario and justify their choice of methods. At least two different techniques must be used to develop models with predictive capacity for the response variable in the chosen dataset. The models must be trained and tested consistently, using the same training and test datasets so that their performance can be compared fairly. Where appropriate, students should also provide insight into feature importance and explain the contribution of relevant variables to predictive performance. Model performance must be evaluated using suitable metrics, followed by a clear description of the findings and recommendations appropriate for the intended audience. The report should document the complete analytical workflow, including data exploration, preprocessing, feature selection, model development, testing and evaluation. Students are expected to explain and justify the decisions made throughout the process rather than simply presenting code or model results. The assessment also requires students to demonstrate practical proficiency in data science tools and techniques. The brief expects the use of R for completing the assignment and requires evidence of important elements of the code, although the complete code does not need to be submitted. Data visualisation must be used to support the written discussion and communicate relevant findings effectively. The assessment is evaluated across theoretical knowledge and method selection, data exploration and processing, technical application and model evaluation, communication of findings, and overall presentation and referencing. The assessment therefore combines technical implementation with critical analysis, requiring students to explain why particular methods were selected, evaluate their effectiveness and consider the limitations and implications of the resulting findings. A separate second assessment component accompanies the written report. This component requires a presentation of the key findings from the written work using a maximum of five slides and a presentation duration of no more than seven minutes. It should summarise the dataset, methods, key findings and project outcomes while providing critical reflective commentary on lessons learned, factors affecting success and potential real-world applications.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning and Big Data
2,000 words
Machine Learning for Big Data
This assignment for the Machine Learning and Big Data module requires students to produce a 2,000-word individual report demonstrating their understanding and practical application of machine learning techniques to big data. The assessment is worth 15 credits and is structured around five interconnected areas: data in big data, machine learning architecture, model deployment, model evaluation, and the machine learning lifecycle. The first part focuses on identifying and evaluating suitable datasets for a selected big data topic and determining whether the datasets are appropriate for the intended machine learning application. Students are expected to examine the characteristics of their data and apply appropriate pre-processing approaches, including consideration of attribute selection and data preparation. The second part addresses machine learning modelling architecture. Students must develop an appropriate architecture for their big data application and may compare alternative architectural approaches. The report should explain the selected machine learning techniques and demonstrate how they operate as part of the proposed system. Practical considerations such as performance, scalability, fault tolerance, technology usage and reliability should also be considered. The third part requires students to implement and deploy the proposed data and machine learning model. This includes testing, visualising and evaluating the resulting outcomes. The fourth part requires critical evaluation of the dataset selection, modelling design, implementation and application, including assessment of whether the selected machine learning techniques are appropriate for the intended purpose. The final part focuses on the complete project lifecycle. Students are expected to critically reflect on the work undertaken, identify what they have learned, evaluate the development process and explain how the machine learning application could be improved in a future implementation. The assessment develops five learning outcomes covering big data sources and applications, machine learning techniques, practical application of machine learning tools, critical evaluation of techniques and tools, and the ability to follow a complete big data analysis lifecycle. The marking criteria allocate 20% to each of these five areas. The assignment is submitted as an individual written report. The brief states that Microsoft Word should be used rather than PDF and requires students to acknowledge sources and any AI tools used in accordance with the stated AI policy.
Read Model Answer →
Artificial Intelligence
Developing an Intelligent Chatbot and Expert System for UK Train Services
This postgraduate Advanced Artificial Intelligence group project requires students to design, implement, evaluate and demonstrate an intelligent conversational system for a UK train operating company. The chatbot combines conversational AI, expert-system concepts, predictive modelling and knowledge-based reasoning to support both railway passengers and operational staff. The coursework is worth 70% of the module and is designed to develop practical experience in applying modern AI techniques to realistic service and operational problems. The first task requires the chatbot to interact with passengers, collect journey requirements such as origin, destination, date and travel time, and identify the cheapest available train ticket. Appropriate railway ticket data sources or APIs may be used, with the selected ticket presented together with access to the relevant booking service. The second task extends the system to improve customer service through train-delay prediction. The chatbot gathers information about a passenger's current train, location, delay and destination before passing these data to one or more predictive models. Students process historical railway-performance data, train and compare suitable machine-learning models, evaluate their accuracy and integrate an appropriate model into the chatbot. The third task introduces an expert system for railway contingencies. Students extract rules and operational knowledge from provided contingency and station-disruption documents and construct a knowledge base capable of advising railway staff during events such as partial or complete line blockages. The system should gather details such as event type, location, time and severity, then provide relevant operational guidance, diversion information, alternative services and passenger advice. The overall architecture may include a user interface, NLP/NLU component, knowledge base, reasoning engine, predictive model, database and optional knowledge-acquisition component. Particular emphasis is placed on context-aware dialogue, reliable reasoning, appropriate fallback responses and effective user experience. Assessment outputs include the working chatbot, source code, a live presentation and demonstration, a detailed group technical report, and an individual contribution report. Overview word count: approximately 375 words. AI-use note: pre-trained LLMs may be used as an engine within the system, but they must not be used to generate coursework code. Any use of an LLM within the solution must be clearly justified and explained in the group report.
Read Model Answer →
Data Mining / Data Science
Customer Service Escalation Risk Analytics Using Data Mining and Machine Learning
This advanced Data Mining assessment applies the Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) process to a real-world customer-service analytics scenario. Acting as a Data Scientist, students analyse a historical Customer Service Escalation Risk dataset to help an organisation reduce serious and legal customer escalations by identifying early signs of dissatisfaction, service bottlenecks and operational risk. The findings are intended to support business decisions relating to staffing, employee training, customer-journey improvement and escalation prevention. The dataset contains information covering customer demographics, account characteristics, communication channels, issue categories, operational measures such as wait times, transfers and SLA breaches, behavioural indicators including sentiment and response delays, and commercial variables such as monthly fees and contract value. The target variable contains four escalation outcomes: No escalation, Minor escalation, Serious escalation and Legal escalation. The first stage requires data exploration, visualisation and summary, including examination of variable distributions, dataset structure, descriptive characteristics and potential data-quality issues. Students then perform appropriate data cleaning, transformation, feature engineering and preprocessing. Particular attention must be given to variables that could introduce prediction leakage because of their meaning, timing or reliability. The supervised-learning component requires development and tuning of predictive models using suitable techniques such as k-nearest neighbours, Decision Trees, Support Vector Machines, ensembles or neural networks. Models must be evaluated using appropriate multiclass metrics and compared systematically, with interpretation of influential features and model behaviour. The assessment also requires unsupervised learning. After removing the escalation target, students apply and compare clustering approaches such as K-Means and hierarchical clustering. Appropriate preprocessing, encoding, normalisation or dimensionality reduction may be used, with visualisations such as PCA, t-SNE or scatterplots used to explore cluster structure and its relationship with escalation behaviour. Overall, the project assesses the student's ability to independently design a coherent KDD workflow, justify analytical decisions, compare alternative modelling approaches and communicate actionable findings to both technical and executive audiences. Overview word count: approximately 350 words. AI-use note: the brief permits AI tools only to assist with small, specific code snippets. Any AI-generated code must be clearly acknowledged and cited, while the submitted coding, analysis, interpretation and decision-making must remain the student's own work.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning and Deep Learning
2,000 words
Development and Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Healthcare Classification
This individual technical assessment focuses on the design, development, analysis and evaluation of a deep learning solution for a healthcare-related classification problem. Students select one of two provided scenarios: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) detection using ultrasound images or heartbeat classification using electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. The objective is to develop an appropriate deep learning approach and demonstrate critical understanding of the complete machine learning workflow, from initial data exploration through to model evaluation and reflection. Students may either design and train a deep learning model from scratch or customise and fine-tune an existing pre-trained architecture. The complete work is presented through a single Jupyter Notebook integrating Python code, technical discussion, results and visualisations. The notebook must clearly define the selected healthcare problem, explain its significance, justify methodological and architectural choices, and critically evaluate the resulting solution. The first stage involves exploratory data analysis and preprocessing, including investigation of class distributions, data imbalance and relevant patterns. Students prepare the data through techniques such as normalisation, augmentation, train-validation-test splitting and appropriate handling of class imbalance. This is followed by model design, training, validation and hyperparameter tuning, with the architecture selected according to the characteristics of the data and classification task. Model performance must then be evaluated using appropriate classification measures, including precision, recall, F1-score, ROC curves and area under the curve (AUC). The developed model should also be compared against suitable benchmark approaches, which may include traditional machine learning algorithms or alternative deep learning architectures. This comparison should identify the relative strengths and limitations of the proposed solution. The final component requires clear visual presentation and critical reflection on the complete modelling process, including limitations, challenges and opportunities for improvement. Importantly, grading prioritises methodological rigour, analytical depth and critical evaluation rather than simply achieving the highest predictive accuracy. Overview word count: approximately 330 words. AI restriction: this brief only permits automated AI tools for spelling and grammar checking. It explicitly prohibits tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini or Copilot from authoring assessment text or code; any permitted AI use must also be acknowledged.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
1,000 words
End-to-End Machine Learning Model Development, Tuning and Evaluation
This Level 7 Machine Learning and Intelligent Agents assessment requires students to develop and document an end-to-end machine-learning solution, covering the complete workflow from data preparation through model training, tuning, testing and evaluation. Students select an appropriate dataset or scenario, formulate a research question and determine whether the problem is most appropriately addressed through supervised learning, unsupervised learning or reinforcement learning. Suitable machine-learning techniques must then be implemented to create a model that can be systematically trained and tested. The assignment requires students to follow a structured machine-learning development process and document the complete development journey. The report should explain the selected scenario, data collection or dataset, Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA), rationale for selecting particular machine-learning methods, model training, fine-tuning and evaluation. Model performance must be assessed using appropriate established metrics, with relevant published research used to justify methodological decisions and support the interpretation of results. The technical implementation should demonstrate the ability to identify the performance of machine-learning algorithms, implement machine-learning approaches using one or more object-oriented programming languages, and determine which algorithms are most appropriate for a particular analytical brief. These requirements directly correspond to the module learning outcomes relating to machine-learning performance, implementation and algorithm selection. Students are advised to document their work within a Jupyter Notebook, combining Markdown explanations with executable code. The notebook may be submitted directly or converted to PDF. Alternatively, students may prepare the 1,000-word report in Microsoft Word, provided that the Python code is included within the submitted document. Assessment is divided into three principal areas: Introduction (20 marks), Machine Learning Process (40 marks), and Evaluation of Model Performance (40 marks). Higher-level work is expected to demonstrate strong understanding of machine-learning concepts, a functioning and thoroughly tested implementation, appropriate selection of algorithms and critical evaluation of the developed solution. Overall, the assessment integrates research-question formulation, data exploration, algorithm selection, programming, model optimisation and evidence-based evaluation within a reproducible machine-learning workflow. All academic sources must be presented using Harvard referencing.
Read Model Answer →
Data Science / Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
2,500 words
Predicting ADHD Diagnosis Using Machine Learning and Explainable Data Science
This Data Science assessment requires students to develop a comprehensive analytical solution to a real-world healthcare prediction problem using the WiDS Datathon 2025 Health Outcomes Prediction Dataset. The dataset contains socio-demographic information, diagnostic variables and functional MRI data relating to children and adolescents, with the principal objective of developing predictive models for ADHD diagnosis. The assessment is designed to demonstrate the complete data-science lifecycle, from data preparation and exploratory analysis through predictive modelling, interpretation and evidence-based recommendations. Students begin by exploring the dataset's features, data types and distributions before addressing missing values, outliers and other inconsistencies. Appropriate feature engineering should be undertaken where necessary, followed by Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) using relevant visualisations to identify relationships, patterns and correlations within the data. Students with limited computational resources may use a representative subset, provided that the sampling method preserves the integrity and distribution of the original dataset and is clearly justified. A major component of the assignment involves developing and comparing at least three classification models. Appropriate techniques may include Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting and Neural Networks. Model performance should be evaluated using measures including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score and ROC-AUC, allowing students to identify the strongest-performing model through systematic comparison. The assessment also requires model interpretation and explainability. Students should explain the results of the selected model and may apply techniques such as SHAP or LIME to investigate feature importance and individual predictions. A feature-importance visualisation must be produced, and the most influential variables should inform practical recommendations for healthcare professionals regarding the potential use of predictive modelling in supporting earlier ADHD diagnosis and intervention. Overall, the assignment integrates data cleaning, exploratory analytics, predictive modelling, model comparison, explainable AI and research-informed healthcare recommendations. Students must submit a comprehensive report of no more than 2,500 words, alongside a Jupyter Notebook containing the implementation and outputs. The report must use Harvard referencing, with appropriate academic research integrated into the analysis, recommendations and conclusion.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Data Mining / Text Mining
Machine Learning Analysis of Classification Models and Text Mining on Furniture Review Data
This technical machine-learning report demonstrates the practical application of predictive modelling and text mining using WEKA. The work is divided into two major tasks. The first evaluates and compares Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree classification models, while the second applies text-mining techniques to furniture-review data and compares multiple classifiers after preprocessing, feature selection and class balancing. The first task uses the Screenshots.arff dataset to investigate the performance of libSVM and J48 Decision Tree classifiers. A 70% training and 30% testing split is applied, and the models are manually tuned to examine how different parameter settings affect predictive performance. For libSVM, an RBF kernel is used while different gamma and cost values are tested through grid-search-style experimentation. The report identifies gamma 0.03 and cost 2 as the strongest tested combination, producing approximately 91.67% accuracy on the test split. The J48 model is also optimised by adjusting the confidence factor used for pruning. Several confidence-factor values are examined, with 0.09 producing the strongest reported result of 80% accuracy. The optimised SVM and J48 models are then compared using five-fold cross-validation, where libSVM achieves 89.75% accuracy compared with 81.25% for J48. The second task focuses on text mining of Furniture Reviews. Text preprocessing includes TF-IDF term weighting, stopword removal, stemming, conversion to lowercase and word-count generation. The resulting textual dataset is transformed into a numerical feature representation suitable for machine-learning classification. Dimensionality reduction is performed using InfoGainAttributeEval with Ranker, selecting the 900 most informative attributes. The dataset is then balanced using WEKA techniques including Resample and SpreadSubsample to reduce class bias before classification. Finally, three classifiers—Naive Bayes, libSVM and J48—are evaluated on the balanced text dataset. The reported accuracies are 90.52% for Naive Bayes, 58.62% for libSVM and 78.45% for J48. The analysis concludes that Naive Bayes performs strongest for the processed furniture-review dataset, while the wider exercise demonstrates the importance of preprocessing, parameter tuning, feature selection, class balancing and appropriate model evaluation in producing reliable classification results. Important: this upload appears to be the completed student report, not the actual assessment guideline. Because the document does not state the university, module name, academic level, academic year, required word count or prescribed referencing style, I would leave those fields as Not specified rather than guessing.
Read Model Answer →
Technical Evaluation and Professional Reflection on a Cloud-Based Machine Learning Fraud Detection Solution
This individual technical evaluative report forms the reflective and critical component of the Machine Learning on Cloud module. It builds directly upon a group project involving the development of a machine learning solution for financial fraud detection. The report requires each student to critically evaluate the technical decisions made within the group solution while also reflecting on their individual contribution, teamwork experience and professional development. The first component, Technical Evaluation, accounts for 50% of the individual assessment and has a suggested allocation of approximately 1,000 words. Students critically examine the group’s machine learning solution, including the approaches adopted for data preprocessing, model selection and evaluation. They are expected to discuss the suitability of the chosen techniques and metrics, identify limitations and explain how individual technical decisions affected the final performance and outcome of the fraud-detection solution. The second component, Reflection and Professional Issues, also accounts for 50% and has a suggested allocation of approximately 1,000 words. Students reflect critically on their personal contribution to the project and their experience of working within a team. The discussion addresses challenges encountered, lessons learned and how the experience contributed to technical and professional development. Professional and ethical considerations form an important part of the reflection. Relevant issues include algorithmic bias, fairness, sustainability and data privacy, particularly in relation to machine learning applications within financial services and cloud environments. Students are also required to attach their Seminar Activity Tracker as an appendix, providing evidence of weekly participation and knowledge development. The assessment therefore combines technical critique with reflective practice, requiring students to demonstrate that they understand not only how a machine learning solution was developed, but also why specific technical decisions were made, their consequences, the limitations of the resulting system and the wider ethical and professional implications of deploying AI on cloud infrastructure. Overview word count: approximately 315 words. The brief also states that AI may assist with areas such as grammar, structure, organisation of ideas and suggestions, but the main content, analysis and conclusions must be the student's own work, and AI use must be declared.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Cloud Computing
3,984 words
Machine Learning on Cloud: Fraud Detection Model Design, Training and Evaluation
This postgraduate group project focuses on the design, development and critical evaluation of a cloud-based machine learning solution for financial fraud detection. The scenario involves a financial services organisation seeking to detect fraudulent transactions in order to reduce financial losses and improve customer security. Students are required to analyse an appropriate dataset, develop a machine learning solution, evaluate its effectiveness and critically consider the suitability of cloud technologies for deployment. The project begins with a cloud feasibility study, requiring critical comparison of at least two major machine learning platforms such as Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud Platform. Evaluation criteria include performance, scalability, cost, compliance, integration and vendor lock-in, followed by a justified recommendation. Students then conduct exploratory data analysis to identify patterns, anomalies and correlations using appropriate visualisations such as heatmaps, histograms and boxplots. A substantial component addresses data preprocessing and class imbalance. Students are expected to clean and transform the data, apply scaling and encoding, perform feature engineering and investigate approaches such as SMOTE, undersampling and cost-sensitive learning. Each preprocessing choice must be justified in terms of its potential impact on model performance. Students must select and train at least two machine learning models, with suggested approaches including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost and Neural Networks. Model development incorporates cross-validation and hyperparameter tuning. Evaluation uses fraud-relevant measures including Precision, Recall, F1 score, AUC and precision-recall curves, supported by confusion matrices, ROC curves and feature-importance visualisations. The project concludes with critical consideration of professional and ethical issues in cloud-based AI, including bias, fairness, transparency, data privacy and sustainability. The overall assessment therefore integrates cloud-platform evaluation, machine learning development, imbalanced classification, model evaluation and responsible AI practice. Overview word count: approximately 340 words.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Data Science
Linear Regression and Stability of the Moore–Penrose Pseudoinverse Using Python
This machine learning practical and assessment activity develops an understanding of linear regression, Ordinary Least Squares and the Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse using Python. The work progresses from generating synthetic regression datasets to implementing regression algorithms manually, applying established machine learning libraries, analysing real datasets and evaluating the stability of estimated regression coefficients. The laboratory component begins with the generation of synthetic linear regression data using NumPy, including explanatory variables, random noise and an outcome variable. Students then implement simple linear regression without relying on machine learning libraries, using the least-squares solution to estimate the intercept and slope. The resulting observations and fitted regression line are visualised using Matplotlib. The work is subsequently extended to multiple linear regression, where several independent variables are used and coefficients are first calculated manually before the same problem is solved using Scikit-learn. The laboratory also introduces application of regression to the Scikit-learn Diabetes dataset, including feature and target standardisation, model fitting, prediction, correlation analysis and interpretation of regression coefficients. It also highlights the importance of residual analysis when assessing whether a linear model is appropriate. The associated weekly challenge focuses on the stability of linear regression solutions estimated using the Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse. Using a house-price dataset containing variables such as property size, number of bedrooms, distance from the city centre and property age, students construct the design matrix, standardise features and the response variable, and calculate regression coefficients using the pseudoinverse. Students then investigate model robustness by repeatedly fitting the regression model to random subsamples of different sizes and analysing the mean and standard deviation of each coefficient. Tables, boxplots or error-bar visualisations can be used to compare coefficient variability. The final discussion considers which variables are most influential, which coefficients are most stable, how sample size affects stability and whether coefficient interpretation remains reliable across different samples. The final work is submitted as a single PDF exported from Jupyter Notebook or Google Colab, combining documented Python code, experimental results, plots and written interpretation in a professionally organised notebook. Overview word count: approximately 360 wor
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
1,011 words
End-to-End Machine Learning Model Development, Testing and Evaluation
This Level 7 Machine Learning and Intelligent Agents assignment requires students to develop and document an end-to-end machine-learning solution, covering the complete process from data preparation through model training, tuning, testing and evaluation. Students independently select a suitable dataset or scenario, formulate an appropriate research question and determine whether the problem should be addressed using supervised learning, unsupervised learning or reinforcement learning. Appropriate machine-learning algorithms must then be implemented to create a model capable of being trained and objectively tested. The assessment encourages the use of a structured machine-learning development methodology. Students are expected to explain the selected scenario and data source, perform suitable data preparation and Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA), and provide a reasoned justification for the machine-learning methods selected. The development process should demonstrate how the chosen algorithms are trained and fine-tuned before their performance is evaluated using established and relevant metrics. Published academic research should be incorporated to justify methodological choices and support the interpretation of results. The technical work is normally documented within a Jupyter Notebook, combining Markdown explanations with executable code cells. Alternatively, the report may be produced in Microsoft Word provided that the Python implementation is included. The assignment therefore assesses both conceptual understanding and practical programming competence. Students must demonstrate an ability to identify the performance of machine-learning algorithms, implement machine-learning techniques using an object-oriented programming language, and evaluate which algorithms are appropriate for a particular analytical brief. Assessment places particular emphasis on three areas: the Introduction, the Machine Learning Process, and the Evaluation of Model Performance. The marking criteria reward strong understanding of machine-learning concepts, a functioning and thoroughly tested implementation, appropriate selection of algorithms, and critical evaluation of the final solution. At the highest achievement level, implementations are expected to work without exception, satisfy the required functionality, demonstrate comprehensive testing and extend beyond the basic requirements. Overall, the assignment combines research-question formulation, data analysis, algorithm selection, machine-learning implementation, model optimisation and evidence-based evaluation within a reproducible technical workflow. All academic sources and supporting material must be presented using Harvard referencing.
Read Model Answer →
Data Science / Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
2,500 words
Predicting ADHD Diagnosis Using Machine Learning and Explainable Data Science
This Data Science assignment focuses on developing a comprehensive analytical solution to a real-world healthcare prediction problem. Using the WiDS Datathon 2025 Health Outcomes Prediction Dataset, students are required to analyse complex and high-dimensional healthcare data containing socio-demographic information, diagnostic variables and functional MRI data relating to children and adolescents. The principal predictive objective is to determine ADHD diagnosis from the available features. Students may use a representative subset of the dataset where computational resources are limited, provided that the sampling approach maintains the integrity and distribution of the original data and is appropriately justified. The assessment requires a complete data-science workflow beginning with data understanding and preprocessing. Students investigate the dataset's features, data types and distributions before addressing missing values, outliers and inconsistencies. Appropriate feature engineering should then be undertaken where it can improve the predictive capability of the models. Exploratory Data Analysis is used to identify important patterns, relationships and correlations, supported by relevant visualisations that communicate meaningful insights. A major component of the work involves the development and comparison of at least three classification models for predicting ADHD diagnosis. Suitable approaches may include Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting and Neural Networks. Models are evaluated using performance measures including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score and ROC-AUC, after which the most effective model is selected based on the evidence obtained. The assessment also places substantial emphasis on model interpretation and explainability. Students must interpret the selected model and may use approaches such as SHAP or LIME to explain feature importance and individual predictions. A feature-importance visualisation is required, and the most influential variables should inform practical recommendations. The final section translates analytical findings into recommendations for healthcare professionals, considering how predictive modelling could assist early ADHD diagnosis and intervention. Research literature must be integrated into the recommendations and conclusion. The assessment therefore combines preprocessing, exploratory analysis, predictive modelling, explainable AI and evidence-based healthcare decision-making within a single applied data-science project. The required report is a maximum of 2,500 words, with code, supplementary charts and tables permitted in appendices. A Jupyter Notebook containing the implementation and outputs is also required. Harvard referencing must be used throughout.
Read Model Answer →
Management / Digital Transformation and Leadership
1,500 words
Leading Through Digital Change: Digital Transformation Report and Future Technology Poster
This Masters-level assessment for the Leading Through Digital Change module examines how organisations can respond strategically and effectively to rapid technological and digital transformation. Students take the role of a Digital Transformation Manager for one selected international organisation and prepare a professional Digital Transformation Report accompanied by an A4 digital poster. The purpose is to evaluate the organisation's current digital context and recommend changes that can strengthen competitive advantage and create sustainable business value. The first component requires critical evaluation and recommendation of one appropriate digital transformation strategic framework. Students may apply frameworks such as the McKinsey 4Ds, BCG Three Stages, Gartner's Six Steps or Cognizant's Four Pillars. The analysis should establish clear digital transformation objectives relevant to organisational functions such as operations, ICT and marketing, while using organisational evidence, academic research and practical examples to justify the proposed strategic direction. The second component is an academic poster evaluating two disruptive technologies or techniques expected to affect the chosen organisation, its industry, employment and the labour market over the next five years. Potential technologies include Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 5G connectivity, the Internet of Things, robotics, drone delivery, blockchain, augmented reality and virtual reality. The poster should combine academic literature with real-world examples to demonstrate the likely opportunities, challenges and wider organisational implications of technological disruption. The final component focuses on digital leadership. Students analyse and recommend two suitable leadership approaches for managing and supporting digital transformation. Relevant approaches may include agile leadership, ethical-tech leadership, people-oriented leadership, hyperaware agile leadership and Goleman's leadership styles. Overall, the assessment integrates digital strategy, innovation, emerging technologies and leadership. The wider module also covers digital transformation strategies, data-driven decision-making, leadership in the digital age, artificial intelligence in contemporary business, digital risk management and planning for the future. Reference style: Harvard. Main report word limit: 1,500 words. Poster: A4 size with no specified word count.
Read Model Answer →
Computer Science / Machine Learning
Machine Learning Portfolio Challenge: Support Vector Machines and Kernel Methods
This machine learning portfolio challenge requires students to demonstrate both theoretical understanding and practical application of machine learning methodologies introduced during the second block of the module. During Weeks 7–12, students select one of the machine learning methods covered in class and apply it to a dataset of their choice. The completed work contributes to an assessment portfolio and must demonstrate a clear, systematic and professionally documented experimental process. The accompanying learning material places particular emphasis on Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and kernel-based machine learning. SVMs are presented as maximum-margin classifiers that construct a decision hyperplane between classes, with support vectors playing the key role in defining the classification boundary. The material also introduces soft-margin optimisation, slack variables, the regularisation parameter C, primal and dual formulations, and the use of KKT multipliers. SVMs are additionally discussed in relation to multiclass classification through approaches including one-versus-all and Error Correcting Output Codes (ECOC). Kernel methods extend these principles by replacing explicit feature transformations with similarity functions. Students encounter concepts including Gram matrices, feature mappings, Mercer conditions and the kernel trick, alongside common kernel choices such as linear, radial basis function and polynomial kernels. The material demonstrates how kernel methods can represent nonlinear decision boundaries in the original input space while retaining a linear representation in an embedded feature space. The final submission must be produced as a single PDF lab notebook. It should contain clear and well-commented MATLAB, Python or equivalent code explaining each methodological step, experimental results presented through appropriate tables and/or plots, and narrative discussion explaining the selected approach, observations and conclusions. The notebook should integrate code, outputs and written explanation into a coherent and professional submission. Students may also optionally present their solution in class, where the quality of explanation and discussion can contribute additional marks.
Read Model Answer →
Artificial Intelligence
2,000 words
End-to-End Applied AI Development — Comparative Machine Learning and Neural Network Modelling on a Public Dataset
This assessment runs a complete applied AI development cycle end to end: problem definition, dataset selection, preprocessing, model building, optimisation, evaluation and critical reflection. Students identify a real-world problem themselves, formulate a research question from it, and source a suitable dataset from a recognised public repository such as UCI, Kaggle, Data.gov or OpenML. Dataset choice carries more weight than students expect. It must be genuinely suitable for supervised learning, complex enough to make preprocessing and feature engineering meaningful, and — critically — structured so that a traditional machine learning approach and a deep learning approach can be sensibly compared on it. A dataset too small or too clean makes the neural network component pointless; one too large or too noisy makes the whole pipeline unfinishable within the page limit. The source must be referenced and the choice explicitly justified against the research problem. The modelling requirement is fixed: at least two supervised machine learning models, plus one artificial neural network built in a mainstream deep learning framework, all trained and tested. The comparison between them is the analytical core of the work. Reporting that the neural network scored higher is not an answer; explaining why, in terms of the data's structure and each model's inductive assumptions, is. Marks are distributed across problem framing, the traditional models, the deep learning model, evaluation and critical analysis including responsible AI considerations, and academic communication. That responsible AI component is easy to overlook and is not decorative — it asks what the model's limitations mean for anyone who might rely on it. Presentation requirements are specific. The report is page-limited rather than purely word-limited, and every plot must be described in the text while also being legible enough to communicate on its own — a common failure is dense default library output pasted in without axis labels or scale. The implementation is documented in a notebook combining markdown and code cells so the development process is visible, not just the final result, and submissions typically include the cleaned dataset alongside the code. The strongest submissions treat the notebook and the report as one argument. Weaker ones produce a working notebook and then write a report that describes it, rather than a report that uses it as evidence. Our support on assessments of this type is guidance-based. Typical areas of help include: advising on whether a candidate dataset can actually support the required model comparison, explaining how to justify preprocessing decisions, clarifying which evaluation metrics suit which problem type and why accuracy alone is often misleading, showing how to structure a critical limitations and responsible AI discussion, checking Harvard referencing, and reviewing a student's own draft against the published marking criteria.
Read Model Answer →