Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
Strategic Management in Healthcare
4,000 words
Strategic Management in Healthcare – Strategic Analysis and Strategy Formulation
This individual summative assessment for the Strategic Management in Healthcare module requires students to critically examine strategic management and strategic thinking within a healthcare organisation, hospital, clinical department or healthcare unit of their choice. The assessment is designed to develop students’ ability to apply strategic management concepts and analytical frameworks to a real healthcare setting, evaluate the internal and external factors affecting organisational performance, and formulate appropriate strategies in response to identified operational and competitive challenges. The assessment consists of a 4,000-word report with a 10% tolerance and accounts for 100% of the module assessment. Students must first select an organisation, clinical department or healthcare unit to use as the case setting. The report should begin with a concise introduction to the selected case setting, establishing its organisational context and providing a clear direction for the strategic analysis. The introduction should explain the relevant characteristics of the organisation or healthcare unit and provide sufficient background to understand the strategic issues examined in the report. The report must critically analyse the relevance of strategic management and strategic thinking to the selected healthcare setting. Rather than simply describing strategic management concepts, students are expected to explain why strategic planning and strategic thinking are important for the particular organisation or department and how they can support performance improvement, service development and responses to operational and competitive challenges. A central requirement is the application of three strategic analysis tools or frameworks. The assessment examples include SWOT, PESTLE, Balanced Scorecard, Value Chain, Porter’s Five Forces, Resource Based View and Blue Ocean Strategy. Students must apply at least one appropriate tool at each of three analytical levels: macro-environment analysis, service area or market analysis, and internal environment analysis. Before applying each tool, students should define the framework and critically justify why it is relevant, effective and suitable for the selected healthcare case setting. The analysis should be detailed and evidence-based rather than purely descriptive. Students are then required to develop a hierarchy of strategies based on the findings from the strategic analysis. Strategies should be formulated at three levels and should clearly respond to the issues identified through the external, market or service-area and internal analyses. The report should explain how the proposed strategies could help the healthcare organisation or unit improve performance and address its operational and competitive challenges. The relationship between the analysis, strategic recommendations and expected outcomes should be made explicit. The final component requires students to reflect on the relevance and usefulness of the strategic tools beyond the selected case study and in relation to their current or future professional role. The reflection should consider how the strategic frameworks and analytical approaches could be transferred to other organisational or professional situations. The assessment should use appropriate evidence from sources such as academic journal articles, books, websites, case studies and grey literature. Harvard referencing is required. The marking criteria place emphasis on the quality of the introduction and case context, critical discussion of strategic planning, quantitative and analytical application of three strategic tools, strategy formulation and evaluation, reflection on application relevance, and presentation and referencing. The assessment therefore requires an integrated connection between the healthcare case, strategic analysis, evidence, recommendations and reflection rather than isolated descriptions of strategic frameworks.
Read Model Answer →
Financial Performance Management
3,500 words
Financial Performance Management – Financial Performance, Balanced Scorecard and Integrated Reporting
This individual assessment for the Financial Performance Management module requires students to produce a comprehensive analysis of the financial and non-financial performance of an international organisation and its closest competitor. The assessment is designed to develop students’ ability to evaluate organisational performance using financial analysis techniques, critically assess strategic performance-management frameworks, and examine the benefits and challenges associated with Integrated Reporting. The report has a maximum length of 3,500 words, with a 10% tolerance, excluding references, tables, figures and appendices, and accounts for 100% of the summative assessment. The first part of the report focuses on financial performance using ratio analysis. Students must select an international organisation as Company A and identify its closest competitor as Company B. The competitor should be selected using appropriate criteria, including comparable operating activities, industry, country and financial characteristics. Students are expected to obtain financial statements covering at least the most recent two years available for analysis. The ratio analysis should cover a broad range of areas, including liquidity, working capital cycle, profitability, leverage and valuation. Students should calculate and interpret relevant ratios, compare performance between the two organisations and across different years, and critically discuss the overall financial position. Input data and calculations may be presented in the main report or appendix, supported by appropriate tables and graphs. The second part examines Kaplan and Norton’s Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Students must critically evaluate the relevant Balanced Scorecard literature and consider whether the traditional model remains appropriate in contemporary business environments. The report should discuss possible limitations or areas for improvement and then develop a proposed Balanced Scorecard specifically for Company A. The proposed scorecard should be linked to the organisation’s strategy and vision and should identify suitable objectives, measures and critical success factors. The third part focuses on Integrated Reporting. Students must critically analyse the potential benefits and challenges of adopting Integrated Reporting for Company A, using relevant academic literature and the International Integrated Reporting framework. The discussion should consider how Integrated Reporting combines financial, non-financial, historical and forward-looking information and how it can help stakeholders understand an organisation’s use of resources and prospects for long-term sustainable success. The report should follow an appropriate academic structure, including an introduction, financial performance analysis, Balanced Scorecard analysis, Integrated Reporting analysis and conclusion. Harvard referencing is required, supported by a comprehensive range of relevant academic and professional sources. The recommended structure allocates approximately 1,000 words to each main question, with approximately 250 words for the introduction and conclusion.
Read Model Answer →
Business Consultancy Project: Strategic Analysis, Stakeholder Evaluation and Evidence-Based Recommendations
Business Consultancy, Strategic Management, Business Analysis, Consultancy Project, Stakeholder Analysis, Mendelow Matrix, Business Strategy, Data Analysis, Secondary Research, SWOT Analysis, PESTLE Analysis, Porter’s Five Forces, Balanced Scorecard, Ethics, Sustainability, UN Sustainable Development Goals, Recommendations, Risk Analysis, Implementation Barriers, Organisational Strategy, Business Problem Solving, Employability Skills, Professional Development, Reflective Practice, Project Management, Evidence-Based Decision-Making
Read Model Answer →
Business Management / Consultancy / Strategic Management
5,000 words
Business Consultancy Project: Strategic Analysis, Stakeholder Evaluation and Evidence-Based Recommendations
This Business Consultancy Project assessment requires students to produce a professional 5,000-word consultancy report addressing a strategically important issue, challenge or problem facing a client organisation. The project must normally continue from the topic and client proposed in the earlier Consultancy Project Proposal, ensuring continuity between the proposal and final consultancy work. The assessment is designed to replicate professional consultancy practice through independent research, critical analysis and the development of actionable recommendations. Copy of Apr 25 Onwards brief_EE… Copy of Apr 25 Onwards brief_EE… The report begins with an Executive Summary, followed by an introduction and company/client overview. Students must define one clear business problem, establish the overall project aim and purpose, and specify the consultancy focus, which may relate to areas such as strategy, human resources, marketing or sustainability. The selected issue should be clearly connected to the organisation’s wider strategic and industry context. Copy of Apr 25 Onwards brief_EE… A dedicated Stakeholder Analysis section requires identification and evaluation of internal and external stakeholders. Students must assess stakeholder interests, influence, expectations, conflicts and power relationships, and are encouraged to apply a framework such as Mendelow’s Matrix. The purpose is to show how stakeholder dynamics influence the consultancy problem and the feasibility of proposed solutions. Copy of Apr 25 Onwards brief_EE… The largest section is Data Analysis and Framework Application, where students critically evaluate secondary evidence and apply two or three relevant management frameworks. Suitable approaches may include SWOT, PESTLE, Porter’s frameworks and the Balanced Scorecard. The analysis should incorporate credible company and industry evidence, Excel outputs, tables or charts where relevant, and connect patterns in the data to strategic, operational or HR implications. Ethical and sustainability considerations should be embedded where appropriate. Copy of Apr 25 Onwards brief_EE… The project concludes with three prioritised and evidence-based recommendations. Recommendations should be practical, justified, risk-aware and linked directly to the findings. Students must explain expected benefits and demonstrate how the proposed actions create strategic value for the client organisation. Copy of Apr 25 Onwards brief_EE… The final assessed section is a 500-word Employability Reflection covering skills developed through the project, application of theory to practice, professional behaviours, personal strengths and weaknesses, career relevance and specific future-development actions. Copy of Apr 25 Onwards brief_EE… Overall, the assessment integrates consultancy problem definition, stakeholder analysis, strategic frameworks, secondary-data interpretation, ethics, sustainability, recommendations and professional reflection within a Masters-level business project. The marking criteria reward criticality, current evidence, intellectual originality, professional consultancy thinking and accurate Harvard referencing. Copy of Apr 25 Onwards brief_EE… One important point: the brief states that the majority of references should come from sources published within the last 6–12 months, so the final project is expected to use very current company, industry and academic evidence. Copy of Apr 25 Onwards brief_EE…
Read Model Answer →