Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
1,000 words
Organisational Strategy and Sustainability: Strategic and Sustainability Analysis of Engineers & Planners Company Ltd
This formative Organisational Strategy and Sustainability assessment requires students to act as a management consultant for BPP Consulting Group and provide a strategic and sustainability evaluation of ENGINEERS & PLANNERS COMPANY LTD for its Board of Directors. The task focuses on how internal capabilities, external market forces, sustainability pressures, ethical practices and responsible leadership shape the organisation’s strategy within an increasingly global business environment. Formative Assessment - Organisa… ENGINEERS & PLANNERS COMPANY LTD is described as a Ghanaian-owned mining and construction contracting company, established in 1997 and headquartered in Accra. Its activities include contract mining, road construction, tailings-dam construction, land reclamation and hard-rock mining, with operations in Ghana and Liberia. The company also owns Dzata Cement, a cement manufacturing facility in Tema with an annual production capacity of approximately 2.3 million metric tons. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa… The formative task addresses the first two learning outcomes of the summative assessment. LO1 – Strategic Environmental Analysis requires a brief but critical evaluation of the organisation’s internal resources and capabilities together with its external environment. Students should use one internal and one external strategic framework, with examples including PESTEL or Porter’s Five Forces, identify internal competencies, opportunities and threats, and consider how the organisation might respond to dynamic market forces in regions such as the European Union, Asia or North America. Sources of competitive advantage should also be identified from the internal analysis. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa… LO2 – Ethical, Sustainable and Responsible Practices requires students to assess how ENGINEERS & PLANNERS COMPANY LTD could integrate CSR, sustainability or ethical practice into its wider business strategy. The brief recommends applying one framework such as the Triple Bottom Line or Sustainable Supply Chain Management. The discussion should connect the sustainability analysis back to the strategic issues identified under LO1. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa… Students are also expected to consider how leadership shapes the organisation’s sustainability response, including engagement with stakeholders such as suppliers, customers and NGOs and the influence of regulatory frameworks such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals and relevant European Union legislation. One specific sustainability initiative should be briefly considered, such as product lifecycle management, eco-design, renewable-energy integration or supply-chain transparency. Formative Assessment - Organisa… The recommended report structure consists of an introduction, LO1 Strategic Environmental Analysis, LO2 Ethical, Sustainable and Responsible Practices, and a conclusion summarising recommended strategic and sustainability improvements. Suggested allocations are approximately 50 words for the introduction, 450 words for LO1, 450 words for LO2 and 50 words for the conclusion. Formative Assessment - Organisa… The total submission limit is 1,000 words, with the main body subject to the word-count restriction. The work must use third-person academic writing, professional formatting, appropriate tables and figures, and consistent Harvard citations. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Higher-quality work is expected to go beyond descriptive use of strategic models by critically evaluating the organisation’s internal and external environment, identifying key drivers of change, considering global and local influences on strategic choices, and linking sustainability and responsible-business practices to stakeholder expectations and regulatory pressures. Formative Assessment - Organisa… Formative Assessment - Organisa…
Read Model Answer →
Business Ethics
2,500 words
Success Through Business Ethics – Ethical Analysis of an FMCG Brand
This assessment is an individual written report for the Success Through Business Ethics module. The assignment requires students to critically examine ethical issues and challenges within a Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) brand and evaluate how ethical theories, decision-making approaches and leadership practices can be applied to understand unethical business behaviour. The report has a total word limit of 2,500 words and accounts for 100% of the assessment. Students are required to select an FMCG brand that has been involved in unethical practices between 2000 and 2025. The selected brand may originate or operate anywhere in the world and may still be operating or may have ceased operations. Students must ensure that sufficient information is available about the organisation and its external environment before selecting the company. The report begins with an introduction explaining the nature of business ethics and introducing the selected FMCG brand and the unethical business practices associated with it. The main analysis requires students to select three normative ethical theories, explain their key principles and critically evaluate whether the company's behaviour adhered to or violated those principles. Students must use this analysis to explain why the identified business practices can be considered unethical. A second analytical section requires students to choose either ethical decision-making or social accounting. The selected concept must be explained and then critically applied to the unethical practices of the chosen FMCG brand. A further analysis focuses on the leadership style of the company's leadership team. Students must explain the principles of the leadership style, consider its positive and negative aspects, and analyse how the leaders responded to the unethical business practices. The report concludes by summarising the key findings from the analysis and providing two important recommendations for the selected brand. The recommendations should be directly relevant to the unethical practices identified and should be justified using evidence and findings from the report. Where a selected company has ceased operating, recommendations should still be provided on the assumption that the brand is operating. The assessment develops students' ability to apply ethical frameworks to business decision-making, understand ethical decision-making and corporate social responsibility, align ethics and values with business contexts, analyse ethical challenges in business strategies and operations, and evaluate moral dilemmas using economic, legal and ethical considerations. The report must use Harvard referencing for in-text citations and the reference list, with the reference list organised alphabetically.
Read Model Answer →
Organisational Strategy and Sustainability
2,500 words
Strategic Evaluation and Analysis of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL)
This 2,500-word coursework for the MSc Management module Organisational Strategy and Sustainability requires a strategic evaluation and analysis of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL). The assignment is written from the perspective of a management consultant at BPP Consulting Group and is addressed to HUL’s Board of Directors. It focuses on HUL’s strategic management, sustainability initiatives and responsible leadership within a global business context. The report begins by examining HUL’s internal capabilities and external business environment. Students are required to apply one strategic model to analyse the internal environment and one model to assess the external environment, such as VRIO, PESTEL or Porter’s Five Forces. The analysis should identify internal competencies, external opportunities and threats, sources of competitive advantage, and the influence of global and local market dynamics on HUL’s strategic choices. Particular consideration may be given to key regions such as the European Union, Asia and North America. The second section evaluates HUL’s ethical, sustainable and responsible business practices. The brief requires the use of one framework, such as the Triple Bottom Line or Sustainable Supply Chain Management, to assess one selected area of CSR, sustainability or ethical practice. The discussion should consider stakeholder engagement, regulatory influences such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and European Union legislation, and one HUL sustainability initiative such as product lifecycle management, eco-design, renewable energy integration or supply chain transparency. The third section critically evaluates HUL’s strategic responses to current and future challenges, including climate change, artificial intelligence and digital disruption. One strategic framework, such as the Ansoff Matrix, Blue Ocean Strategy or VRIO, should be applied to evaluate strategic options and their implications for long-term sustainability, competitiveness and market relevance. The final section provides a personal leadership and sustainability reflection. Students select one leadership model, such as Goleman’s Emotional Intelligence, Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions or Transformational Leadership, and reflect on their learning from the previous sections. The reflection covers personal development, ethical, cross-cultural or sustainable leadership, career aspirations, and values-driven leadership. The report concludes by summarising recommended changes to HUL’s organisational strategy and sustainability initiatives. The assessment requires Harvard referencing and a professional academic structure. The main body has a 2,500-word limit, with suggested allocations of approximately 50 words for the introduction, 600 words each for LO1, LO2, LO3 and LO4, and 50 words for the conclusion. The cover page, contents, references and appendices are excluded from the word count.
Read Model Answer →
Business Ethics / Corporate Social Responsibility
2,500 words
Success Through Business Ethics (BS846) — Individual Report: Ethical Failure in an FMCG Brand, Moral Philosophy, Decision-Making and Leadership Response
This Level 7 individual report examines a real fast-moving consumer goods brand that was found to have engaged in unethical business practices between 2000 and 2023, and works through why the failure happened rather than simply recounting what occurred. The brand is selected on the basis that sufficient documented evidence exists about both the company and its external environment — regulatory findings, investigative journalism, financial disclosures and NGO reporting — so that every analytical claim can be supported rather than assumed. The introduction establishes what business ethics means as an academic field, drawing on recognised sources, before introducing the chosen brand and setting out concisely what the unethical practices were, when they came to light and who was harmed. The first and largest analytical section applies three moral philosophical bases from the module to the case. Each is used as a lens rather than described in isolation: the utilitarian calculation the company appears to have made and where its accounting of harm was deficient, the duty-based obligations to consumers, workers or communities that were breached regardless of outcome, and the character and organisational culture questions that virtue ethics raises about how such decisions became normal internally. The evaluation is genuinely critical — it identifies where the company's conduct could be partially defended under one framework while failing badly under another, which is where the analytical marks sit. The second section takes one of the two theoretical approaches offered and applies it in depth. Where ethical decision-making is chosen, the report traces the sequence of judgements that produced the outcome, examining awareness, intent, organisational pressure and the moral intensity of the issue. Where social accounting is chosen, it assesses what the company disclosed about its social and environmental impact against what was actually occurring, and what that gap reveals about the purpose its reporting served. The third section evaluates leadership. It characterises the prevailing leadership style from the evidence and then focuses on the response once the practices were exposed — whether leaders denied, deflected, settled quietly or accepted accountability — supported by tables, figures and quoted material showing the consequences in share price, revenue, regulatory penalties and documented social or environmental harm. Three concrete recommendations follow, each derived directly from a failure identified in the preceding analysis and justified specifically for this brand rather than offered as generic good practice, with a short conclusion drawing the sections together. Harvard referencing is applied in text and in an alphabetised reference list.
Read Model Answer →