Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Engineering and Environment Advanced Practice London Campus Consultancy Project
2,000 words
Individual Reflective Report – Group Consultancy Project
This assessment is an individual reflective report based on the student’s learning and experience during the Group Consultancy Project for the Engineering and Environment Advanced Practice London Campus Consultancy Project module at Northumbria University. The assessment requires students to critically reflect on their activities, contributions, skills development and professional learning throughout the group-based consultancy experience. The report has a total word limit of 2,000 words, excluding the table of contents, page numbers and captions for figures and tables. It is structured around two main components: a Progress Report of approximately 1,000 words and a Reflection of Learning and Development of approximately 1,000 words. The Progress Report brings together the main themes of the module from the perspective of additional skills development, engagement in self-development, group-based learning, cultural awareness and ethical awareness. Students are expected to discuss key personal activities undertaken during the group project, skills gained through participation, personal contributions to the project, and the development of interpersonal and intrapersonal skills. Academic literature can be used to support the discussion. The Reflection of Learning and Development section requires students to critically evaluate their personal strengths and weaknesses and demonstrate their ability to engage in continuous self-development within the context of group project work. Students should reflect on a range of project activities and provide examples of their involvement in decision-making, problem-solving, communication and influencing, technical skills, collaboration, innovation and proactivity. The assessment therefore focuses not only on describing what students did, but also on evaluating what they learned and how the experience contributed to their professional and personal development. The assessment is worth 50% of the total marks available for the module, which is assessed on a pass/fail basis. The assessment rubric evaluates the Progress Report at 50%, Reflection of Learning and Development at 40%, and Writing Style at 10%. Strong submissions are expected to provide clear and relevant examples, integrate activities with skills and contributions, demonstrate critical reflection on strengths and weaknesses, and present a well-structured and professional written report. Students are also expected to follow the university’s requirements regarding academic integrity and the responsible use of generative AI. The assessment guidance states that AI may assist with activities such as improving grammar, formatting structure, organising ideas and generating suggestions, but the main content, analysis and conclusions must remain the student’s own work. Students are required to declare their use of AI tools when submitting the assessment.
Read Model Answer →
Engineering and Environment Advanced Practice London Campus Consultancy Project
5,000 words
Group Consultancy Report – Engineering and Environment Advanced Practice
This assessment is a group consultancy project for the LD7119 Engineering and Environment Advanced Practice London Campus Consultancy Project module at Northumbria University. Students work in consultancy groups of four to five members and are assigned a live project in collaboration with an organisation and the university. The purpose of the assessment is to investigate an organisational issue or requirement and develop practical, evidence-based solutions that can support the organisation in implementing improvements. The main assessment consists of a 5,000-word Group Consultancy Report and a compulsory 10-minute client presentation. The report is expected to demonstrate a professional and commercially appropriate approach to consultancy work. It should provide a clear introduction to the project, establish the organisational context, and analyse the business requirements and needs of the client organisation. The report should then explain the research methodology used, including appropriate ethical considerations and the design of the practical work undertaken. A substantial part of the assessment focuses on research, discussion and findings. Students are expected to collect and analyse relevant evidence, present their findings clearly, and provide evidence of practical implementation and testing where applicable. The assessment therefore requires students to connect academic research and relevant theories with practical consultancy activities and organisational requirements. Evidence from diagnostic tools, feedback and other appropriate sources can be incorporated into the report to support the analysis and conclusions. The final part of the report focuses on recommendations and improvements. Students should develop practical and actionable recommendations that are relevant to the organisation and can contribute to the successful implementation of the proposed ideas. Recommendations should be supported by the research findings and should demonstrate an understanding of the organisation's requirements and potential implementation considerations. The assessment is worth 50% of the total marks available for the module, which is assessed on a pass/fail basis. The report has a 5,000-word limit, excluding the table of contents, page numbers and captions for figures and tables. The client presentation is compulsory, although it does not have marks directly allocated to it; its purpose is to help the client and supervisor understand the consultancy project. The assessment is evaluated across professional and commercial presentation and introduction, business and requirement analysis, research methodology including ethics and practical work design, research and findings including implementation and testing, and recommendations including improvements. Students are also required to acknowledge sources appropriately and complete the assessment declaration regarding their work and any use of generative AI. The assessment brief states that AI may assist with activities such as improving grammar, structure, organising ideas and providing suggestions, but the main content, analysis and conclusions must remain the student's own work.
Read Model Answer →
Business
800 words
Individual Reflection on Group Research Presentation
This assignment is an individual written reflection based on a group research presentation completed for the Principles of International Business module. The assessment requires students to reflect on both the research topic explored by their group and the process of working collaboratively to develop and deliver the group presentation. The reflection has a word count of 800 words and should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the student's individual experience, contribution and learning. The first part of the reflection introduces the research topic investigated by the group. Students are expected to provide a concise summary of the subject explored and establish the context for their reflection. This provides an opportunity to explain the focus of the group's research and the main area investigated. The second area focuses on the group project experience. Students should reflect on their own contribution to the group presentation and evaluate how effectively the group collaborated. The reflection should consider aspects of teamwork such as communication, presentation, time management and conflict resolution. Students should also discuss what they learned from undertaking the research project, including critical reading and thinking, development of the research topic, data collection and analysis, and the process of making recommendations. Importantly, the reflection should include at least one specific example of how a problem was identified and resolved during the group process. The final area focuses on research skills development. Students should identify the research skills they developed while conducting the chosen research topic and provide examples of how these skills were applied during the group research project. They should also discuss challenges encountered while completing the project and explain how they addressed or overcame those challenges. Overall, the assignment is designed to encourage students to critically reflect on their group research and presentation experience, rather than simply describe what happened. It provides an opportunity to consider individual contributions, teamwork, research capabilities, problem-solving and personal learning gained through the project. The assessment therefore combines reflection on the international business research topic with evaluation of collaborative working and the development of research skills.
Read Model Answer →
800 words
Individual Reflection on Group Research Presentation and Research Skills Development
This assessment is an individual 800-word reflective piece that requires students to reflect on their experience of completing a group research project and delivering a group presentation. The reflection focuses on the research topic explored by the group, the student's individual contribution to the presentation, the effectiveness of group collaboration, the development of research skills and the challenges encountered throughout the research process. The reflection begins with an introduction to the research topic investigated by the group. Students are expected to provide a concise summary of the topic explored and establish the context for their subsequent reflection. The discussion should demonstrate an understanding of the research undertaken by the group and provide a clear foundation for evaluating the student's experience. The second area focuses on the group project experience. Students should describe their individual contributions to the group presentation and critically reflect on how effectively the group worked together. The reflection should consider aspects of teamwork such as communication, presentation skills, time management and conflict resolution. Students should also identify what they learned from both the teamwork process and the research project, including areas such as critical reading and thinking, research topic development, data collection and analysis, and making recommendations. At least one specific example of how a problem was resolved during the group process must be included to demonstrate practical reflection on the team's experience. The third area focuses on research skills development. Students should identify the research skills they developed while conducting the chosen research topic and provide specific examples of how these skills were applied during the group research project. The reflection should also discuss challenges experienced while completing the research and explain how those challenges were addressed or overcome. Overall, the assessment requires students to move beyond simply describing what happened and provide meaningful reflection on their learning and development. The reflection should demonstrate how participation in the group research project contributed to the development of teamwork, communication, research, analytical and problem-solving skills. It should also consider how these skills can support future academic and professional activities. The assessment is marked using four criteria: presentation and structure of the reflection, breadth and depth of reflection, research skills development, and group presentation experience. The rubric allocates 10 points to presentation and structure, 30 points to breadth and depth of reflection, 40 points to research skills development and 20 points to group presentation experience, for a total of 100 points. The assessment instructions also state that students must not use AI tools for the assignment.
Read Model Answer →
Research Methods / Project Management / Computer and Information Sciences
3,000 words
Critical Literature Review in Research Methods and Project Management
This Research Methods and Project Management assessment develops students’ ability to search for, evaluate, critically analyse and synthesise academic literature within a computing or information-science research area. Students work within an allocated group to conduct a structured literature search and critically evaluate research papers relevant to an assigned theme, before using the combined group literature corpus to produce an individual literature review. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… Each group member must identify and critically analyse a minimum of five academic papers using the supplied Critical Paper Summary template. These individual summaries are then combined into a single group document and shared so that all team members can use the collective body of research. The quality of this component depends on the relevance and academic quality of the selected papers and the depth of critical evaluation rather than simple description. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… The main individual component is a 3,000-word critical literature review, worth 60% of the assessment. Students must use the literature identified and summarised through the group activity and critically discuss the research associated with their allocated topic. The review should synthesise the literature into a coherent discussion rather than presenting disconnected paper summaries, demonstrating criticality, clear structure and effective academic writing. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… A further 20% is awarded for an individual research and meeting log, maintained through Blackboard. Students are expected to record their research progress, contribution to the group, approach to collaboration and reflections on the literature-review process. Stronger logs demonstrate detailed evidence of active participation, reflective insight and professional collaboration rather than merely listing completed tasks. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… The assessment directly evaluates the ability to apply project-management principles to a computing-related research activity and to search, evaluate and develop a critical literature review. Wider module outcomes also emphasise research techniques, data and information analysis, professional research practice, ethics, risk, legal issues, societal considerations and sustainability. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… The marking structure allocates 20% to the combined critical paper analysis, 20% to the research/meeting log and 60% to the individual literature review. Higher-performing work is expected to use high-quality and directly relevant academic sources, demonstrate strong critical analysis, synthesise evidence across the research theme, maintain a professional academic structure and apply accurate Harvard referencing throughout. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… Important for the public Reference Library: the brief states that ChatGPT or other AI tools must not be used to generate text or fill in assessment-template sections. Any AI use that supports the work or thinking must be declared, referenced and accompanied by a prompt log in an appendix. Therefore, this entry should be used only as a high-level public description of the assessment rather than as directly submissible student content. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste…
Read Model Answer →
Digital Transformation / Management and Leadership
1,500 words
Leading Through Digital Change: Digital Transformation Strategy, Emerging Technologies and Leadership
This postgraduate assessment requires students to act as a Digital Transformation Consultant and evaluate how a selected organisation should respond to accelerating technological change. Students choose one organisation from the options provided in the brief and prepare a Digital Transformation Report and accompanying poster designed to recommend changes that can help the organisation maintain competitive advantage and create business value. Summative_Assessment_Leading_Th… The first section focuses on a Digital Transformation Strategic Framework. Students must critically review and apply one recognised framework, choosing from the McKinsey 4Ds, BCG 3 Stages, Gartner’s 6 Steps or Cognizant’s 4 Pillars. The analysis should identify appropriate digital-transformation objectives and explain how these can support business functions such as operations, ICT and marketing. Higher-level work is expected to move beyond description and critically evaluate recent digital initiatives and organisational challenges. Summative_Assessment_Leading_Th… The second component is an A4 poster examining future digital trends. Students must evaluate two disruptive technologies or techniques likely to influence the relevant industry, employment and the labour market over the next five years. Suggested technologies include artificial intelligence and machine learning, 5G connectivity, IoT, robotics, drone delivery, blockchain, augmented reality and virtual reality. Academic literature and real-world examples are expected to support the evaluation. Summative_Assessment_Leading_Th… The third section addresses Digital Leadership. Students analyse and recommend two leadership styles that could support organisational transformation. Relevant approaches may include hyperaware agile leadership, ethical-tech leadership, people-oriented leadership, agile leadership and Goleman’s leadership styles. The analysis should explain how leadership capabilities can support collaboration, organisational networks and people during digital change. Summative_Assessment_Leading_Th… The final submission should contain a clear introduction, conclusion and Harvard-referenced evidence, and must be written in the third person with professional academic presentation. Summative_Assessment_Leading_Th… Overview word count: approximately 330 words.
Read Model Answer →
Engineering and Environment Advanced Practice
3,000 words
AP Research Project – Reflective Individual Report and Poster Presentation
This assessment is the Advanced Practice (AP) Research Project for the Engineering and Environment Advanced Practice London Campus Research Project module. It is designed for postgraduate students undertaking an independent research project with supervisory guidance. The assessment provides an opportunity to reflect critically on the research process, knowledge gained, professional development and challenges encountered during the project. Students are expected to demonstrate independent learning, research skills, critical thinking and the ability to communicate complex ideas in a professional context. The main assessment is a 3,000-word Reflective Individual Report, which contributes 80% of the module assessment. The report is structured around four key areas. The first section, Finding a Research Topic, requires students to explain how and why they selected their research topic, the research tools and search strategies used, the library collections explored, their research aims and objectives, and relevant discussions or recommendations received from their supervisor. The second section, Professional Activities, focuses on reflection on research development activities, scheduling, the independent researcher role, challenges such as time management, and communication with the supervisor. The third section, Literature Review and Research Work, requires students to critically review relevant literature, discuss their research method, demonstrate major research activities and consider the feasibility of the selected method, including challenges and recommendations. The final section, Reflection of Research Project, requires critical reflection on personal strengths and weaknesses, continuous self-development and the relevance of research activities to the student's programme of study and future career. Areas such as decision making, problem solving, communication and influencing, technical skills, collaboration, innovation and proactivity should be considered. The second component is a 10-minute Poster Presentation worth 20% of the assessment. The poster should provide a balanced combination of visuals and text and present the research objectives and significance, a summary of the literature review and research method, key research findings, and conclusions and recommendations. The assessment also requires appropriate academic presentation, including a cover page, table of contents, page numbers, figure and table captions, numbered headings and consistent formatting. Harvard or APA referencing may be used. The report is submitted through Turnitin and is subject to anonymous marking. The assessment is a Pass/Fail module, with students required to achieve at least 50% to pass.
Read Model Answer →
Integrated Communications
2,000 words
CW2 Communications Engagement Report – Client Stream
This assignment requires students to produce an individual 2,000-word Communications Engagement Report in the form of an engagement communications campaign for Stream. Stream is a collaboration between 16 UK water companies, supported by industry and civil society partners including the Open Data Institute, with the aim of unlocking the potential of water-sector data to benefit customers, society and the environment. The organisation has established data-sharing infrastructure designed to enable data to be used to generate insights, support innovation, improve decision-making and contribute to greater transparency across the water sector. The central focus of the assignment is to develop a communications campaign that attracts and engages the research and academic community. Stream has identified postgraduate and postdoctoral students, together with relevant university faculty leads, as an important priority audience because of their potential to transform published water-sector data into valuable research insights, innovative products and services. Relevant academic departments may include computer science, engineering, mathematics, environmental science, social science, town planning and business development. Students are expected to consider how this audience can be reached, segmented and prioritised according to its interest and willingness to engage with Stream. The proposed campaign should build awareness of Stream, communicate the value of accessing and using water-sector data, and encourage longer-term engagement between Stream, universities and students. Existing communication channels include LinkedIn, the Stream website and communications distributed through delivery partners such as the Open Data Institute and Aiimi, as well as Ofwat. Key campaign opportunities include Open Data Day in March and Open October in mid-October. These events should be considered as important campaign moments while also being integrated into a longer-term communications programme. The report should include an introduction and background to Stream, including brand history, market position, competitive analysis, the need for an engagement communications campaign and relevant market research. It should establish short-, medium- and long-term communication objectives with clear timeframes, define the target audience, and apply an appropriate theoretical framework to develop the communication strategy. Students must provide four recommended communication pieces supported by detailed rationale, together with a Gantt chart showing campaign timings and a clear campaign measurement approach. The report should conclude with a summary of the overall proposal. The assessment requires critical application of communication theories and concepts, research evidence and relevant literature. Students must demonstrate analysis, evaluation and justification rather than simply describing communication activities. A minimum of 15 high-quality references is required, including at least eight journal articles, using Cite Them Right Harvard referencing. The report is assessed on presentation and structure, intellectual curiosity and referencing, content and application, campaign integration, discussion, conclusion, recommendations, campaign timeframes and measurement.
Read Model Answer →
Engineering and Environment Advanced Practice London Campus Research Project
3,000 words
LD7152 – AP Research Project
The LD7152 AP Research Project is a postgraduate research and reflective assessment for students studying within the MSc Computing Framework or MSc International Project Management programme. The module focuses on developing students as independent researchers and requires them to reflect critically on their research strategy, activities, learning and personal development. The assessment is designed to encourage students to recognise their achievements, identify challenges encountered during the research process and evaluate how their research experience has contributed to their academic and professional development. The assessment consists of two components: a 3,000-word Reflective Individual Report worth 80% and a 10-minute Poster Presentation worth 20%. Students are expected to work independently while receiving supervisory guidance. The reflective report requires students to demonstrate critical engagement with knowledge discovery and reflect on their educational development in relation to the challenges experienced during their research project. The report is structured around four main areas. The first section, Finding a Research Topic, is approximately 500 words and requires students to explain their chosen topic, why it was selected, the research tools and search techniques used, the Library collections explored, the research aims and objectives, and relevant discussions or recommendations from their supervisor. The second section, Professional Activities, is approximately 500 words and focuses on research development tasks, scheduling, the independent researcher role, challenges such as time management, and communication with the supervisor. The third section, Literature Review and Research Work, is approximately 1,500 words. It requires a critical review of relevant literature with appropriate citation, discussion of the research method and major research activities, and consideration of the feasibility, challenges and recommendations associated with the selected method. The fourth section, Reflection of Research Project, is approximately 500 words and focuses on achievements, contributions, strengths and weaknesses, continuous self-development and employability. Students are expected to reflect on areas including decision making, problem solving, communication and influencing, technical skills, collaboration, innovation and proactivity. The second assessment component is a 10-minute poster presentation. The poster should provide an overview of the research activities and communicate what the student learned during the research process. It should balance visual and textual information and include the research objectives and significance, a summary of the literature review and research method, key research findings, and conclusions and recommendations. The report must include a cover page, table of contents, page numbers and captions for figures and tables. The required formatting includes Times New Roman, 12-point font, numbered headings and approximately 1.2–1.3 line spacing. The assessment brief permits Harvard or APA referencing. The report is submitted electronically through Turnitin on Blackboard. The module is assessed on a Pass/Fail basis, with students required to achieve 50% or above to pass. The assessment also evaluates critical reflection, application of knowledge, independent learning, communication of complex ideas, personal development and reflection on technical leadership.
Read Model Answer →
Leadership and Change
3,000 words
Leadership and Change – Reflective Learning Portfolio
This 3,000-word coursework is a reflective learning portfolio focused on leadership, organisational change and reflective practice. The assessment is worth 100% of the module mark and is structured into four individual components. It is designed to assess leadership capabilities such as strategic thinking, emotional intelligence, communication, adaptability, team building, ethical decision-making and change management, while encouraging students to connect leadership theories and self-assessment tools with their own development. Component 1 focuses on individual leadership style and requires students to provide the results of the Fastest MBTI Test and critically reflect on what the outcome means in relation to their preferred leadership style. Students are expected to connect their MBTI results with leadership approaches covered in the module, including the Situated Leadership model. This component represents 20% of the assessment and has a suggested length of 600 words. Component 2 examines team roles. Students must present evidence from their Team Roles Test, identify their preferred team role and explain why it suits them. They must then identify two other Belbin team roles that would be important when building a team and explain their relevance. Connections can also be made between the Team Roles Test, Belbin’s framework and the results of the Conflict Management questionnaire. This component contributes 20% and has a suggested length of 600 words. Component 3 requires students to develop an individual organisational change plan in response to a fictional case study in which ARU is considering the adoption of AI to mark student coursework assignments and examinations. The plan evaluates change enablers and barriers, stakeholder involvement, ethical considerations and resource constraints. Students then develop an implementation strategy using a suitable change-management framework such as Lewin’s Change Model or Kotter’s 8-Step Model, including stakeholder engagement, communication, resistance management and strategies for sustaining change. This component represents 30% and has a suggested length of 900 words. Component 4 is a 900-word reflective account of what students learned about leadership while working as part of a team to design the organisational change plan. The reflection considers how leadership emerged, team collaboration, missing or required roles, conflict management and personal development. Students may structure the reflection using Kolb’s Reflective Learning Cycle or Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle and support their discussion with theories such as transformational, situational and distributed leadership, as well as Belbin’s team-role framework. Overall, the learning outcomes require students to critically reflect on their leadership style, evaluate classical and contemporary leadership theories, understand organisational change processes and develop evidence-based change strategies. The assessment also emphasises reflective practice and personal leadership development through experiential learning in a group setting.
Read Model Answer →
Organisational Strategy and Sustainability
2,473 words
Strategic Evaluation of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL): Organisational Strategy and Sustainability
This 2,473-word MSc Management coursework for BPP University’s Organisational Strategy and Sustainability module examines the strategic, sustainability and leadership dimensions of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL). The report applies the module’s learning outcomes through four main areas: strategic environmental analysis, ethical and sustainable practice, evaluation of strategic options, and personal leadership and sustainability reflection. The assignment is structured around PESTEL and VRIO for strategic analysis, the Triple Bottom Line for sustainability evaluation, the Ansoff Matrix for strategic options, and Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership for personal reflection. The first section evaluates HUL’s external and internal environment. PESTEL analysis considers political and legal requirements, economic pressures, social changes, technological developments and environmental risks. The report highlights issues including packaging regulation, extended producer responsibility, data privacy, commodity and energy volatility, rural–urban differences, AI-enabled operations, digital traceability, climate risk, water stress and packaging circularity. VRIO analysis then evaluates HUL’s purposeful brands and portfolio breadth, rural route-to-market, digital operations and analytics, and supplier development and sustainability governance as sources of competitive advantage. The second section assesses HUL’s ethical, sustainable and responsible practices through the Triple Bottom Line framework of People, Planet and Profit. The analysis considers workforce and community priorities, customer responsibility, renewable energy, emissions, water stewardship, waste and packaging, as well as productivity, efficiency, risk mitigation and sustainable growth. A specific packaging circularity transition is proposed, including design-for-recycling, post-consumer recycled content, lightweighting, refill and reuse pilots, collection partnerships and consumer education. The third section evaluates four strategic options using the Ansoff Matrix: urban refill and concentrate formats, rural assisted commerce through “Shakti 2.0”, an ingredient traceability platform, and precision revenue-growth management in quick-commerce. Each option is considered in relation to strategic fit, VRIO capabilities, risks, implementation actions, ownership and KPIs. The final section provides a first-person reflection on leadership and sustainability. It uses Goleman’s Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership to examine learning from the strategic and sustainability analysis, including self-awareness, self-regulation, empathy, collaboration and evidence-based decision-making. It also presents a 90-day leadership development plan focused on decision briefs, stakeholder pre-mortems and a personal Triple Bottom Line checklist.
Read Model Answer →
Data Visualisation / Business Intelligence
2,500 words
Data Visualisation (BS664) — Portfolio: Tableau and Power BI Dashboard Development for Evidence-Based Decision-Making
This Level 7 portfolio accumulates work across a full semester of data visualisation study and is submitted as one continuous document combining reflective writing, tool evaluation and an applied dashboard project. The emphasis throughout falls on interpretative rigour — showing not just that a visualisation was built, but why each design decision serves the decision-maker who has to act on it. The first activity documents sustained critical participation across the module's weekly discussion topics. Five or more substantive responses are evidenced with dated screenshots, each paired with the corresponding workshop date, and each grounded in both academic literature and practitioner sources rather than opinion alone. Live URLs to the Power BI and Tableau dashboards built during the module are included, and the activity closes with a consolidated review of how understanding developed across the units. The second activity covers formal training completion in both platforms, with certificates and badges reproduced, and then turns to accessibility. It examines the visualisations produced during that training against accessibility principles — colour contrast and colour-blind safe palettes, text alternatives, chart type legibility, cognitive load — and argues why accessibility is not a compliance afterthought but a determinant of whether a dashboard actually informs decisions inside a global organisation with a diverse user base. The third activity is a structured comparison of Tableau and Power BI, conducted through the evaluative frameworks introduced in workshops rather than a feature checklist. Benefits and limitations are weighed across data connectivity, calculation capability, visual flexibility, licensing and cost, collaboration and governance, and organisational fit. The section ends with a reasoned recommendation of one platform for the applied work that follows, with the trade-offs of that choice acknowledged openly. The fourth and largest activity is the applied project. A dataset is selected from an approved open source and its provenance, quality and limitations discussed. The target business, its stakeholder groups and the varying analytical literacy of the intended audience are analysed, because these determine what the dashboard must show and how plainly. The report then walks through the full development sequence — data preparation and cleaning, chart selection and justification, layout and interactivity, iteration in response to identified weaknesses — with screenshots evidencing each stage. Findings are reported and translated into specific, evidence-based decisions the business could take on the strength of them. The submission follows the prescribed structure with title page, contents, introduction, business problem, main analysis, findings, Harvard reference list and appendices, presented as a single file.
Read Model Answer →
Cyber Security / Penetration Testing
2,400 words
Grey-Box Penetration Testing: Vulnerability Assessment, Exploitation and Mitigation
This technical cyber-security project presents an authorised grey-box penetration test conducted within a controlled virtual laboratory environment. The objective is to assess the security posture of a deliberately vulnerable target system, identify weaknesses in exposed network services, demonstrate how those weaknesses could be exploited, evaluate their security and organisational impact, and recommend appropriate mitigation measures. The assessment follows a practical penetration-testing workflow supported by technical evidence, screenshots, activity records and academic research. The project begins with laboratory configuration, network discovery, service enumeration and vulnerability analysis. Tools including Kali Linux, Metasploitable, VMware, Nmap, Netcat and Metasploit are used across the testing lifecycle. Identified services are mapped to known vulnerabilities before controlled exploitation is undertaken and the resulting access is documented. The activity log records the progression from environment setup and network scanning through vulnerability identification, exploitation, evidence collection and final reporting. Five principal attack vectors are examined. These include the vsftpd 2.3.4 FTP backdoor, Samba username-map-script exploitation, an UnrealIRCd backdoor, insecure Java Remote Method Invocation and a misconfigured DistCC service. The practical demonstrations show how vulnerable or incorrectly configured services can permit unauthorised command execution and, in several cases, privileged shell access. For each vulnerability, the report explains the weakness, exploitation process, observed result, security impact and proposed mitigation. Recommended controls include patching or upgrading obsolete services, disabling unnecessary services, implementing firewall restrictions, strengthening authentication and input validation, restricting access to authorised systems, applying least privilege and monitoring suspicious activity. The project also incorporates group management and reflective practice. Team members perform specialised roles covering laboratory configuration, reconnaissance, vulnerability analysis, exploitation and documentation. Individual reflection considers technical performance, teamwork, evidence management and future skills development, demonstrating how structured collaboration contributes to an effective penetration-testing engagement. Important: unlike the earlier assignment briefs, these uploads appear to be completed student/project materials rather than the official 7COM1068 assessment brief. Therefore I would not invent the university, academic level or academic year. If you upload the actual 7COM1068 assignment guideline, I can fill those fields exactly.
Read Model Answer →
Business and Management
34,000 words
Examining the Role of Cross-Cultural Communication in Enhancing Team Efficiency: Evidence from McDonald’s Multicultural Workforce in London
This dissertation examines the role of cross-cultural communication in enhancing team efficiency within McDonald’s multicultural workforce, with the study framed around the challenges and opportunities created by culturally diverse working environments. The research considers how differences in language, communication styles, cultural expectations and workplace behaviour can influence employee collaboration, productivity and organisational effectiveness. The study aims to assess cross-cultural communication within multicultural teams, analyse its relationship with team success, and identify cultural factors that can support stronger workplace collaboration. The research adopts a qualitative secondary-research methodology under an interpretivist and inductive approach. Evidence is drawn from peer-reviewed academic literature, McDonald’s annual and diversity reports, and relevant hospitality-sector studies. The collected evidence is examined through thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns relating to communication barriers, workforce productivity, multicultural collaboration and inclusive leadership. The analysis is organised around four principal themes: cross-cultural diversity and workforce productivity; communication barriers and cultural challenges; diversity management and inclusive leadership; and HR practices, employee motivation and organisational performance. The discussion considers issues such as language barriers, cultural adjustment, misunderstandings, workplace conflict, leadership representation, employee inclusion, recruitment, training, digital HR systems and the use of AI-enabled workforce technologies. The study finds that workforce diversity alone does not automatically generate higher productivity. Instead, the effectiveness of multicultural teams depends substantially on the communication structures, inclusive leadership practices and HR support systems used by the organisation. Effective cross-cultural communication can strengthen coordination, customer responsiveness, employee engagement and operational efficiency, while poorly managed communication differences can contribute to delays, misunderstanding, stress and conflict. The report concludes with recommendations for continued cross-cultural communication training, inclusive leadership development, conflict-resolution initiatives and multilingual communication support. It also recognises the limitation of relying on secondary evidence and identifies primary research with employees and managers as a potential direction for future research. Overview word count: approximately 350 words.
Read Model Answer →
People Practice / Human Resource Management
2,500 words
Business, Culture and Change in Context: Organisational Acquisition Case Study
This CIPD Level 3 assessment examines how the external business environment, organisational culture and planned change influence organisations and their people. The assessment is based on a case study involving Best Pharmacy Ever (BPE), a small group of local pharmacies considering the acquisition of Emrosu, a much larger national pharmacy chain with approximately 100 stores and an established online pharmacy operation. The acquisition creates significant implications for organisational structure, culture, technology, people practices and change management. Learners are required to provide written responses to nine case-based questions. The assessment begins by examining external factors that may affect the acquisition and identifying appropriate post-acquisition business goals. It also requires consideration of the organisations' products, services and customers and the ways technology could support people professionals, improve working practices and strengthen collaboration following organisational growth. A central component of the assessment concerns organisational culture. Learners must explain the meaning and importance of culture, consider organisations as interconnected systems, and assess how the actions of people professionals can influence wider organisational outcomes. The final questions focus on planned organisational change, the contribution people professionals can make during periods of transition and the potential impact of significant change on employees. The unit therefore develops understanding of environmental analysis, organisational systems, workplace culture, technology and effective change management from a people-practice perspective. Written answers should make clear and consistent use of the case study and demonstrate application of relevant people-practice concepts rather than providing generic theoretical descriptions. The required submission is approximately 2,500 words, with a permitted variation of ±10%, subject to the CIPD word-count policy.
Read Model Answer →
Computing / Artificial Intelligence / Digital Transformation / Management Consultancy
7,000 words
AI Readiness and Programme Adoption Strategy for the NewFutures: AI Programme at Northumbria University London
This postgraduate consultancy project focuses on developing an AI readiness, skills-development and programme-adoption strategy for students and recent alumni at Northumbria University London. The project supports the university’s participation in NewFutures: AI, a funded AI skills and career-readiness programme offering a four-week online course covering responsible AI foundations and specialist pathways in Marketing and Communications, Finance and Accounting, Business Operations and Logistics, Administration, and ICT and Technical Support. The central consultancy challenge is to understand the AI literacy, confidence, readiness and training needs of Northumbria University London students and alumni and translate that evidence into a practical implementation and outreach strategy. The client aims to reach approximately 12,000 students and recent alumni and support a target of 6,000 LMS registrations during the 2026–2027 programme period. The project requires primary and secondary research into AI readiness, demand for different AI-skilling pathways and barriers to participation such as awareness, time, perceived value and accessibility. The consultancy team is also expected to benchmark comparable initiatives and use research evidence to develop recommendations appropriate to different academic disciplines and student and alumni groups. The implementation component focuses on designing an evidence-based outreach and adoption campaign, including appropriate communication channels, messaging, timing, incentives, faculty engagement and stakeholder participation. Recommended channels may include email campaigns, newsletters, social media, student services, events, learning platforms and alumni communications. The project also requires an implementation timeline and indicative budget for the 2026–2027 programme period. The wider assessment develops professional consultancy capability through business and requirements analysis, research methodology, ethical research practice, practical implementation, testing and strategic recommendations. The project charter additionally establishes milestones for research design, data collection, analysis, report development, review and presentation, together with defined responsibilities for project management, data analysis, AI expertise and stakeholder communication. The individual component complements the consultancy work through critical reflection on personal contribution, skills development, decision-making, problem-solving, communication, collaboration, technical capability, innovation and continuous professional development.
Read Model Answer →