Filter by keyword, subject, or both. Updates live as new model answers are added to our portal.
International Business
2,500 words
Literature Review – International Business Research
This assessment is a 2,500-word individual Literature Review for the International Business module. The assignment requires students to select an international business-related research topic, develop a suitable research question and critically examine existing academic literature relevant to the proposed area of research. The purpose of the assessment is to demonstrate knowledge of the selected subject area, evaluate existing research, identify important debates and inconsistencies, examine research methodologies and theoretical frameworks, and establish a clear research gap that can provide the basis for further investigation. Students must obtain tutor approval for their chosen research topic before completing the Literature Review. The selected topic should have clear relevance to international business and should address an issue that is academically significant and practically relevant. Students are expected to use high-quality academic sources, with particular emphasis on peer-reviewed journal articles. The assessment guidance expects students to critically discuss a minimum of five and a maximum of eight journal articles, although additional academic sources may be used to support the discussion and critique. The Literature Review consists of three main sections: Introduction, Literature Analysis and Conclusion. The Introduction should be approximately 300 words and should introduce the research topic, explain why the issue is important, establish the main research question and demonstrate its relevance to international business. Students should also briefly discuss the potential implications of the proposed research for the advancement of knowledge, theory and practice. The Literature Analysis should be approximately 1,900 words and forms the main part of the assessment. Students should move beyond simply describing individual articles and instead analyse, evaluate and synthesise the literature. For each selected journal article, students should consider its contribution to existing knowledge, theoretical frameworks, research methodology, suggested research gaps and relationship to the proposed research question. The literature should be compared and contrasted to identify areas of agreement, disagreement, methodological differences, theoretical differences and unresolved issues. The analysis should demonstrate critical engagement with the literature rather than providing separate descriptive summaries of each source. The Conclusion should be approximately 300 words and should bring together the major agreements, disagreements and themes identified in the literature. Students should use the conclusion to justify their proposed research by demonstrating how it can address one or more of the research gaps identified through the literature review. The assessment is worth 100% of the final module grade and requires Harvard-style referencing. Students must provide a complete reference list and ensure that sources are appropriately acknowledged throughout the review. The assessment criteria evaluate knowledge of the subject area, analysis of research and methodologies, critical evaluation of literature, communication of complex ideas and professional referencing. High-quality work is expected to demonstrate a well-defined international business topic, strong critical analysis, comparison and synthesis of academic literature, clear identification of a research gap and a logically justified direction for future research.
Read Model Answer →
Engineering and Environment Advanced Practice London Campus Consultancy Project
5,000 words
Group Consultancy Report – Engineering and Environment Advanced Practice
This assessment is a group consultancy project for the LD7119 Engineering and Environment Advanced Practice London Campus Consultancy Project module at Northumbria University. Students work in consultancy groups of four to five members and are assigned a live project in collaboration with an organisation and the university. The purpose of the assessment is to investigate an organisational issue or requirement and develop practical, evidence-based solutions that can support the organisation in implementing improvements. The main assessment consists of a 5,000-word Group Consultancy Report and a compulsory 10-minute client presentation. The report is expected to demonstrate a professional and commercially appropriate approach to consultancy work. It should provide a clear introduction to the project, establish the organisational context, and analyse the business requirements and needs of the client organisation. The report should then explain the research methodology used, including appropriate ethical considerations and the design of the practical work undertaken. A substantial part of the assessment focuses on research, discussion and findings. Students are expected to collect and analyse relevant evidence, present their findings clearly, and provide evidence of practical implementation and testing where applicable. The assessment therefore requires students to connect academic research and relevant theories with practical consultancy activities and organisational requirements. Evidence from diagnostic tools, feedback and other appropriate sources can be incorporated into the report to support the analysis and conclusions. The final part of the report focuses on recommendations and improvements. Students should develop practical and actionable recommendations that are relevant to the organisation and can contribute to the successful implementation of the proposed ideas. Recommendations should be supported by the research findings and should demonstrate an understanding of the organisation's requirements and potential implementation considerations. The assessment is worth 50% of the total marks available for the module, which is assessed on a pass/fail basis. The report has a 5,000-word limit, excluding the table of contents, page numbers and captions for figures and tables. The client presentation is compulsory, although it does not have marks directly allocated to it; its purpose is to help the client and supervisor understand the consultancy project. The assessment is evaluated across professional and commercial presentation and introduction, business and requirement analysis, research methodology including ethics and practical work design, research and findings including implementation and testing, and recommendations including improvements. Students are also required to acknowledge sources appropriately and complete the assessment declaration regarding their work and any use of generative AI. The assessment brief states that AI may assist with activities such as improving grammar, structure, organising ideas and providing suggestions, but the main content, analysis and conclusions must remain the student's own work.
Read Model Answer →
Managing Customer Experience
1,000 words
Managing Customer Experience – Customer Experience Strategy Report
This assessment for the Managing Customer Experience module requires students to prepare a 1,000-word business report evaluating the customer experience (CX) strategy of one selected banking organisation. Students must choose one company from the organisations provided in the assessment brief and analyse its customer experience strategy within the specific country in which it operates. The report is designed to develop a critical understanding of the importance of customer experience for business success and the ways in which organisations can create a seamless omnichannel customer journey. The assessment provides a choice of six banking organisations: Lloyds Banking Group in the United Kingdom, HDFC Bank in India, Habib Bank Limited (HBL) in Pakistan, Nabil Bank Ltd in Nepal, Prime Bank PLC in Bangladesh, and Access Holdings/Access Bank in Nigeria. Students are required to clearly identify the selected organisation and country in their report and use relevant customer experience concepts, academic literature, research and practical examples to support their analysis. The first major requirement is to explain the concept of customer experience and critically review its importance to the success of the selected banking brand. The report should consider the role of CX, the mutual benefits created for the organisation and its customers, and the impact of customer experience on business performance, including financial performance. Students should also provide specific examples demonstrating how the selected bank has used customer experience to create or strengthen competitive advantage. The second major requirement is to evaluate how the selected bank delivers a seamless omnichannel customer experience. This requires discussion of the organisation's approach to creating a consistent customer journey across relevant channels. Students must develop a detailed customer persona based on research and data analysis, covering the persona's profile, goals, pain points and motivations. They must also create a customer journey map using the recommended class template. The journey map should identify stages, needs, activities, feelings, pain points and opportunities for improvement. The report should evaluate the effectiveness of the selected bank's customer journey and identify areas where the organisation could improve the ease and quality of the customer's experience. The customer persona and customer journey map are important components of the assessment, and the words contained within these visual templates do not count towards the 1,000-word limit. The report must be written in an academic style and in the third person. Harvard referencing is required for academic sources, figures, diagrams and independent research. The main report has a maximum word count of 1,000 words, excluding the cover sheet, title page, table of contents, references and appendices. The assessment therefore combines academic research, customer experience theory, organisational analysis, customer persona development, journey mapping and critical evaluation of omnichannel customer experience.
Read Model Answer →
Leading Through Digital Change
1,000 words
Leading Through Digital Change – Digital Transformation Report
This formative assessment for the Leading Through Digital Change module requires students to act as a Digital Transformation Specialist and prepare a Digital Transformation Report for a selected retail organisation. The assessment focuses on how traditional brick-and-mortar retailers can respond to the rapid growth of e-commerce and changing customer expectations. Students are required to evaluate the digital changes affecting their selected organisation and propose appropriate strategic changes that can help maintain competitiveness and create business value. The assessment is aligned with Learning Outcome 1, which focuses on applying knowledge and understanding of management and leadership strategies in organisations experiencing digital change. Students must select one organisation from the options provided in the assessment brief. The available organisations are River Island, Khaadi, Shoprite Holdings Ltd, Reliance Retail and Carphone Warehouse. Each organisation operates within the retail sector but has different markets, products and business contexts, allowing students to investigate digital transformation from an organisational perspective. The main task requires students to critically review and propose an appropriate digital transformation strategic framework that the selected organisation should employ in response to current digital change. Students must use one digital transformation framework from the specified choices: McKinsey 4Ds, BCG 3 Stages, Gartner's 6 Steps or Cognizant's 4 Pillars. The chosen framework should be applied to the organisation rather than simply described. The report should also establish digital transformation objectives that support important organisational departments, particularly operations, ICT and marketing. Examples may be used to strengthen the discussion, while higher-level work should demonstrate extensive personal research and critical evaluation. The report should demonstrate an understanding of the organisation's technological challenges, factors driving digital transformation, internal and external threats, opportunities and emerging digital practices. Stronger submissions are expected to provide clear justification for the selected transformation framework and explain how proposed objectives connect with the factors driving the organisation's digital transformation. The marking criteria place importance on knowledge, analysis, justification, evidence-based discussion and the use of relevant and recent research. The submission has a maximum main-body word count of 1,000 words. The cover page, table of contents, list of abbreviations, references and appendices are excluded from the word count. The required structure includes the BPP cover sheet, table of contents, list of abbreviations where appropriate, introduction, Task 1, conclusion, references and appendix if required. The report must be written in the third person, use professional academic formatting, include correctly labelled tables and figures where applicable, and use Harvard referencing and in-text citations. Overall, the assessment develops students' ability to analyse digital transformation challenges in retail organisations and apply management and leadership concepts to develop a strategically justified response to digital change. It combines organisational analysis, digital transformation frameworks, strategic objectives, academic research and professional business-report writing.
Read Model Answer →
Big Data and Cloud Computing
2,500 words
Big Data and Cloud Computing: FieldVision Cloud-Based Big Data Solution for AgroNova
This assessment is a 2,500-word individual report for the Big Data and Cloud Computing module within the MSc Management with Data Analytics programme at BPP University. The report is based on a fictional agricultural technology company, AgroNova, and its FieldVision project. AgroNova provides climate change and crop monitoring services to farmers in the UK and intends to expand internationally. However, its existing ageing infrastructure and manual processes present challenges to international expansion and the development of data-driven decision-making. The FieldVision project aims to use Internet of Things (IoT) technology and cloud-based big data solutions to collect, store and analyse real-time information from agricultural environments. The report requires students to act as a big data and cloud solution consultant and provide recommendations to senior management at AgroNova. The project involves IoT devices such as CropCam aerial cameras supplied by HydroSense and SmartHarvester solar-powered sensors supplied by SoilTech. These technologies collect information including crop imagery, soil moisture, temperature and humidity. The resulting data can support crop monitoring, risk assessment, early warning alerts, irrigation decisions, crop-failure claims validation and other farming-related insights. The first task focuses on Big Data Requirements and Storage Solutions. Students must identify the requirements arising from the scenario and critically evaluate a range of cloud-based big data storage solutions. The evaluation should consider factors such as capacity, functionality and costs. The second task requires students to propose one appropriate cloud-based solution architecture supported by an architecture diagram showing the essential components from data sources through to reporting. The selected architecture must be analysed in relation to AgroNova's requirements and the storage solutions considered in Task 1. The third task addresses Project Risks and Issues. Students must critically appraise the risks and issues associated with deploying the proposed cloud-based big data solution and identify appropriate mitigation approaches. These issues should be connected directly to the storage solutions and proposed architecture. The scenario highlights concerns from AgroNova's CISO, CFO and Chief Reputation Officer regarding potential data breaches, high costs and poor returns on investment, making security, financial viability and organisational risk important considerations. The report should contain an approximately 200-word introduction, an 800-word analysis of Big Data Requirements and Storage Solutions, a 500-word Proposed System Architecture section supported by relevant diagrams, an 800-word Project Risks and Issues section, and an approximately 200-word conclusion. Harvard referencing, academic research and appropriate supporting appendices are also required. The assessment addresses three learning outcomes: designing an architecture that supports complex data collection, critically evaluating data storage solutions from an enterprise systems perspective, and critically appraising issues involved in enterprise-system deployment.
Read Model Answer →
Computational Algorithms and Paradigms
1,000 words
Computational Algorithm Analysis – Research Paper Algorithm
This individual coursework for the Computational Algorithms and Paradigms module requires students to thoroughly analyse a computational algorithm proposed in a research paper selected from the list of research papers provided on Canvas. The purpose of the assessment is to develop students' ability to understand, explain and critically evaluate computational algorithms presented in academic research. Students must first identify and describe the computational problem addressed by the selected research paper and clearly state the research questions investigated by the authors. They must then extract the main computational algorithm proposed in the paper and present it in pseudocode. The assessment also requires students to clearly identify the inputs required by the algorithm and the outputs produced by it. The coursework consists of six main analytical sections. The first section focuses on the computational problem and research questions addressed in the selected paper. Students are expected to provide an accurate description of the problem and explain the research questions that the proposed algorithm attempts to address. The second section requires the proposed computational algorithm to be represented using suitable pseudocode. The third section identifies and explains the algorithm's inputs and outputs. The fourth section requires students to explain the proposed algorithm using simple and understandable language. The explanation should demonstrate a clear understanding of how the algorithm operates rather than simply reproducing the description provided in the research paper. The fifth section focuses on analysing the time complexity of the proposed algorithm. Students should evaluate the computational cost of the algorithm and explain its time complexity appropriately. The final section requires a critical evaluation of the algorithm's strengths and weaknesses. Students should identify the advantages and limitations of the proposed approach and discuss potential improvements where appropriate. This section should demonstrate critical thinking about the effectiveness, efficiency and practical applicability of the algorithm. The coursework has a total word count requirement of 800–1,000 words. The inputs and outputs, pseudocode and time-complexity analysis sections are excluded from this word-count limit. The template requires approximately 250 words for the computational problem and research questions, approximately 250 words for the simple explanation of the algorithm, and approximately 300 words for the strengths and weaknesses evaluation. Students must report the word count for sections 1, 4 and 6 after completing the assignment. The submitted work must be original and is subject to plagiarism and collusion checks through Turnitin. The assessment brief also states that generative AI tools may be used for proofreading but are not permitted for creating the coursework content. No figures or images are permitted, and the coursework must be submitted using the provided Word template in DOC or DOCX format.
Read Model Answer →
Research Methods / Project Management / Computer and Information Sciences
3,000 words
Critical Literature Review in Research Methods and Project Management
This Research Methods and Project Management assessment develops students’ ability to search for, evaluate, critically analyse and synthesise academic literature within a computing or information-science research area. Students work within an allocated group to conduct a structured literature search and critically evaluate research papers relevant to an assigned theme, before using the combined group literature corpus to produce an individual literature review. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… Each group member must identify and critically analyse a minimum of five academic papers using the supplied Critical Paper Summary template. These individual summaries are then combined into a single group document and shared so that all team members can use the collective body of research. The quality of this component depends on the relevance and academic quality of the selected papers and the depth of critical evaluation rather than simple description. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… The main individual component is a 3,000-word critical literature review, worth 60% of the assessment. Students must use the literature identified and summarised through the group activity and critically discuss the research associated with their allocated topic. The review should synthesise the literature into a coherent discussion rather than presenting disconnected paper summaries, demonstrating criticality, clear structure and effective academic writing. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… A further 20% is awarded for an individual research and meeting log, maintained through Blackboard. Students are expected to record their research progress, contribution to the group, approach to collaboration and reflections on the literature-review process. Stronger logs demonstrate detailed evidence of active participation, reflective insight and professional collaboration rather than merely listing completed tasks. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… The assessment directly evaluates the ability to apply project-management principles to a computing-related research activity and to search, evaluate and develop a critical literature review. Wider module outcomes also emphasise research techniques, data and information analysis, professional research practice, ethics, risk, legal issues, societal considerations and sustainability. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… The marking structure allocates 20% to the combined critical paper analysis, 20% to the research/meeting log and 60% to the individual literature review. Higher-performing work is expected to use high-quality and directly relevant academic sources, demonstrate strong critical analysis, synthesise evidence across the research theme, maintain a professional academic structure and apply accurate Harvard referencing throughout. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste… Important for the public Reference Library: the brief states that ChatGPT or other AI tools must not be used to generate text or fill in assessment-template sections. Any AI use that supports the work or thinking must be declared, referenced and accompanied by a prompt log in an appendix. Therefore, this entry should be used only as a high-level public description of the assessment rather than as directly submissible student content. KF7028 - Assessment 1 - Semeste…
Read Model Answer →
Critical Analysis of Computational Algorithms: Research Paper Evaluation and Complexity Analysis
This postgraduate Computer Science coursework requires students to undertake a critical technical analysis of a computational algorithm presented in a prescribed academic research paper. Students select one paper from the available options and demonstrate that they understand both the research problem addressed by the authors and the algorithmic solution proposed. The assessment contributes 30% of the overall module grade and is completed individually. assignment The available research papers cover several algorithmic topics, including an improved Dijkstra shortest-path algorithm for sparse networks, a modified merge-sort approach for large-scale datasets, parallel merge sort with load balancing, and a Prim-based algorithm for hierarchical clustering. Students must extract the principal algorithm from their selected paper and explain its purpose, inputs, outputs and operating procedure. A major component involves identifying the research question and computational problem addressed by the selected study. Students then reproduce or extract the proposed algorithm in pseudocode form and clearly identify the information supplied to the algorithm and the outputs it generates. The algorithm must also be explained step by step using straightforward language so that its operation can be understood without relying exclusively on formal notation. The coursework further requires a detailed time-complexity analysis, demonstrating understanding of how computational requirements grow with input size and how the proposed technique compares with alternative or conventional approaches. Students must critically evaluate the algorithm’s strengths, weaknesses, performance characteristics and limitations, and suggest potential improvements where appropriate. The marking rubric gives substantial emphasis to five areas: identifying the computational problem and research questions, extracting the proposed algorithm, identifying inputs and outputs, explaining the algorithm clearly, analysing its time complexity, and critically evaluating its strengths and weaknesses. assignment The written submission must be 800–1,000 words, although the inputs/outputs, pseudocode and time-complexity sections are excluded from that limit. Figures and images are not permitted, and the work must be submitted using the prescribed coursework template in DOC/DOCX format. Overview word count: approximately 340 words. AI-use note: the guideline permits generative AI only for proofreading. AI tools are explicitly not permitted to create the assessed work itself. assignment
Read Model Answer →
Engineering and Environment Advanced Practice
3,000 words
AP Research Project – Reflective Individual Report and Poster Presentation
This assessment is the Advanced Practice (AP) Research Project for the Engineering and Environment Advanced Practice London Campus Research Project module. It is designed for postgraduate students undertaking an independent research project with supervisory guidance. The assessment provides an opportunity to reflect critically on the research process, knowledge gained, professional development and challenges encountered during the project. Students are expected to demonstrate independent learning, research skills, critical thinking and the ability to communicate complex ideas in a professional context. The main assessment is a 3,000-word Reflective Individual Report, which contributes 80% of the module assessment. The report is structured around four key areas. The first section, Finding a Research Topic, requires students to explain how and why they selected their research topic, the research tools and search strategies used, the library collections explored, their research aims and objectives, and relevant discussions or recommendations received from their supervisor. The second section, Professional Activities, focuses on reflection on research development activities, scheduling, the independent researcher role, challenges such as time management, and communication with the supervisor. The third section, Literature Review and Research Work, requires students to critically review relevant literature, discuss their research method, demonstrate major research activities and consider the feasibility of the selected method, including challenges and recommendations. The final section, Reflection of Research Project, requires critical reflection on personal strengths and weaknesses, continuous self-development and the relevance of research activities to the student's programme of study and future career. Areas such as decision making, problem solving, communication and influencing, technical skills, collaboration, innovation and proactivity should be considered. The second component is a 10-minute Poster Presentation worth 20% of the assessment. The poster should provide a balanced combination of visuals and text and present the research objectives and significance, a summary of the literature review and research method, key research findings, and conclusions and recommendations. The assessment also requires appropriate academic presentation, including a cover page, table of contents, page numbers, figure and table captions, numbered headings and consistent formatting. Harvard or APA referencing may be used. The report is submitted through Turnitin and is subject to anonymous marking. The assessment is a Pass/Fail module, with students required to achieve at least 50% to pass.
Read Model Answer →
2,000 words
Creative Marketing Plan for a Product Gap in the Smart Wearable Device Industry
This individual coursework requires students to develop a creative marketing plan for a new product concept within the smart wearable device industry. The assessment is a 2,000-word individual written report and accounts for 100% of the coursework assessment. Students are required to identify an existing product gap in the smart wearable device market, create a unique product concept that addresses the identified gap and develop a creative marketing plan designed to position the proposed product effectively in an increasingly competitive market. The central focus of the assignment is the application of innovative thinking and strategic marketing principles to the smart wearable device industry. Students must identify a meaningful gap or unmet opportunity within the market and use this as the foundation for developing their proposed product. The new concept should respond to consumer needs and demonstrate how innovation can create value within the wearable technology sector. The assignment therefore combines market understanding, product innovation and strategic marketing planning. The brief directs students to begin their preparation by studying Chapter 17 of Jobber and Ellis-Chadwick's *Principles and Practice of Marketing* (Ninth Edition, 2023). It also provides a range of Mintel reports and industry sources covering technology visions, wearable technology trends, digital platforms, healthcare applications, luxury brands, family technology habits and Generation X technology habits. These sources provide background for understanding the development and adoption of wearable technology and emerging opportunities in the market. The recommended supporting material also includes academic research on marketing and organisational performance. The brief specifically identifies Morgan's research on marketing and business performance and Hult's work on boundary-spanning marketing organisations and organisation theories. These sources can support the theoretical and strategic foundations of the proposed marketing plan and help connect marketing activities with broader organisational performance. The completed report should demonstrate the student's ability to recognise a product opportunity, develop an original smart wearable concept and translate that opportunity into a coherent marketing plan. The proposed concept should be clearly connected to the identified product gap and should demonstrate how the product could provide value to its intended consumers within the competitive smart device market. The marketing plan should therefore integrate creative product thinking with appropriate strategic marketing principles. The assignment is submitted through Blackboard, with the deadline stated as 14 January 2026. The assessment is returned within 20 days and feedback is provided in written form. The brief identifies the submission as a Summative Assessment: Individual Written Report and specifies a 2,000-word limit. Overall, the coursework provides an opportunity to apply marketing theory and contemporary industry evidence to a practical new-product scenario. The final report should demonstrate an understanding of the smart wearable technology market while presenting a distinctive product idea and a strategically considered marketing plan capable of addressing an identified market opportunity.
Read Model Answer →
7COM1076
4,000 words
7COM1076 Network Design, Modelling and Evaluation Coursework
This 7COM1076 coursework requires students to design, model, emulate, test and evaluate networking environments for a new department building at the University of Hertfordshire. The assessment combines practical network modelling with theoretical analysis and evaluation, covering wireless and mobile networking, cloud networking, Software Defined Networking (SDN), network applications and contemporary networking technologies. The assignment is designed to develop practical knowledge through Python-based network emulation and critical understanding through academic research. Task 1 focuses on wireless and mobile networking. Students must use Python to emulate a building containing three WiFi access points and two user stations, identified as UE1 and UE2. The access points are connected using a physical linear topology, while the stations use Class C private IP addresses. The task requires configuration of SSIDs, passwords, channels, ranges and coordinates, with WPA2 encryption and standalone fail mode. The stations must also be configured with mobility, following specified movement sequences and speed ranges. Students must discuss the design and implementation, complete the configuration and mobility tables, provide the Python script used with the Mininet API, and include screenshots demonstrating mobility, access-point association and successful ping connectivity. Task 2 examines cloud services using Mininet and Render.com. Students must emulate a network containing three switches and two hosts and deploy a simple static website using Render.com. Host H1 must access the deployed webpage through the xterm environment. Deliverables include a discussion of the design and implementation, the Python script, evidence of configuring Render.com with the GitHub repository, commands used to connect H1 to the internet and access the webpage, screenshots of the webpage through xterm, and the HTML code of the website. Task 3 focuses on Software Defined Networking and connectivity. Students must emulate an environment containing ten hosts and three servers using a linear topology, with an ONOS controller enabled for control-plane programmability. The task requires configuration of assigned IP and MAC addresses, demonstration of connectivity between hosts and servers, and a UDP transmission using a duration of 600 seconds and bandwidth of 100 Mbps. Students must provide a design discussion, Python emulation script, ONOS GUI screenshot, full ping connectivity evidence and the required UDP transmission results. Task 4 is the analysis and evaluation component. Students must critically discuss three contemporary networking issues using academic sources. These include the challenges faced by a small-to-medium organisation providing services to the UK National Health Service when migrating from on-premises infrastructure to cloud computing; the opportunities and challenges of incorporating Software Defined Networking into future optical networks; and whether WiFi and 5G should coexist to provide ubiquitous services to users. The final report must use 12-point font, normal margins and Harvard referencing in accordance with University of Hertfordshire guidelines. The required report length is 4,000 words with a permitted variation of plus or minus 10%, excluding the title page, contents page, references and appendix, with a maximum page limit of 25 pages. The recommended structure includes an introduction, discussions and results for Tasks 1–3, the three Task 4 analysis sections, conclusion, references and an appendix containing the Task 1, Task 2 and Task 3 code. The assessment covers wireless and mobile networking, cloud and SDN networking, network applications, analysis and evaluation, MCQ tests and overall report quality. The marking allocation includes WiFi networking, mobility and ICMP, cloud configuration, SDN networking, cloud web page, UDP, three analysis sections, two MCQ tests and quality of the report.
Read Model Answer →
Digital Data Acquisition, Recovery and Analysis
1,500 words
Digital Data Acquisition, Recovery and Analysis – Autonomous Vehicle Forensics
This individual coursework for the Digital Data Acquisition, Recovery and Analysis module requires students to produce a 1,500-word technical research paper critically investigating autonomous vehicle (AV) forensics. The assignment focuses on the challenges, methodologies and tools involved in extracting, preserving, analysing and interpreting digital evidence from autonomous vehicles and their associated systems. The work specifically considers how forensic evidence can be used to reconstruct events and establish accountability following accidents, security breaches or system malfunctions. The assignment examines the increasing importance of digital evidence generated by intelligent transportation systems and smart vehicles. Students are expected to consider data produced by different sources within an autonomous vehicle ecosystem, including LiDAR, radar and GPS sensors, vehicle control units and connected infrastructure. The report should explore how these different forms of information can be collected and forensically preserved while maintaining their evidential value for subsequent investigation and analysis. The coursework requires a detailed technical analysis rather than a general overview of autonomous vehicles or digital forensics. Students are expected to engage with academic literature, industry frameworks and technical examples, while providing critical insights into the subject. The report should analyse the practical challenges associated with AV forensics and critically examine the tools and methodologies that can be applied to obtain and interpret evidence from autonomous vehicle environments. Legal, ethical and privacy considerations form an important part of the assignment. The report should examine issues surrounding the use of autonomous vehicle evidence, including legal responsibility, regulatory considerations, privacy implications and ethical challenges associated with collecting and analysing potentially sensitive vehicle and user data. These considerations should be connected to the wider forensic investigation process and the reliability and admissibility of digital evidence. The required report should follow an academic research-paper structure, including a cover page, abstract, keywords, table of contents, clearly organised sections and subsections, references and an appendix where required. The brief requires APA referencing and a reference list at the end of the paper. Students are expected to use their own words and critically analyse the literature rather than simply summarising existing research. The assessment evaluates five equally weighted areas: structure and presentation with supporting references; balance, objectivity, critical evaluation and original insight; identification of AV-forensics challenges and quality of analysis; analysis of tools and methodologies used in AV forensics; and understanding of AV forensics together with its legal, professional and ethical considerations. Each area contributes 20% to the assessment.
Read Model Answer →
Data Science / Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
2,500 words
Predicting ADHD Diagnosis Using Machine Learning and Explainable Data Science
This Data Science assessment requires students to develop a comprehensive analytical solution to a real-world healthcare prediction problem using the WiDS Datathon 2025 Health Outcomes Prediction Dataset. The dataset contains socio-demographic information, diagnostic variables and functional MRI data relating to children and adolescents, with the principal objective of developing predictive models for ADHD diagnosis. The assessment is designed to demonstrate the complete data-science lifecycle, from data preparation and exploratory analysis through predictive modelling, interpretation and evidence-based recommendations. Students begin by exploring the dataset's features, data types and distributions before addressing missing values, outliers and other inconsistencies. Appropriate feature engineering should be undertaken where necessary, followed by Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) using relevant visualisations to identify relationships, patterns and correlations within the data. Students with limited computational resources may use a representative subset, provided that the sampling method preserves the integrity and distribution of the original dataset and is clearly justified. A major component of the assignment involves developing and comparing at least three classification models. Appropriate techniques may include Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting and Neural Networks. Model performance should be evaluated using measures including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score and ROC-AUC, allowing students to identify the strongest-performing model through systematic comparison. The assessment also requires model interpretation and explainability. Students should explain the results of the selected model and may apply techniques such as SHAP or LIME to investigate feature importance and individual predictions. A feature-importance visualisation must be produced, and the most influential variables should inform practical recommendations for healthcare professionals regarding the potential use of predictive modelling in supporting earlier ADHD diagnosis and intervention. Overall, the assignment integrates data cleaning, exploratory analytics, predictive modelling, model comparison, explainable AI and research-informed healthcare recommendations. Students must submit a comprehensive report of no more than 2,500 words, alongside a Jupyter Notebook containing the implementation and outputs. The report must use Harvard referencing, with appropriate academic research integrated into the analysis, recommendations and conclusion.
Read Model Answer →
Cyber Security / Penetration Testing
2,400 words
Grey-Box Penetration Testing: Vulnerability Assessment, Exploitation and Mitigation
This technical cyber-security project presents an authorised grey-box penetration test conducted within a controlled virtual laboratory environment. The objective is to assess the security posture of a deliberately vulnerable target system, identify weaknesses in exposed network services, demonstrate how those weaknesses could be exploited, evaluate their security and organisational impact, and recommend appropriate mitigation measures. The assessment follows a practical penetration-testing workflow supported by technical evidence, screenshots, activity records and academic research. The project begins with laboratory configuration, network discovery, service enumeration and vulnerability analysis. Tools including Kali Linux, Metasploitable, VMware, Nmap, Netcat and Metasploit are used across the testing lifecycle. Identified services are mapped to known vulnerabilities before controlled exploitation is undertaken and the resulting access is documented. The activity log records the progression from environment setup and network scanning through vulnerability identification, exploitation, evidence collection and final reporting. Five principal attack vectors are examined. These include the vsftpd 2.3.4 FTP backdoor, Samba username-map-script exploitation, an UnrealIRCd backdoor, insecure Java Remote Method Invocation and a misconfigured DistCC service. The practical demonstrations show how vulnerable or incorrectly configured services can permit unauthorised command execution and, in several cases, privileged shell access. For each vulnerability, the report explains the weakness, exploitation process, observed result, security impact and proposed mitigation. Recommended controls include patching or upgrading obsolete services, disabling unnecessary services, implementing firewall restrictions, strengthening authentication and input validation, restricting access to authorised systems, applying least privilege and monitoring suspicious activity. The project also incorporates group management and reflective practice. Team members perform specialised roles covering laboratory configuration, reconnaissance, vulnerability analysis, exploitation and documentation. Individual reflection considers technical performance, teamwork, evidence management and future skills development, demonstrating how structured collaboration contributes to an effective penetration-testing engagement. Important: unlike the earlier assignment briefs, these uploads appear to be completed student/project materials rather than the official 7COM1068 assessment brief. Therefore I would not invent the university, academic level or academic year. If you upload the actual 7COM1068 assignment guideline, I can fill those fields exactly.
Read Model Answer →
Machine Learning / Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
1,011 words
End-to-End Machine Learning Model Development, Testing and Evaluation
This Level 7 Machine Learning and Intelligent Agents assignment requires students to develop and document an end-to-end machine-learning solution, covering the complete process from data preparation through model training, tuning, testing and evaluation. Students independently select a suitable dataset or scenario, formulate an appropriate research question and determine whether the problem should be addressed using supervised learning, unsupervised learning or reinforcement learning. Appropriate machine-learning algorithms must then be implemented to create a model capable of being trained and objectively tested. The assessment encourages the use of a structured machine-learning development methodology. Students are expected to explain the selected scenario and data source, perform suitable data preparation and Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA), and provide a reasoned justification for the machine-learning methods selected. The development process should demonstrate how the chosen algorithms are trained and fine-tuned before their performance is evaluated using established and relevant metrics. Published academic research should be incorporated to justify methodological choices and support the interpretation of results. The technical work is normally documented within a Jupyter Notebook, combining Markdown explanations with executable code cells. Alternatively, the report may be produced in Microsoft Word provided that the Python implementation is included. The assignment therefore assesses both conceptual understanding and practical programming competence. Students must demonstrate an ability to identify the performance of machine-learning algorithms, implement machine-learning techniques using an object-oriented programming language, and evaluate which algorithms are appropriate for a particular analytical brief. Assessment places particular emphasis on three areas: the Introduction, the Machine Learning Process, and the Evaluation of Model Performance. The marking criteria reward strong understanding of machine-learning concepts, a functioning and thoroughly tested implementation, appropriate selection of algorithms, and critical evaluation of the final solution. At the highest achievement level, implementations are expected to work without exception, satisfy the required functionality, demonstrate comprehensive testing and extend beyond the basic requirements. Overall, the assignment combines research-question formulation, data analysis, algorithm selection, machine-learning implementation, model optimisation and evidence-based evaluation within a reproducible technical workflow. All academic sources and supporting material must be presented using Harvard referencing.
Read Model Answer →
Management / Digital Transformation and Leadership
1,500 words
Leading Through Digital Change: Digital Transformation Report and Future Technology Poster
This Masters-level assessment for the Leading Through Digital Change module examines how organisations can respond strategically and effectively to rapid technological and digital transformation. Students take the role of a Digital Transformation Manager for one selected international organisation and prepare a professional Digital Transformation Report accompanied by an A4 digital poster. The purpose is to evaluate the organisation's current digital context and recommend changes that can strengthen competitive advantage and create sustainable business value. The first component requires critical evaluation and recommendation of one appropriate digital transformation strategic framework. Students may apply frameworks such as the McKinsey 4Ds, BCG Three Stages, Gartner's Six Steps or Cognizant's Four Pillars. The analysis should establish clear digital transformation objectives relevant to organisational functions such as operations, ICT and marketing, while using organisational evidence, academic research and practical examples to justify the proposed strategic direction. The second component is an academic poster evaluating two disruptive technologies or techniques expected to affect the chosen organisation, its industry, employment and the labour market over the next five years. Potential technologies include Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 5G connectivity, the Internet of Things, robotics, drone delivery, blockchain, augmented reality and virtual reality. The poster should combine academic literature with real-world examples to demonstrate the likely opportunities, challenges and wider organisational implications of technological disruption. The final component focuses on digital leadership. Students analyse and recommend two suitable leadership approaches for managing and supporting digital transformation. Relevant approaches may include agile leadership, ethical-tech leadership, people-oriented leadership, hyperaware agile leadership and Goleman's leadership styles. Overall, the assessment integrates digital strategy, innovation, emerging technologies and leadership. The wider module also covers digital transformation strategies, data-driven decision-making, leadership in the digital age, artificial intelligence in contemporary business, digital risk management and planning for the future. Reference style: Harvard. Main report word limit: 1,500 words. Poster: A4 size with no specified word count.
Read Model Answer →
Computer Science / Research Methods
500 words
Interim Report: Systematic Literature Review Research Protocol
This postgraduate computer science assignment requires students to prepare an Interim Report establishing the research protocol for a systematic literature review. The assessment focuses on whether the proposed research question is suitable for computer science research, clearly formulated, appropriately motivated by existing literature, and capable of being investigated through a systematic review. The main body of the report must not exceed 500 words, while supporting evidence may be provided separately where appropriate. The report is structured around three main chapters. Chapter 1 introduces the selected research area and summarises the purpose and structure of the report. Chapter 2 provides relevant background and a brief history of the chosen research domain, identifies the problem being addressed, and supports the discussion with at least two relevant academic citations. Chapter 3 presents the formal Literature Review Protocol, including the research question, its context, and the associated PICO elements: Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome. Students must also develop and test a Boolean search string using IEEE Xplore and report the number of papers returned by that search. The search strategy is accompanied by explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria governing which studies will be considered for the review. The supplied protocol template requires students to document these elements through two structured tables: one covering the research question and PICO framework, and another recording the search string, paper count, and study-selection criteria. The assessment places significant emphasis on methodological consistency. The research question, PICO elements, search strategy, paper count and inclusion/exclusion criteria must align logically with one another. Students are also assessed on the justification and motivation of the research question, document structure, presentation quality, spelling, grammar and academic referencing. The report must include a title page, table of contents, bibliography and the required research-protocol tables. Harvard referencing is required for both in-text citations and the final reference list. Overall, the assignment develops the foundational skills required for conducting a rigorous systematic literature review, including research-question formulation, structured evidence searching, transparent study-selection procedures, academic justification and professional research reporting.
Read Model Answer →