Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Digital Marketing / Web Design and User Experience
800 words
Digital Marketing Portfolio Website: User Experience, SEO and Professional Digital Branding
This digital marketing assessment requires students to create and launch a fully functional personal portfolio website designed to showcase their professional capabilities, creativity and readiness for employment or client-facing work. The website operates as a digital business card and professional showcase, demonstrating the application of digital marketing strategy, user-centred design, storytelling, usability and digital content creation. Digital Portfolio Website The website must contain a homepage, contact page and portfolio or projects section. The homepage introduces the student and provides an engaging overview of the portfolio, while the contact page includes appropriate professional communication channels such as email or LinkedIn. The projects section must feature approximately three to five digital marketing work samples, which may include mock-ups, content or other digital artefacts. The overall site should demonstrate effective structure, aesthetics, usability and intuitive navigation. Digital Portfolio Website Students must also complete a prescribed LinkedIn Learning course on Wix or WordPress and submit the associated completion certificate. This supports the practical website-development component and demonstrates engagement with contemporary digital-design tools and platforms. Digital Portfolio Website A major component is the reflective rationale, which may be submitted as an 800-word written piece or a four-to-six-minute video commentary. It explains and justifies the design decisions made, the SEO strategies implemented and changes introduced to enhance the user experience. The rationale must be supported by credible sources and demonstrate alignment between theoretical principles and practical design choices. Digital Portfolio Website SEO is explicitly assessed through the effective use of metadata, keywords and image alt text, while design performance also considers originality, calls to action, responsive behaviour, mobile usability and effective use of Wix or WordPress features. The marking structure allocates 20% to website structure and usability, 15% to design and creativity, 15% to SEO, 40% to the reflective rationale, and 10% collectively to the LinkedIn Learning certificate and cover page. Digital Portfolio Website Digital Portfolio Website Overall, the assessment integrates digital marketing, personal branding, web design, UX, SEO, content creation and reflective professional practice. Overview word count: approximately 345 words. AI-use note: this assessment is under Category 1 – Authorised use of AI. AI may be used within platforms such as Wix or WordPress to help create the portfolio, but AI must not be used to write the reflective rationale, which must be composed entirely by the student. Digital Portfolio Website
Read Model Answer →
500 words
Strategic Digital Marketing Campaign Planning Using the RACE Framework: Cambridge Museum of Technology
This Digital Leadership and Disruptive Innovation assessment requires students to act as digital marketing consultants for the Cambridge Museum of Technology and develop a strategic social media campaign focused on the Reach and Act stages of the RACE framework. The campaign is designed to increase awareness of the museum and encourage meaningful interaction using paid and owned content across Facebook and Instagram. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) The first deliverable is a two-page landscape campaign poster created in Canva. Page 1 focuses on Reach and should present a clear awareness objective, one Facebook paid advertisement mock-up, and one Instagram owned post. Page 2 focuses on Act and should include an engagement objective, one Instagram paid advertisement and one Facebook owned post. Each mock-up must be clearly labelled by platform, RACE phase and media type. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) The poster is expected to function as a strategic visual board, rather than a website or social feed simulation. It should demonstrate clear visual hierarchy, logical layout, consistent headings, spacing and alignment, and communicate how the Reach and Act strategies connect. The target audience persona should not appear on the poster itself. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) The second deliverable is a maximum 500-word written rationale. This should define a relevant target audience persona using demographic, psychographic and behavioural characteristics, and explain needs, motivations and online behaviour. The persona should be visually designed and embedded in the written document. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) The rationale must also justify the Reach content strategy, including platform choice, content format, targeting and budget considerations, and explain the Act engagement strategy, including tactics such as event promotion, interactive posts and comment prompts. Students should also explain how layout, visual structure and calls-to-action support user experience and engagement. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) The assessment requires application of relevant digital marketing theories and frameworks and at least five credible academic or industry sources, using Cite Them Right Harvard referencing. Suitable evidence can include peer-reviewed journal articles and recognised sources such as Mintel, Statista and industry reports. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) The marking scheme gives 30% to Reach, 30% to Act, 20% to the written rationale, and 20% to poster design, communication and professional presentation. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) Assessment Brief for CW1 (1) Overall, the assessment integrates RACE-based campaign planning, paid and owned social media, audience segmentation, persona development, targeting, budget awareness, content strategy, UX principles and professional visual communication within a real cultural-organisation context. Important: the brief explicitly states that the applicable AI category is Category 2 – Proofreading only permitted, meaning AI may be used for proofreading but not for creating assessment content. Assessment Brief for CW1 (1)
Read Model Answer →
Digital Marketing / Marketing Analytics / Data-Driven Marketin
Data-Driven Marketing Analytics: Google Analytics 4 and Google Merchandise Store Campaign Analysis
This Data Driven Marketing assessment requires students to develop practical digital analytics skills and apply them to the evaluation of a real-world marketing campaign. The assessment combines professional training through LinkedIn Learning with a recorded executive-level presentation based on data from the Google Analytics 4 Demo Account for the Google Merchandise Store. The aim is to analyse campaign performance, interpret relevant marketing KPIs and present actionable recommendations that senior executives and managers can use for decision-making. CW 1_ LinkedIn Learning and Rec… The first task requires completion of two LinkedIn Learning courses: Google Analytics 4 (GA4) Essential Training and Advanced Google Analytics. Students must submit the certificates of completion as evidence of developing the foundational and advanced skills required for digital marketing analysis. CW 1_ LinkedIn Learning and Rec… The second task places the student in the role of a digital marketing executive for the Google Merchandise Store. Students select and analyse a digital marketing campaign using GA4 demo-store data and then create a 10-minute recorded presentation, with a tolerance of ±2 minutes, providing evidence-based recommendations for improving campaign performance. CW 1_ LinkedIn Learning and Rec… The main presentation is limited to 12 slides and should include an executive summary, key findings and insights, recommendations, actionable steps, and references or appendix material. An additional 4–6 appendix/reference slides may be used for supporting charts, graphs and data. Recommendations must be linked directly to analytical evidence and aligned with the campaign's overall marketing objectives. CW 1_ LinkedIn Learning and Rec… The analysis should examine relevant marketing performance indicators, including click-through rate, conversion rate, cost per acquisition, return on ad spend and user-engagement measures such as bounce rate, session duration, pages per session and retention patterns. CW 1_ LinkedIn Learning and Rec… Students are expected to move beyond descriptive reporting and develop strategic recommendations concerning budget reallocation, creative optimisation, audience targeting and funnel performance. The presentation should identify underperforming and high-performing channels, evaluate audience segments, examine points of user drop-off and propose practical interventions to improve conversion and campaign efficiency. CW 1_ LinkedIn Learning and Rec… The marking scheme gives 20 points for LinkedIn Learning certification, 35 points for executive communication and structure, 35 points for data analysis and insight generation, and 10 points for references and appendices. CW 1_ LinkedIn Learning and Rec… CW 1_ LinkedIn Learning and Rec… Overall, the assessment integrates GA4 skills, campaign analytics, KPI interpretation, data visualisation, strategic recommendation development and executive presentation skills within a practical digital-marketing context. The brief also requires Cite Them Right Harvard referencing. CW 1_ LinkedIn Learning and Rec…
Read Model Answer →
Business Consultancy / Digital Marketing / Social Media Marketing
3,000 words
You Keep Me Sane: Social Media Growth and Digital Product Marketing Live Business Project
his Extended Work Project is a live business consultancy assignment completed for You Keep Me Sane, a podcast and social-media brand seeking to expand its online audience and increase sales of its digital products. The organisation promotes its podcast across platforms including Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube and LinkedIn and identified a need for additional support with regular content creation, social-media scheduling and digital-product promotion. Project Brief_You Keep Me Sane … The client challenge focuses on improving the organisation's social-media presence while reducing the workload associated with producing and publishing content. The project brief specifically identifies the need to create reels, carousels and other social-media posts, potentially using Canva, and to support an existing Buffer-based scheduling process. The organisation aims to publish approximately three times per week while also promoting new digital products. The intended commercial outcomes are growth in social-media following and increased digital-product sales. Project Brief_You Keep Me Sane … The academic assessment requires students to document the project journey in chronological order, from the initial client brief and early meetings through planning, research, idea development, feedback, implementation, challenges and final outcomes. The 3,000-word report should explain the business context, methods and frameworks used, significant milestones, problems encountered, adaptations made and recommendations provided to the client. EWP 5TH MAY 2026 (1) EWP 5TH MAY 2026 (1) Professional reflection is also an important element of the project. Students are expected to evaluate team learning, skills development, project-management experience and the practical lessons gained from working on a genuine business challenge. The report should demonstrate critical thinking and reflective analysis rather than simply describing activities completed. EWP 5TH MAY 2026 (1) The accompanying 10-slide presentation mirrors the report and communicates the project overview, organisational background, initial brief, research, development process, challenges, outcomes, recommendations and learning in a concise visual format. EWP 5TH MAY 2026 (1) Overall, the project integrates live business consultancy, social-media strategy, content development, digital-product marketing, client engagement, teamwork, project management and reflective professional learning, with emphasis on demonstrating practical value created for the client organisation.
Read Model Answer →
Digital Marketing
Three Weekly Digital Marketing Tutorial Challenges
This assessment consists of three weekly digital marketing tutorial challenges designed to develop practical skills in digital marketing, consumer insights, content creation, inclusive communication, ethical storytelling and campaign design. The assessment accounts for 45% of the module and requires students to apply digital marketing theory and consumer insight techniques in real-world marketing contexts. The activities are completed through tutorial-based learning, where students participate in discussions, receive tutor guidance and develop their work before submitting it through Canvas. The assessment focuses on applying consumer insights, data analytics tools and digital marketing strategies to create meaningful and responsible customer experiences. Challenge 1, titled “Are You Being Inclusive?” – Brand Audit & Persona for Ethical Reach, focuses on ethical digital auditing and inclusive persona design. Students select a brand from their home country and evaluate the inclusiveness and accessibility of its digital marketing across its website, social media and paid advertising. They then develop two to three detailed customer personas representing underserved or marginalised customer groups. Students also use AI analytics tools such as Google Trends, SparkToro or simulated AI insights to identify audience behaviours and preferences. The challenge is linked to SDG 10 – Reduced Inequalities and includes consideration of the ethics of using AI in digital marketing and its effect on the credibility of consumer insights. Challenge 2, titled “Don't Just Capture Attention – Respect It” – Campaign Idea Pitch, focuses on sustainable branding and growth. Students research the client's existing branding, examine opportunities to expand or sustain its audience and use consumer insight tools such as Google Trends, reviews and surveys to understand public perceptions. Students then create a visual mini-campaign promoting sustainable and transparent brand messaging, including social media content and AI-generated visuals. The campaign is connected to SDG 16 – Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions. Challenge 3, titled “Create, Educate, Disseminate & Evaluate”, develops digital social marketing and consumer engagement. Students extend the campaign developed in Challenge 2 into an interactive digital event that promotes positive behavioural change and educates audiences about a social issue. The activity must consider audience interests, increase interactivity and engagement, and provide evidence of positive engagement. This challenge is linked to SDG 4 – Quality Education. Overall, the assessment develops students' ability to combine digital marketing strategy, consumer insights, ethical considerations, sustainability and creative campaign design in practical marketing activities.
Read Model Answer →
Digital Marketing / Marketing Analytics
2,483 words
Digital Marketing Analytics (BS783) — GA4 Performance Analysis and 90-Day Campaign Strategy for the Google Merchandise Store
This Level 7 report positions the writer as a digital marketing consultant engaged by the Google Merchandise Store, a live e-commerce operation. All quantitative work is drawn from the public GA4 Analytics Demo Account, so the analysis rests on real platform data rather than invented figures, and the report is structured in two halves that move from diagnosis to prescription. Part A is research and analysis. It opens by defining and evaluating the role analytics currently plays in shaping the store's digital marketing strategy — what is being measured, what that measurement is used for, and where the strategic gaps sit — grounded in marketing performance-measurement literature rather than description of the interface. The tactical analysis then assesses how effectively the store's digital channels and social content drove traffic and conversions across two defined quarterly reporting periods. Performance reporting follows, comparing the two periods in detail to identify the strongest customer segments, acquisition channels and products, and — more importantly — offering a reasoned explanation for why performance differed between them, distinguishing seasonality and campaign activity from genuine structural change. Part B turns to campaign strategy for a niche lifestyle market segment. A customer persona is developed and supported by the behavioural evidence visible in the GA4 data rather than asserted demographics, and a full journey map traces that persona from awareness through consideration, conversion and retention, identifying the friction points at each stage. Strategic recommendations then propose specific enhancements to channels and content aimed at that audience, each justified against the performance evidence from Part A and against the competitive landscape the store operates in. The final section builds the measurement architecture for the proposed campaign over the following ninety days. It sets goals and performance management parameters, selects the tools and metrics that will track them, defines the reporting cadence and the decision thresholds that trigger optimisation, and places particular weight on measuring return on marketing investment — connecting spend to sales, leads and customer satisfaction rather than to vanity engagement figures. Attribution limitations and the practical constraints of GA4 measurement are acknowledged where they affect confidence in the numbers. Throughout, screenshots and exported GA4 reports evidence the claims made, academic and practitioner sources support the analytical framing, and Harvard referencing is applied consistently. The submission is a single file through Turnitin.
Read Model Answer →
Digital Marketing and Analytics
2,974 words
Digital Marketing Analytics Consultancy Report — Accessibility, Social Listening and Web Analytics for an E-Commerce Storefron
This assessment places the student in a consultancy role advising a global brand's e-commerce storefront on its digital marketing strategy. It is written as a business report rather than an academic essay, in the third person, with appendices used only for supporting material that the main text explicitly refers the reader to. The work is built from four analytical layers, and the mark weighting tells students where the effort belongs. The first is an accessibility and user experience evaluation of the client site benchmarked against two self-selected industry competitors — the selection itself must be justified, and the analysis must cover both technical and content dimensions using recognised evaluation tools rather than impressionistic browsing. The second layer, carrying the smallest weight, is social listening: which networks the brand and its competitors are active on, what engagement looks like, which content types perform, and who the influential voices are. This is paired with qualitative sentiment or content analysis of actual social comments, on the premise that quantitative engagement metrics describe reach but not attitude. The third and heaviest layer is quantitative analysis using a web analytics platform, typically via a demonstration account that provides real traffic data. Students query the data themselves and extract performance insights. Comparison across time periods is what separates competent work from strong work here: a single-period snapshot describes, while period-over-period comparison explains. The fourth layer, weighted equally with the analytics, asks the student to synthesise everything into strategic recommendations for the coming year, covering areas such as customer segments, user behaviour, landing and exit page performance, search ranking positions, advertising budget allocation, marketing channels and e-commerce performance. This section is where most marks are lost. Recommendations that do not trace back to a specific finding from the preceding analysis read as generic digital marketing advice, and rubrics at this level penalise exactly that. Presentation requirements are prescriptive — specified font, size, line spacing and justified margins — and the report is expected to be concise despite the breadth of analysis, which makes ruthless selection of evidence part of the task. A draft submission point for similarity checking is usually provided separately from the marked final submission. Assessments of this type commonly require a signed declaration itemising any AI tool use, with an explicit confirmation that AI was not used to generate sentences, paragraphs or sections. Our support on assessments of this type is guidance-based. Typical areas of help include: explaining how accessibility evaluation tools are used and what their output actually shows, clarifying the difference between reporting analytics figures and interpreting them, showing how a recommendation should be traced to a specific finding, advising on report structure and appendix discipline, checking APA consistency, and reviewing a student's own draft against the published rubric.
Read Model Answer →